Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Odie Hatzcats said:

 

Disagree, they will just wipe it. No problem, it is just gone as it never was real anyway!

 

 

There are vastly more powerful systems than is allowed to the public, they have no issue there.

 

There is one problem which they will need to address and that is the energy to run the system?

 

"the Internet is a predator species that feeds voraciously on a prey, the electric power and soon it will use all the combinded production of this world"

 

Exactly. Both US and UK lost billions, they don't know where it's gone. We don't hear about that anymore though. lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 46k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DarianF

    2635

  • oddsnsods

    2108

  • Avoiceinthecrowd

    1945

  • SimonTV

    1714

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You wont believe this.   I just went down Lidls to get some steak.   Security guard calls me out as I walk past & I ignore him. Gets my steak walks to the credit only till

Some images of today's demonstration in London (not taken by me personally).                

Fuck the fuck off.

Posted Images

This from our gracious host;

 

"The reason we are so controlled is not that we don't have the power to decide our own destiny, it is that we give that power away every minute of our lives. When something happens that we don't like, we look for someone else to blame. When there is a problem in the world, we say "What are they going to do about it". At which point they, who have secretly created the problem in the first place, respond to this demand by introducing a 'solution' - more centralisation of power and erosion of freedom. If you want to give more powers to the police, security agencies and military, and you want the public to demand you do it, then ensure there is more crime, violence and terrorism, and then it's a cinch to achieve your aims. Once the people are in fear of being burgled, mugged or bombed, they will demand that you take their freedom away to protect them from what they have been manipulated to fear. The Oklahoma bombing is a classic of this kind, as I detail in ..And The Truth Shall Set You Free. I call this technique problem-reaction-solution.

Create the problem, encourage the reaction "something must be done", and then offer the solution. It is summed up by the Freemason motto 'Ordo Ab Chao' -order out of chaos. Create the chaos and then offer the way to restore order. Your order. The masses are herded and directed by many and varios forms of emotional and mental control. It is the only way it coud be done."

 

David Icke. (The Biggest Secret) published 1998

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Illmatic said:

 

Texted a Dutch fella I met while travelling out of curiosity, asking what's really going on over there. He said a lot of people are now waking up in a big way to the fact that this is not about a virus.

 

While that's great I'm a bit split on the violence. On the one hand it hands them an easy excuse to crack down harder, on the other hand it's better than peaceful acceptance of destruction of countless lives and livelihoods. The best way by far is to take off the masks and open businesses but at this stage that's real unlikely

 

My old man always used to say   "The only thing a bully respects is a punch on the nose"

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, FrankVitali said:

Seen the covid hotels they been building in Germany?

 

Any who speaks German it would help if you could give us a rough idea of wtf the reporter is saying:

 

 

 

Frankly it looks scary as, man.. 

 

Voiceover commentary is patronizing and threatening, announcing the "first jail for quarantine refusers", "starting February."
The shown facility is a "vacant" juvenile prison in Moltsfelde, Schleswig-Holstein where
"COVID-19 offenders will soon be locked up."
Reporter with microphone says "quarantine offenders would not be allowed to go outside
but would need to stay inside their 12 m2 cells which do not look quite inviting.
You should think twice before rejecting home quarantine. Your own home is likely to be much more comfortable."
Voiceover: "In a three-shift schedule, retired police and correction officers watch over the prisoners."
Local politician in suit says this was the "ultimate measure we take" to punish multiple offenders.
VO: maximum "jail time" will be the duration of the quarantine, "usually a few days".

Jail has a web site
https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Landesregierung/JAA/Jugendarrestanstalt/jugendarrestanstalt_node.html

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

On MRSA - I'm a few pages behind- I'd like to share experience working for contracted NHS domestics.

 

20 years old, I found myself in a position that I need to take a job, any job outside my profession. That happened to be cleaning a hospital.

 

I was originally on night shift, buffing corridoors and large areas nothing to do with wards.

 

But soon after I was put on day shift and trained in the ways to clean wards effectively. That and do the daily tasks in the doctors apartments on site - bed change clean cooker etc. 

 

To properly clean a ward took at least 30 minutes. at least. But after a short time, targets dictated that the time shrank.

 

Since I was doing my job, eventually I was called in to ask why I am slacking and not meeting targets.

 

I told them. I do a good job. I am cleaning everything. But the boss didn't give a shit- I'm just taking too long. And if I didn't pull my finger out, I'd be looking for another job real soon. Think about it for a moment. A ward. They were trying to say that one person should be able to wipe over every bed, change all the sheets, clean the floor and empty all the bins in less than half an hour and move on. I can't remember if it was 20 or 25 minutes at the time. It just gradually becomes more and more ridiculous.

 

When the fellow domestics came together in the smoking room on break, it was revealed to me how the rest of them also found the targets impossible. But the majority just pretended they did their job and got out of there because, you know, money. It's needed. Meanwhile MRSA is fucking real people up, losing limbs and dying needlessly, due to a company trying to maximise profits. That was the penultimate wake up call to me and god knows how bad it is today 20+ years later. saying that I just heard that shocking podcast from the fat earth. People wailing for help and getting ignored. It seems to me like the best place to go if you wanna end it all is hospital these days.

 

This is almost hell.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Saved said:

That's got a distinct whiff of Auschwitz about it 

 

 

Pff jeez who Auschwitzed?

 

3 hours ago, Thewoodsman said:

Yeah it's a tough one. Mass noncompliance would be the ideal choice. I was talking with a couple friends who are in the uk about this last night. One thinks violence is the only way out of this, the other said its exactly what they want.

 

What's for sure and I say this as a pacifist and a believer in the teachings of christ that when I think of the idea of forced vaccination,  forcibly removing people, using fear to manipulate and worse then I think although I agree with friend number 2 that certain tactics are certainly called for.

 

Like I said to someone earlier, if people want to live in fear, wear masks, go get vaccinated and hide away that's their prerogative.ill give my opinion but each to their own. Second someone wants to tell me to do these things we have a problem and its absolutely fair enough to reply with force. Might not get you very far but surely it's the only logical conclusion for any being with any soul still intact.

 

What was it Ghandi supposedly said? having a weapon is different to using it? Something like that.. I've got a big fuckin' weapon. And I don't want to use it but if you insist..

 

 

3 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

My old man always used to say   "The only thing a bully respects is a punch on the nose"

 

Amen

 

3 hours ago, BridgeBuilder said:

Surely our government don't do such thing as psyop? 😱

 

 

 

I feel blessed seriously that I have never bought into this bullshit, so many people are living in fear of death right now. It's a case of do you sympathise or mock. I waver between the two.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Saved said:

following the advice of scientists and for once, being forced to tell the truth.

 

Science doesn't lie. Scientists don't lie.

 

I can't figure out if you're being sarcastic or whether you actually that woefully misinformed and/or naïve? 

 

There's been crisis building in the modern scientific field for decades.. and we don't have to go back further in history to remember what all the esteemed "scientists" used to believe our bodies and the world/universe around us.

https://www.corbettreport.com/the-crisis-of-science/

In recent years, the public has gradually discovered that there is a crisis in science. But what is the problem? And how bad is it, really? Today on The Corbett Report we shine a spotlight on the series of interrelated crises that are exposing the way institutional science is practiced today, and what it means for an increasingly science-dependent society.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, - TZC - said:

On MRSA - I'm a few pages behind- I'd like to share experience working for contracted NHS domestics.

 

20 years old, I found myself in a position that I need to take a job, any job outside my profession. That happened to be cleaning a hospital.

 

I was originally on night shift, buffing corridoors and large areas nothing to do with wards.

 

But soon after I was put on day shift and trained in the ways to clean wards effectively. That and do the daily tasks in the doctors apartments on site - bed change clean cooker etc. 

 

To properly clean a ward took at least 30 minutes. at least. But after a short time, targets dictated that the time shrank.

 

Since I was doing my job, eventually I was called in to ask why I am slacking and not meeting targets.

 

I told them. I do a good job. I am cleaning everything. But the boss didn't give a shit- I'm just taking too long. And if I didn't pull my finger out, I'd be looking for another job real soon. Think about it for a moment. A ward. They were trying to say that one person should be able to wipe over every bed, change all the sheets, clean the floor and empty all the bins in less than half an hour and move on. I can't remember if it was 20 or 25 minutes at the time. It just gradually becomes more and more ridiculous.

 

When the fellow domestics came together in the smoking room on break, it was revealed to me how the rest of them also found the targets impossible. But the majority just pretended they did their job and got out of there because, you know, money. It's needed. Meanwhile MRSA is fucking real people up, losing limbs and dying needlessly, due to a company trying to maximise profits. That was the penultimate wake up call to me and god knows how bad it is today 20+ years later. saying that I just heard that shocking podcast from the fat earth. People wailing for help and getting ignored. It seems to me like the best place to go if you wanna end it all is hospital these days.

 

This is almost hell.

 

 

 

 

 

Your experience is the real life equivalent of a Ken Loach film. He always shows how all human values are wrecked and destroyed by the pursuit of big ££. It's the kind of anti-society we associate with the names of Thatch and Bliar. Though both are now gone, the after stench still lingers on, indeed more intense than ever...just like a particularly unpleasant piece of excreta.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, pete675 said:

 

The masses should remember the adage: 'He who pays the piper calls the tune.'

 

 grants from Gates.

 

bg.png.9e659d24cc7e9bc54e9b61b97f3c6b9c1.png.be2ba4cba4033ab5e53b159a83899898.png

influence_billgates.jpg.800782a402c9139ea7a73d02d762b7b3.jpg

264389478_BM.png.cb31c3d1a66214fb08d17ac102d4d73c1.png.8b368be3943521600eff7288c7def817.png

EWdTxfmX0AgspKI.jpg_large.jpg.f746d8f331768900b90f1b706dd6c84e.jpg

 

 

A bizarre conspiracy theory puts Bill Gates at the centre of the coronavirus crisis

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/coronavirus-conspiracy-bill-gates-infowars-2020-4?r=US&IR=T

 

How Bill Gates became the voodoo doll of Covid conspiracies

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52833706

(from the article)

In 2015, an unassuming-looking Bill Gates came on stage at the TED conference in Vancouver to issue a dire warning.

_112712419_bill.jpg.0658510500ec4eb79881a8079c9998db.jpg_112555485_microchipgraphic.jpg.7e3a10c190b8b871ca516bd49dcdf29d.jpg

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/bill-gates-is-targeted-by-social-media-mobs-11587133938

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Illmatic said:

 

I've also encountered a lot of these people running away from you when out for a jog. Could be a bit of a laugh to jog after them for a bit coughing and spluttering with your arms outstretched like a zombie hungry for brains.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9142053/Jogger-stopped-Covid-marshal-breathing-heavily-run.html

Jogger is stopped by Covid marshal for 'breathing heavily' on run as police say exercise rules need to be TIGHTENED

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

 

At least they haven't stopped you attempting to escape YET.

 

Australians havent been allowed to leave for almost a year

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-31/coronavirus-covid-outbound-international-travel-ban-morrison/12605404

 

What is the ban?

The ban on leaving Australia was put in place by Health Minister Greg Hunt on March 25, as an “emergency requirement” under the Biosecurity Act. It is the first time Australia has had such a ban, and it was made on the advice of the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee.

The determination says plainly:

An Australian citizen or permanent resident … must not leave Australian territory as a passenger on an outgoing aircraft or vessel.

The accompanying statement explains,

[This] is in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to represent a severe and immediate threat to human health in Australia and across the globe.

Is this legal?

The government legally made the determination under the Biosecurity Act, which gives the health minister power to put in place “any requirement” they believe is necessary to prevent or control the entry or spread of the virus into Australia.

International law recognises the right to leave any country, including your own, but there is no equivalent constitutional protection in Australia. 

In other words, Australians don’t have a constitutional right to leave Australia.

 

Most applications to leave are not successful

Despite these exemptions, it is still difficult to get permission to leave. Only about one in three requests are being granted.

According to Border Force, between March and mid-August it received more than 104,000 requests to leave Australia. About 34,300 exemptions have been granted.

https://theconversation.com/theres-a-ban-on-leaving-australia-under-covid-19-who-can-get-an-exemption-to-go-overseas-and-how-145089

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

We've been primed for a while

 

https://futurism.com/the-byte/scientist-cannibalism-climate-change

A behavioural scientist from Sweden thinks cannibalism of corpses will become necessary due to effects of climate change.


Richard mustn't have got the message but there's quite a few people who have gotten over our taboo against cannibalism, maybe he should go and ask the people they imprisoned for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/  

David Rasnick: new strain of the coronavirus, or a giant con? How deep do the lies go?

by Jon Rappoport

January 25, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

David Rasnick [1], PhD chemist, with a long history working in the pharmaceutical industry (Abbott, Prototek, Arris), broke away from official science and served as the president of Rethinking AIDS: the group for the scientific reappraisal of the HIV hypothesis. He was a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel of South Africa.

Here is a recent explosive statement Rasnick made [2] about SARS-CoV-2 and HIV. Digesting it brings about a breakthrough revelation:

“Viruses are unstable, RNA [e.g, SARS-Cov-2] viruses especially. They are so unstable, there is no such thing as an un-mutated RNA virus. They are like snow flakes, no two are identical.”

“HIV is an RNA virus with 9,800 nucleotides. You can download the HIV Sequence Compendium here:” [3]

“In the Preface it says:”

“’The number of [genetic] sequences in the HIV database is still increasing. In total, at the end of 2017, there were 812,586 sequences in the HIV Sequence Database, an increase of 8.5% since the previous year.”

“None of the sequences of the world destroying [sarcasm], computer generated coronavirus with its 30,000 or so nucleotides, are identical.”

“The virus maniacs use computers to compare the menagerie of sequences to come up with ‘A Consensus Sequence’ for HIV, Coronavirus, and all the rest. The consensus sequence exists in two places: in computers and in strings of RNA synthesized in the lab.”

“Even consensus sequences are not stable. Different groups, using a variety of computer algorithms will invariably come up with different ‘consensus sequences’.”

The implications of Rasnick’s statement are enormous.

First of all, forget about the idea that SARS-Cov-2 has one genetic sequence.

And these multiple sequences aren’t assembled by looking through a magic microscope. They’re put together by computer programs which have pre-set algorithms.

In other words, the sequences are built by ASSUMPTIONS (not evidence) embedded in the algorithms.

ANY vaccine developed for SARS-Cov-2 (even if you believe in the theory of how vaccines are supposed to work) would face the task of producing immunity to an ever-mutating virus—not just one mutated strain, but endless numbers of mutations.

You would have an analog to seasonal flu, in which researchers make a guess about what the new version of the virus will look like every year and develop a new vaccine for that guess.

How well is this working out? Public health agencies report that, each and every year, there are a BILLION cases of seasonal flu, worldwide.

Going still deeper, if the genetic sequences of the ever-mutating viruses are not discovered, but concocted via computer programs, how likely is it that a vaccine utilizing that “data” would work?

And at the bottom of the whole pile of guesswork, is, of course, the realization that, if these genetic sequences are concocted—where is the ACTUAL isolated virus? WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT IT EXISTS?

Where is it, when, as I’ve been reporting for months now, researchers twist and torture the meaning of “isolated,” so that it indicates “the virus is somewhere in a soup in a dish in a lab”—definitely UN-isolated.

Such is the “science” of modern virology.

But don’t worry, be happy, the test “for the coronavirus” must be accurate, the case and death numbers must be accurate, and the consequent lockdowns which are destroying national economies and hundreds of millions of lives are necessary…right?

Sure. Why not? Let’s say it’s all, all right. Everybody can go back to sleep and let tyrants demolish Earth civilization.

OR, you can REBEL against the Police State built on a house-of-cards hoax called “science.”

As opposed to “the virus,” liberty and freedom are quite real. People can feel them in their bones, in their minds and souls. Even and especially if they are slaves, they can feel them.

Speaking of whether a virus actually exists, here is an article I’ve reposted several times:

DOES HIV EXIST? AN EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW

Before we get to Christine Johnson’s interview, a bit of background.

My first book, AIDS INC., was published in 1988. The research I engaged in then formed a foundation for my recent work in exposing the vast fraud called COVID-19.

In 1987-88, my main question eventually became: does HIV cause AIDS? For months, I had blithely assumed the obvious answer was yes. This created havoc in my investigation, because I was facing contradictions I couldn’t solve.

For example, in parts of Africa, people who were chronically ill and dying obviously needed no push from a new virus. All their “AIDS” conditions and symptoms could be explained by their environment: contaminated water supplies; sewage pumped directly into the drinking water; protein-calorie malnutrition; hunger, starvation; medical treatment with immunosuppressive vaccines and drugs; toxic pesticides; fertile farm land stolen by corporations and governments; wars; extreme poverty. The virus cover story actually obscured all these ongoing crimes.

Finally, in the summer of 1987, I found several researchers who were rejecting the notion that HIV caused AIDS. Their reports were persuasive.

I’m shortcutting a great deal of my 1987-8 investigation here, but once HIV was out of the picture for me, many pieces fell into place. I discovered that, in EVERY group supposedly at “high-risk” for AIDS, their conditions and symptoms could be entirely explained by factors that had nothing to do with a new virus.

AIDS was not one condition. It was an umbrella label, used to re-package a number of immunosuppressive conditions and create the illusion of a new and unique and single “pandemic.”

Several years after the publication of AIDS INC., I became aware of a quite different emerging debate going on under the surface of research: DOES HIV EXIST?

Was the purported virus ever truly discovered?

And THAT question led to: what is the correct procedure for discovering a new virus?

The following 1997 interview, conducted by brilliant freelance journalist, Christine Johnson, delves into these questions:

How should researchers prove that a particular virus exists? How should they isolate it? What are the correct steps?

These questions, and their answers, reside at the heart of most disease research—and yet, overwhelmingly, doctors never explore them or even consider them.

Johnson interviews Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia. Over the past decade and more she and her colleagues have published many scientific papers questioning the HIV/AIDS hypothesis…”

Here I’m publishing and highlighting excerpts from the interview [4] [5]. Technical issues are discussed. Grasping them is not the easiest exercise you’ve ever done, but I believe the serious reader can comprehend the vital essentials.

CJ: Does HIV cause AIDS?

EP: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.

CJ: Why not?

EP: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists.

… CJ: Didn’t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV] isolate HIV back in the early eighties?

EP: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients. [HIV is said to be a retrovirus.]

CJ: They say they did isolate a virus.

EP: Our interpretation of the data differs. To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up. Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate.

CJ: Can’t you just look down a microscope and say there’s a virus in the cultures?

EP: No, you can’t. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses.

… CJ: My understanding is that high-speed centrifugation is used to produce samples consisting exclusively of objects having the same density, a so-called “density-purified sample.” Electron microscopy is used to see if these density-purified samples consist of objects which all have the same appearance — in which case the sample is an isolate — and if this appearance matches that of a retrovirus, in terms of size, shape, and so forth. If all this is true, then you are three steps into the procedure for obtaining a retroviral isolate. (1) You have an isolate, and the isolate consists of objects with the same (2) density and (3) appearance of a retrovirus. Then you have to examine this isolate further, to see if the objects in it contain reverse transcriptase [an enzyme] and will replicate when placed in new cultures. Only then can you rightfully declare that you have obtained a retroviral isolate.

EP: Exactly. It was discovered that retroviral particles have a physical property which enables them to be separated from other material in cell cultures. That property is their buoyancy, or density, and this was utilized to purify the particles by a process called density gradient centrifugation.

The technology is complicated, but the concept is extremely simple. You prepare a test tube containing a solution of sucrose, ordinary table sugar, made so the solution is light at the top but gradually becomes heavier, or more dense, towards the bottom. Meanwhile, you grow whatever cells you think may contain your retrovirus. If you’re right, retroviral particles will be released from the cells and pass into the culture fluids. When you think everything is ready, you decant a specimen of culture fluids and gently place a drop on top of the sugar solution. Then you spin the test tube at extremely high speeds. This generates tremendous forces, and particles present in that drop of fluid are forced through the sugar solution until they reach a point where their buoyancy prevents them from penetrating any further. In other words, they drift down the density gradient until they reach a spot where their own density is the same as that region of the sugar solution. When they get there they stop, all together. To use virological jargon, that’s where they band. Retroviruses band at a characteristic point. In sucrose solutions they band at a point where the density is 1.16 gm/ml.

That band can then be selectively extracted and photographed with an electron microscope. The picture is called an electron micrograph, or EM. The electron microscope enables particles the size of retroviruses to be seen, and to be characterized by their appearance.

CJ: So, examination with the electron microscope tells you what fish you’ve caught?

EP: Not only that. It’s the only way to know if you’ve caught a fish. Or anything at all.

CJ: Did Montagnier and Gallo do this?

EP: This is one of the many problems. Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding, but for some unknown reason they did not publish any Ems [photos] of the material at 1.16 gm/ml…this is quite puzzling because in 1973 the Pasteur Institute hosted a meeting attended by scientists, some of whom are now amongst the leading HIV experts. At that meeting the method of retroviral isolation was thoroughly discussed, and photographing the 1.16 band of the density gradient was considered absolutely essential.

CJ: But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles.

EP: No. Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged, or even separated from the culture cells, for that matter. These EMs contained, in addition to many other things, including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses, a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses, and which all belonged to the same retroviral species, now called HIV. But photographs of unpurified particles don’t prove that those particles are viruses. The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.

CJ: And what was that method?

EP: All the steps I have just told you. The only scientific method that exists. Culture cells, find a particle, isolate the particle, take it to pieces, find out what’s inside, and then prove those particles are able to make more of the same with the same constituents when they’re added to a culture of uninfected cells.

CJ: So before AIDS came along there was a well-tried method for proving the existence of a retrovirus, but Montagnier and Gallo did not follow this method?

EP: They used some of the techniques, but they did not undertake every step including proving what particles, if any, are in the 1.16 gm/ml band of the density gradient, the density that defines retroviral particles.

CJ: But what about their pictures?

EP: Montagnier’s and Gallo’s electron micrographs…are of entire cell cultures, or of unpurified fluids from cultures…”

—end of interview excerpt—

If you grasp the essentials of this discussion, you’ll see there is every reason to doubt the existence of HIV, because the methods for proving its existence were not followed.

And so…as I’ve reported these past few months, there is every reason to doubt and reject the existence of the COVID virus, since correct large-scale electron microscope studies have never been done.

I kept the Christine Johnson interview, and other similar information, in mind when, for example, I explored the dud epidemics called SARS and 2009 Swine Flu.

How many viruses have been named as causes of disease, when in fact those viruses have never been isolated or proved to exist?

Of course, conventional-consensus researchers and doctors will scoff at any attempt to raise these issues. For them, “the science is settled.” Meaning: they don’t want to think. They don’t want to stir the waters.

A few years ago, chemist David Rasnick sent a request to the CDC, asking for evidence demonstrating that the Ebola virus had ever been isolated from a human. The answers he received did not begin to approach a level of certainty.

After 30 years working as a reporter in the area of deep medical-research fraud, I’ve seen that false science occurs in levels.

The deeper you go, the stranger it gets. To put it another way: the deeper you go, the worse it gets.


SOURCES:

[1] https://www.davidrasnick.com/

[2] personal communication

[3] https://permalink.lanl.gov/object/tr?what=info:lanl-repo/lareport/LA-UR-18-25673

[4] http://virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cjinterviewep.htm

[5] https://www.immunity.org.uk/articles/christine-johnson/

 

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

We're all going on a corona holiday

We're going where the bars shine brightly

We're going where the people are blue

We've seen it all in Auschwitz lets see if it's true

Who will be forced to quarantine and can I upgrade my hotel room? We answer the vital questions about the UK's new Australia-style isolation for travellers 

38474486-0-image-m-21_1611621790676.jpg

As a first step, British travellers returning from high-risk countries where new strains of the virus have been detected, such as Brazil and South Africa, will be forced to isolate for ten days in airport hotels.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9186627/Who-forced-quarantine-upgrade-hotel-room-new-isolation-travellers.html

 

 

 

Edited by alexa
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, skitzorat said:

bg.png.9e659d24cc7e9bc54e9b61b97f3c6b9c1.png.be2ba4cba4033ab5e53b159a83899898.png

influence_billgates.jpg.800782a402c9139ea7a73d02d762b7b3.jpg

264389478_BM.png.cb31c3d1a66214fb08d17ac102d4d73c1.png.8b368be3943521600eff7288c7def817.png

EWdTxfmX0AgspKI.jpg_large.jpg.f746d8f331768900b90f1b706dd6c84e.jpg

 

 

A bizarre conspiracy theory puts Bill Gates at the centre of the coronavirus crisis

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/coronavirus-conspiracy-bill-gates-infowars-2020-4?r=US&IR=T

 

How Bill Gates became the voodoo doll of Covid conspiracies

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52833706

(from the article)

In 2015, an unassuming-looking Bill Gates came on stage at the TED conference in Vancouver to issue a dire warning.

_112712419_bill.jpg.0658510500ec4eb79881a8079c9998db.jpg_112555485_microchipgraphic.jpg.7e3a10c190b8b871ca516bd49dcdf29d.jpg

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/bill-gates-is-targeted-by-social-media-mobs-11587133938

This guy would be in a shit sandwich ..... Aussie slang for someone who has to be involved in everything!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, skitzorat said:

Australians havent been allowed to leave for almost a year

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-31/coronavirus-covid-outbound-international-travel-ban-morrison/12605404

 

What is the ban?

The ban on leaving Australia was put in place by Health Minister Greg Hunt on March 25, as an “emergency requirement” under the Biosecurity Act. It is the first time Australia has had such a ban, and it was made on the advice of the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee.

The determination says plainly:

An Australian citizen or permanent resident … must not leave Australian territory as a passenger on an outgoing aircraft or vessel.

The accompanying statement explains,

[This] is in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to represent a severe and immediate threat to human health in Australia and across the globe.

Is this legal?

The government legally made the determination under the Biosecurity Act, which gives the health minister power to put in place “any requirement” they believe is necessary to prevent or control the entry or spread of the virus into Australia.

International law recognises the right to leave any country, including your own, but there is no equivalent constitutional protection in Australia. 

In other words, Australians don’t have a constitutional right to leave Australia.

 

Most applications to leave are not successful

Despite these exemptions, it is still difficult to get permission to leave. Only about one in three requests are being granted.

According to Border Force, between March and mid-August it received more than 104,000 requests to leave Australia. About 34,300 exemptions have been granted.

https://theconversation.com/theres-a-ban-on-leaving-australia-under-covid-19-who-can-get-an-exemption-to-go-overseas-and-how-145089

What Australian would want to leave at a time like this anyway.... I wouldn’t want to be locked up or die in an overseas shithole, I’d rather be in my own thanks very much! Lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, alexa said:

 

What's this cog symbol ?😕

 

The white gear cog symbol/icon is on the bottom right-hand corner of youtube videos (next to the subtitles icon). The settings menu allows you to switch on auto-generated transalation, for example, from German to English, with the video posted by Frank Vitalli. The auto-generated translation can be a bit hit and miss, but it should give a general idea of what is being said.

 

Edited by Orange Alert
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, skitzorat said:

 

 

Those same Scientists who publish their work in esteemed "peer-reviewed" academic journals?

 

image.png.9dd1aad894e653aa37f5e1e85ee18838.png

Is it a condition of feminism to have brightly coloured clown hair?😂

  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...