Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Frankieboy said:

Lockdown light starting Monday in Switzerland

 

plus due to Whatsapp new privacy conditions i  have now deleted  whatsapp

i never had Facebook, Twitter or instram

 

so now i am not going to support any social media

 

What changed with what’s app recently ???

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 31k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • EnigmaticWorld

    1494

  • oddsnsods

    1288

  • SimonTV

    1161

  • DarianF

    1130

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Fuck the fuck off.

Bit weird saying this. But, Merry Christmas to my friends/family on here, even though I know none of you personally. Good riddance to the sheeples. Here we stand together. So Merry Xmas & A Happy

omg please watch this.     1_4931640710949503228 (1).mp4

Posted Images

Just now, J47 said:

What changed with what’s app recently ???

 

whatsapp blocked a video i uploaded showing the woman with the shakes from the vaccine. Move to signal, telegram and gab.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The AdapNation site has, following information from medical staff, put together this summary as to the real reasons why hospitals are under pressure at present despite lower than normal bed occupancy rates and ambulance admissions. The hospitals may have less patients to deal with (and thus appear empty) but there seems to be a general state of chaos created by disastrous "pandemic" related decisions.

 

https://adapnation.io/inside-track-nhs-hospital-pressure/

 

image.png.c0df48abf692c492991ef13e45d65ded.png

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

If you get a covid test and come back positive, they want the person to isolate for 14 days. I assume the logic is that they want to see if the person develops symptoms. Yet if no symptoms after 14 days, they are allowed to go back to work. So they admit that asymptomatic people are no risk? Once someone is infected, how long do they remain in a positive status? If there is asymptomatic transmission, then why would an infected person who has had the vaccine not remain isolated? They are only going to spread it surely? unless there is no asymptomatic transmission.

There is no contagion or infection from symptomatic people and thats whats makes the vaccine so dangerous

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Malbec said:

 

there’s people on Facebook celebrating and bragging they’ve had the jab with weird hashtags and comments about getting their life back and “light at the end of the tunnel”. I almost despair at this point. No negative comments, all in agreement and excited for theirs. People in their late 20s and early 30s 🤷🏼‍♀️🤦🏼‍♀️

 

Emperor's new clothes. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't even know why they are calling it a vaccine.  Not a single person (government or medical specialist) has confirmed that it gives immunity to Covid-19.  So it isn't a vaccine.

 

image.png.b6d85591e9c3c3c6a57f25440daaea65.png

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

If you get a covid test and come back positive, they want the person to isolate for 14 days. I assume the logic is that they want to see if the person develops symptoms. Yet if no symptoms after 14 days, they are allowed to go back to work. So they admit that asymptomatic people are no risk? Once someone is infected, how long do they remain in a positive status? If there is asymptomatic transmission, then why would an infected person who has had the vaccine not remain isolated? They are only going to spread it surely? unless there is no asymptomatic transmission.

 

you are looking for logic in the reasoning of people who are not motivated by logic. They are motivated by control

 

This whole things has been since the beginning a sick game of 'simon says'. I've been waiting for the time where they just say 'now we want everyone to stick their head in and oven and inhale the fumes'

 

The scientists behind the great barrington declaration have argued that only the old and infirm should have self-isolated while the rest of society carry on with work and life so that they can build up herd immunity

 

That's logical because health is pegged to GDP so if you destroy the economy you destroy health and also people need exposure to germs and pathogens to build their immune systems so the young should have carried on with life, gained exposure to whatevers going around, some would be sick-a-bed for a few days and then they carry on with life

 

But if you all self isolate and live a sterile life you are weakening your immune system and that in itself will have negative health impacts when people then mingle because they have not been keeping their immune systems sharp

 

The problem is that we live in a nanny state. But viruses mutate so the only real protection against them is a healthy immune system and the government should be putting its energies into that and i suggest a big part of that should be looking at what corporations are putting in all of their products because there are a shit ton of unhealthy things people are being exposed to.

 

We are constantly told that certain foods are unhealthy but is if the food or is it what the corporations put in it for example: preservatives, flavourings, additives, E-numbers, sweetners, colourings, antibiotics etc. So really we need to have a shift in the dialogue here towards WHAT ARE THE CORPORATIONS PUTTING IN EVERYTHING

 

So that would include asking why they are putting so many endocrine disrupting chemicals into household bedding and furnishings in the UK, why they are putting aluminium in vaccines and why they are putting nitrates and nitrites that cause cancer in meat etc etc

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Cyber Attackers Leaked Covid-19 Vaccine Data After EU Hack

 

Hackers posted confidential documents regarding Covid-19 medicines and vaccines on the internet after a data breach late last year at the European Medicines Agency.

 

Timelines related to evaluating and approving Covid medicines and vaccines haven’t been affected, the EMA said in a statement on Tuesday. The agency said it remains fully functional and that law enforcement authorities are taking action on the breach.

 

Caught up in the hack were some documents submitted by Pfizer Inc. and BioNTech SE during regulatory review of their vaccine, approved last month. The EMA said it would notify any additional entities and individuals whose documents and personal data may have been subject to unauthorized access.

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-01-12/covid-vaccine-documents-leaked-on-web-eu-drug-regulator-says

 

Leaked data zip file:

https://0x0.st/-rGv.zip

https://anonymousfiles.io/vN7DGOZ6/

 

pwd: Moses

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, J47 said:
1 hour ago, Frankieboy said:

Lockdown light starting Monday in Switzerland

 

plus due to Whatsapp new privacy conditions i  have now deleted  whatsapp

i never had Facebook, Twitter or instram

 

so now i am not going to support any social media

 

Expand  Expand  

What changed with what’s app recently ???

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/whatsapp-new-privacy-terms-facebook-rules-explained-b1784469.html

hear one of the english links i found . i heard about it on Swiss Radio lots of people  now deleting Whatsup and changing to Signal and other alternatives

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

whatsapp blocked a video i uploaded showing the woman with the shakes from the vaccine. Move to signal, telegram and gab.

there is also Treema It costs about $3 dollars but also safe (think it is a swiss Co so not sure if it works outsid Switzerland)

at moment try  out other alternatives to Whatsapp!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unilever workers will never return to desks full-time, says boss

Alan Jope says multinational firm will look at different working patterns after pandemic experiences

The boss of Unilever, one of the UK’s biggest companies, has said his office workers will never return to their desks five days a week, in the latest indication that coronavirus will transform modern working life.

Alan Jope, the chief executive of the consumer goods group, said the company would also encourage all of its employees to receive vaccinations against Covid-19, but would stop short of making jabs mandatory. Employees who opt not to be vaccinated, however, will face mandatory testing.

Unilever workers will never return to desks full-time, says boss | Working from home | The Guardian

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/12/2021 at 8:00 PM, zarkov said:

 

@Mitochondrial Eve

That appears to reveal more than a correlation or coincidence - Thanks.

 

 

UK Column, coincidentally, have also picked up today on what they say is a strong correlation between flu vaccine take up and higher incidences of Covid-19. They explored this in today's broadcast from around 8:00 in the video below.

 

The link to the BMJ opinion they referred to (dated 4th June 2020) is here: https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2184/rr-4.

 

This, in turn, links to the following piece (published 15th May 2020) which sets out the flu vaccine uptake rate vs Covid-19 death rates in 20 European countries: https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1932/rr-15

 

% INFLUENZA VACCINATIONS IN THE ELDERLY/COVID-19 DEATH RATES PER MILLION
Czech Republic 20.3/28 Lithuania 13.4/22
Denmark 52.0/97 Luxembourg 37.6/174
Estonia 4.8/48 Netherlands 64.0/337
Finland 48.4/55 Norway 34.4/43
France 49.7/431 Portugal 60.8/125
Germany 34.8/99 Slovak Republic 13.0/5
Hungary 26.8/49 Slovenia 11.8/51
Ireland 57.6/319 Spain 53.7/596
Italy 52.7/535 Sweden 49.4/384
Latvia 7.7/12 United Kingdom 72.6/531

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

you are looking for logic in the reasoning of people who are not motivated by logic. They are motivated by control

 

This whole things has been since the beginning a sick game of 'simon says'. I've been waiting for the time where they just say 'now we want everyone to stick their head in and oven and inhale the fumes'

 

The scientists behind the great barrington declaration have argued that only the old and infirm should have self-isolated while the rest of society carry on with work and life so that they can build up herd immunity

 

That's logical because health is pegged to GDP so if you destroy the economy you destroy health and also people need exposure to germs and pathogens to build their immune systems so the young should have carried on with life, gained exposure to whatevers going around, some would be sick-a-bed for a few days and then they carry on with life

 

But if you all self isolate and live a sterile life you are weakening your immune system and that in itself will have negative health impacts when people then mingle because they have not been keeping their immune systems sharp

 

The problem is that we live in a nanny state. But viruses mutate so the only real protection against them is a healthy immune system and the government should be putting its energies into that and i suggest a big part of that should be looking at what corporations are putting in all of their products because there are a shit ton of unhealthy things people are being exposed to.

 

We are constantly told that certain foods are unhealthy but is if the food or is it what the corporations put in it for example: preservatives, flavourings, additives, E-numbers, sweetners, colourings, antibiotics etc. So really we need to have a shift in the dialogue here towards WHAT ARE THE CORPORATIONS PUTTING IN EVERYTHING

 

So that would include asking why they are putting so many endocrine disrupting chemicals into household bedding and furnishings in the UK, why they are putting aluminium in vaccines and why they are putting nitrates and nitrites that cause cancer in meat etc etc

 

It gets right to the heart of this whole farce. How long do positive people remain positive for, anyone know the official line on that? If asymptomatic people are not contagious, well then it is not special at all and none of this makes sense. If asymptomatic people are contagious forever or years etc then even if positive people have had a vaccine, they would still be contagious. Why would allowing vaccinated people to "live a normal life" not spread the virus even further (by their logic)? Surely if asymptomatic people are contagious and remain so after being vaccinated then there would be no benefit to a vaccine for asymptomatic people. They are already infected and will spread it regardless, right? If you have symptoms and you survive are you still contagious and for how long? We can't exactly quarantine healthy people on the basis of a positive test indefinitely. It is just ridiculous. 

Edited by SimonTV
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sexpistol50 said:

What about the homeless alcoholics, where are they gonna drink their Buckfast ?

 

You don't need to be homeless or an alcoholic to drink Buckfast, outdoors. If you know, you know...

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SimonTV said:

whatsapp blocked a video i uploaded showing the woman with the shakes from the vaccine. Move to signal, telegram and gab.

 

When the masonic mass media start openly discussing the 'alternatives' to Facebook and Twitter etc. on TV news, as they did do recently, then you just know that this is what the PTB want to happen. They are effectively quarantining the hardcore sheeple. Sure, folks should try to find somewhere else to speak freely, but they should at least also try to keep one foot in the mainstream, social media camp. Just be a bit more careful in how they go about things. A little bit thought can go an awful long way.

 

36 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

UK Column, coincidentally, have also picked up today on what they say is a strong correlation between flu vaccine take up and higher incidences of Covid-19. They explored this in today's broadcast from around 8:00 in the video below.

 

I will watch it later. Did they mention anything about Long Covid? From what I can tell, there now seems to be a concerted effort, by the masonic mass media, to push the idea of Long Covid very hard into the minds of Joe Public. This is  obviously so they can blame vaccine side effects on Long Covid. Quite ridiculous really, as a lot of these soon-to-be vaccine damaged folks will never have been ill with anything, not even flu or pneumonia, to begin with.

 

P.S. Is it wrong to lust after Priti Patel?

Edited by numnuts
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had yet another very odd conversation with a total believer who has just had the first jab. Apparently I'm a bad person who is putting those around me in danger by not having the jab. Forget that it doesn't stop you contracting or  transmitting the virus, that the people taking this untested new tech vaccine are unwitting guinea pigs or that previous coronavirus vaccines have caused deadly cytokine storms in test animals. Her interaction was utterly simplistic. I'm good you're bad. I despair

Link to post
Share on other sites

My strategy for now is to wait. Current measures at some point will lead to a major social, economic meltdown. More people will then start to ask questions. Whichever way you look at it, the present approach has no permanent back-up system to substitute the erosion of society and the economy. As it is now, a large number if people still feel they're being protected and assisted. Most of these people exhibit symptoms of psychological fear, obvious to a more qualified psychologist. The way they recoil and step back or pull their covers on their mouth. Putting it very bluntly, thousands of people are suffering paranoia, hyperchondria and instability. It's similar to cult victims who we heard of in the 1970s - Moonies, for example. It doesn't affect me at all. I suffered a major breakdown decades ago and am now far less vulnerable to socially transmitted stress disorders. Yet, I recognise stress reaction when I see it. To treat it is very difficult indeed. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, AnarchicBreeze said:

Just had yet another very odd conversation with a total believer who has just had the first jab. Apparently I'm a bad person who is putting those around me in danger by not having the jab. Forget that it doesn't stop you contracting or  transmitting the virus, that the people taking this untested new tech vaccine are unwitting guinea pigs or that previous coronavirus vaccines have caused deadly cytokine storms in test animals. Her interaction was utterly simplistic. I'm good you're bad. I despair

 

I would ask  if they believe you/we everyone has a "right to life". If they say yes then thats OK and walk away, end of point.

If they insist that you must be vaccinated by compulsion then their thinking process is erroneous.

If you have no choice then you have no right to life.

Rights are inalienable. Rights are permanent. If they can be removed even temporarily then they are not rights.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...