Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Illmatic said:


Yeah, I've always had very little patience for lazy twats. Live and let live I suppose but we only get one shot at this incredible experience of life, at least as this version of ourselves. Why the fuck would you aim to spend that time blobbing out on your sofa on the dole?


Doesn't seem a good way to grow or expand your consciousness to me, and isn't that what it's all about? 

I don't think being busy or having a job equals expanding consciousness. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHO Finally Admits COVID19 PCR Test Has A ‘Problem’

Published on December 17, 2020

Written by John O'Sullivan



In a statement released on December 14, 2020 the World Health Organization finally owned up to what 100,000’s of doctors and medical professionals have been saying for months: the PCR test used to diagnose COVID-19 is a hit and miss process with way too many false positives.

This  WHO-admitted “Problem” comes in the wake of international lawsuits exposing the incompetence and malfeasance of public health officials and policymakers for reliance on a diagnostic test not fit for purpose.

This World Health Organization admission is that the crux of the “problem” is a wholly arbitrary cycling process which “means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.”  [emphasis added]

The UN body is now clearly looking to distance itself from the fatally flawed test as a growing number of lawsuits are processing through the courts exposing the insanity of relying on a test that even the inventor, Professor Kary B. Mullis said was never designed to diagnose diseases. [1]


Professor Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993.  ‘Coincidentally’, Mullis died just before the pandemic started.

We reported on November 22, 2020 that a landmark court case in Portugal had ruled that the polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) used worldwide to diagnose COVID-19 was not fit for purpose.  Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.

As Off-Guardian.org reported at the time:

“In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably this study by Jaafar et al., which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.

The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.”

You can read the complete ruling in the original Portuguese here, and translated into English here.

Among thousands of angry doctors arguing PCR tests should not be used is Dr. Pascal Sacré. He wrote that:

“This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.”

Clear and conclusive scientific evidence proves that these tests are not accurate and create a statistically significant percentage of false positives. Positive results more likely indicate “ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.” [2]


However, none of this is new information to science. These facts were known at least before 2007 after a New York Times report entitled, “Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t,” (image, above) clearly showed how scientifically inaccurate PCR tests are, featuring many shocking statements from medical experts on the use of these tests, clearly laying out how they result in false positives and lead to dangerous exaggerations and false alarms. [3]

In their 2007 story the New York Times cited a prescient quote from Dr. Elizabeth Talbot, deputy state epidemiologist for the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, who said:

“One Of The Most Troubling Aspects Of The Pseudo-Epidemic Is That All The Decisions Seemed So Sensible At The Time.”

Those who run our public institutions have allowed history to repeat itself. At the head of the line of incompetence and malfeasance is the UN itself. At the media briefing on COVID-19 on March 16, 2020, the WHO Director General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (photo, below) said:

“We Have A Simple Message For All Countries: Test, Test, Test.”


This insanity of testing anyone and everyone, even without symptoms has been an unmitigated global public health scandal and must be stopped. All officials in high places complicit in this crime must be prosecuted.

About the author: John O’Sullivan John is CEO and co-founder (with Dr Tim Ball) of Principia Scientific International (PSI).  John is a seasoned science writer and legal analyst who assisted Dr Ball in defeating world leading climate expert, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann in the ‘science trial of the century‘. O’Sullivan is credited as the visionary who formed the original ‘Slayers’ group of scientists in 2010 who then collaborated in creating the world’s first full-volume debunk of the greenhouse gas theory plus their new follow-up book.

[1] Kary Mullis : « Le test PCR ne permet pas de savoir si vous êtes malade », vidéo accessible sur YouTube, 9 octobre 2020.

[2] David DeGraw, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, https://www.globalresearch.ca/national-security-alert-covid-tests-scientifically-fraudulent-epidemic-false-positives/5720271

[3] New York Times,’Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t,’ Gina Kolota, Published: January 22, 2007


Source: https://principia-scientific.com/who-finally-admits-covid19-pcr-test-has-a-problem/

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, BlueSky said:

I don't think being busy or having a job equals expanding consciousness. 


No maybe it was badly worded I don't either, but doing things in your spare time you are passionate about and learning more about yourself does, and some people manage to get jobs they actually enjoy which are an opportunity to learn and grow.


It was more in response to the last bit of Grumpy Owls post about people forced into furlough who'd taken the opportunity to learn or create, rather than committing full time to Netflix and alcohol, and how some people actually seem to be satisfied with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

most people won't complain and will comply.

most people did/had comply in many ways 

this is a done deal.....snowball is roling 


in 3 years time when you go to your doctor you will be tested for covid( enter the number here)


the cornerstone for technlogical transhumanism is set....people sense something is wrong but continue with their progarming....it's discusting 




  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bombadil said:
Australia First Minister takes the vaccine, with the cap still in the needle
As I keep saying, all the goverments are following the same script.
0:12 / 0:54


Right click on any twitter video and choose 'copy video address'

Then paste here.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one who is frankly concerned about this Daily Mail article comparing the effectiveness of Infrared non contact body temperature thermometers with what they describe as rectal thermometers.




Are we going to be asked to bend over before going to a restaurant?



Dr Mackowiak told MailOnline the true reading for body temperature can only be obtained via a highly invasive procedure, reserved solely for seriously ill hospital patients, which inserts a thermometer into the pulmonary artery via a catheter. 

He said a rectal thermometer was the next most accurate method, but its obvious practical limitations make it unsuitable for screening. He suggested an oral reading is the most accurate option. 


Also hoping they don't give people the option of where they'd like the probe before being seated, clearly some restaurants would fail to clean the probe between guests!

Edited by Mikhail Liebestein
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK so I work in retail and every year we get one of those shitty royalty free Christmas playlists over our tannoy system. A few weeks ago I heard a song which I guess from the lyrics is most likely called 'Christmas 1984'. I was waiting for the right moment to snatch a recording if it and this afternoon I got it. I missed the opening line which I think goes "Once a year he creeps up behind your bed." The rest of the lyrics are:


Listening to everything you said.

His ear is pressed up to the door. 

Christmas 1984.


He knows if you've been acting bad or good.

Has surveillance of your neighbourhood. 

He marks your name and keeps a score. 

Christmas 1984.


He sees you when you're sleeping. 

He knows when you're awake. 

He knows that he's been keeping track of your mistakes. 


In the North he's got a secret base. 

Has his smile over everyplace. 

Needles are rotten to the core. 

Christmas 1984.


He sees you when you're sleeping. 

He knows when you're awake. 

He knows that he's been keeping track of your mistakes. 


Once a year he breaks in to your house. 

No one knows a way to keep him out. 

About as welcome as a war. 

Christmas 1984.


Not a nightmare and it's not a dream. 

A totalitarian regime.

No one is merry anymore. 

Christmas 1984.




  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stage show they're putting on for the vaccine is really the height of desperation. They trotted out Gandalf earlier to say he was buzzing off his tits after getting the jab. As if any of these "celebs" and crisis actors are being pricked with the real soul separating serum. Truth is that while the brainwashed Covidian Cultists will line up for Billy's magic beans there are a hell of a lot of people who won't. The cabal and their clown frontmen know that, which is why they're escalating the psy-op and trying to grind people down more with the "Tier" lockdown bullshit. They are not in control at all, it all feels very desperate and there is no way they'll get the number of people they actually want on the business end of the needle.  

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw this one woman in a new article, she had an "adverse reaction" which means she ended up in ICU from taking a vaccine. The news said she was disappointed that she couldn't have the second dose of vaccine. Wow even after the first one almost killed you...? 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

Am I the only one who is frankly concerned about this Daily Mail article comparing the effectiveness of Infrared non contact body temperature thermometers with what they describe as rectal thermometers.




Near time then for the butt protection against covid entering, can't be too safe banana.gif.a83db425da7cd46691233c5a6322e52c.gif




You can just see the headlines and media promotion gsbrnint.gif.53aa93797d6ca0966a7bd8baf3abed76.gif



  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Macnamara said:

well it can't be the vaccine because as we all know vaccines are completely safe


the problem must be with the person. Always the problem must be with the person and never the vaccine. Vaccines must be protected at all costs. Public health must come secondary to the protection of the vaccines themself. Its vital to keep a positive public perception towards vaccines therefore it wasn't the vaccine, it was some problem with the person themself. Lets move on...


a second alaskan health worker given the pfizer jab now gone into anaphylactic shock but as wl all know because the sage team tell us, vaccine are totally safe...


Therefore it can't be the vaccine making them sick and as the experts say vaccines are totally safe no one should ever investigate the possibility that the vaccines cause harm


and if you disagree then you are an anti-vaxxer, anti-semite who probably sleeps with a tinfoil turban on....

A SECOND Alaska healthcare worker has an allergic reaction to Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine just one day after another staff member at the same hospital went into anaphylactic shock

  • A second healthcare worker in Juneau, Alaska, suffered an allergic reaction after getting Pfizer Inc's coronavirus vaccine on Wednesday
  • He experienced symptoms such as eye puffiness, light headedness and a scratchy throat, which resolved in an hour after being given Benadryl
  • His reaction was less serious than another healthcare worker from the same hospital who went into anaphylactic shock on Tuesday 
  • She is currently hospitalized and it is unclear when she will be discharged
  • The woman has no known history of allergies and is said to be disappointed that she can't receive the vaccine's second dose
  • The anaphylactic-like reaction is believed to be the same one suffered by two British healthcare workers last week, both of whom have since recovered
  • It led the U.K.'s regulatory body to warn that anyone with severe allergic reactions to food or medicine not get the vaccine 

By Mary Kekatos Senior Health Reporter For Dailymail.com

Published: 17:11, 17 December 2020 | Updated: 17:16, 17 December 2020

A second healthcare worker in Alaska has suffered an allergic reaction after receiving Pfizer Inc's coronavirus vaccine on Wednesday.

The man, a staff member at Bartlett Regional Hospital in Juneau, started experiencing eye puffiness, light headedness and a scratchy throat 10 minutes after being injected, a statement from the hospital read.

Doctors determined he was not going into anaphylactic shock and he was given epinephrine - a hormone that opens the airways - Pepcid and Benadryl. 

Hospital officials say his symptoms resolved within an hour and he was released from the emergency department.

It is unknown if the man has any history of allergies, either to food or medications. 

The news comes just one day after another worker at the same hospital experienced an allergic reaction to the immunization, but needed to be hospitalized.

DailyMail.com has reached out to Bartlett Regional Hospital for a request for comment. 


Edited by Macnamara
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...