Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, numnuts said:

 

Maybe he should listen...

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mexico_City_Learjet_crash

 

 

They don't even obey the lockdown rules. A nice idea there, but let's start with the basics. 😀

 

 

I have never injected myself with any drug in my life. However, if I had a choice between receiving £15 billion and the vaccine or £0 and having to shoot up, then I would shoot up. Not even up for discussion.

 

I was just thinking about this care home vaccine roll-out again. Do the residents of sound mind even get the opportunity to say 'No way'? Are the vaccine givers suddenly going to appear on the scene with a false air of authority? I can hardly see care homes booting out renegade residents. I find it extremely disturbing how BoJo and Hancock automatically refer to all care home residents as 'getting the vaccine'. It's like they haven't even conceived of any unwilling residents.    

 

BoJo and Wancock are going to be taking care of these residents.

 

But as the great Fr Ted Crilly would say, would that be 'taking care of'  in a Julie Andrews way...... or an Al Pacino way?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

signed life insurance policy before taking the vaccine 😄

 

 

Yep, Sergey done a whole load of research before going on the trial. I mean, of course he realises that selling a kidney on the blackmarket would be more profitable than the 22,000 euros his family would get if he dies!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Who will be ensuring the vaccination teams follow proper procedure?

Who will be ensuring that there is "informed consent".

What is the correct procedure in cases where consent cannot be given?

 

Should we be having monitors/advocates in care homes to ensure correct procedure and no coercion?

 

Should we be contacting care homes to ask what safeguards are in place to ensure correct procedure?

 

Who is responsible for ensuring correct procedure? Will there be records kept of every vaccination given and whether informed consent was obtained?

 

Send these questions to your MP.

 

Edited by jesuitsdidit
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

 

Who will be ensuring the vaccination teams follow proper procedure?

Who will be ensuring that there is "informed consent".

What is the correct procedure in cases where consent cannot be given?

 

Should we be having monitors/advocates in care homes to ensure correct procedure and no coercion?

 

Should we be contacting care homes to ask what safeguards are in place to ensure correct procedure?

 

Who is responsible for ensuring correct procedure? Will there be records kept of every vaccination given and whether informed consent was obtained?

 

sorry fella, like in March/April its too late. all stops are removed. the monsters in control are at it

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Macnamara said:

Your Complete Guide to the Covid Pseudo pandemic

 

1. Boris Johnson warns Pfizer jab 'WON'T deliver knock-out blow' needed to end lockdown as 50 rebel Tory MPs say PM must not 'use vaccine as excuse to keep England closed for even longer' and country prepares for 'FOUR-tier system from December 2'

The premier said science had given the country 'two big boxing gloves' via a possible vaccine and mass testing, but added: 'Neither of them is capable of delivering a knock out blow on its own. The pointed comments came amid signs whole regions of England could be kept under brutal restrictions after the blanket lockdown ends on December 2. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8936191/Government-considers-changing-anti-Covid-tier-December-2.ht

 

2. Coronavirus vaccine will be 'as safe as it can be' but scientist will admit there is no 100% guarantee in honesty-first fight against anti-vaxxers

  • Department of Health and Cabinet Office created task force to promote vaccine
  • Team will advertise jab on social media and TV but acknowledge it is not flawless
  • A source told The Times: 'No clinician would ever say any vaccine is 100% safe'
  • It follows revelations that GPs could offer vaccine on Christmas and Boxing Day 

By Katie Weston For Mailonline

Published: 08:45, 7 November 2020 | Updated: 09:08, 7 November 2020

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8923645/Covid-19-vaccine-campaign-admit-jab-NOT-100-cent-safe-honesty-approach.html

3. Pfizer CEO ‘not certain’ their vaccine stops transmission of Covid-19 as company’s jab approved in UK and evaluated in US

4 Dec, 2020 04:36 / Updated 6 hours ago
The top executive at pharma giant Pfizer said it still isn’t clear if those who receive the company’s vaccine will be able transmit the coronavirus to others, just one day after the UK became the first to approve the inoculation.

While Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said he expects the vaccine rollout to be rapid after it gets the green light from US health officials, following in the steps of Britain, he noted that it remains to be seen whether recipients of the jab can still carry and pass the virus. 

“Even though I’ve had the protection, am I still able to transmit it to other people?” NBC’s Lester Holt asked in an interview on Thursday night, prompting a startling response from Bourla:

''I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now.''

https://www.rt.com/news/508636-pfizer-vaccine-transmission-covid/

4. Lockdown 'could kill 75,000 over five years' - that's the OFFICIAL projection of non-COVID deaths caused by missed cancer diagnoses, cancelled operations and health impacts of a recession. The virus death toll? 42,000
By Ben Spencer and Simon Walters for the Daily Mail
Published: 22:00, 25 September 2020 | Updated: 08:11, 26 September 2020
Nearly 75,000 people could die from non-Covid causes as a result of lockdown, according to devastating official figures buried in a 188-page document. The startling research, presented to the Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), will further increase pressure on Boris Johnson to hold back on introducing further coronavirus restrictions. The document reveals 16,000 people died as a result of the chaos in hospitals and care homes in March and April alone. It estimates a further 26,000 will lose their lives within a year if people continue to stay away from A&E and the problems in social care persist.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rojection.html

 

5.

FERTILITY-QUOTE.jpg

 

6. Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science

BMJ 2020; 371 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425 (Published 13 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425

 

When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die

Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists.

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425

 

7. Press release

MHRA awarded over £980,000 for collaboration with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the World Health Organisation

MHRA today announced a partnership worth over £980,000 to improve the safety monitoring of medicines in low and middle-income countries.

Published 15 December 2017
From: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/mhra-awarded-over-980000-for-collaboration-with-the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-and-the-world-health-organisation
 
8. Public health England document admits that their PCR test does NOT test for infectious viruses:
PCR.jpg
 

9. A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should

1 Dec, 2020 18:59

Among the fatal flaws that totally invalidate the PCR testing protocol are that the test:

  • is non-specific, due to erroneous primer design

  • is enormously variable

  • cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments

  • has no positive or negative controls

  • has no standard operating procedure

  • does not seem to have been properly peer reviewed

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/508383-fatal-flaws-covid-test/

10. Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People

November 18, 2020

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”

The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.

The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.

https://greatgameindia.com/portuguese-court-pcr-tests-unreliable/

 

11. Dr. Peter Hotez Addressing House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Hearing on Coronavirus

March 5, 2020

Excerpt:

"When I say scientific challenge, one of the things we are not hearing a lot about is potential safety problems of coronavirus vaccines. This was first found in the 1960s with respiratory interstitial virus vaccines done in Washington with the NIH and Children's National Medical Center. Some of those kids who got the vaccine did worse and I believe there were two deaths. What happens with certain types of respiratory virus vaccine, to get immunized and when you are exposed to the virus you get this paradoxical enhancement phenomenon. We don't entirely understand the basis of it, that we recognize there's a real problem with certain respiratory virus vaccines. That killed the program for decades and now the Gates foundation is taking it up again, but then we start developing coronavirus vaccines. We noticed laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same pathology that resembled what it happened years earlier. This is going to be problematic..."

12. Immune Enhancement

Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-vaccines-insight-idUSKBN20Y1GZ

13. BMJ Sounds the Alarm: COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Cannot Tell Us if They Will Save Lives

By BMJ October 21, 2020

None of the current trials are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospitalizations, intensive care use, or deaths.

Vaccines are being hailed as the solution to the covid-19 pandemic, but the vaccine trials currently underway are not designed to tell us if they will save lives, reports Peter Doshi, Associate Editor at The BMJ today.

https://scitechdaily.com/bmj-sounds-the-alarm-covid-19-vaccine-trials-cannot-tell-us-if-they-will-save-lives/

 

14. Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition

December 1, 2020

The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:

The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus. The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

 

https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr-yeadon-request-a-stop-of-all-corona-vaccination-studies-and-call-for-co-signing-the-petition/

15. Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says "Second Wave" Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, "Pandemic is Over"

Updated on September 29, 2020

Ralph Lopez

In a stunning development, a former Chief Science Officer for the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer says "there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen." The "Big Pharma" insider asserts that false positive results from inherently unreliable COVID tests are being used to manufacture a "second wave" based on "new cases."

Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer for 16 years, says that half or even "almost all" of tests for COVID are false positives. Dr. Yeadon also argues that the threshold for herd immunity may be much lower than previously thought, and may have been reached in many countries already.

In an interview last week Dr. Yeadon was asked:

"we are basing a government policy, an economic policy, a civil liberties policy, in terms of limiting people to six people in a meeting...all based on, what may well be, completely fake data on this coronavirus?"

Dr. Yeadon answered with a simple "yes."

Even more significantly, even if all positives were to be correct, Dr. Yeadon said that given the "shape" of all important indicators in a worldwide pandemic, such as hospitalizations, ICU utilization, and deaths, "the pandemic is fundamentally over."

Yeadon said in the interview:

"Were it not for the test data that you get from the TV all the time, you would rightly conclude that the pandemic was over, as nothing much has happened. Of course people go to the hospital, moving into the autumn flu season...but there is no science to suggest a second wave should happen."

Survival Rate of COVID Now Estimated to be 99.8%, Similar to Flu, Prior T-Cell Immunity

The survival rate of COVID-19 has been upgraded since May to 99.8% of infections. This comes close to ordinary flu, the survival rate of which is 99.9%. Although COVID can have serious after-effects, so can flu or any respiratory illness. The present survival rate is far higher than initial grim guesses in March and April, cited by Dr. Anthony Fauci, of 94%, or 20 to 30 times deadlier. The Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) value accepted by Yeadon et al in the paper is .26%. The survival rate of a disease is 100% minus the IFR.

Dr. Yeadon pointed out that the "novel" COVID-19 contagion is novel only in the sense that it is a new type of coronavirus. But, he said, there are presently four strains which circulate freely throughout the population, most often linked to the common cold.

 

16. The Great Barrington Declaration

The Great Barrington Declaration – As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. 

Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice. 

Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza. 

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e.  the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. 

The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection. 

Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent PCR testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals. 

Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.

On October 4, 2020, this declaration was authored and signed in Great Barrington, United States, by:

 

Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.

https://gbdeclaration.org/

 

  • The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
  • The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

 

 

Send this list to your MP. Ask if there is anything he/she disagrees with.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha-Ha!

 

We don't want your vaccine, stick it where the sun don't shine and I don't mean Scotland!

 

The Queen is set to receive the coronavirus vaccine "within weeks" and will publicly reveal she has had it to boost take-up of the jab, according to the Mail on Sunday's splash. The paper cites senior sources who insist the 94-year-old monarch and her husband, the Duke of Edinburgh, 99, will not get "preferential treatment" and will "wait in line" during the first wave of injections set aside for the over-80s and care home residents. Public health experts are said to believe that if the royal couple reveal they have had the jab, it could help to combat misinformation, which it is feared, could lead to a "substantial proportion" of the population refusing a vaccine.

 

Surely people who have lived way beyond life expectancy already and are in God's 'waiting room' are not a priority. I mean, how much fucking longer do they want Prince Philip to live?

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, magu said:

But they do have definite plans in the pipeline to make it difficult to live your life the way you would like to....no vax no benefits no vax no travel no vax no work etc etc etc....they wont need people to enforce it or forcibly hold you down whilst they inject it.....your life will be totally unmangeable in so many regards that many people will just give in for an easy life...exactly as so many have done with the mask

 

I don't wear a mask, I work from home in a completely freelance well paid job, I don't travel abroad and never went to pubs before this anyway. I know an organic retailer who will deliver food to my doorstep if there is ever any issue entering supermarkets or local stores. I'm also not registered at any GP surgery because I don't subscribe to mainstream medicine and take a purely holistic approach to any illness. I don't have any children, it's just my wife and I and she also works from home. There is nothing they have that I want or need so it's very easy for me to say No to their sterility potion.

 

I do empathise with those who have job and family commitments which are affected by this totalitarian crap but it is possible to let go of the fear of change and adapt our lives to ensure we don't need to comply with this bullshit. I know it's tough but we create our own reality and should never hand our power over to any "authority" figures. It is possible to manoeuvre around their measures, but the work needs to be done to cultivate a lifestyle which suits us as an empowered individual. I'm not saying it's easy for everyone but it is very possible and hopefully people start seeing this time as an era where major change in their lives can actually be for the better. And on a final note, I actually think the cabal's house of cards is coming down next year anyway. They've overplayed their hand and have become so desperate now, I actually don't believe their agenda is going to work out as planned. 2021 is going to be very interesting.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Just sent to my MP

Would be good if at least 5 people could do the same.

We need to get at least one reply.

 

 

 
Dear XXX
I have concerns about the roll out of the Pfizer Vaccine.
Could you please answer the following questions.
 

Who will be ensuring the vaccination teams follow proper procedure?

Who will be ensuring that there is "informed consent".

What is the correct procedure in cases where consent cannot be given?

 

Should we be having monitors/advocates in care homes to ensure correct procedure and no coercion?

 

Should we be contacting care homes to ask what safeguards are in place to ensure correct procedure?

 

Who is responsible for ensuring correct procedure? Will there be records kept of every vaccination given and whether informed consent was obtained?

 
Yours sincerely
Name
Address
 
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't talk while eating in restaurants, study warns 🤫

Diners should refrain from having "conversation during meals" as well as avoid "loud talking or shouting", according to researchers

Don't talk while eating in restaurants, a study has warned, as it claims people can be infected by Covid-19 more than six metres away.

Diners should refrain from having "conversation during meals" as well as avoid "loud talking or shouting", according to researchers in Korea.

Their study claims that people who are 6.5 metres apart can still infect each other, and the window of transmission can be as little as five minutes.

Restaurants should consider installing dividing walls between tables to prevent this happening, they argue.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/05/dont-talk-eating-restaurants-study-warns/?utm_content=telegraph&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1607240187
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our 'National Treasures' (euphamism for cunts) are lining up for vaccines, to set an example.

 

Esther Rantzen, Maureen Lipman, Bob Geldof, Gloria Hunningford, Eamonn Holmes, Michael Palin, Christopher Biggins and fucking Lulu.

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/uk-biggest-stars-unite-declare-23121477

 

I can't stop swearing today!

 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oddsnsods said:

Don't talk while eating in restaurants, study warns 🤫

Diners should refrain from having "conversation during meals" as well as avoid "loud talking or shouting", according to researchers

Don't talk while eating in restaurants, a study has warned, as it claims people can be infected by Covid-19 more than six metres away.

Diners should refrain from having "conversation during meals" as well as avoid "loud talking or shouting", according to researchers in Korea.

Their study claims that people who are 6.5 metres apart can still infect each other, and the window of transmission can be as little as five minutes.

Restaurants should consider installing dividing walls between tables to prevent this happening, they argue.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/12/05/dont-talk-eating-restaurants-study-warns/?utm_content=telegraph&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=Echobox&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1607240187

 

Rubbish.

The Virus ended in June.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Velma said:

Our 'National Treasures' (euphamism for cunts) are lining up for vaccines, to set an example.

 

Esther Rantzen, Maureen Lipman, Bob Geldof, Gloria Hunningford, Eamonn Holmes, Michael Palin, Christopher Biggins and fucking Lulu.

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/uk-biggest-stars-unite-declare-23121477

 

I can't stop swearing today!

 

 

 

Sell-outs or stupid.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Auto response received

 

Thank you for your e-mail. Please accept this as an acknowledgement of your email. Your enquiry is very important to me. 

 

When emailing, please include your full name, address and contact telephone number. Please be advised we can only deal with constituents from Birmingham Hall Green due to strict Parliamentary protocols. If this information is omitted from your email please resend the email.

 

We aim to get a response to you within 14 working days. Due to current Coronavirus crisis we are receiving an exceptionally high volume of emails, meaning response times may be delayed. I will respond to your enquiry as soon as possible.

 

Thank you for your patience

 

UK Parliament Disclaimer: this e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Airports reject vaccine requirement as travel debate intensifies

Airports Council International, which represents airports worldwide, joined most airlines in calling for a choice between testing or vaccination, fearing a blanket rule imposing pre-flight inoculation would be as disruptive as quarantines.

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-airports-int-idUSKBN28D2UG

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elon Musk admits to the vaccines being programmed!!!

Here is a part of an Interview with Elon Musk for a German Newspaper (Sueddeutsche Zeitung)

Published on the 6th of December 2020. 

The text translates to

 

Interviewer: And there are positive effects on cancer research. 

Elon Musk: The development of vaccine technology is currently being upgraded. MRNA vaccines are particularly interesting because they could also be potential cures for cancer. I am thinking of the work of Biontech, Curevac, Moderna; mRNA is the future of medicine. You can basically treat anything with mRNA. It's like a computer program, a synthetic virus, so to speak. And you can program it to do whatever you want. You could even transform yourself into a butterfly.

FBDC2AB5-DB75-4776-B3C6-F72D8EF736F8.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elon Musk said the same in an interview a few days ago on television.

 

 

I personally think, hes full of shit & just a koolaid salesman.

He does put it out there he is against depopulation tho.

But hes big into transhumanism, which like messing with DNA, will be another form of eugenics.

Hes a snake like the rest.

Edited by oddsnsods
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

Elon Musk said the same in an interview a few days ago on television.

 

 

I personally think, hes full of shit & a just a koolaid salesman.

He does put it out there he is against depopulation tho.

But hes big into transhumanism, which like messing with DNA, will be another form of eugenics.

Hes a snake like the rest.

Yes, that’s it. I really thought he was a visionary at the beginning. And it all seemed great. Rockets to space and all. But he has really shown to be just another fronter of the Cult.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...