Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, Nip said:

 

IMHO, there is little, if any, point in arguing with those types altogether. That time is better spent playing Oddsparks

Yep arguing with them only makes them more giddy and dangerous.

Their eyes widen and roll from side to side, frothing and drooling from the mouth with malicious intent. 

What, may I ask, is Oddsparks? 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Yep arguing with them only makes them more giddy and dangerous.

Their eyes widen and roll from side to side, frothing and drooling from the mouth with malicious intent. 

What, may I ask, is Oddsparks? 

 

 Characters in a creative computer game. At least they don't answer back

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Nip said:

 

 Characters in a creative computer game. At least they don't answer back

Oh dear.

 

The state wants you to play games in isolation, have no kids, fear everything til you plead with them to take the pain of living away. 
Admitted yes, there are some creatures around that aren’t quite human, and they shit all over everything and ruin things for the rest of us, but they aren’t EVERYONE. 
 

But I suppose I can see where your coming from.

Do you dream about the game? Just wondering 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Oh dear.

 

The state wants you to play games in isolation, have no kids, fear everything til you plead with them to take the pain of living away. 
Admitted yes, there are some creatures around that aren’t quite human, and they shit all over everything and ruin things for the rest of us, but they aren’t EVERYONE. 
 

But I suppose I can see where your coming from.

Do you dream about the game? Just wondering 

 

 

 

Not at all. Not addicted to the game in any way if that's what you mean. The characters are pretty cool though.

 

Never mind

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

July 2021

 

 

https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/19425127.janey-godley-covid-independence-divisive/

 

'It has been said that the vaccine is breaking the link between hospitalisation and deaths, and I for one have been “double jagged” and I am optimistic that we can finally come through the other end of this horrific pandemic. '

 

September2024

Comedian Janey Godley receiving end-of-life care

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd7xv79dp0jo

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Observations said:


Fears of a ‘tripledemic’ of Covid, flu, and RSV this winter

 

 

IMG_3640.webp.e8645ed4d9c45a6e8618e5e76ed52fa3.webp

 

Those eligible have been urged to get vaccinated as soon as possible (Picture: Getty)

 


https://metro.co.uk/2024/09/23/vaccine-push-amid-fears-a-tripledemic-covid-flu-rsv-21653157/?ico=more_text_links

We don't want you staying alive to claim the state pension.

 

Nose to the grindstone please and drop dead at 65 from a turbo cancer or heart attack.

 

This has been a message from the truthful health department.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Observations said:


Fears of a ‘tripledemic’ of Covid, flu, and RSV this winter

 

 

IMG_3640.webp.e8645ed4d9c45a6e8618e5e76ed52fa3.webp

 

Those eligible have been urged to get vaccinated as soon as possible (Picture: Getty)

 


https://metro.co.uk/2024/09/23/vaccine-push-amid-fears-a-tripledemic-covid-flu-rsv-21653157/?ico=more_text_links

Have they not already done the triple pandemic card.  Maybe they should go straight to 5-Pan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, webtrekker said:

Shock! Horror! Etcetera ... etcetera,... etcetera!

 

 

2024-09-25_15-55-57.png.3bec0f8ad2d8ba37167fb332f513c3ad.png

 

 

These experts again ….the bloody experts.  
oh and could… could…traces … thanks reporter very useful.  
and is the UK bracing for cold and flu season?  A question for msm and Mr Felix  Reeves.

 

5% had traces - what does that mean?

Edited by Diversion
More
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Nip said:

 

 

I found his information linking celebrity musicians to the Gulf of Tolkein incident in Vietnam, which was the ignition point, and object of revisionist scrutiny, that started that decade-long war with the USA, very interesting besides enjoying the entire clip. Good research work. Thanks for putting it up. 😎

 

There is talk out there that Jim Morrisson became Rush Limbaugh and the stench of CIA surrounding all that it becomes another one of those spook intrigues. The Gulf of Tolkein is believed by some to have been a CIA fabrication. Just to show how Oliver's explanations tie-in well with other facts about these stories.

 

His narrative voice is soothing and personally I love his accent. His presentation is impeccable.

 

 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Diversion said:

These experts again ….the bloody experts.  

 

Some of those people enter universities with the explicit intent to obtain a degree they can sell out to the highest bidder.

 

Experts that lend their credentials to endorce nefarious agendas for a price. Like whores on a street corner flashing their sexy credentials.

 

Big money buys up these clowns by the trainload. The worship of money blinds them to the harm they inflict with their dubious endorcements. Society is getting fed up with all that.

 

Just 'google' "I hate my doctor" see how many pages of hatred are directed against them. You read all those and really start feeling an awakening happening.

 

Smartmeters were certified this way as most other deadly toxins said to be remedial. Fraudent use of credentials resulting in injury and death.

 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's worth taking a few minutes to read this ...

 

WHO SAID THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” WERE “SAFE”?

Here is how it was done....

Source:

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.ama
Sep 21, 2024
 

From the very beginning, the Australian government and so-called “health experts” said the COVID-19 “vaccines” were “safe”.  Period.  The public believed them.

 

Now, that claim of “safe” really surprised me on 2 counts:

 

Firstly, the COVID-19 “vaccines” were not “Approved” when they were released for use.  No.  They were not “Approved”.  Anybody who tells you they were “Approved” either is lying or doesn’t know what they are talking about.

 

I’ve testified in court when asked the question: “Do you agree the COVID-19 vaccines have been approved in Australia?”.  My answer was: “No, they have only been Provisionally Approved and there is a big difference”.  With that statement I was immediately dismissed from the proceedings.

The reason why I said: “No, they have only been Provisionally Approved and there is a big difference” is because drugs which are “Provisionally Approved”, by definition, are not supported by the usually required quality, safety and efficacy evidence considered adequate for “Approval”.  The manufacturer (Sponsor) is given years to generate the missing quality, safety and efficacy evidence.  This is a relatively new system introduced in 2018.  Hummmm …..Did they see COVID coming?

 

So, how could anybody say the COVID-19 “vaccines” were “safe” if they did not have the evidence of safety and the shots had no medium or long term safety record?  They could not.

 

Secondly, I always clearly understood that no drug was “safe”.  This is how I was trained.  “Safe” was not a word used without qualification in the pharmaceutical industry when I was a busy consultant.  Sometimes it was necessary to use the term “relatively safe”.   Indeed, it was illegal to say a drug was “safe” in an unqualified manner under the Therapeutic Goods (Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code) instrument (see exerpt below).

 

Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2015 (Cth) published 13.11.2015

 

“4.       General Principles

 

(2) An advertisement for therapeutic goods must not:

(i)          contain any claim, statement or implication that the goods are safe [bolding for emphasis] or that their use cannot cause harm or that they have no side-effects; or……”

 

Here is where it gets interesting……..

 

On 4 June 2021 a special permission apparently was made by John Skerritt (head of the TGA) pursuant to section 42DK of the TGA act and published on the TGA website and later apparently made by “Tracey Duffy – acting Deputy Secretary, Health Products Regulation Group, Dept  of Health. 

 

These “permissions” exempted the COVID-19 “vaccines” from the time-honoured prudent principle of not ever referring to a therapeutic (drug) as being “safe”.

 

Here is the astounding wording:

 

This prohibition on the use of the word “safe” is found in section 9 of that instrument:

“9 Safe and proper use 

(1) An advertisement about therapeutic goods must not contain any statement, pictorial representation or design that, expressly or by implication, represents the goods to be:

(a) safe, or without harm or side-effects; or 

(b) effective in all cases, or a guaranteed cure; or

(c) infallible, unfailing, magical or miraculous.”

Now, how they got around this prohibition is by relying on Part 2, section 6 of the same Instrument, which states:

“Part 2 Application of this Code

6 Advertisements to which this Code does not apply

(1) This Code does not apply to an advertisement that is:

(a) directed exclusively to a person mentioned in section 42AA of the Act; or

(b) part of, or otherwise comprises, a public health campaign; or

(c) made in accordance with the Therapeutic Goods (Restricted Representations—COVID-19 Vaccines) Permission*(these permissions date across 2021 to 2022 regarding COVID-19 vaccines)

Note: The Therapeutic Goods (Restricted Representations—COVID-19 Vaccines) Permission 2022 is published on the Department’s website at www.tga.gov.au.”

What this appears to mean is that any advertisement/representation ‘promoting the use or supply’ of COVID-19 vaccines was exempt from the TGA Advertising Code requirements in full, including prohibitions about whether the vaccines were “safe” or not pursuant to Part 3 - Section 9.  

 

It appears to me that the ‘Secretary’ of the Department of Health can ‘delegate’ some random individual at the Department of Health to make permissions, whenever they want, and permit violations of the TGA Advertising Code whenever they want – with no oversight, accountability, evidence or even review it seems. They probably can also make these permissions as part of a ‘public health campaign’, and not just from a specific COVID-19 vaccines permission.

 

In other words, the Advertising Code was able to be completely nullified whenever the government wanted with respect to COVID-19 vaccines.  

 

This is how they have been able to make the extraordinary claim that the COVID-19 vaccines are “safe” despite evidence to the contrary. 

 

 

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few thoughts on toxins. Microwave cellular damage can be mitigated if the time spent sleeping is microwave free. This can be accomplished by sleeping inside a emf canopy. 

 

Food toxins are not designed to kill but to sicken over a period of repeated uses. So, a cheat here and there can't do serious harm. 

 

I found a great way to get good water is from a dehumidifier and a light filtration. The water obtained this way is distilled, the only contaminant could be found of the condensation coils of the dehumidifier so boiling is what I do if I wish to drink it.

 

I use dehumidifier water for dishes and for backup water. Of course you still need electricity and a humid outside climate.

 

So, you don't need to be overcome with microwaves and food cheats won't hurt if your base diet is decent and you get the rest you need and water is in the air we breathe. Flouride-free too.

 

 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webtrekker said:

It's worth taking a few minutes to read this ...

 

WHO SAID THE COVID-19 “VACCINES” WERE “SAFE”?

Here is how it was done....

Source:

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.ama
Sep 21, 2024
 

From the very beginning, the Australian government and so-called “health experts” said the COVID-19 “vaccines” were “safe”.  Period.  The public believed them.

 

Now, that claim of “safe” really surprised me on 2 counts:

 

Firstly, the COVID-19 “vaccines” were not “Approved” when they were released for use.  No.  They were not “Approved”.  Anybody who tells you they were “Approved” either is lying or doesn’t know what they are talking about.

 

I’ve testified in court when asked the question: “Do you agree the COVID-19 vaccines have been approved in Australia?”.  My answer was: “No, they have only been Provisionally Approved and there is a big difference”.  With that statement I was immediately dismissed from the proceedings.

The reason why I said: “No, they have only been Provisionally Approved and there is a big difference” is because drugs which are “Provisionally Approved”, by definition, are not supported by the usually required quality, safety and efficacy evidence considered adequate for “Approval”.  The manufacturer (Sponsor) is given years to generate the missing quality, safety and efficacy evidence.  This is a relatively new system introduced in 2018.  Hummmm …..Did they see COVID coming?

 

So, how could anybody say the COVID-19 “vaccines” were “safe” if they did not have the evidence of safety and the shots had no medium or long term safety record?  They could not.

 

Secondly, I always clearly understood that no drug was “safe”.  This is how I was trained.  “Safe” was not a word used without qualification in the pharmaceutical industry when I was a busy consultant.  Sometimes it was necessary to use the term “relatively safe”.   Indeed, it was illegal to say a drug was “safe” in an unqualified manner under the Therapeutic Goods (Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code) instrument (see exerpt below).

 

Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2015 (Cth) published 13.11.2015

 

“4.       General Principles

 

(2) An advertisement for therapeutic goods must not:

(i)          contain any claim, statement or implication that the goods are safe [bolding for emphasis] or that their use cannot cause harm or that they have no side-effects; or……”

 

Here is where it gets interesting……..

 

On 4 June 2021 a special permission apparently was made by John Skerritt (head of the TGA) pursuant to section 42DK of the TGA act and published on the TGA website and later apparently made by “Tracey Duffy – acting Deputy Secretary, Health Products Regulation Group, Dept  of Health. 

 

These “permissions” exempted the COVID-19 “vaccines” from the time-honoured prudent principle of not ever referring to a therapeutic (drug) as being “safe”.

 

Here is the astounding wording:

 

This prohibition on the use of the word “safe” is found in section 9 of that instrument:

“9 Safe and proper use 

(1) An advertisement about therapeutic goods must not contain any statement, pictorial representation or design that, expressly or by implication, represents the goods to be:

(a) safe, or without harm or side-effects; or 

(b) effective in all cases, or a guaranteed cure; or

(c) infallible, unfailing, magical or miraculous.”

Now, how they got around this prohibition is by relying on Part 2, section 6 of the same Instrument, which states:

“Part 2 Application of this Code

6 Advertisements to which this Code does not apply

(1) This Code does not apply to an advertisement that is:

(a) directed exclusively to a person mentioned in section 42AA of the Act; or

(b) part of, or otherwise comprises, a public health campaign; or

(c) made in accordance with the Therapeutic Goods (Restricted Representations—COVID-19 Vaccines) Permission*(these permissions date across 2021 to 2022 regarding COVID-19 vaccines)

Note: The Therapeutic Goods (Restricted Representations—COVID-19 Vaccines) Permission 2022 is published on the Department’s website at www.tga.gov.au.”

What this appears to mean is that any advertisement/representation ‘promoting the use or supply’ of COVID-19 vaccines was exempt from the TGA Advertising Code requirements in full, including prohibitions about whether the vaccines were “safe” or not pursuant to Part 3 - Section 9.  

 

It appears to me that the ‘Secretary’ of the Department of Health can ‘delegate’ some random individual at the Department of Health to make permissions, whenever they want, and permit violations of the TGA Advertising Code whenever they want – with no oversight, accountability, evidence or even review it seems. They probably can also make these permissions as part of a ‘public health campaign’, and not just from a specific COVID-19 vaccines permission.

 

In other words, the Advertising Code was able to be completely nullified whenever the government wanted with respect to COVID-19 vaccines.  

 

This is how they have been able to make the extraordinary claim that the COVID-19 vaccines are “safe” despite evidence to the contrary. 

 

 

 

 

I think a real big reason people bought the covid vax lie was because the knowledge they possessed dated to a time of cultured egg-yolk-based vaccines and plenty of people took those and were not taken ill (at least not in the short term) or died suddenly. So, why worry, right?

 

They were unaware that calling this new thing a vaccine was misleading. A serious felony in fact.

 

Nobody told them it was experimental (I believe it was way past the experimental phase and they knew exactly what the outcome would be) when it mattered most.

 

So, using an old vaccine handle to describe a radical new bioweapon played a big part in the acceptance levels. The advertisers were hiding this important element of the new injections.

 

Life insurers also held back this information until the bereaved made claims for loss of life.

 

They were then told it was an experimental drug and under the contractual rules as they apply to clinical trials, disqualified them from benefits. Just picture the shock of news like that.

 

They were basically saying, "sorry, we forgot to tell you that your policy would be voided if you complied with the mandate."

 

The mandates were voiding life insurance policy contracts recklessly, when they would be needed most. The main provider passes by vax and no insurance money backup...destitution follows. 

 

How many were turned away like this?

 

 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is one of the greatest requirements of a mass awakening?

 

I think slowing down your life and pondering and reflecting deeper than the hectic daily work schedules permit, affords one the opportunity to see things unseen before and sort those things out. 

 

In this respect I view the lockdowns as a serious mistake for the covid architects. Removing the daily grind could end up being the biggest mistake they made with covid.

 

Except perhaps where the hectic work schedule was transplanted into the home. Then the pace was still rather intense, no time for personal reflections except superficial reflections.

 

People like to say that it was the easy money that made youth reluctant to go back to work but I think the time they took to think during lockdown created a rebellious mindset. The youth I know want to earn money not take free handouts. They crave stability and something to believe in.

 

Youth reflected on the futility of undertaking great societal enterprises and investments in a dying system. When some shadowy figures can shut everything down like that.

 

The chronic and alarming runaway inflation that followed covid confirmed in the mind of those youth that something other in their lives was needed, that the old system was being torn apart. Values that needed to be re-evaluated.

 

How career/enterprise ambitious can one be in societal meltdown 

 

 

Edited by Avoiceinthecrowd
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...