Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

numnuts

By numnuts
in Covid-19 & NWO

 Share

Recommended Posts

Captainlove

Captainlove

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

Where is that toothless tiger, Amnesty International? That so-called big defender of human rights that has gone awol since the smartmeter rollout and was nowhere to be found during those vax murders.

Interesting this one. I emailed amnesty international when one of there workers was at a protest rally supporting a mp who wasnt lets say the best person. And they replied to me saying it was nothing to do with them and they supported the members action. Also look who backs them and theres your answer.

They are a bought charity like many other. Boycott them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
RobinJ

RobinJ

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

The mainstream cancer and vaccine industry spokespersons and apologists are pathological liars. Using toxins to cure illness is the true medieval madness.

 

How many times have I seen cinematic depictions of those poor souls being tortured with cancer chemo therapy and puking their heads off until they drop dead and always wondering how any of that had anything to do with healing.

 

When do we ever see vaccinated people transform into spartan icons of health? If we listen to these labcoat fools, everyone they injure or kill would have had it worse without these killer therapies designed to line the pockets of these illness profiteers that cherish repeat business. 

 

When you tell them you feel fine and don't require their services they look at you like you are a terrorist, nutjob, fanatic or reckless and irresponsible.

 

We, the healthy, are not profitable to those types and they despise us and look down to us. Humans will breathe easier when those devils are sent back to hell.

 

The "poison to cure you" thing is actually very ancient if you look into it. The old way of doing it is to use very small doses of natural plants like belladonna for example, used under very strict protocols.

Small amounts of certain toxins can cure cancers.

However, as usual the cabal takes things to extremes.

The real reason folks get cancer is either a build up of toxins, or, a single or succession of big emotional trauma shocks to the body which are left untreated.

It's been proven that even a diagnosis of cancer can kick off a cancer cell. This is why removing feat from your life matters more than anything else. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Avoiceinthecrowd

Avoiceinthecrowd

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, RobinJ said:

The "poison to cure you" thing is actually very ancient if you look into it. The old way of doing it is to use very small doses of natural plants like belladonna for example, used under very strict protocols.

Small amounts of certain toxins can cure cancers.

However, as usual the cabal takes things to extremes.

The real reason folks get cancer is either a build up of toxins, or, a single or succession of big emotional trauma shocks to the body which are left untreated.

It's been proven that even a diagnosis of cancer can kick off a cancer cell. This is why removing feat from your life matters more than anything else. 

 

Foxglove, which is a notable deadly poison, is regularly administered to cardiac patients recovering from heart surgery.

 

Small dosages apparently slows the heart just enough to give the tissues a chance to heal before assuming a more normalized pace.

 

Seems the medieval mindset with regards to poisons had a superstitous aspect also.

 

Like the nobles drinking out of cups adorned with precious gems. The belief was that the gems held some kind of power to neutralize poisons in drink.

 

I doubt these persons consuming early medicines containing poison had any idea of the concept of toxins accumulating in tissues over time.

 

Meaning the dosages of toxins may have hardened their metabolisms against a full scale poisoner's attack but ultimately, the cumulative effect could have shortened their lifespan drastically. 

 

Besides making life a succession of various ailments brought upon by the accumulations of those toxins even in small quantities. 

 

The most effective counter to a poison attack back then was the slave food taster and drinker. If the guy or gal was still alive after a few minutes then the noble would dig in or drink up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Avoiceinthecrowd

Avoiceinthecrowd

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Violinist Nigel Kennedy says he was partially deaf for three months after Covid vaccine (December 2024)
 

 

 

 

My first thought was microclotting in the labyrinthine artery or the main branches feeding it. Clots may have disolved over time.

 

 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nip2

Nip2

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Katsika said:

Maybe jabbed, maybe too many head injuries as a goalie, maybe too much mobile use as a youngster - maybe a combo of all that. 

 

Maybe Climate Change. Maybe Gardening or Shoveling Snow. Maybe a combo of all three. Or all six if your 'maybes' are included.

 

Oh dear. 

 

Who knows 

Edited by Nip2
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Avoiceinthecrowd

Avoiceinthecrowd

Posted
Posted (edited)

Pharmaceutical plastic bottles market are expected to earn 11.6 billion US dollars by 2029

The 5 biggest players in that market are:
- Amcor Limited
- Berry Plastics Group Inc.
- Gerresheimer AG
- Aptar Pharma
- O. Berk Company LLC
(Source: modorintelligence.com)

US medical technology giant, Becton Dickenson and Co. lead the world syringe and needle markets with 65,000 employees and earning 17 billion dollars in 2020.

European B. Braun Melsungen is another big player in syringes and needles as are Terumo Corporation in Japan, Medtronic, Gerresheimer AG. All raking in fabulous fortunes from diabetics and vax.

World stethoscope sales were 634.93 million dollars in 2023.
(Source grandviewresearch)
Those sales are expected to grow to a billion dollars annually by 2033.
(Source futuremarketinsights)

Covid accelerated the production of syringes, particularly for vaccines, leading to increased investments in capacity expansion among the largest manufacturers.

So, lets make America healthier, right, eh?

Like RFK Jr or Trump or any of those bought clowns will ever dare step on such big toes. Those industries have the means to make clowns go away by the trainloads.

Those industries were made bigger and stronger by covid and microwaves and whatever else they offer as nutritious.

A great big bunch of Frankenstein's monsters. Their appetites will not be satiated by government hollow promises of reform in healthcare.

We must make ourselves healthier and stop waiting for money-grubbing power freaks to do it for us. MAHA is a big fat smokescreen and bold lie coming from those leaders.

 

News everywhere is littered with false hopes of health reform. They are finally removing flouride in 'a few' places (big wow there, eh?) while smartmeters keep roasting everyone on a spit. 

 

Open-air asylums for the criminally insane.

 

 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Avoiceinthecrowd

Avoiceinthecrowd

Posted
Posted

A while back, the World Economic Forum told us what a digital ID should contain;
- Drivers Licence.
- Certificate of birth, education, etc.
- Passport and international passport.
- Medical information (diseases, where they were treated, etc).
- Vaccination passports.
- Financial services/money CBDC. Complete information about your spending.
- Allowable CO2 emissions quota and it's balance.
- Travel data: where and what you went/fly/sailed on.
- Diet and it's compliance with the WEF.
- Waste of energy resources.
- Code - the key to entry/exit to smart cities, 15 minute areas.

 

🤣🤣 Certifiable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Avoiceinthecrowd

Avoiceinthecrowd

Posted
Posted

In all my decades in this world, having been near sick people down with the flu, I never heard the expression 'super spreader' that was used widely during covid.

 

Of all those really sick people of my past, not a single one was ever labelled as a super spreader. They were seen as contagious or not, without attributing a degree to it.

 

Just exactly how contagious anyone was or estimating the number of people a sick person could infect simply was so impractical a concept as to have been seen as ludicrous had they even tried to pull that off back in those days.

 

Even during AIDS when suffers were discovered to have had many sexual partners they were never labelled super spreaders. Dangerously prolific perhaps. 😁

 

The only real super spreaders of covid were the mainstream bs artists spreading their lies to the four corners of the world.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lobster

lobster

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

In all my decades in this world, having been near sick peoonceple down with the flu, I never heard the expression 'super spreader' that was used widely during covid.

 

Of all those really sick people of my past, not a single one was ever labelled as a super spreader. They were seen as contagious or not, without attributing a degree to it.

 

Just exactly how contagious anyone was or estimating the number of people a sick person could infect simply was so impractical a concept as to have been seen as ludicrous had they even tried to pull that off back in those days.

 

Even during AIDS when suffers were discovered to have had many sexual partners they were never labelled super spreaders. Dangerously prolific perhaps. 😁

 

The only real super spreaders of covid were the mainstream bs artists spreading their lies to the four corners of the world.

The term is new, the concept isn't, that of asymptomatic carriers who interact with lots of people is a well known thing going back 100s of years.

 

Perhaps the most famous being typhoid Mary, who killed quite a few people and ended up in prison for the rest of her life to protect " society". Which actually meant rich people, they didn't really care about the poor and she kept getting jobs as a cook for the well off

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lobster

lobster

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

In all my decades in this world, having been near sick people down with the flu, I never heard the expression 'super spreader' that was used widely during covid.

 

Of all those really sick people of my past, nestedot a single one was ever labelled as a super spreader. They were seen as contagious or not, without attributing a degree to it.e sam

 

Just exactly how contagious anyone was or estimating the number of people a sick person could infect simply was so impractical a concept as to have been seen as ludicrous had they even tried to pull that off back in those days.

 

Even during AIDS when suffers were discovered to have had many sexual partners they were never labelled super spreaders. Dangerously prolific perhaps. 😁

 

The only real super spreaders of covid were the mainstream bs artists spreading their lies to the four corners of the world.

On the topic of AIDs there was a not dissimilar media misinformation campaign to convince the public that it's wasn't primarily a male homosexual desease, but an equal opportunity disease.

A campaign for sexual health isn't a bad thing. But I still resent being lied to with glossy adverts

If you suggested otherwise you were treated with much the same contempt you received for questioning the COVID narrative

 

This bollocks is far from new

Edited by lobster
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Avoiceinthecrowd

Avoiceinthecrowd

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, lobster said:

The term is new, the concept isn't, that of asymptomatic carriers who interact with lots of people is a well known thing going back 100s of years.

 

Perhaps the most famous being typhoid Mary, who killed quite a few people and ended up in prison for the rest of her life to protect " society". Which actually meant rich people, they didn't really care about the poor and she kept getting jobs as a cook for the well off

 

Typhoid 'is' symptomatic. Asymptomatic was another term I never heard before covid. 

 

Those people you allude to that have been super spreading asymptomatics for a 100 years were suffering from what exactly?

 

How could they possibly know someone was spreading a thing that has no symptoms? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Avoiceinthecrowd

Avoiceinthecrowd

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, lobster said:

On the topic of AIDs there was a not dissimilar media misinformation campaign to convince the public that it's wasn't primarily a male homosexual desease, but an equal opportunity disease.

 

Junkies of both genders exchanging needles were falling ill too. 

 

What I recall from the period of AIDS was that, in spite of public heath notifications via mainstream media, heterosexual sexual activity did not slow down one bit.

 

And although condoms became super popular to curb spread besides prevent conception, the deep mouth kissing and unchecked blood transfusions were common.

 

Back then I got the feeling from the way people acted, that they did not believe heterosexual AIDS was such a big issue.

 

Some people insisted on a new conquest getting an AIDS test (more PCR chicanery) but that fizzed out quickly because too many people were lying about having gone to get tested.

 

The doctor patient confidentiality made authenticating a claim of having been tested quite problematic. 

 

People were very careful near homosexuals and shunned them from formal and informal social gatherings. But they would not view a highly prolific heterosexual as that much of a threat. 

 

Throughout the entire AIDS period I can't recall anyone lobbying for health passports indicating a person was tested nor were lockdowns considered.

 

Tracking and tracing was very labour intensive as cell phones did not exist yet.

 

I remember the intense drama of a person testing positive and calling all the sexual partners to tell them. Many chose to keep the positive test secret but self imposed a celibate lifestyle on themselves and underwent dietary reforms to boost the immune system.

 

 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lobster

lobster

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

 

Junkies of both genders exchanging needles were falling ill too. 

 

What I recall from the period of AIDS was that, in spite of public heath notifications via mainstream media, heterosexual sexual activity did not slow down one bit.

 

And although condoms became super popular to curb spread besides prevent conception, the deep mouth kissing and unchecked blood transfusions were common.

 

Back then I got the feeling from the way people acted, that they did not believe heterosexual AIDS was such a big issue.

 

Some people insisted on a new conquest getting an AIDS test (more PCR chicanery) but that fizzed out quickly because too many people were lying about having gone to get tested.

 

The doctor patient confidentiality made authenticating a claim of having been tested quite problematic. 

 

People were very careful near homosexuals and shunne COVID bthet I'omam een the eirsehich may not haved them from formal and informal social gatherings. But they would not view a highly prolific heterosexual as that much of a threat. 

 

Throughout the entire AIDS period I can't recall anyone lobbying for health passports indicating aw person was tested nor were lockdowns considered.

 

Tracking and tracing was very labour intensive as cell phones did not exist yet.

 

I remember the intense drama of a person testing positive and calling all the sexual partners to tell them. Many chose to keep the positive test secret but self imposed a celibate lifestyle on themselves and underwent dietary reforms to boost the immune system.

 

 

They were lobbying to lock up all cases in prison at one point early on, in fact I have it in mind they did with a few

But the point I'm making is that public policy and messaging wasn't to provide accurate information to allow people to make informed choices, it was to broadbrush it, claim everyone was equally at risk and try and scare everyone into compliance with a misinformation campaign. Which seemed to work for all STDs other than AIDs

 

That's much the same as we went through with COVID, with fit young adults who were only at the lowest risk being scared and controled, and as with AIDS that did little to protect the at risk population

Edited by lobster
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nip2

Nip2

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Avoiceinthecrowd said:

 

Junkies of both genders exchanging needles were falling ill too. 

 

What I recall from the period of AIDS was that, in spite of public heath notifications via mainstream media, heterosexual sexual activity did not slow down one bit.

 

And although condoms became super popular to curb spread besides prevent conception, the deep mouth kissing and unchecked blood transfusions were common.

 

Back then I got the feeling from the way people acted, that they did not believe heterosexual AIDS was such a big issue.

 

Some people insisted on a new conquest getting an AIDS test (more PCR chicanery) but that fizzed out quickly because too many people were lying about having gone to get tested.

 

The doctor patient confidentiality made authenticating a claim of having been tested quite problematic. 

 

People were very careful near homosexuals and shunned them from formal and informal social gatherings. But they would not view a highly prolific heterosexual as that much of a threat. 

 

Throughout the entire AIDS period I can't recall anyone lobbying for health passports indicating a person was tested nor were lockdowns considered.

 

Tracking and tracing was very labour intensive as cell phones did not exist yet.

 

I remember the intense drama of a person testing positive and calling all the sexual partners to tell them. Many chose to keep the positive test secret but self imposed a celibate lifestyle on themselves and underwent dietary reforms to boost the immune system.

 

 

 

IMHO, all this stuff about covid, Aids etc are just a red-herrings. The jabs and lifestyles are the problems; nowt else

Edited by Nip2
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lobster

lobster

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Fluke said:

 

Still everyone I know who's had the needlecraft is pretty ill this year with intense flu. I'm not tempting fate but I still haven't had anything not even a cold.

Yes I've been extremely healthy since I didn't have the vaccine, but then I was extremely healthy before I didn't have the vaccine,

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...