webtrekker Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 'The Other Michael' has just posted this on the TCW site... Covid Inquiry: Jenny Harries, CEO of the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and deputy Chief Medical Officer in the early phases of the coronavirus pandemic, claims she had reservations about mandatory vaccination. In an email sent on Feb 15, 2021, Jenny Harries said she was “quite outspoken” on the mandatory vaccination policy. “I am hugely supportive of getting care homes protected, but I have seen no evidence to suggest that this policy is going to result in more benefit than harm,” she wrote in the email, shown to the inquiry. She added at the time that her own “gut feeling” was that this was a “hugely risky” endeavour as it could lead to “potential racial antagonism” because many carers in critical areas are from “minority ethnic backgrounds”. So it's okay to mandate an untested experimental drug for white people, but not for ethnic minorities because it could lead to racial antagonism! Speaking to the inquiry on Monday, she said she was “leaning away” from the mandatory vaccination policy at the time in her personal opinion. “That was one of many views at the time and there were many good logical reasons, which I also understood, for why you would want to maximally protect a care home immediately,” she added. Except you knew full well the jabs did not prevent infection or transmission, and were causing blood clots and heart complications! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freaky Dragonfly Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsika Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 34 minutes ago, webtrekker said: 'The Other Michael' has just posted this on the TCW site... Covid Inquiry: Jenny Harries, CEO of the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and deputy Chief Medical Officer in the early phases of the coronavirus pandemic, claims she had reservations about mandatory vaccination. In an email sent on Feb 15, 2021, Jenny Harries said she was “quite outspoken” on the mandatory vaccination policy. “I am hugely supportive of getting care homes protected, but I have seen no evidence to suggest that this policy is going to result in more benefit than harm,” she wrote in the email, shown to the inquiry. She added at the time that her own “gut feeling” was that this was a “hugely risky” endeavour as it could lead to “potential racial antagonism” because many carers in critical areas are from “minority ethnic backgrounds”. So it's okay to mandate an untested experimental drug for white people, but not for ethnic minorities because it could lead to racial antagonism! Speaking to the inquiry on Monday, she said she was “leaning away” from the mandatory vaccination policy at the time in her personal opinion. “That was one of many views at the time and there were many good logical reasons, which I also understood, for why you would want to maximally protect a care home immediately,” she added. Except you knew full well the jabs did not prevent infection or transmission, and were causing blood clots and heart complications! Where is that piece of σκατά, June Raine - I'm not sure who is worse Ursula Fond-of-Lying or her. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freaky Dragonfly Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 Former UK Secretary of State admits Pfizer-BioNTech expected payouts of up to £300 billion for vaccine injuries in the UK before its injections were approved for use https://expose-news.com/2025/01/20/former-uk-secretary-of-state-admits/ Alok Sharma, a Secretary of State in the previous UK government, has admitted that the Government knew, before they received regulatory approval, that people would be injured by the covid vaccines. It was a lie to say that the vaccines were “safe” and it was unethical to coerce and mandate people into taking them. Worse still, it was pure evil to expose our nation’s children to this unnecessary and entirely avoidable risk of serious injury and death. 5 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti Facts Sir Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 Round them up. Engaging in criminal behaviour, with knowledge of the consequences. Blood on hands, lives lost, the lot. (As we have said all along). 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Alert Posted January 21 Share Posted January 21 On 1/20/2025 at 12:01 PM, Freaky Dragonfly said: Fauci and Pfizer LIED to President Trump about the ‘C-19 Vaxxines’…and AGAIN, Trump was lied to about the disclosure of side effects. They made him believe that it was a true vaxxine…when it was not…” -Peter Navarro https://www.instagram.com/reel/DEGHUA0BfHO?fbclid=IwY2xjawH59Z5leHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHURBzLTQqxC_3djIfcwPred4pNNdRKrtT0hmuVdgGGKX8V8J0UBS8Alazw_aem_ECArK1JShSxt5W28vN7cRg I thought Trump was going to drain the swamp, take down the Deep State and that should have included Fauci from day one in 2017. Another saviour poster boy that went along with it all was good old Putin. They were all conned. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 On 1/20/2025 at 5:53 PM, Dazzer said: That`s incredible isn't it? The new normal. What it means is that Trump can shake his fist at Fauci and say some bad things, but make out his hands are tied, when it comes to Fauci not being prosecuted and sent to prison. Fauci was never going to prison, even if Biden hadn't pardoned him. 12 hours ago, webtrekker said: 'The Other Michael' has just posted this on the TCW site... Covid Inquiry: Jenny Harries, CEO of the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) and deputy Chief Medical Officer in the early phases of the coronavirus pandemic, claims she had reservations about mandatory vaccination. In an email sent on Feb 15, 2021, Jenny Harries said she was “quite outspoken” on the mandatory vaccination policy. “I am hugely supportive of getting care homes protected, but I have seen no evidence to suggest that this policy is going to result in more benefit than harm,” she wrote in the email, shown to the inquiry. I don't know what she knew and when. It would be hard to prove that she knew about the vaccination side effects in mid-February 2021. The mass vaccinations only really got going at the beginning of January 2021. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avoiceinthecrowd Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 World Health Organization May..............95% protection, June.............70% protection, July..............50% protection, August.........no protection but reduces spread, September...doesn't reduce the spread but reduces severity, October.......doesn't reduce severity but reduces hospitalizations, November...doesn't reduce hospitalizations but you aren't going to die, December...you die but you go to heaven. 5 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avoiceinthecrowd Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 12 hours ago, Freaky Dragonfly said: It's also the face I make watching Fauci bouncing around seeming quite healthy after all those covid shots he had to have had if he followed his own advice. His robust immune system makes him a filthy liar and hypocrite. A nonsensical pardon for a guy that should be seriously vax-crippled or dead, what a novel idea. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nip Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 hours ago, numnuts said: The new normal. What it means is that Trump can shake his fist at Fauci and say some bad things, but make out his hands are tied, when it comes to Fauci not being prosecuted and sent to prison. Fauci was never going to prison, even if Biden hadn't pardoned him. I don't know what she knew and when. It would be hard to prove that she knew about the vaccination side effects in mid-February 2021. The mass vaccinations only really got going at the beginning of January 2021. Yep; Plausible Deniability. We are going to hear much of this term in the near future , I'd suggest 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freaky Dragonfly Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Drs Were Reporting Vax Injuries in Private Fb Group Early in ‘Pandemic’ https://principia-scientific.com/drs-were-reporting-vax-injuries-in-private-fb-group-early-in-pandemic/ ... and then their balls dropped off!!! 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XelNaga Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 On 1/20/2025 at 6:39 PM, numnuts said: Executive Grant of Clemency JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR. President of the United States of America TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME, GREETING: BE IT KNOWN, THAT THIS DAY, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PURSUANT TO MY POWERS UNDER ARTICLE II, SECTION 2, CLAUSE 1, OF THE CONSTITUTION, HAVE GRANTED UNTO DR. ANTHONY S. FAUCI A FULL AND UNCONDITIONAL PARDON FOR ANY OFFENSES against the United States which he may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 20I4, through the date of this pardon arising from or in any manner related to his service as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as a member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force or the White House COVID-19 Response Team, or as Chief Medical Advisor to the President. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF I have hereunto signed my name and caused the seal of the Department of Justice to be affixed. Done at the City of Washington this 19th day of January in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Twenty-Five and of the Independence of the United States the Two Hundred and Forty-Ninth. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR. President A true example of great American demoNcracy. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XelNaga Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 9 hours ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said: World Health Organization May..............95% protection, June.............70% protection, July..............50% protection, August.........no protection but reduces spread, September...doesn't reduce the spread but reduces severity, October.......doesn't reduce severity but reduces hospitalizations, November...doesn't reduce hospitalizations but you aren't going to die, December...you die but you go to heaven. Well if it's a christian heaven, meh.. If it's a muslim heaven, well hello there 72 virgins 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freaky Dragonfly Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 (edited) Edited January 22 by Freaky Dragonfly 3 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freaky Dragonfly Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 Copied from another thread... 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeoScota Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 2 hours ago, Freaky Dragonfly said: Copied from another thread... So the hyperprogressive cancers will skyrocket. And the peeps grasping at some more time here will take them. When they die anyway and faster, well, the cancer was just too far advanced. But imagine how bad it would be if they didn't take the C jab!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
numnuts Posted January 22 Author Share Posted January 22 6 hours ago, Freaky Dragonfly said: Drs Were Reporting Vax Injuries in Private Fb Group Early in ‘Pandemic’ https://principia-scientific.com/drs-were-reporting-vax-injuries-in-private-fb-group-early-in-pandemic/ ... and then their balls dropped off!!! It was not mandatory for G.P. surgeries to administer 'Covid' vaccines from their premises. If any G.P.'s opened up their surgery for the administering of 'Covid' vaccines and subsequently noticed their patients suffering the consequences, then I would be very disappointed if they didn't quickly stop administering 'Covid' vaccines from their premises. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avoiceinthecrowd Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 "FACTBOX: Biden leads US presidents with 8,064 pardons as more than 45,000 have been issued since 1775 Joe Biden, Andrew Johnson, Franklin D. Roosevelt stand out as James Garfield, William Harrison granted no clemencies" Yasin Gungor |22.01.2025 - Update : 22.01.2025 https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/factbox-biden-leads-us-presidents-with-8-064-pardons-as-more-than-45-000-have-been-issued-since-1775/3459194 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avoiceinthecrowd Posted January 22 Share Posted January 22 In my mind the most absurd idea is the head of a huge crime syndicate (US gov) issuing pardons to his co-conspirators. Are we to believe Biden was/is above reproach himself to sit on some high horse and craft clemencies for unrepenting mass murderers? What next..Trump issuing a pardon for Biden's systematic thievery, lies, and incitements, encouraging folk to get vaxxed? One thing is made clear by all these clusters of pardons across the millenia, the USA government has been a crime syndicate almost from day one. Honest governments don't pardon hardened killers of their constituents and don't issue clemencies for drug czars that conspire to poison and kill their consituents, they try them and sentence them. The whole reason we have a collective judicial redress process is to prevent folks from taking the law into their own hands. If any of us plain folk took syringes filled with toxic waste and assaulted citizens randomly and massively with those, we would be most detested as we sat on death row and described by mainstream media as monsters that make the savageries of Gingus Khan pale by comparison. If we assured our victims that the needles were to save them from a greater invisible killer that doesn't really exist, we get a presidential pardon. Enjoy your stay in clownworld y'all. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SimonTV Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) https://files.catbox.moe/2bm4dn.MP4 we made it up weird video artefact added Edited January 23 by SimonTV 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nip Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 4 hours ago, SimonTV said: https://files.catbox.moe/2bm4dn.MP4 we made it up weird video artefact added How infantile ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katsika Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 14 hours ago, numnuts said: It was not mandatory for G.P. surgeries to administer 'Covid' vaccines from their premises. If any G.P.'s opened up their surgery for the administering of 'Covid' vaccines and subsequently noticed their patients suffering the consequences, then I would be very disappointed if they didn't quickly stop administering 'Covid' vaccines from their premises. They were paid a fair bit of dosh I think - (for a long long time) everything medical has been "incentivised" - "Incentivized means to provide someone with a reason or motivation to do something, often by offering rewards or benefits" - the US hospital administrations were incredibly well rewarded to use ventilators for example - sort of iatrogenic murder 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avoiceinthecrowd Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) Where are all the other countries scrambling to grant clemency to their respective chief medical officers? Fauci was just one of many players from many countries. Why do the others not fear their medical officers might eventually be tried for high crimes against humanity? Fauci is thrust into the spotlight and suddenly nothing else or no one else in the world matters anymore. Like some demented responsibilty laundering device throwing the crimes of many on the shoulders of Fauci, making him appear as the only culpable player. The Fauci clemency itself must also be acknowledged as a psyop. A tool to subliminally suggest in the minds of the nearsighted masses that covid was a local USA event and the only culprit is covered legally so....move on folks, eh? Is Trudeau trying to pardon all his provincial health officers before he cycles out? Hardly. Is the USA the only country in the world that does not consider motions like those covid clemencies as admissions of guilt? Why not a pre-emptive pardon to all the utility chiefs that maimed and killed with toxic radiological smartmeters? They are going to get caught too in time. Is Mexico pardonning their hand sanitizer wholesaler/manufacturers for poisoning the world deliberately? Hardly. Edited January 23 by Avoiceinthecrowd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avoiceinthecrowd Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) We are at the mercies of world swarms of transgenerational masters of illusion. To illustrate this reality, lets think of another thing that is subliminally suggested in the Fauci pardon. The pardon assumes a robust judiciary working their fingers to the bone trying to dig up something incriminating on Fauci. Suggesting an obsession bordering on mental instability. The pardon is a metaphorical way for big daddy warbucks to put his foot down and order a cessation of this obsession of finding Fauci at fault during AIDS and covid. Leave our 'hero' alone. Poor man is being inconvenienced by all the nonsense misinformation. Law enforcement are put to sleep with such mantras. Obtaining salaries under false pretenses is in the law books. You see, another subliminal suggestion is that if anything exists to incriminate Fauci it must be rare, obscure, trivial, so, let's cover that possibility. The subliminal suggestion is that the judicial and it's enforcement arms are not owned. That they represent a constant threat to unlawful behavior. Competant. Nothing was more obvious during the commission of the covid crime of genocide than the total dereliction of those processes. Police and courts, judges...out to lunch...many owning pharma stock..took a powder as they say in gangster lingo. Owned. The pardon suggests the judiciary and it's enforcement/intelligence arms are competant and vigilent, not totally owned. The pardon is a psychological grooming political tool. The biggest assumption made by this worthless pardon is that the hoardes taking the law into their own hands for lack of a functional public redress mechanism won't simply wipe their behinds with any presidential pardons, that's the big assumption here, that the paper will have any shred of value when time comes for the entrenched devils to face the music. Edited January 23 by Avoiceinthecrowd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avoiceinthecrowd Posted January 23 Share Posted January 23 (edited) Trump's first move in office (if he wasn't just another in a long line of owned puppet actors without a speck of discretionary choice) should have been to tear up the Biden Fauci pardon. Make it a big deal too. Indict Biden as complicit and arrest both Biden and Fauci. Totally owned!! Make America The Same Or Worse (MATSOW). Edited January 23 by Avoiceinthecrowd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.jpg.8081a54a3b74a5d1823dfac966666137.jpg)
.jpg.594f0ef23288ec5ab04539b2f8a8dbd4.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.