Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[jesuitsdidit]

5 hours ago, Macnamara said:

Your complete guide to the Covid Pseudo Pandemic

(please share around)

 

Contents

 

1. Boris admits that the Pfizer jab won't end the lockdowns
2. Government admits that the vaccine is not 100% safe
3. Pfizer CEO warns that he is 'not certain' that the vaccine will stop the transmission of the virus
4. Government report warns that the lockdowns could kill 75,000 people over five years
5. Government document admits it is unknown if the Covid vaccine will cause infertility
6. The British Medical Journal warn that the government are suppressing science to rush through the vaccines
7. MHRA regulator is not 'independent' as was funded 980,000 by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2017
8. Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses
9. A global team of experts finds flaws with the PCR tests which have been driving the lockdowns
10. A Portuguese court rules that the PCR tests are not fit for purpose
11. Dr Hotez testifies that the mRNA vaccine technology killed test subjects
12. Previous experiments using mRNA vaccines caused 'immune enhancement' in the test subjects leading to their deaths
13. The British Medical Journal warns that the vaccine trials can't tell if the vaccines will reduce deaths
14. Ex Pfizer scientist warns that the Pfizer vaccine may cause infertility or death
15. Ex Pfizer scientist says the second wave does not exist
16. Over 35,000 scientists and Doctors sign the Great Barrington Declaration saying that only the vulnerable should have been quarantined

 

 

 

 

Perfect, send to your MP and ask for comment.

Do it. Publish response. 

We need to find out who is doing their job.

 

[jesuitsdidit]

6 hours ago, Malbec said:

Well, I’m only being pessimistic about the prospect of a reply based on what I’ve seen on the fb page. But yeh, I suppose There could be more enquiries than normal in the current climate and there are obviously further avenues if there is a complete lack of acknowledgement or response. There’s a wealth of other information that needs to be directly brought to the attention of any MP, but without being negative you do wonder whether it will have any effect tho. 

 

The effect is we find out which ones are doing their job. Then we can start picking them off.

They are the weak link in the system and they need to be exposed.

You (plural) provide the responses* and I will do the demolishing.

 

* or lack thereof

 

Edited December 6, 2020 by jesuitsdidit

[jesuitsdidit]

4 hours ago, Tamlinn said:

The vaccine may make people much more seriously ill. Then it can be labelled a new strain- Covid 21.

 

X Zacklee

 

[DarianF]

8 hours ago, Sexpistol50 said:

I like how the Metro says ' Arayomi who is not a Doctor questioned the safety of the vaccine .'

Did you know your not allowed to question anything unless your a Doctor . Arseholes!

 

Yes, but it's so funny how only the doctors who support the official story are allowed to have an opinion.

[DarianF]

4 hours ago, zarkov said:

and drive a further dividing wedge into the populace "the vaccinated verses unvaccinated spreaders"

With the pcr they can cycle high or low and direct the result any way they want as discussed on this thread.

 

Ive never witnessed a propaganda comapaign of this magnitude before. Its diabolical and when this is corrected there is going to be a witch hunt and trials that will be landmarks in history for all to see, forever.

 

This is a massive learning event for all to see and feel.

 

The absolute abuse of power.

 

 

 

Witch hunts go both ways. Them hunting us, or us hunting them. Time will tell.

[DarianF]

How to get people to accept a COVID vaccine: 5 key steps from Johns Hopkins expert

https://www.bostonherald.com/2020/12/03/how-to-get-people-to-accept-a-covid-vaccine-5-key-steps-from-johns-hopkins-expert/

 

"There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy."

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/941452/Information_for_healthcare_professionals.pdf

[DarianF]

17 hours ago, Illmatic said:

 

Cunts. It might come down to that. Your money or your life.

 

The black market for fake covid vaccination certificates is going to boom.

[magu]

18 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

The black market for fake covid vaccination certificates is going to boom.

You are assuming that its going to  be something tangible like a paper pass....methinks it'll be something electronic,unfakeable and strictly controlled on pain of some new punishment being introduced...watch for a draft of new regs being slipped in between dec 23 ish and jan 2nd

[DarianF]

Dan the Saviour. Let me guess, Dan, you ordered the PCR tests to be cycled down, then claimed credit for saving us all. https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/victorian-premier-daniel-andrews-announces-major-overhaul-to-covid-rules-for-christmas-c-1715625

[pete675]

13 hours ago, numnuts said:

 

Maybe he should listen...

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mexico_City_Learjet_crash

 

 

They don't even obey the lockdown rules. A nice idea there, but let's start with the basics. 

 

 

I have never injected myself with any drug in my life. However, if I had a choice between receiving £15 billion and the vaccine or £0 and having to shoot up, then I would shoot up. Not even up for discussion.

 

I was just thinking about this care home vaccine roll-out again. Do the residents of sound mind even get the opportunity to say 'No way'? Are the vaccine givers suddenly going to appear on the scene with a false air of authority? I can hardly see care homes booting out renegade residents. I find it extremely disturbing how BoJo and Hancock automatically refer to all care home residents as 'getting the vaccine'. It's like they haven't even conceived of any unwilling residents.    

 

BoJo and Wancock are going to be taking care of these residents.

 

But as the great Fr Ted Crilly would say, would that be 'taking care of'  in a Julie Andrews way...... or an Al Pacino way?

 

 

[oneantisworthtenofyou]

signed life insurance policy before taking the vaccine

[FVCK BILLY G4TES]

50 minutes ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

signed life insurance policy before taking the vaccine

"Completely safe, so safe in fact they built me a coffin and headstone just in case"

 

Whenever I watch news media interview people about vaccines they all talk like they've got guns to their heads

 

[wingwang]

1 hour ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

signed life insurance policy before taking the vaccine

 

 

Yep, Sergey done a whole load of research before going on the trial. I mean, of course he realises that selling a kidney on the blackmarket would be more profitable than the 22,000 euros his family would get if he dies!

[wingwang]

[jesuitsdidit]

 

Who will be ensuring the vaccination teams follow proper procedure?

Who will be ensuring that there is "informed consent".

What is the correct procedure in cases where consent cannot be given?

 

Should we be having monitors/advocates in care homes to ensure correct procedure and no coercion?

 

Should we be contacting care homes to ask what safeguards are in place to ensure correct procedure?

 

Who is responsible for ensuring correct procedure? Will there be records kept of every vaccination given and whether informed consent was obtained?

 

Send these questions to your MP.

 

Edited December 6, 2020 by jesuitsdidit

[zArk]

13 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

 

Who will be ensuring the vaccination teams follow proper procedure?

Who will be ensuring that there is "informed consent".

What is the correct procedure in cases where consent cannot be given?

 

Should we be having monitors/advocates in care homes to ensure correct procedure and no coercion?

 

Should we be contacting care homes to ask what safeguards are in place to ensure correct procedure?

 

Who is responsible for ensuring correct procedure? Will there be records kept of every vaccination given and whether informed consent was obtained?

 

sorry fella, like in March/April its too late. all stops are removed. the monsters in control are at it

[jesuitsdidit]

9 hours ago, Macnamara said:

Your Complete Guide to the Covid Pseudo pandemic

 

1. Boris Johnson warns Pfizer jab 'WON'T deliver knock-out blow' needed to end lockdown as 50 rebel Tory MPs say PM must not 'use vaccine as excuse to keep England closed for even longer' and country prepares for 'FOUR-tier system from December 2'

The premier said science had given the country 'two big boxing gloves' via a possible vaccine and mass testing, but added: 'Neither of them is capable of delivering a knock out blow on its own. The pointed comments came amid signs whole regions of England could be kept under brutal restrictions after the blanket lockdown ends on December 2. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8936191/Government-considers-changing-anti-Covid-tier-December-2.ht

 

2. Coronavirus vaccine will be 'as safe as it can be' but scientist will admit there is no 100% guarantee in honesty-first fight against anti-vaxxers

• Department of Health and Cabinet Office created task force to promote vaccine
• Team will advertise jab on social media and TV but acknowledge it is not flawless
• A source told The Times: 'No clinician would ever say any vaccine is 100% safe'
• It follows revelations that GPs could offer vaccine on Christmas and Boxing Day 

By Katie Weston For Mailonline

Published: 08:45, 7 November 2020 | Updated: 09:08, 7 November 2020

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8923645/Covid-19-vaccine-campaign-admit-jab-NOT-100-cent-safe-honesty-approach.html

3. Pfizer CEO ‘not certain’ their vaccine stops transmission of Covid-19 as company’s jab approved in UK and evaluated in US

4 Dec, 2020 04:36 / Updated 6 hours ago

The top executive at pharma giant Pfizer said it still isn’t clear if those who receive the company’s vaccine will be able transmit the coronavirus to others, just one day after the UK became the first to approve the inoculation.

While Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said he expects the vaccine rollout to be rapid after it gets the green light from US health officials, following in the steps of Britain, he noted that it remains to be seen whether recipients of the jab can still carry and pass the virus. 

“Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?” NBC’s Lester Holt asked in an interview on Thursday night, prompting a startling response from Bourla:

''I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now.''

https://www.rt.com/news/508636-pfizer-vaccine-transmission-covid/

4. Lockdown 'could kill 75,000 over five years' - that's the OFFICIAL projection of non-COVID deaths caused by missed cancer diagnoses, cancelled operations and health impacts of a recession. The virus death toll? 42,000
By Ben Spencer and Simon Walters for the Daily Mail
Published: 22:00, 25 September 2020 | Updated: 08:11, 26 September 2020
Nearly 75,000 people could die from non-Covid causes as a result of lockdown, according to devastating official figures buried in a 188-page document. The startling research, presented to the Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), will further increase pressure on Boris Johnson to hold back on introducing further coronavirus restrictions. The document reveals 16,000 people died as a result of the chaos in hospitals and care homes in March and April alone. It estimates a further 26,000 will lose their lives within a year if people continue to stay away from A&E and the problems in social care persist.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rojection.html

 

5.

 

6. Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science

BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425

 

When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die

Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists.

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425

 

7. Press release

MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation

MHRA today announced a partnership worth over £980,000 to improve the safety monitoring of medicines in low and middle-income countries.

Published 15 December 2017

From: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-awarded-over-980000-for-collaboration-with-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-and-the-world-health-organisation

 

8. Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses:

 

9. A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should

1 Dec, 2020 18:59

Among the fatal flaws that totally invalidate the PCR testing protocol are that the test:

• is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design

• is enormously variable

• cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments

• has no positive or negative controls

• has no standard operating procedure

• does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/

10. Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People

November 18, 2020

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”

The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.

The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.

https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-court-pcr-tests-unreliable/

 

11. Dr. Peter Hotez Addressing House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Hearing on Coronavirus

March 5, 2020

Excerpt:

"When I say scientific challenge, one of the things we are not hearing a lot about is potential safety problems of coronavirus vaccines. This was first found in the 1960s with respiratory interstitial virus vaccines done in Washington with the NIH and Children's National Medical Center. Some of those kids who got the vaccine did worse and I believe there were two deaths. What happens with certain types of respiratory virus vaccine, to get immunized and when you are exposed to the virus you get this paradoxical enhancement phenomenon. We don't entirely understand the basis of it, that we recognize there's a real problem with certain respiratory virus vaccines. That killed the program for decades and now the Gates foundation is taking it up again, but then we start developing coronavirus vaccines. We noticed laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same pathology that resembled what it happened years earlier. This is going to be problematic..."

12. Immune Enhancement

Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-insight-idUSKBN20Y1GZ

13. BMJ Sounds the Alarm: COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Cannot Tell Us if They Will Save Lives

By BMJ October 21, 2020

None of the current trials are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalizations, intensive care use, or deaths.

Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, but the vaccine trials currently underway are not designed to tell us if they will save lives, reports Peter Doshi, Associate Editor at The BMJ today.

https://scitechdaily.com/bmj-sounds-the-alarm-covid-19-vaccine-trials-cannot-tell-us-if-they-will-save-lives/

 

14. Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition

December 1, 2020

The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:

The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus. The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

 

https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/

15. Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over"

Updated on September 29, 2020

Ralph Lopez

In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases."

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.

In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked:

"we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting...all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?"

Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple "yes."

Even more significantly, even if all positives were to be correct, Dr. Yeadon said that given the "shape" of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, "the pandemic is fundamentally over."

Yeadon said in the interview:

"Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving into the autumn flu season...but there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen."

Survival Rate of COVID Now Estimated to be 99.8%, Similar to Flu, Prior T-Cell Immunity

The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR.

Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the "novel" COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said, there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population, most often linked to the common cold.

https://hubpages.com/politics/Pfizer-Chief-Science-Officer-Second-Wave-Based-on-Fake-Data-of-False-Positives-for-New-Cases-Pandemic-is-Over

 

16. The Great Barrington Declaration

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. 

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. 

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. 

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. 

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. 

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals. 

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

 

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

https://gbdeclaration.org/

 

• The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
• The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

 

 

Send this list to your MP. Ask if there is anything he/she disagrees with.

 

[jesuitsdidit]

4 minutes ago, zArk said:

sorry fella, like in March/April its too late. all stops are removed. the monsters in control are at it

 

What are you saying?

 

[Velma]

Ha-Ha!

 

We don't want your vaccine, stick it where the sun don't shine and I don't mean Scotland!

 

The Queen is set to receive the coronavirus vaccine "within weeks" and will publicly reveal she has had it to boost take-up of the jab, according to the Mail on Sunday's splash. The paper cites senior sources who insist the 94-year-old monarch and her husband, the Duke of Edinburgh, 99, will not get "preferential treatment" and will "wait in line" during the first wave of injections set aside for the over-80s and care home residents. Public health experts are said to believe that if the royal couple reveal they have had the jab, it could help to combat misinformation, which it is feared, could lead to a "substantial proportion" of the population refusing a vaccine.

 

Surely people who have lived way beyond life expectancy already and are in God's 'waiting room' are not a priority. I mean, how much fucking longer do they want Prince Philip to live?

 

[AndyJ]

9 hours ago, magu said:

But they do have definite plans in the pipeline to make it difficult to live your life the way you would like to....no vax no benefits no vax no travel no vax no work etc etc etc....they wont need people to enforce it or forcibly hold you down whilst they inject it.....your life will be totally unmangeable in so many regards that many people will just give in for an easy life...exactly as so many have done with the mask

 

I don't wear a mask, I work from home in a completely freelance well paid job, I don't travel abroad and never went to pubs before this anyway. I know an organic retailer who will deliver food to my doorstep if there is ever any issue entering supermarkets or local stores. I'm also not registered at any GP surgery because I don't subscribe to mainstream medicine and take a purely holistic approach to any illness. I don't have any children, it's just my wife and I and she also works from home. There is nothing they have that I want or need so it's very easy for me to say No to their sterility potion.

 

I do empathise with those who have job and family commitments which are affected by this totalitarian crap but it is possible to let go of the fear of change and adapt our lives to ensure we don't need to comply with this bullshit. I know it's tough but we create our own reality and should never hand our power over to any "authority" figures. It is possible to manoeuvre around their measures, but the work needs to be done to cultivate a lifestyle which suits us as an empowered individual. I'm not saying it's easy for everyone but it is very possible and hopefully people start seeing this time as an era where major change in their lives can actually be for the better. And on a final note, I actually think the cabal's house of cards is coming down next year anyway. They've overplayed their hand and have become so desperate now, I actually don't believe their agenda is going to work out as planned. 2021 is going to be very interesting.

[jesuitsdidit]

 

Just sent to my MP

Would be good if at least 5 people could do the same.

We need to get at least one reply.

 

 

 

Dear XXX

I have concerns about the roll out of the Pfizer Vaccine.

Could you please answer the following questions.

 

Who will be ensuring the vaccination teams follow proper procedure?

Who will be ensuring that there is "informed consent".

What is the correct procedure in cases where consent cannot be given?

 

Should we be having monitors/advocates in care homes to ensure correct procedure and no coercion?

 

Should we be contacting care homes to ask what safeguards are in place to ensure correct procedure?

 

Who is responsible for ensuring correct procedure? Will there be records kept of every vaccination given and whether informed consent was obtained?

 

Yours sincerely

Name

Address

 

 

 

[oddsnsods]

Don't talk while eating in restaurants, study warns

Diners should refrain from having "conversation during meals" as well as avoid "loud talking or shouting", according to researchers

Don't talk while eating in restaurants, a study has warned, as it claims people can be infected by Covid-19 more than six metres away.

Diners should refrain from having "conversation during meals" as well as avoid "loud talking or shouting", according to researchers in Korea.

Their study claims that people who are 6.5 metres apart can still infect each other, and the window of transmission can be as little as five minutes.

Restaurants should consider installing dividing walls between tables to prevent this happening, they argue.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/05/dont-talk-eating-restaurants-study-warns/?utm_content=telegraph&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1607240187

[jesuitsdidit]

 

From what I understand the reason nobody has ever made a Coronavirus Vaccine before is that whilst the Vaccine is often received by the body once the individual comes into contact with the Wild Virus the reaction is often fatal.

 

[Velma]

Our 'National Treasures' (euphamism for cunts) are lining up for vaccines, to set an example.

 

Esther Rantzen, Maureen Lipman, Bob Geldof, Gloria Hunningford, Eamonn Holmes, Michael Palin, Christopher Biggins and fucking Lulu.

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/uk-biggest-stars-unite-declare-23121477

 

I can't stop swearing today!

 

 

[jesuitsdidit]

1 minute ago, oddsnsods said:

Don't talk while eating in restaurants, study warns

Diners should refrain from having "conversation during meals" as well as avoid "loud talking or shouting", according to researchers

Don't talk while eating in restaurants, a study has warned, as it claims people can be infected by Covid-19 more than six metres away.

Diners should refrain from having "conversation during meals" as well as avoid "loud talking or shouting", according to researchers in Korea.

Their study claims that people who are 6.5 metres apart can still infect each other, and the window of transmission can be as little as five minutes.

Restaurants should consider installing dividing walls between tables to prevent this happening, they argue.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/05/dont-talk-eating-restaurants-study-warns/?utm_content=telegraph&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1607240187

 

Rubbish.

The Virus ended in June.