Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/  

David Rasnick: new strain of the coronavirus, or a giant con? How deep do the lies go?

by Jon Rappoport

January 25, 2021

(To join our email list, click here.)

David Rasnick [1], PhD chemist, with a long history working in the pharmaceutical industry (Abbott, Prototek, Arris), broke away from official science and served as the president of Rethinking AIDS: the group for the scientific reappraisal of the HIV hypothesis. He was a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel of South Africa.

Here is a recent explosive statement Rasnick made [2] about SARS-CoV-2 and HIV. Digesting it brings about a breakthrough revelation:

“Viruses are unstable, RNA [e.g, SARS-Cov-2] viruses especially. They are so unstable, there is no such thing as an un-mutated RNA virus. They are like snow flakes, no two are identical.”

“HIV is an RNA virus with 9,800 nucleotides. You can download the HIV Sequence Compendium here:” [3]

“In the Preface it says:”

“’The number of [genetic] sequences in the HIV database is still increasing. In total, at the end of 2017, there were 812,586 sequences in the HIV Sequence Database, an increase of 8.5% since the previous year.”

“None of the sequences of the world destroying [sarcasm], computer generated coronavirus with its 30,000 or so nucleotides, are identical.”

“The virus maniacs use computers to compare the menagerie of sequences to come up with ‘A Consensus Sequence’ for HIV, Coronavirus, and all the rest. The consensus sequence exists in two places: in computers and in strings of RNA synthesized in the lab.”

“Even consensus sequences are not stable. Different groups, using a variety of computer algorithms will invariably come up with different ‘consensus sequences’.”

The implications of Rasnick’s statement are enormous.

First of all, forget about the idea that SARS-Cov-2 has one genetic sequence.

And these multiple sequences aren’t assembled by looking through a magic microscope. They’re put together by computer programs which have pre-set algorithms.

In other words, the sequences are built by ASSUMPTIONS (not evidence) embedded in the algorithms.

ANY vaccine developed for SARS-Cov-2 (even if you believe in the theory of how vaccines are supposed to work) would face the task of producing immunity to an ever-mutating virus—not just one mutated strain, but endless numbers of mutations.

You would have an analog to seasonal flu, in which researchers make a guess about what the new version of the virus will look like every year and develop a new vaccine for that guess.

How well is this working out? Public health agencies report that, each and every year, there are a BILLION cases of seasonal flu, worldwide.

Going still deeper, if the genetic sequences of the ever-mutating viruses are not discovered, but concocted via computer programs, how likely is it that a vaccine utilizing that “data” would work?

And at the bottom of the whole pile of guesswork, is, of course, the realization that, if these genetic sequences are concocted—where is the ACTUAL isolated virus? WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT IT EXISTS?

Where is it, when, as I’ve been reporting for months now, researchers twist and torture the meaning of “isolated,” so that it indicates “the virus is somewhere in a soup in a dish in a lab”—definitely UN-isolated.

Such is the “science” of modern virology.

But don’t worry, be happy, the test “for the coronavirus” must be accurate, the case and death numbers must be accurate, and the consequent lockdowns which are destroying national economies and hundreds of millions of lives are necessary…right?

Sure. Why not? Let’s say it’s all, all right. Everybody can go back to sleep and let tyrants demolish Earth civilization.

OR, you can REBEL against the Police State built on a house-of-cards hoax called “science.”

As opposed to “the virus,” liberty and freedom are quite real. People can feel them in their bones, in their minds and souls. Even and especially if they are slaves, they can feel them.

Speaking of whether a virus actually exists, here is an article I’ve reposted several times:

DOES HIV EXIST? AN EXPLOSIVE INTERVIEW

Before we get to Christine Johnson’s interview, a bit of background.

My first book, AIDS INC., was published in 1988. The research I engaged in then formed a foundation for my recent work in exposing the vast fraud called COVID-19.

In 1987-88, my main question eventually became: does HIV cause AIDS? For months, I had blithely assumed the obvious answer was yes. This created havoc in my investigation, because I was facing contradictions I couldn’t solve.

For example, in parts of Africa, people who were chronically ill and dying obviously needed no push from a new virus. All their “AIDS” conditions and symptoms could be explained by their environment: contaminated water supplies; sewage pumped directly into the drinking water; protein-calorie malnutrition; hunger, starvation; medical treatment with immunosuppressive vaccines and drugs; toxic pesticides; fertile farm land stolen by corporations and governments; wars; extreme poverty. The virus cover story actually obscured all these ongoing crimes.

Finally, in the summer of 1987, I found several researchers who were rejecting the notion that HIV caused AIDS. Their reports were persuasive.

I’m shortcutting a great deal of my 1987-8 investigation here, but once HIV was out of the picture for me, many pieces fell into place. I discovered that, in EVERY group supposedly at “high-risk” for AIDS, their conditions and symptoms could be entirely explained by factors that had nothing to do with a new virus.

AIDS was not one condition. It was an umbrella label, used to re-package a number of immunosuppressive conditions and create the illusion of a new and unique and single “pandemic.”

Several years after the publication of AIDS INC., I became aware of a quite different emerging debate going on under the surface of research: DOES HIV EXIST?

Was the purported virus ever truly discovered?

And THAT question led to: what is the correct procedure for discovering a new virus?

The following 1997 interview, conducted by brilliant freelance journalist, Christine Johnson, delves into these questions:

How should researchers prove that a particular virus exists? How should they isolate it? What are the correct steps?

These questions, and their answers, reside at the heart of most disease research—and yet, overwhelmingly, doctors never explore them or even consider them.

Johnson interviews Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia. Over the past decade and more she and her colleagues have published many scientific papers questioning the HIV/AIDS hypothesis…”

Here I’m publishing and highlighting excerpts from the interview [4] [5]. Technical issues are discussed. Grasping them is not the easiest exercise you’ve ever done, but I believe the serious reader can comprehend the vital essentials.

CJ: Does HIV cause AIDS?

EP: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.

CJ: Why not?

EP: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists.

… CJ: Didn’t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV] isolate HIV back in the early eighties?

EP: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients. [HIV is said to be a retrovirus.]

CJ: They say they did isolate a virus.

EP: Our interpretation of the data differs. To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle on its own so you can take it to pieces and analyze precisely what makes it up. Then you need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate.

CJ: Can’t you just look down a microscope and say there’s a virus in the cultures?

EP: No, you can’t. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses.

… CJ: My understanding is that high-speed centrifugation is used to produce samples consisting exclusively of objects having the same density, a so-called “density-purified sample.” Electron microscopy is used to see if these density-purified samples consist of objects which all have the same appearance — in which case the sample is an isolate — and if this appearance matches that of a retrovirus, in terms of size, shape, and so forth. If all this is true, then you are three steps into the procedure for obtaining a retroviral isolate. (1) You have an isolate, and the isolate consists of objects with the same (2) density and (3) appearance of a retrovirus. Then you have to examine this isolate further, to see if the objects in it contain reverse transcriptase [an enzyme] and will replicate when placed in new cultures. Only then can you rightfully declare that you have obtained a retroviral isolate.

EP: Exactly. It was discovered that retroviral particles have a physical property which enables them to be separated from other material in cell cultures. That property is their buoyancy, or density, and this was utilized to purify the particles by a process called density gradient centrifugation.

The technology is complicated, but the concept is extremely simple. You prepare a test tube containing a solution of sucrose, ordinary table sugar, made so the solution is light at the top but gradually becomes heavier, or more dense, towards the bottom. Meanwhile, you grow whatever cells you think may contain your retrovirus. If you’re right, retroviral particles will be released from the cells and pass into the culture fluids. When you think everything is ready, you decant a specimen of culture fluids and gently place a drop on top of the sugar solution. Then you spin the test tube at extremely high speeds. This generates tremendous forces, and particles present in that drop of fluid are forced through the sugar solution until they reach a point where their buoyancy prevents them from penetrating any further. In other words, they drift down the density gradient until they reach a spot where their own density is the same as that region of the sugar solution. When they get there they stop, all together. To use virological jargon, that’s where they band. Retroviruses band at a characteristic point. In sucrose solutions they band at a point where the density is 1.16 gm/ml.

That band can then be selectively extracted and photographed with an electron microscope. The picture is called an electron micrograph, or EM. The electron microscope enables particles the size of retroviruses to be seen, and to be characterized by their appearance.

CJ: So, examination with the electron microscope tells you what fish you’ve caught?

EP: Not only that. It’s the only way to know if you’ve caught a fish. Or anything at all.

CJ: Did Montagnier and Gallo do this?

EP: This is one of the many problems. Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding, but for some unknown reason they did not publish any Ems [photos] of the material at 1.16 gm/ml…this is quite puzzling because in 1973 the Pasteur Institute hosted a meeting attended by scientists, some of whom are now amongst the leading HIV experts. At that meeting the method of retroviral isolation was thoroughly discussed, and photographing the 1.16 band of the density gradient was considered absolutely essential.

CJ: But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles.

EP: No. Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged, or even separated from the culture cells, for that matter. These EMs contained, in addition to many other things, including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses, a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses, and which all belonged to the same retroviral species, now called HIV. But photographs of unpurified particles don’t prove that those particles are viruses. The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.

CJ: And what was that method?

EP: All the steps I have just told you. The only scientific method that exists. Culture cells, find a particle, isolate the particle, take it to pieces, find out what’s inside, and then prove those particles are able to make more of the same with the same constituents when they’re added to a culture of uninfected cells.

CJ: So before AIDS came along there was a well-tried method for proving the existence of a retrovirus, but Montagnier and Gallo did not follow this method?

EP: They used some of the techniques, but they did not undertake every step including proving what particles, if any, are in the 1.16 gm/ml band of the density gradient, the density that defines retroviral particles.

CJ: But what about their pictures?

EP: Montagnier’s and Gallo’s electron micrographs…are of entire cell cultures, or of unpurified fluids from cultures…”

—end of interview excerpt—

If you grasp the essentials of this discussion, you’ll see there is every reason to doubt the existence of HIV, because the methods for proving its existence were not followed.

And so…as I’ve reported these past few months, there is every reason to doubt and reject the existence of the COVID virus, since correct large-scale electron microscope studies have never been done.

I kept the Christine Johnson interview, and other similar information, in mind when, for example, I explored the dud epidemics called SARS and 2009 Swine Flu.

How many viruses have been named as causes of disease, when in fact those viruses have never been isolated or proved to exist?

Of course, conventional-consensus researchers and doctors will scoff at any attempt to raise these issues. For them, “the science is settled.” Meaning: they don’t want to think. They don’t want to stir the waters.

A few years ago, chemist David Rasnick sent a request to the CDC, asking for evidence demonstrating that the Ebola virus had ever been isolated from a human. The answers he received did not begin to approach a level of certainty.

After 30 years working as a reporter in the area of deep medical-research fraud, I’ve seen that false science occurs in levels.

The deeper you go, the stranger it gets. To put it another way: the deeper you go, the worse it gets.


SOURCES:

[1] https://www.davidrasnick.com/

[2] personal communication

[3] https://permalink.lanl.gov/object/tr?what=info:lanl-repo/lareport/LA-UR-18-25673

[4] http://virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cjinterviewep.htm

[5] https://www.immunity.org.uk/articles/christine-johnson/

 

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 49.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DarianF

    2827

  • oddsnsods

    2269

  • Avoiceinthecrowd

    2014

  • SimonTV

    1904

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You wont believe this.   I just went down Lidls to get some steak.   Security guard calls me out as I walk past & I ignore him. Gets my steak walks to the credit only till

Some images of today's demonstration in London (not taken by me personally).                

Fuck the fuck off.

Posted Images

We're all going on a corona holiday

We're going where the bars shine brightly

We're going where the people are blue

We've seen it all in Auschwitz lets see if it's true

Who will be forced to quarantine and can I upgrade my hotel room? We answer the vital questions about the UK's new Australia-style isolation for travellers 

38474486-0-image-m-21_1611621790676.jpg

As a first step, British travellers returning from high-risk countries where new strains of the virus have been detected, such as Brazil and South Africa, will be forced to isolate for ten days in airport hotels.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9186627/Who-forced-quarantine-upgrade-hotel-room-new-isolation-travellers.html

 

 

 

Edited by alexa
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, skitzorat said:

bg.png.9e659d24cc7e9bc54e9b61b97f3c6b9c1.png.be2ba4cba4033ab5e53b159a83899898.png

influence_billgates.jpg.800782a402c9139ea7a73d02d762b7b3.jpg

264389478_BM.png.cb31c3d1a66214fb08d17ac102d4d73c1.png.8b368be3943521600eff7288c7def817.png

EWdTxfmX0AgspKI.jpg_large.jpg.f746d8f331768900b90f1b706dd6c84e.jpg

 

 

A bizarre conspiracy theory puts Bill Gates at the centre of the coronavirus crisis

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/coronavirus-conspiracy-bill-gates-infowars-2020-4?r=US&IR=T

 

How Bill Gates became the voodoo doll of Covid conspiracies

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52833706

(from the article)

In 2015, an unassuming-looking Bill Gates came on stage at the TED conference in Vancouver to issue a dire warning.

_112712419_bill.jpg.0658510500ec4eb79881a8079c9998db.jpg_112555485_microchipgraphic.jpg.7e3a10c190b8b871ca516bd49dcdf29d.jpg

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/bill-gates-is-targeted-by-social-media-mobs-11587133938

This guy would be in a shit sandwich ..... Aussie slang for someone who has to be involved in everything!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, skitzorat said:

Australians havent been allowed to leave for almost a year

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-08-31/coronavirus-covid-outbound-international-travel-ban-morrison/12605404

 

What is the ban?

The ban on leaving Australia was put in place by Health Minister Greg Hunt on March 25, as an “emergency requirement” under the Biosecurity Act. It is the first time Australia has had such a ban, and it was made on the advice of the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee.

The determination says plainly:

An Australian citizen or permanent resident … must not leave Australian territory as a passenger on an outgoing aircraft or vessel.

The accompanying statement explains,

[This] is in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to represent a severe and immediate threat to human health in Australia and across the globe.

Is this legal?

The government legally made the determination under the Biosecurity Act, which gives the health minister power to put in place “any requirement” they believe is necessary to prevent or control the entry or spread of the virus into Australia.

International law recognises the right to leave any country, including your own, but there is no equivalent constitutional protection in Australia. 

In other words, Australians don’t have a constitutional right to leave Australia.

 

Most applications to leave are not successful

Despite these exemptions, it is still difficult to get permission to leave. Only about one in three requests are being granted.

According to Border Force, between March and mid-August it received more than 104,000 requests to leave Australia. About 34,300 exemptions have been granted.

https://theconversation.com/theres-a-ban-on-leaving-australia-under-covid-19-who-can-get-an-exemption-to-go-overseas-and-how-145089

What Australian would want to leave at a time like this anyway.... I wouldn’t want to be locked up or die in an overseas shithole, I’d rather be in my own thanks very much! Lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, alexa said:

 

What's this cog symbol ?😕

 

The white gear cog symbol/icon is on the bottom right-hand corner of youtube videos (next to the subtitles icon). The settings menu allows you to switch on auto-generated transalation, for example, from German to English, with the video posted by Frank Vitalli. The auto-generated translation can be a bit hit and miss, but it should give a general idea of what is being said.

 

Edited by Orange Alert
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, skitzorat said:

 

 

Those same Scientists who publish their work in esteemed "peer-reviewed" academic journals?

 

image.png.9dd1aad894e653aa37f5e1e85ee18838.png

Is it a condition of feminism to have brightly coloured clown hair?😂

  • Haha 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, alexa said:

We're all going on a corona holiday

We're going where the bars shine brightly

We're going where the people are blue

We've seen it all in Auschwitz lets see if it's true

Who will be forced to quarantine and can I upgrade my hotel room? We answer the vital questions about the UK's new Australia-style isolation for travellers 

38474486-0-image-m-21_1611621790676.jpg

As a first step, British travellers returning from high-risk countries where new strains of the virus have been detected, such as Brazil and South Africa, will be forced to isolate for ten days in airport hotels.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9186627/Who-forced-quarantine-upgrade-hotel-room-new-isolation-travellers.html

 

 

 

 

I love the Cliff Richard, Lockdown Holiday parody video.😆

 

The first step to quarantine hotels, detainment by force is a whole new level starting with imprisonment in hotels for arrivals from Brazil and South Africa.  If people still think this is a normal reaction by the government and things will return turn to normal after a while, then they are a lost cause.   

 

From the Daily Mail article you posted, which sums up what is just around the corner for this stage of forced detention.

 

Foreign nationals are already banned from entering the UK from these places. The Government is looking at widening the hotel quarantine requirement to all arrivals at airports and ports from everywhere around the world, but wants to pilot the process with a smaller group of people first.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9186627/Who-forced-quarantine-upgrade-hotel-room-new-isolation-travellers.html

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, skitzorat said:

I can't figure out if you're being sarcastic or whether you actually that woefully misinformed and/or naïve? 

 

There's been crisis building in the modern scientific field for decades.. and we don't have to go back further in history to remember what all the esteemed "scientists" used to believe our bodies and the world/universe around us.

https://www.corbettreport.com/the-crisis-of-science/

In recent years, the public has gradually discovered that there is a crisis in science. But what is the problem? And how bad is it, really? Today on The Corbett Report we shine a spotlight on the series of interrelated crises that are exposing the way institutional science is practiced today, and what it means for an increasingly science-dependent society.

Scientism. The new religion.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Orange Alert said:

 

I love the Cliff Richard, Lockdown Holiday parody video.😆

 

The first step to quarantine hotels, detainment by force is a whole new level starting with imprisonment in hotels for arrivals from Brazil and South Africa.  If people still think this is a normal reaction by the government and things will return turn to normal after a while, then they are a lost cause.   

 

From the Daily Mail article you posted, which sums up what is just around the corner for this stage of forced detention.

 

Foreign nationals are already banned from entering the UK from these places. The Government is looking at widening the hotel quarantine requirement to all arrivals at airports and ports from everywhere around the world, but wants to pilot the process with a smaller group of people first.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9186627/Who-forced-quarantine-upgrade-hotel-room-new-isolation-travellers.html

 

In Australia, people are required to stay in their room the entire time with security guards patrolling the corridors. Hotel staff are forbidden from cleaning the rooms during a person's stay.

And they will even have to pay for this none privilege, they will have to pay an estimated cost at about £1,500 for a 14 day stay.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, skitzorat said:

From HighimpactTV - NBC admits THEY NEVER ISOLATED THE VIRUS

4173266_Screenshot2021-01-26175739.png.ef818ac41c059aee90200cc1c584a382.png

https://www.bitchute.com/video/mGYefByrG0h0/

 

What was used for the PCR tests explained on the FDA.gov site

525130938_Screenshot2021-01-26181650.png.5973a51767f1615a12b8d4d9c660eb2a.png

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

 

Looks like David Icke was right all along.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, facere arbitrium said:


Richard mustn't have got the message but there's quite a few people who have gotten over our taboo against cannibalism, maybe he should go and ask the people they imprisoned for it.

 

Is cannibalism now becoming a hot topic in the MSM - just like trans people, eating insects and the relaxation benefits of lockdown?

 

Guess they imagine the masses are as dumb as a drooling  Homer Simpson longingly repeating:

" Soylent Green.. mmm mmm".

 

Soylent Green is a bit of a running gag in the Simpsons in the episodes that are set in the future.

 

In the one with prediction of the election of President Trump, there's an advertising poster for Soylent Green that reads Now with 30% more people.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19398310/

 

Quote

 

Study: Electromagnetism (Including 5G) Disrupts Human Immune System

Published on January 22, 2021

Written by Olle Johansson

 

xxxx.jpg?resize=550%2C326&ssl=1

Paper published by the National Library of Medicine summarizing various studies into the issue, validates growing fears that electromagnetic radiation fields from hitech devices (including 5G) poses an existential and enduring threat to the immune system.

 

Abstract

A number of papers dealing with the effects of modern, man-made electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on the immune system are summarized in the present review. EMFs disturb immune function through stimulation of various allergic and inflammatory responses, as well as effects on tissue repair processes. Such disturbances increase the risks for various diseases, including cancer. These and the EMF effects on other biological processes (e.g. DNA damage, neurological effects, etc.) are now widely reported to occur at exposure levels significantly below most current national and international safety limits. Obviously, biologically based exposure standards are needed to prevent disruption of normal body processes and potential adverse health effects of chronic exposure. Based on this review, as well as the reviews in the recent Bioinitiative Report [http://www.bioinitiative.org/] [C.F. Blackman, M. Blank, M. Kundi, C. Sage, D.O. Carpenter, Z. Davanipour, D. Gee, L. Hardell, O. Johansson, H. Lai, K.H. Mild, A. Sage, E.L. Sobel, Z. Xu, G. Chen, The Bioinitiative Report-A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF), 2007)], it must be concluded that the existing public safety limits are inadequate to protect public health, and that new public safety limits, as well as limits on further deployment of untested technologies, are warranted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alexa said:

 

In Australia, people are required to stay in their room the entire time with security guards patrolling the corridors. Hotel staff are forbidden from cleaning the rooms during a person's stay.

And they will even have to pay for this none privilege, they will have to pay an estimated cost at about £1,500 for a 14 day stay.

Double 😭

I don’t know anyone or have been told of anyone who has gone through this at this stage

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bullion said:

Double 😭

I don’t know anyone or have been told of anyone who has gone through this at this stage

 

"If you entered quarantine alone you will receive an invoice from Revenue NSW after you check out of quarantine. If you entered quarantine as part of a group, the primary occupant (identified at quarantine check-in) will receive an invoice from Revenue NSW with other occupants of your group identified on the invoice. If you entered as an unaccompanied youth (under 18 years of age) you will be invoiced as a child ie $500 and your invoice will be sent to your next of kin."

https://www.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/what-you-can-and-cant-do-under-rules/quarantine#invoicing-and-payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve had the misfortune to catch the 6Music news on the radio last night... had me screaming at the radio...

 

The summary was this – ‘cases’ massively down on last week, deaths also falling sharply, while vaccination uptake was at “a really high level”... cut to Matt Hancock CROWING that, “The measures are working.”

 

No they aren’t you evil little bastard.

 

Those cases are coming down on the back of the WHO’s announcement  on cycle thresholds for the PCR tests which has resulted in them being dialled back and probably due to the fact that Biden was sworn in last week allowing them to get back on track with their global plans for the world...

 

Just watch, if the vaccination take-up remains “good” this nonsense will be “downgraded” as we head towards summer – but I’ll wager most of the restrictive measures will stay in place.

 

RANT OVER.

 

Edit: Oh, and I’ve now also watched Peter Hitchens’ Monday chat with Mike Graham on Talk Radio... 20 SECONDS EDITED OUT where he was talking about the government powers to enforce the coronavirus restrictions being  extended to July at the weekend... No surprise there given what I said above!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, alexa said:

 

In Australia, people are required to stay in their room the entire time with security guards patrolling the corridors. Hotel staff are forbidden from cleaning the rooms during a person's stay.

And they will even have to pay for this none privilege, they will have to pay an estimated cost at about £1,500 for a 14 day stay.

 

1 adult  $2,800

2 adults  $3,710

2 adults and 2 children  $4,620

https://www.qld.gov.au/health/conditions/health-alerts/coronavirus-covid-19/protect-yourself-others/quarantine/fees-payment#Fees-0

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

"If you entered quarantine alone you will receive an invoice from Revenue NSW after you check out of quarantine. If you entered quarantine as part of a group, the primary occupant (identified at quarantine check-in) will receive an invoice from Revenue NSW with other occupants of your group identified on the invoice. If you entered as an unaccompanied youth (under 18 years of age) you will be invoiced as a child ie $500 and your invoice will be sent to your next of kin."

https://www.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/what-you-can-and-cant-do-under-rules/quarantine#invoicing-and-payment

Haven’t a clue what it’s like in Vic, btw Gladys looks bloody awful these last months, all that lying must be getting to her!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...