Jump to content

The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)


bflat
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, zArk said:

 

i am one conversation behind that, i was explaining how infection rates do not dictate deaths for viruses and showed official data , he shot back at me

"you just dont like vaccines"

 

so, after i go down that argument with Thompsons leaked data from CDC i will of course be in the Flat Earth zone

 

 

 

 

Thing is if you managed to put together a huge intel.dossier finally proving once and for all that vaccines are dangerous and you also managed to get a good following of people say 200 thousand all sharing your dossier

 

All that would need to happen to completely fuck up your progress is for you to turn around and say 

 

And also the Earth is flat 

 

Then all of your previous work , no matter how truthful and well put together can be ridiculed and all put in the same file labelled " mental " 

 

And that IMO is exactly how FE is used by the intel agencies 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

 

One of the most amazing sites ive ever witnessed & if youde never heard about, could think was an alien invasion or end of the world.

 

I made a bad joke once living in rural Canada 

 

A plane was flying over head and I said the locals probably think its a flying witch 

 

Im bad and I apologise here and now 

 

* confession time * 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MrA said:

 

Thing is if you managed to put together a huge intel.dossier finally proving once and for all that vaccines are dangerous and you also managed to get a good following of people say 200 thousand all sharing your dossier

 

All that would need to happen to completely fuck up your progress is for you to turn around and say 

 

And also the Earth is flat 

 

Then all of your previous work , no matter how truthful and well put together can be ridiculed and all put in the same file labelled " mental " 

 

And that IMO is exactly how FE is used by the intel agencies 

 

This is one of the main groyps I hear against David Icke right ? 

 

People love his work but they hate having to be made fun of because of " the Lizards " so sometimes they just.refuse to bring Icke up even though he has some of the best presentations out there on the NWO

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the name of that Ozzy guy who recently or.last year made a series of videos saying earth is flat and his followers were like wtf.man what happened

 

He is a popular guy I forget his name though because I dont listen to him 

 

Anyway he then went on to say sorry guys that was wierd he felt like he was under some sort of mental.duress that he couldnt pinpoint the source  and knew that the FE material he made was a mistake and was going.to discredit his lifes work 

 

*edit* Max Igan - just remembered 

Edited by MrA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, MrA said:

 

Thing is if you managed to put together a huge intel.dossier finally proving once and for all that vaccines are dangerous and you also managed to get a good following of people say 200 thousand all sharing your dossier

 

All that would need to happen to completely fuck up your progress is for you to turn around and say 

 

And also the Earth is flat 

 

Then all of your previous work , no matter how truthful and well put together can be ridiculed and all put in the same file labelled " mental " 

 

And that IMO is exactly how FE is used by the intel agencies 

 

Ive seen plenty of footage of the ISS that most definitely is CGI. But yet I know there is a space station of sorts or what looks exactly like a space station, that orbits the Earth at precise times, cant just be going round in circles.

I wouldn't be talking to anyone whos not on a level about it outside certain circles.

Sort of shit could get you sectioned.

 

I wonder do you see the Auroa Borealis up in Canukistan?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MrA said:

What was the name of that Ozzy guy who recently or.last year made a series of videos saying earth is flat and his followers were like wtf.man what happened

 

He is a popular guy I forget his name though because I dont listen to him 

 

Anyway he then went on to say sorry guys that was wierd he felt like he was under some sort of mental.duress that he couldnt pinpoint the source  and knew that the FE material he made was a mistake and was going.to discredit his lifes work 

 

*edit* Max Igan - just remembered 

 

Yeah he totally lost the plot for some reason...momentary lapse of reason. Or maybe he was spiked with acid coz someone heard him preaching about chemtrails.

People can be very nasty when they see you as a threat to their reality outside the interwebs or a kook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Ive seen plenty of footage of the ISS that most definitely is CGI. But yet I know there is a space station of sorts or what looks exactly like a space station, that orbits the Earth at precise times, cant just be going round in circles.

I wouldn't be talking to anyone whos not on a level about it outside certain circles.

Sort of shit could get you sectioned.

 

I wonder do you see the Auroa Borealis up in Canukistan?

 

 

Its not really visible from my current location but yes further north definitely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Trippy shit.

 

That the dome elevator?

 

Beam me up Scottty. ?

 

Might explain some of the language surrounding pillars holding up the sky ? 

Edited by MrA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tycho Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric theory in his time, positing that if the earth revolved around the sun, the change in relative position of the stars after 6 months orbital motion could not fail to be seen. He argued that the stars should seem to separate as we approach and come together as we recede. In actual fact, however, after 190 million miles of supposed orbit around the sun, not a single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars, proving we have not moved at all.

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Michelson-Morey and Sagnac experiments attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to earth's assumed motion through space. After measuring in every possible different direction in various locations they failed to detect any significant change whatsoever, again proving the stationary geocentric model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If earth were truly constantly spinning eastwards at over 1000 mph, during the Red Bull stratosphere dive, Felix Baumgartner, spending 3 hours ascending over New Mexico, should have landed 2500 miles west into the Pacific Ocean but instead landed a few dozen miles east of the takeoff point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Globe believers often claim "gravity" magically and inexplicably drags the entire lower atmosphere of the earth in perfect synchronization up to some undetermined height where this progressively faster spinning atmosphere gives way to the non-spinning, non-gravitized, non-atmosphere of infinite vacuum space.

Such non-sensical theories are debunked, however, by rain, fireworks, birds, bugs, clouds, smoke, planes and projectiles all of which would behave differently if both the ball earth and it's atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards at 1000 mph.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A surveyor and engineer of thirty years published in the Birmingham Weekly Mercury stated:

"I am thoroughly aquainted with the theory and practice of civil engineering. However bigoted some of our professors may be in the theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, yet it is well known amongst us that such theoretical measurements are incapable of any practical illustration.

All our locomotives are designed to run on what may be regarded as true levels or flats.

There are, of course, partial inclines or gradients here and there but they are always accurately defined and must be carefully traversed. But anything approaching to 8 inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance, could not be worked by any engine that was ever yet constructed.

Taking one station with another all over England and Scotland, it may be stated that all the platforms are on the same relative level.

The distance between eastern and western coasts of England may be set down as 300 miles. If the prescribed curvature was indeed as represented, the central stationns at Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon 3 miles higher than a chord drawn from the two extremities.

If such were the case there is not a driver or stoker within the kingdom that would be found to take charge of the train.

We can only laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit for such venturesome exploits as running trains round spherical curves.

Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous enough, vertical curves would be a thousand times worse, and with our rolling stock constructed as at present physically impossible."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Engineer W. Winckler was published in the Earth Review regarding the earth's supposed curvature stating:

"As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in schoolbooks.

No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind.

I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals ad the allowance has not been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this - that it is 8 inches for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles.

Thus, a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule and allowance for curvature of 600 feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools.

Nothing of the sort is allowed.

We no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal than of wasting our time trying to square the circle"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Tycho Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric theory in his time, positing that if the earth revolved around the sun, the change in relative position of the stars after 6 months orbital motion could not fail to be seen. He argued that the stars should seem to separate as we approach and come together as we recede. In actual fact, however, after 190 million miles of supposed orbit around the sun, not a single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars, proving we have not moved at all.


earth in the centre of the universe in my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Max Malone:

"After 50 years and thousands of hours of space travel footage, both by NASA and other countries, there is no exterior shot where the astronaut completes the simple act of panning the camera 180 degrees let alone a full 360 degree sweep.

This has never happened on any moon mission, exterior space station, nothing, ever. Statistics will tell you that this would have already happened by accident years ago but it hasn't and it won't.

This is because of the rules they cannot break, the same rule that applies to television set shows, that never shows the fourth wall."

 

Snip-it_1590638014683.jpg.b8d390b92e16c57d37e73c097b260398.jpg

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Olber's Paradox" states that if there were billions of stars which are suns the night sky would be filled completely with light.

 

Snip-it_1590638546246.jpg.c0df735da09d2e5e4dc5cfcf2c4486d0.jpg

As Edgar Allen Poe said:

"Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present as a uniform luminosity, since there could exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star."

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, zArk said:

it is a wonder why smoke rises vertically and doesnt curve as it gets higher

 

Lol'z It never ceases to amaze me how stupid these ball earthers can be at times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

"Olber's Paradox" states that if there were billions of stars which are suns the night sky would be filled completely with light.

 

Snip-it_1590638546246.jpg.c0df735da09d2e5e4dc5cfcf2c4486d0.jpg

As Edgar Allen Poe said:

"Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present as a uniform luminosity, since there could exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star."

 

The succession of stars may or may not be endless, whataver that means to science, and Poe was an excellent writer but like the early astronomers he  knew very little of the dust and dusty plasma that obscures much of space and of the distortion of space by gravitational and electromagnetic effects. He would have loved the Hubble  images I'm sure.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Tycho Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric theory in his time, positing that if the earth revolved around the sun, the change in relative position of the stars after 6 months orbital motion could not fail to be seen. He argued that the stars should seem to separate as we approach and come together as we recede. In actual fact, however, after 190 million miles of supposed orbit around the sun, not a single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars, proving we have not moved at all.

 

Here again he was right to argue about such things certainly from a point of not knowing how far away the stars actually were but centuries later astronomers have a much better grasp of the distances involved and the technology required to make much fine measurements.

 

The parallax principle was known by the ancients Greeks and the Gaia telescope is a magnificent demonstration of the principle in action for measuring the dstances to all sorts of space phenomenon.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Grumpy Owl changed the title to The Flat Earth Thread: The reality of our physical plane (v2)
  • Grumpy Owl locked, unlocked and locked this topic
  • Grumpy Owl unlocked this topic
  • Grumpy Owl locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...