Macnamara Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 (edited) 21 minutes ago, Noctua said: From Jon Rappoport... Lockdowns were never about a virus or a pandemic. Lockdown Civilization has been in the planning and development stage for a long time. People say, “Why? Why are they doing this?” The lockdowns achieve several things for the corporate elites Firstly they destroy small, independent businesses Secondly they enable the government to coerce the public into accepting the corporate vaccines just like a gangster runs a protection racket. ''either you accept the vaccine or we will keep you locked down forever'' = gangsterism thirdly they condition the public to be used to being micro-managed by the state Edited January 7, 2021 by Macnamara 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Orange Alert said: This morning at 10.09 am, Mike Graham on Talk Radio said Donald Trump's facebook and twitter accounts had been suspended and how can this be right when Trump is the leader of the Free World. because he isn't the leader the cabal control big tech and the corporate media and they'll skew things however they like and unless a member of the public has the authenticity to see through it they will have their perceptions shaped for them the cabal also have the influence to stop evidence of voter fraud being presented in a court of law Edited January 7, 2021 by Macnamara 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macnamara Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 9 hours ago, BridgeBuilder said: Supposing you post this video in mums dot net. What sort of reaction one would get? i agree with prof cahill that the experimental covid mRNA injections will cause crashing health over this year which the government will then call a 'thirdwave of covid' but mumsnet is the kind of place that engineers of perception such as 77th brigade operatives will seek to pour their attention on because they want mums to inject their children For this reason mums net is likely to be a military intelligence stronghold 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneantisworthtenofyou Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr H Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Just come back from my daily walk. Don't bring my phone but noticed two people walking around looking all official, they had monitors attached to their backs so it was above their heads, advertising for people to get tested. Was a little strange, and just thought what kind of a job is that meant to be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Mr H said: Just come back from my daily walk. Don't bring my phone but noticed two people walking around looking all official, they had monitors attached to their backs so it was above their heads, advertising for people to get tested. Was a little strange, and just thought what kind of a job is that meant to be? Corona Case sales men. One of the reason the UK has so many cases is because testing is free. In countries without a free healthcare for everyone, they have to pay for their own tests, like in Africa. Edited January 7, 2021 by SimonTV Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabriel Huber Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAARPING_On Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 (edited) This little piece of news is interesting.... https://www.pbctoday.co.uk/news/hr-skills-news/hospital-building-project/86943/ Firstly, where is the money coming from? (Apart from Rishi Sunak’s magic money tree) Secondly , they must be expecting to see a lot of people in hospital in the years leading up to 2030... Why on earth could that be? Are they expecting more “pandemics” perhaps??? Edited January 7, 2021 by HAARPING_On paragraphed for clarity Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zArk Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 4 hours ago, Mr H said: Wow massive row on talk radio this morning between Julia and Chris Hopson. Well worth the watch! Lots allegations thrown around. @9.35 amish talkRADIO LIVE - Pretty clear hes the type the nwo want leading the charge His dismissal of official data was incredible and the moon landing tag was funny. On the back of the YT deplatform the neo-marxist technocrats either really want talkradio to getinline or its to drag in more listeners/viewers for damage control 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donotbend Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 On 1/6/2021 at 6:32 AM, Ergo Storm said: Thanks for this post. I am interested in the part above where you talk about positive antibodies. I'm not quite clear about what you are saying and its implications. My understanding of the conventional science is that the body produces antibodies as a reaction to a virus, hence the presence of positive antibodies can be considered an indication of infection. If I interpret what you are saying correctly, all tests of staff are coming back positive, and also staff who have been tested positive for reactive antibodies are still submitting to inoculation. These two points imply that the testing is bogus and/or the vaccine is bogus (probably 'and', because one implies the other). You are also being told that antibodies are still present long after six months, implying continued immunity, but if the testing is bogus in the first place, then what use are these results? Hi, I am far an expert in antibodies and things like that. In fact I know nothing. All I see in my line of work is people who have had "COVID 19" have produced antibodies. Antibodies to what exactly, I do not know. As we all know the testing is bogus. So in theory the antibody testing is bogus. For example.... There have been a few people who have had a negative PCR test but have tested positive for antibodies. And yes you are correct, majority of staff that have tested positive for antibodies are going ahead with the vaccine. There was only one staff member that I spoke with who says that they will wait and see if the level of antibodies drops if it does they will get the vaccine. Something else that has been circulated by PHE today is...... https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1045/regulation/2#text%3Dself isolation Pay particular attention to paragraph 2A (a) and beyond. I know that no one on here will get tested but it's good to know if someone ever gets contacted by "Track and Trace" You can either tell them to fuck off or say that you are part of a research project. As far as I know the study does not have to be disclosed to anyone. Over 500 staff have been vaccinated in the hospital so far. It makes me sick. Funny thing is most of the people I have spoken to are saying that they feel forced to have the vaccine. Madness! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zArk Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 1 minute ago, donotbend said: All I see in my line of work is people who have had "COVID 19" have produced antibodies My wife and i wonder why the antigen test hasnt been rolled out as a 'youre a-ok' test. But then it might highlight big holes in the covid gospel. Like the 'vaccine wont stop transmission'... cover story. Would be pretty devasting when people were still getting ill after getting vaccinated. They think better to retain the asymptomatic argument And this is maybe why antigen tests are sidelined I mean wheres the fun in the headlines "50,000 more people test positive for covid antigens" "20 million people have natural immunity" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zArk Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 12 minutes ago, HAARPING_On said: This little piece of news is interesting.... https://www.pbctoday.co.uk/news/hr-skills-news/hospital-building-project/86943/ Firstly, where is the money coming from? (Apart from Rishi Sunak’s magic money tree) Secondly , they must be expecting to see a lot of people in hospital in the years leading up to 2030... Why on earth could that be? Are they expecting more “pandemics” perhaps??? 3 weeks to flatten the curve. Prevent nhs from being overwhelmed Build nightingale Wtf happened then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/061/374/633/original/d4e6d0fb403c6686.mp4 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticWorld Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 No comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAARPING_On Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 11 minutes ago, SimonTV said: https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/061/374/633/original/d4e6d0fb403c6686.mp4 Absolute C***TS!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zarkov Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 13 minutes ago, SimonTV said: https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/061/374/633/original/d4e6d0fb403c6686.mp4 WTF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allymisfit Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 2 hours ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said: My neighbours started being cold towards us when we refused to clap the last time. We were the only people in the street who didn't give a crap, and I was a carer at the time. It made me feel sick! I won't forget the day at work when the news crew came to film the staff clapping. Ffs was absolutely ridiculous! "MAKE SURE YOU'RE SOCIAL DISTANCING AND DON'T LET THE RESIDENTS STAND TOGETHER. SPACE EVERYONE OUT!" ,< Managers freaking out, trying to make us look like we were well indoctrinated in the new system, whilst they franticallypaint rainbows everywhere (and left us short staffed on a floor that wasn't on view...but that's a whole different story! And a common one.) The whole thing was so false for image! Really pissed me (and a lot of others) off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shy Talk Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 30 minutes ago, SimonTV said: https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/061/374/633/original/d4e6d0fb403c6686.mp4 Did anybody catch what plod said was his justification for entering? It was hard to make out under the mask and power-trip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odie Hatzcats Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Shy Talk said: Did anybody catch what plod said was his justification for entering? It was hard to make out under the mask and power-trip. I think: "Suspicion that you have people living here who do not belong here!" Maybe a Scot could give a better translation? Edit to add the video so it doesn't disappear sometime: To Serve And Protect2.mp4 Edited January 7, 2021 by Odie Hatzcats 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctua Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 58 minutes ago, donotbend said: Hi, I am far an expert in antibodies and things like that. In fact I know nothing. All I see in my line of work is people who have had "COVID 19" have produced antibodies. Antibodies to what exactly, I do not know. As we all know the testing is bogus. So in theory the antibody testing is bogus. For example.... There have been a few people who have had a negative PCR test but have tested positive for antibodies. And yes you are correct, majority of staff that have tested positive for antibodies are going ahead with the vaccine. There was only one staff member that I spoke with who says that they will wait and see if the level of antibodies drops if it does they will get the vaccine. Something else that has been circulated by PHE today is...... https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1045/regulation/2#text%3Dself isolation Pay particular attention to paragraph 2A (a) and beyond. I know that no one on here will get tested but it's good to know if someone ever gets contacted by "Track and Trace" You can either tell them to fuck off or say that you are part of a research project. As far as I know the study does not have to be disclosed to anyone. Excellent idea 45 minutes ago, SimonTV said: https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/061/374/633/original/d4e6d0fb403c6686.mp4 This is absolutely horrifying!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kitkat Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 6 minutes ago, Odie Hatzcats said: I think: "Suspicion that you have people living here who do not belong here!" Maybe a Scot could give a better translation? You are correct. Their 'justifiction' is that they had suspicion that they had siomeone else living there. I hope they felt big about themselves for creating terror in that young child by their actions towards her parents. Absolute bastards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saved Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Johnson seamlessly conjoining the NHS and the military. Over to the scientific expert and then over to the Brigadier in full garb. How quickly the escalation towards their intended end game has happened. And the people love it so. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctua Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Hancock said people may need to have a coronavirus vaccine every six months. He said: I anticipate we will probably need to revaccinate because we don’t know the longevity of the protection from these vaccines. We don’t know how frequently it will be, but it might need to be every six months, it might need to be every year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beaujangles Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 3 hours ago, Macnamara said: i agree with prof cahill that the experimental covid mRNA injections will cause crashing health over this year which the government will then call a 'thirdwave of covid' but mumsnet is the kind of place that engineers of perception such as 77th brigade operatives will seek to pour their attention on because they want mums to inject their children For this reason mums net is likely to be a military intelligence stronghold In the past I have posted on Mumsnet...It is definitely a sinister site. They have agendas and if you go up against ANY of them..the wolves gather... typical site being used by 'intelligence'...another one is 'websleuths' this site will again turn on anyone who disagrees with the official narrative - and in these case lives are also at risk. I haven't bothered posting on there for few years...I can only imagine the outcome re coronavirus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr H Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 1 hour ago, zArk said: 3 weeks to flatten the curve. Prevent nhs from being overwhelmed Build nightingale Wtf happened then? Yes that's a problem, people lose sight of what's important and create arguments about things that don't matter. I'm old fashioned, and in terms of this type of public health matter, the things for me that are important are, are how many people are dying FROM disease, how many people are seriously ill FROM the disease. All this nonsense they have created just caused confusion, like phrases and metrics of people dying WITH covid. Why can't they say from? Because they can't prove causation. How do I know? Because I asked PHE they said they don't have information about causation. So every little thing has to be picked apart. Where as it should be made very simple. It's very frustrating. Then when they lose the argument you will get the total figure thrown at you without any context - 70k deaths, do you not care? - and without any consideration of the deaths directly caused by lock down. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.