Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

Just now, SimonTV said:

Let us face the reality they poisoned the blood of billions of people. 

Indeed, and when you see even really fit people dying suddenly and young as in the case of all the sportspeople you know how lethal these injections are. You could be forgiven for thinking these toxic kill shots were taking the vulnerable and those with underlying issues first, but then you hear all these extremely fit people dying too and you realize it is not discriminating. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

Indeed, and when you see even really fit people dying suddenly and young as in the case of all the sportspeople you know how lethal these injections are. You could be forgiven for thinking these toxic kill shots were taking the vulnerable and those with underlying issues first, but then you hear all these extremely fit people dying too and you realize it is not discriminating. 

 

The athletes are edge cases in the grand scheme of things. The first to show up as potentially problematic. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

Indeed, and when you see even really fit people dying suddenly and young as in the case of all the sportspeople you know how lethal these injections are. You could be forgiven for thinking these toxic kill shots were taking the vulnerable and those with underlying issues first, but then you hear all these extremely fit people dying too and you realize it is not discriminating. 

 

It's all that physical exercise. Ironically, we are told it's good for us.  🙄🙄

Edited by Nip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

Either way I doubt our government is even aware of a fart in a barn 

 

I'd suggest they are aware and know but don't wanna mention it; just like the war.

 

 

Edited by Nip
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

The athletes are edge cases in the grand scheme of things. The first to show up as potentially problematic. 

 

Who will be next up ?  Pilots ? Celebrities ? Singers ? oh, wait ........

Edited by Nip
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SimonTV said:

it is fucking dumb 

 

How we put up with this for so long 

 

you know it is not all bad there is still a lot people that are aware of this ridiculous shit 

It is getting harder and harder for them to ignore now. At some point the dam will finally burst and they will have to talk about this in the media and then big G will have to respond. They probably have planned for this though and have a narrative already planned. The sheer numbers now are hard to ignore and even the sleeping are starting to mumble in their sleep 'something is wrong'. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

It is getting harder and harder for them to ignore now. At some point the dam will finally burst and they will have to talk about this in the media and then big G will have to respond. They probably have planned for this though and have a narrative already planned. The sheer numbers now are hard to ignore and even the sleeping are starting to mumble in their sleep 'something is wrong'. 

 

If I am not mistaken, they have already begun putting it (strokes, heart issues, clots, cancers) down to diet and types of anxiety. Perhaps they'll start pushing that alot more as time goes on. There's always electromagnetism from tech equipment (mobile phones for brain cancers) to be used, of course. And then there's climate change, mental health and even convid still.

 

I'm sure they'll think of other 'invisible'  things (things hard or impossible to disprove as causes) just as long as the jabs are kept out of any discussion

Edited by Nip
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Nip said:

 

If I am not mistaken, they have already begun putting it (strokes, heart issues, clots, cancers) down to diet and types of anxiety. Perhaps they'll start pushing that alot more as time goes on. There's always electromagnetism from tech equipment (mobile phones for brain cancers) to be used, of course. And then there's climate change, mental health and even convid still.

 

I'm sure they'll think of other 'invisible'  things (things hard or impossible to disprove) just as long as the jabs are kept out of any discussion

Yeah they have their 'cover stories' for sure. But, I think this is level 2 cover stories (level 1 being to completely ignore it). The fact they moved to level 2 so quickly is a good sign as this was at least 12 months ago, perhaps longer. But yet still, people are starting to wonder. Wasn't there a poll somewhere higher up the thread of people in the USA who around 50% believe that they have lost someone or know someone who is ill and they suspect the jabs had a role? Level 3 will be to move into drip release that 'some people may have had adverse reactions', then maybe even admit certain batches were lethal. Hopefully we get to level 5 or more that will admit these jabs were absolutely lethal. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

Yeah they have their 'cover stories' for sure. But, I think this is level 2 cover stories (level 1 being to completely ignore it). The fact they moved to level 2 so quickly is a good sign as this was at least 12 months ago, perhaps longer. But yet still, people are starting to wonder. Wasn't there a poll somewhere higher up the thread of people in the USA who around 50% believe that they have lost someone or know someone who is ill and they suspect the jabs had a role? Level 3 will be to move into drip release that 'some people may have had adverse reactions', then maybe even admit certain batches were lethal. Hopefully we get to level 5 or more that will admit these jabs were absolutely lethal. 

 

As was whispered to Bridgen by another prominent MP, "You'll probably be proven right in 20 years time"; and that will be when the real culprits are well gone or too frail to prosecute which itself anyway would take several years to reach a final decision with all the appeals available to them. And then there is "plausible deniability" that they can all use as a defence.

 

Sounds depressing, does it not.

 

I dearly hope you are right, though.

 

Fuck them all !

 

And I'm still not angry

Edited by Nip
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Nip said:

 

As was whispered to Bridgen by another prominent MP, "You'll probably be proven right in 20 years time"; and that will be when the real culprits are well gone or too frail to prosecute which itself anyway would take several years to reach a final decision with all the appeals available to them. And then there is "plausible deniability" that they can all use as a defence.

 

Sounds depressing, does it not.

 

I dearly hope you are right, though.

 

Fuck them all !

 

And I'm still not angry

In twenty years time, most of the survivors of this forum will be sitting in a bunker in a far off forest, listening to a wind up radio for news on how the assimilation of humanity by AI is progressing. Our kids will be off trapping deer and pheasant, bringing back firewood and collecting water from the secret wells and springs.

Our wives will be tending to the secret forest allotments we established, occasionally ducking under infra red/heat signature blocking camo hides as the Transhuman’s AI drones hover past, looking for escaped dissidents. They send out cloned AI infected human hybrids to search and infiltrate our communities, but we know how to spot them, and we dispatch these fallen creatures on site, piling their husks on the outskirts of the nearest smart city during the night, lighting the bonfire at dawn, so the modified normies can gaze on the destruction of their masters handiwork, wondering how a normal human existence could feel whilst they sip their morning GM soy coffee replacement 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

In twenty years time, most of the survivors of this forum will be sitting in a bunker in a far off forest, listening to a wind up radio for news on how the assimilation of humanity by AI is progressing. Our kids will be off trapping deer and pheasant, bringing back firewood and collecting water from the secret wells and springs.

Our wives will be tending to the secret forest allotments we established, occasionally ducking under infra red/heat signature blocking camo hides as the Transhuman’s AI drones hover past, looking for escaped dissidents. They send out cloned AI infected human hybrids to search and infiltrate our communities, but we know how to spot them, and we dispatch these fallen creatures on site, piling their husks on the outskirts of the nearest smart city during the night, lighting the bonfire at dawn, so the modified normies can gaze on the destruction of their masters handiwork, wondering how a normal human existence could feel whilst they sip their morning GM soy coffee replacement 

 

Can't wait for chapter 2

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nip said:

 

As was whispered to Bridgen by another prominent MP, "You'll probably be proven right in 20 years time"; and that will be when the real culprits are well gone or too frail to prosecute which itself anyway would take several years to reach a final decision with all the appeals available to them. And then there is "plausible deniability" that they can all use as a defence.

 

Sounds depressing, does it not.

 

I dearly hope you are right, though.

 

Fuck them all !

 

And I'm still not angry

Yep, that is always their plan for the truth to come out long after the energy of it has subsided so that people say 'it is the past, there is nothing we can do now' which is kind of what happened with 911. That is why keeping the pressure on is so important I suppose; there likely are many levels between the harsh truth and where current 'reality' is. Right now they are admitting people are dying in numbers but coming up with all sorts of explanations for them, that are obviously absurd. But with pressure, they will have to release more truth, the game is to expose it as quickly as possible so that they keep having to move in to the next level of 'slow release'. 

 

The quicker this is done, the better and the less likely they can delay it like they did with 911. Remember the internet was not what it is now back in 2001. If we say hypothetically there are 10 levels with 'absurd rationale's but admitting deaths' is level 10, then we need to keep making them move to the next level of slow release, to 'creating a patsy like Fauci', or to a big pharma conspiracy, to next level which is full disclosure of the grand conspiracy. The greater the pressure, the quicker the release and moving to the next level. The 'elite's' goal is to draw it out to as you say, make it lose its power over a long period of time. The more we create pressure, the less they can do this and the more they will be forced to move to next level (excuse) and eventually there will be no more levels other than the reality. If we can do this at speed, they have nowhere to go. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/tragedy-angel-stoke-trent-schoolgirl-9099892?fbclid=IwAR3bW7Azg6A3pTXZNrqHORwOSSf8hEWBLKtajpa2nLrG49icK0KddHR1sn8

 

Quote

Tragedy as 'angel' Stoke-on-Trent schoolgirl, 14, dies suddenly

Quote

Staffordshire Police have confirmed her death is not being treated as suspicious

Surely any death of a 14 year old is suspicious.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

It is getting harder and harder for them to ignore now. At some point the dam will finally burst and they will have to talk about this in the media and then big G will have to respond. They probably have planned for this though and have a narrative already planned. The sheer numbers now are hard to ignore and even the sleeping are starting to mumble in their sleep 'something is wrong'. 


In my travels I heard a good one on radio the other day, they were talking about this big pig farm and for the visitors going in the barn or close to pigs they’d have to wear masks and gloves and that is to protect THE PIGS. 😳

 

It’s just the new normal, no worries folks…

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wideawake said:


In my travels I heard a good one on radio the other day, they were talking about this big pig farm and for the visitors going in the barn or close to pigs they’d have to wear masks and gloves and that is to protect THE PIGS. 😳

 

It’s just the new normal, no worries folks…

 

Yep, WE are the disease !

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Not Thoth said:

 

Nah, 14 year olds dying suddenly have always been happening. It's just that it gets much more media attention nowadays what with social media and the likes  🙄

Edited by Nip
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is vaccine shedding possible? Over 1,000 reports say it’s real and it’s happening

BY RHODA WILSON ON FEBRUARY 17, 2024  ( 1 COMMENT )
 

An analysis of over 1,000 reports of covid vaccine shedding reveals that the most common symptoms, by far, are gynaecological.

Outside of menstrual abnormalities, the most commonly reported symptoms include headaches, tinnitus, nosebleeds, bruising, dizziness, skin rashes and reactivation of latent conditions such as shingles.

The analysis also revealed that there are varying degrees of susceptibility to the effects of vaccine-shedding, different routes of exposure, different timings of the onset of symptoms after exposure and that young and healthy people tend to shed more frequently than the elderly.

 
 

In early 2022, A Midwestern Doctor (“AMD”) had personally come across a few compelling cases of menstrual-related vaccine-shedding injuries which were very difficult to ascribe to anything else.  At the time the idea of vaccine shedding seemed to be a “radical idea.”

The world has changed a lot since that time, AMD wrote. “I believe the reality of ‘shedding injuries’ now has a similar degree of acceptance to what covid-19 vaccine injuries had two years ago.”

Adding, “I regret that it’s taken this long to get to this point and I feel really bad for the people who are suffering from this (e.g., a few of my patients), as it’s almost inevitable healthcare professionals will assume they are crazy and gaslight them about shedding.”

Covid vaccine shedding – becoming ill from vaccinated people – represents the one way the unvaccinated are also at risk from “vaccines” and hence still need to be directly concerned about them.

Speaking about vaccine shedding can be difficult for scientists and medical professionals because the topic runs the risk of causing division within the “freedom movement.”  Resentful unvaccinated members of the public who have been subjected to vitriol can easily turn to using cutting comparisons such as “pure blood” versus “the vaccinated.”   Another reason that makes vaccine shedding difficult to openly discuss is the risk of causing fear.

“The vaccines were marketed on the basis of division (e.g., by encouraging immense discrimination against the unvaccinated), and many unvaccinated [people] thus understandably hold a lot of resentment for how the vaccinated treated them. We do not want to perpetuate anything similar (e.g., discrimination in the other direction),” AMD said. “Likewise, we don’t want to create any more unnecessary fear – which is an inevitable consequence of opening up a conversation about shedding.”

AMD has been collecting vaccine-shedding experiences noted by readers under a Substack article HERE.  At the time of writing, AMD had collected over 1,000 vaccine-shedding stories.

“Enough data has been compiled for it to constitute evidence of a very real phenomenon,” AMD argued. Adding, “The information we’ve collected [ ] is on relatively solid ground (e.g., most of the claims have a source) – and which I believe will be helpful to many of the readers.”

Having looked into vaccine shedding extensively, AMD is relatively sure of the following:

  1. Shedding is very real.
  2. People’s sensitivity to it greatly varies.
  3. Most of the people who are highly sensitive to shedding have already figured it out, so if you do not already believe it is an issue for you, you probably don’t need to worry about it.
  4. There is still no agreed upon mechanism to explain why it happens.

Is Shedding Possible?

Typically, shedding occurs (e.g., from a live viral vaccine like MMR or polio) because a person “sheds” a self-replicating form of the disease.

But AMD was seeing numerous clear-cut cases of shedding occurring from mRNA “vaccines” which suggested, “I was missing a huge piece of the puzzle.”

AMD could also not help but notice that Pfizer’s protocol for testing their vaccine highlighted caution of shedding to pregnant women and breastfeeding women.

This suggested either that Pfizer knew shedding was a real problem, or that they were following the existing standards – the FDA stipulates that gene therapies need to be evaluated for shedding before being given to humans (and subsequently tested for shedding in humans). For context, both the FDA and the EMA classify the mRNA vaccines as a gene therapy.

It should be noted that the prescribing information for the first approved gene therapy, an eye medicine called Luxturna (which works like the J&J vaccine), specifies care must be taken to avoid anyone else coming in contact with the tears of the person using Luxturna to prevent unintended shedding of the product.

A similar gene therapy, Roctavian was also found to shed (e.g., into semen) and gene therapy Zolgensma was also found to shed for a month.

However, curiously, the package inserts for Pfizer’s covid vaccine do not mention shedding despite the fact it has long since been proven.  Likewise, J&J’s vaccine, which is very similar to the currently approved viral gene therapies, does not mention shedding in its inserts either.

AMD suspects Pfizer had concerning data on the issue of shedding but chose not to disclose it so that it could be claimed there was “no evidence” of shedding.

The strongest proof for covid vaccine shedding comes from the observations of patients by Drs. Pierre Kory and Scott Marsland at their clinical practice which is dedicated to treating vaccine injuries.

The two doctors have observed more than twenty patients develop similar symptoms after a shedding exposure, particularly after a “strong” shedding exposure. The symptoms resemble what is seen in other spike protein pathologies (e.g., long covid or mRNA vaccine injury) which often respond to the same treatments used for treating other spike protein pathologies (e.g., ivermectin which binds the spike protein).

Drs. Kory and Marsland have also noticed that many patients will repeatedly have shedding symptoms emerge after the same exposure (e.g., always feeling ill when a vaccinated husband returns from a long trip away, when going to church each week, when singing with their choir, or when taking a crowded route to work). And found that eliminating the shedder from the patient’s life or treating the (asymptomatic) shedder with a vaccine injury protocol significantly helps their patient get well.

Further reading: “Shedding” of Covid mRNA Vaccine Components and Products from The Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated – Part 1, Dr. Pierre Kory, 1 November 2023

AMD also noted that a 2023 peer-reviewed study found unvaccinated people who were around covid vaccinated people developed an immune response to the spike protein. “This demonstrates that something is indeed being transferred from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated (e.g., the spike protein),” AMD said.

Further reading:

Susceptibility to Exposure

Virus vector vaccines – e.g., J&J, AstraZeneca, Sputnik or Sinovac – operate under different principles to mRNA “vaccines.”  To keep the article as short as possible, AMD focused on mRNA “vaccines” and did not venture to discuss exposure to those injected with virus vector vaccines.

Sensitivity to shedding varies immensely. In general, there seem to be three categories of people who are susceptible to shedding:

  1. Sensitive patients tend to be the most susceptible to shedding.  These patients tend to be highly sensitive to toxins in their environment, be very empathetic and perceptive of subtle qualities others do not notice, have an ectomorph or sattvicconstitution, and frequently have ligamentous laxity.
  2. Patients who have been sensitised to the spike protein due to a previous vaccine injury or having long covid. These patients in turn frequently find their symptoms worsen when they are around vaccinated people and many have reported that their sensitivity to shedding increases with time.
  3. People who cannot effectively produce antibodies to the spike protein. Their ability to develop a neutralising antibody for the spike protein was impaired, leading to a large amount of free spike protein circulating in their blood.  Because of this, the spike protein being produced in their body can create havoc throughout and those patients become symptomatic after being exposed to a much lower concentration of the spike protein.

Characteristics of Shedders

There are two forms of shedding: primary (where someone gets ill from being around a vaccinated person) and secondary (where someone gets ill from being around an unvaccinated person who was recently around vaccinated people). Primary shedding is much more common.

The most common observation with shedders is that they are dramatically more likely to shed soon after vaccination.  Depending on who you ask, this window ranges from three days to four weeks.  However, more, sensitive patients find they are affected by a shedder indefinitely and strongly disagree with a 2- to 4-week cutoff.

It has also been observed that young and healthy people tend to shed more frequently; children shed the most and the elderly shed the least.

Quite a few people have noticed that shedding events (in the same location) are the most frequent and severe immediately following a new booster rollout, after which they gradually diminish until the next booster campaign.

Repeatedly boosting appears to worsen shedding for three reasons:

  1. Booster injections cause patients to resume having high spike protein levels in their body as typically after vaccination or boosting, there is a spike and then decline of spike protein which persists at a low level for months – no study has yet assessed if it lasts for years.
  2. Successive boosting appears to increase the degree of shedding which occurs when compared to the previous injections the patient experienced.
  3. Quite a few holistic healers have shared that they believe the most recent boosters are more potent and hence cause greater shedding than the earlier ones; which might be explained by the boosters now containing multiple strains of mRNA to cover the new variants.

Routes of Exposure

There appear to be three possible routes of exposure:

  1. General proximity to the vaccinated person. Many have said they find shedding to be greatly mitigated when outdoors.
  2. Through skin-to-skin contact. This is thought to be due to the spike protein being “shed” in the sweat. People AMD trusts have stated spike is excreted in the sweat. However, when AMD tried to find information relating to it, he/she could only locate research which suggested that it was excreted through sweat.
  3. There is also some evidence shedding occurs in other secretions, e.g., breast milk and saliva.

Timing of Exposure

There seem to be three common periods after exposure that people experience symptoms of vaccine shedding:

  1. Immediate.
  2. 6 to 24-hour delay.
  3. Long term delay.  This is often seen in the patients who have the most severe complications from vaccine shedding.

In each of these cases, patients will typically recover after a few days but many patients reported a permanent (partial or debilitating) illness after the shedding exposure.

Symptoms of Exposure

Many of the symptoms of shedding appear to match what is seen in both long covid and vaccine injuries suggesting this is a spike protein-mediated disease.  By far the most commonly reported symptoms are gynaecological. Of these, menstrual abnormalities are by far the most common.

In some cases, highly unusual menstrual abnormalities occur, e.g., profuse bleeding which sometimes is voluminous enough anaemia or massive clots they’ve never seen before being passed.  Many post-menopausal women have reported that shedding caused them to either bleed or develop severe menstrual cramps.

Decidual cast shedding is a very rare condition. For example, one paper which looked into this found that before the vaccines, less than 40 cases of it had been reported in medical journals across the world – making the condition rare enough that it is impossible to estimate how frequent it is. Yet, in a 2021 survey to which 6,049 vaccinated and unvaccinated women responded, 292 (4.83% of respondents) reported a decidual cast shedding event, of whom 277 had never been vaccinated.  Of those 277, most reported having been around vaccinated people.

Further reading: Unprecedented Number of Women Experience Rare Gynaecological Event, The Exposé, 13 May 2022

Outside of menstrual abnormalities, the most commonly reported symptoms are:

  • Headaches, which are often described as migraines.
  • Tinnitus.
  • Nosebleeds. These are often profuse, frequent throughout the day and immediately following exposure to a vaccinated person.
  • Painless and inexplicable bruising. Sometimes many tiny bruises spontaneously emerge but more frequently large painless bruises are observed.
  • Dizziness, which in many cases occurs immediately after physical intimacy with a vaccinated partner.
  • Mental cloudiness and a general feeling of being unwell (e.g., how you feel before the flu).
  • Reactivation of latent conditions.  In the same way that the covid vaccines cause immune suppression and reactivate latent infections such as Lyme or EBV, lighter versions of latent reactivations have also been seen after shedding events.  The most commonly reported reactivation after a shedding exposure is shingles.
  • Skin rashes. Most frequently these resemble hives, although a few people also reported psoriasis, shingles-like rashes and areas that felt like a rash but not were visible.

Further reading: Covid Vaccine-Associated Tinnitus Needs to be Studied, The Exposé, 1 April 2022

Some of the less frequent symptoms AMD sees being repeatedly reported, which are also frequently seen after covid vaccination, include:

  • Atrial Fibrillation.  Many have also reported heart palpitations or premature ventricular contractions (“PVCs”).
  • Muscle pain. This seemed to be a mix of the typical aches felt at the onset of flu-like symptoms, severe or chronic cramps and tightening or pain in areas (e.g., the calves), in places where muscle pain was frequently reported after mRNA vaccination (e.g., this was one of the most common side effects reported by Pfizer in their original clinical trial).
  • Seizures.
  • Insomnia.
  • Hair loss.
  • Swollen lymph nodes.
  • Severe abdominal pain.
  • Sinus pressure or a copious nasal discharge.
  • Eye issues such as micro clots to the eyes.

Some of the rare symptoms shared by AMD’s readers included:

  • Multiple signs of a stroke.
  • Severe blood clots.
  • Severe heart injuries in children.
  • Polymyalgia Rheumatica, a debilitating autoimmune disease repeatedly seen after covid vaccination.
  • One case of progressively worsening seizures which led to a fatal seizure after a Thanksgiving dinner with vaccinated family members.
  • One case of cancer.
  • A shaking, buzzing, or feeling as though fireworks were going off inside the body.
  • One case of psychiatric complications.

https://expose-news.com/2024/02/17/over-1000-reports-say-shedding-is-real-and-happening/

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

Like him or loathe him, Campbell does a god job of interviewing Richard Hirschman here taking any ambiguity away;

 

 

 

The dot-joining including the time frames is really good to hear. It's pretty obvious that they are blaming, and subtley at that,  the deaths on the jabs without actually coming out and saying it. I think they are trying to avoid getting the video taken down. Pretty clever. Good and very telling interview

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

It is getting harder and harder for them to ignore now. At some point the dam will finally burst and they will have to talk about this in the media and then big G will have to respond. They probably have planned for this though and have a narrative already planned. The sheer numbers now are hard to ignore and even the sleeping are starting to mumble in their sleep 'something is wrong'. 

Myself and others speculated when the jabs went public that the next chapter was written before the end of 2019. 

 

Russians, dirty bombs or what has become known as Disease X (maybe all three) will cover for gross excess deaths. 

 

They are on the verge of not being able to keep a lid on all the suddenlies, unexpectedlies and turbo cancers. When the deaths are exponential (quite probably sometime over the next two to three years) then we'll see carnage in the name of something else. 

 

Twenty million plus over such a short period of time will need a seriously big and nasty covering. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...