Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Not-me]

1 minute ago, Odie Hatzcats said:

No they dont.

They just remove your posts and ban you immediately.

 

Thank god they don't do that here. Much.

[Not-me]

Just now, DarianF said:

 

Okay. I'll take your word for it. But I'm sure the PCR testing was rigorous.

 

You didn't respond to my post before about the virus size and mask efficacy.

[DarianF]

Just now, smashstuff said:

In with the 'I know someone who's had it, and oooh, it was bad all right, so just wear the masks for another ten years, even if you're not sure it's real'.

 

Yeah, the "I know someone who had it" crowd usually neglect to mention the subject was 96 years old, with 5 co-morbidities and three hours prior had fallen down a flight of stairs. But it definitely wasn't the flu. I promise.

[Odie Hatzcats]

1 minute ago, Not-me said:

 

Thank god they don't do that here. Much.

well if you have clocked up 40000 posts then I guess the truther forums are more accepting of different views than the mainstream forum who do just ban you with a few posts!

[Not-me]

1 minute ago, smashstuff said:

In with the 'I know someone who's had it, and oooh, it was bad all right, so just wear the masks for another ten years, even if you're not sure it's real'.

 

Yeah how about that. Maybe Lewis Hamilton was lying. Maybe I am. Maybe I don't know people who work at my local hospital and can tell the difference. I respect your choice on the matter and sincerely hope it goes away, preferably before any of you get it

[Ziggy Sawdust]

2 minutes ago, Not-me said:

 

You didn't respond to my post before about the virus size and mask efficacy.

 22 posts in your first 2 hours here.

Are you on wizz?

[zarkov]

 

 

[FrankVitali]

Yo

 

This video right here:

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kWDbl5urAdtX/

 

Does anyone have a copy of the FOI document Gemma is refering to, that she has in her hands?

 

 

Edited December 24, 2020 by FrankVitali

[Not-me]

Just now, Odie Hatzcats said:

well if you have clocked up 40000 posts then I guess the truther forums are more accepting of different views than the mainstream forum who do just ban you with a few posts!

 

Hmmm, That's with quite a few userids - all banned. I think they tolerate me for a short while. But enough about me, just stick to the debate and behave yourself. Ad hominems and targeting users is not allowed.

[Not-me]

1 minute ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 22 posts in your first 2 hours here.

Are you on wizz?

 No, just getting lots of responses - good to talk huh? How about you respond to the content and not the user?

 

Sheesh, are you people afraid to get your claims challenged? Why??

[Odie Hatzcats]

1 minute ago, Not-me said:

But enough about me, just stick to the debate and behave yourself.

Your NOT my dad dont tell me what to do lol

[DarianF]

5 minutes ago, Not-me said:

 

You didn't respond to my post before about the virus size and mask efficacy.

 

It really doesn't concern me either way. It's a media virus. I'll worry about actual dangerous things.

[smashstuff]

5 minutes ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 22 posts in your first 2 hours here.

Are you on wizz?

Hancock gives him £2 WHSmith book token per post.

[Not-me]

1 minute ago, DarianF said:

 

It really doesn't concern me either way. It's a media virus. I'll worry about actual dangerous things.

 

Listen. It concerned you enough for you to post your article about the mask effectiveness. But when I post MY article showing the microbe size and the way the mask IS effective you avoid it.

 

It is exactly what I expect, confirmation bias and the never ending evasion of anything that doesn't fit.

 

Mask work with large viruses, not so much with tiny microbes. It is a non argument. Still hate the things.

[smashstuff]

3 minutes ago, Not-me said:

 No, just getting lots of responses - good to talk huh? How about you respond to the content and not the user?

 

Sheesh, are you people afraid to get your claims challenged? Why??

What claims?  Who are you working for?  I'm challenging you do admit what you're doing here.  Are you afraid to admit that Covid is an overblown flu used for other agendas?

[Not-me]

1 minute ago, smashstuff said:

Hancock gives him £2 WHSmith book token per post.

 

What exactly is your fear here? It's almost as though your puny responses are trying to stop me posting becase you don't like being questioned. Shut me up with argument. If you have to target me personally, try and imagine how much of the tiniest rat's bottom I could give about your opinions.

 

 

[Ziggy Sawdust]

1 minute ago, Not-me said:

 

Listen. It concerned you enough for you to post your article about the mask effectiveness. But when I post MY article showing the microbe size and the way the mask IS effective you avoid it.

 

It is exactly what I expect, confirmation bias and the never ending evasion of anything that doesn't fit.

 

Mask work with large viruses, not so much with tiny microbes. It is a non argument. Still hate the things.

 

 

[Shining-one]

On a mask, something sarcastic. For T shirt maybe a boy pointing at the naked king and below a rhyme,
"The people are in this altogether, they're altogether, we're altogether, the people are just as hoodwinked as the day Covid was born!"
Maybe a cartoon of the global leaders naked in their "invisible suits."

[Orange Alert]

23 minutes ago, Not-me said:

 

Great observation, So conversely the ones not wearing them are all super informed, rebellious non-compliant world saving heroes.

 

 

 

The people who wear those pathetic face coverings who are frightened of the COVID virus are not sheep, but cabbages, sheep have more sense.   There is this so-called dangerous killer virus in the air, which has been stated to be 0.3 microns in size and people are wearing flimsy 50p masks made in a Chinese or Indian sweatshop.  A friend of mine showed me his mask which cost him £3.99, one of those rubbery gimp mask things, made by a Chinese clothing manufacturer, I put it up to the light and I could see straight through it.  

 

If you want protection from an airbourne virus one needs a suitable respirator with proper filters.  Budget versions are around £20 to £30, a quality respirator is going to cost from £80 upwards.

 

[FrankVitali]

@Ziggy Sawdust haters gonna hate

 

Masks are not effective whatsoever. Next.

[Bombadil]

Just now, Not-me said:

 

Listen. It concerned you enough for you to post your article about the mask effectiveness. But when I post MY article showing the microbe size and the way the mask IS effective you avoid it.

 

It is exactly what I expect, confirmation bias and the never ending evasion of anything that doesn't fit.

 

Mask work with large viruses, not so much with tiny microbes. It is a non argument. Still hate the things.

For me personally the problem is not so much wether a mask is effective or not. The main problem now is that if there is real pandemic it would be logical for 5he government to regulate the type of masks used. Clearly an enormous difference between all makes. Too much profiteering and not enough done to guarantee as much effectiveness as possible.

Also any mask is only as effective as it seal. The space around the nasal to mouth area with for example standardised paper type masks is quite large.

yet again if this is all real, the government should really be clamping down on profiteering over health protection.

[Not-me]

2 minutes ago, smashstuff said:

What claims?  

 

The ones I am talking about concerning the actual thread subject. Try it.

 

2 minutes ago, smashstuff said:

Who are you working for? 

 

Area 51 and Groupthingy 77. I applied via Shills-r-us,com 

 

2 minutes ago, smashstuff said:

I'm challenging you do admit what you're doing here. 

 

I accept your challenge and demand you tell me what you are here for! I just popped back to report a mimic and say hello.

 

2 minutes ago, smashstuff said:

Are you afraid to admit that Covid is an overblown flu used for other agendas?

 

Great claim. I cannot admit something when it seems the opposite is true, however unlike you I am open to persuasion.

 

 

[Shining-one]

More provocative would be two juxtaposed images: One of a Polish citizen in the ghetto with a star of David armband. Below a bunch of masked citizens. Although vehemently denied, the basic disregard for freedom and democracy are reflected by both social realities. As David Icke stated, it's fascism.

[DarianF]

6 minutes ago, Not-me said:

 

Listen. It concerned you enough for you to post your article about the mask effectiveness. But when I post MY article showing the microbe size and the way the mask IS effective you avoid it.

 

It is exactly what I expect, confirmation bias and the never ending evasion of anything that doesn't fit.

 

Mask work with large viruses, not so much with tiny microbes. It is a non argument. Still hate the things.

 

You know, you may be onto something there. All my Exes said I'm an annoying, evasive bastard. I think it's time I took some therapy.

[Not-me]

5 minutes ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

 

 

Warning: All potential members MUST agree with the consensus. If you don't, you get the cold shoulder from "team knowledge". Funny how all the troll comments are coming from those addressing me, yet, here you are........