Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, pete675 said:

Could make a film about this called 'Revenge of the Nerd'.

 

All these 'Jocks' - footballers and athletes - start keeling over after having the Nerd's recommended medication. 

 

I think it is clear now that over-exertion and too much physical exercise is one cause of these sudden and unexpected fatalities. Rappers too seem to be victims too.

 

Maybe being a couch potato is not so bad for you after all

Edited by Nip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/17/2023 at 11:43 AM, Nip said:

 

Surprised  ....... not. Watch premiums skyrocket. Nice if you can get away with it.

6 out of 10 people on US MEDICAID have their medication denied now by way of "paperwork errors" and other minor issues.

Generally speaking, all.kinds of insurance are scams. They rarely pay out anything like what you out in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even AI has Partygate sussed ...

User

 
'write a short poem about government officials partying during a supposed deadly pandemic'
 
 
ChatGPT

 

In times of crisis, when fear runs deep,
A tale unfolds where leaders sleep.
Amidst a pandemic's deadly spread,
Government officials dance instead.

They gather in halls of opulence,
With laughter and revelry, no recompense.
Ignoring the suffering, the pain and loss,
They indulge in merriment, no matter the cost.

While people suffer, lives torn apart,
They dance and feast with reckless heart.
Their masks forgotten, their duties forsaken,
In the haze of indulgence, the truth is shaken.

But truth, like whispers, cannot be contained,
And the people rise, their voices unchained.
For in the darkness, hope remains,
A flame ignited by shared disdain.

The world watches, their eyes awake,
To those who lead for their own sake.
The dance will end, the revelry fade,
As accountability emerges, a price is paid.

For power lies in the hands of the just,
And betrayal ignites the fire of trust.
So let this poem serve as a reminder true,
That leaders are meant to serve, not to pursue

Self-interests and pleasures, while others grieve,
For in unity and compassion, we shall achieve,
A world where officials prioritize our care,
And the spirit of humanity, we all bear.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JABBED?

MMA fighter and father Cris Lencioni, 28, is in intensive care after suffering a cardiac arrest during training on June 8

  • Cris Lencioni was training at a gym when he collapsed after a cardiac arrest 
  • His fellow fighters called 9-1-1 and he was transported to the hospital 
  • DailyMail.com provides all the latest international sports news 

By Jake Fenner For Dailymail.Com

Published: 00:33 BST, 20 June 2023 | Updated: 06:29 BST, 20 June 2023

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/mma/article-12212315/MMA-fighter-father-Cris-Lencioni-28-ICU-suffering-cardiac-arrest-June-8.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The newspapers are reporting Cody Longo as having died of alcohol abuse but as the following presentation by Dr John campbell shows the cause of the excess deaths are mainly heart problems and LIVER problems so could his liver have actually been destroyed by the spike proteins from the covid jab? Are we going to now see a lot of jabbed people being said to have died of 'alcohol abuse' because their livers have packed in?

Days Of Our Lives actor Cody Longo's official cause of death revealed by coroner... after the soap star, 34, was found dead in Texas four months ago

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-12210997/Days-Lives-actor-Cody-Longo-died-result-alcohol-abuse-according-coroners-report.html

Young excess deaths

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amnesty for Covid Fines.

It would be better to pardon and return the 120,000 Covid fines than fine yet more partygoers.

20 Jun 2023
 
 
eb59e599-bd35-4661-8ace-3c720af4c382_1490x1134.jpg.1feca30f2b9cb25de7c8c673166ecc06.jpg

 

On the 23rd March 2020, Boris Johnson announced to the nation in a severe, wartime-style address that we must stay at home and that the police would have powers to enforce the rules. The speech was littered with threats of power, penalty, danger, death.

 

Nobody was in any doubt that we were not supposed to go to parties.

 

0ae4c557-e612-4b48-b21b-cfb388f288bb_3424x1928.webp.a36c76b79ebf452c2ab33ac5f14c7e7e.webp

 

People are understandably angry about the gross hypocrisy on display at the ‘Jingle and Mingle’ Christmas party at Conservative HQ, in the latest episode of the ‘Partygate’ scandal. There are two points I think are more important in the bigger picture.

 
bed8694c-13b7-4434-852e-ab1e12543fef_1358x1092_webp.png.faaa1faa7c0c45c55dda0f9ddb343d18.png
 

The first point is what it means that people ‘in the know’ were breaking the rules.

 

Let us quickly set aside the idea that they thought they were operating within the rules. The rules did change fast and they were confusing, but socialising indoors was not allowed. We knew it. The police knew it. The 120,000 Covid Fixed Penalty Notices attest to it.

 

Were the powers proportionate? Well, that’s something that lawyers, scientists, ethicists and everyone who had to live under the damn rules has been pondering. I say no. I always said no. Lord Sumption said no, so I think I am in very good company.

 

And it turns out that those in government did not act as though the rules were proportionate because they did not obey them. They did not seem to feel that their lives were in mortal danger. You might say they had done a reasonable job of assessing their own risk.

 

Long before lockdown, it was understood that Covid was nasty and dangerous but that the risk was highly related to age, obesity and other clinical factors. A WHO report as early as mid-February 2020 set this out. There were still unknowns but the risk factors were understood earlier than most people like to think.

 

These partygoers were not in fear of their lives, nor was Boris Johnson and nor was Professor Neil Ferguson, who earnt himself the moniker ‘Professor Pantsdown’ for travelling across London for illicit nookie. Despite being the one who predicted that hundreds of thousands of people could die, he was content to ‘risk’ the lives of two families by travelling to meet his extra-marital lover. Why? We can assume he understood the risk. That is the key to this story.

 

306ce830-2d94-419f-b114-76124d9936cf_1324x1262_webp.png.fd90b8734094b42f4ceb0a3c39c83e47.png

 

 

The risk was exaggerated and fear was amplified to induce us to follow the draconian, cruel and un-evidenced rules which had devastating consequences for peoples lives, mental health, education and the economy.

 

That doesn’t mean it was right that the partygoers broke the rules and tried to get away with it. People are right to be angry about the hypocrisy and double standards.

 

Many of us didn’t have parties for our children. My sons 16th birthday was attended by no one outside of our little household during that interminably grim third lockdown. Wedding receptions were cancelled. Hell, weddings were cancelled! Funerals were miserly affairs. Fathers weren’t at births. The casualties go on. So to see people tipsy and twirling around does stick in the craw.

 

It’s easy to push for justice, retribution and punishment when you are angry. But, if you’re angry about people dancing at parties and getting away with it, then aren’t you also angry that two students were fined £10000 each for organising a snowball fight in Leeds in January 2021? People were fined for cups of tea with neighbours, going for walks and sitting on benches. They were fined for perfectly normal human behaviour. It was disproportionate.

 

9953ae8b-d278-461d-b7f7-36524de69bfa_1060x1674_webp(1).png.9cc88d333738db0132e80fc91d9e024a.png

 

 

The fine for 'recklessly' leaving self-isolation was £4,000. That would have been a staggering 16-week salary for someone in the bottom fifth of earnings. These were the worst fines this country has known since the Dark Ages.

 

A report by the National Police Chief’s Council found that compared to the population, fines were more likely to be issued to men, to those aged 18-24, to those from ethnic minority backgrounds, and to those living in areas with higher levels of deprivation. Three quarters of FPNs were issued to white people but, proportionately, people from ethnic minorities were 2.3 times more likely than white people to receive an FPN in England and 2.8 times more likely in Wales.

 

No sane, just or compassionate society should tolerate the unfairness.

 

Which brings me to my second point: rather than seek retribution for revellers what about amnesty for all Covid lockdown rule breakers? The cases still in the courts could be cancelled. Fines could be returned. Didn’t everyone suffer enough during that terrible time?

 

After the Second World War, Winston Churchill resolved to have a ‘bonfire of state controls’ and ID cards were scrapped. We have an opportunity to consider the sort of society we want. We do not want to be left altered for the worse with biometric monitoring and vaccine passes for travel. Equally, do we want to be the kind of country that punishes people for going to parties?

 

We need a bonfire of cruelties and injustice, and pardons for all.

 

 

 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Macnamara said:

JABBED?

MMA fighter and father Cris Lencioni, 28, is in intensive care after suffering a cardiac arrest during training on June 8

  • Cris Lencioni was training at a gym when he collapsed after a cardiac arrest 
  • His fellow fighters called 9-1-1 and he was transported to the hospital 
  • DailyMail.com provides all the latest international sports news 

By Jake Fenner For Dailymail.Com

Published: 00:33 BST, 20 June 2023 | Updated: 06:29 BST, 20 June 2023

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/mma/article-12212315/MMA-fighter-father-Cris-Lencioni-28-ICU-suffering-cardiac-arrest-June-8.html

 

More athletes dropping dead. No surprise anymore. The new normal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webtrekker said:

Amnesty for Covid Fines.

It would be better to pardon and return the 120,000 Covid fines than fine yet more partygoers.

20 Jun 2023
 
 
eb59e599-bd35-4661-8ace-3c720af4c382_1490x1134.jpg.1feca30f2b9cb25de7c8c673166ecc06.jpg

 

On the 23rd March 2020, Boris Johnson announced to the nation in a severe, wartime-style address that we must stay at home and that the police would have powers to enforce the rules. The speech was littered with threats of power, penalty, danger, death.

 

Nobody was in any doubt that we were not supposed to go to parties.

 

0ae4c557-e612-4b48-b21b-cfb388f288bb_3424x1928.webp.a36c76b79ebf452c2ab33ac5f14c7e7e.webp

 

People are understandably angry about the gross hypocrisy on display at the ‘Jingle and Mingle’ Christmas party at Conservative HQ, in the latest episode of the ‘Partygate’ scandal. There are two points I think are more important in the bigger picture.

 
bed8694c-13b7-4434-852e-ab1e12543fef_1358x1092_webp.png.faaa1faa7c0c45c55dda0f9ddb343d18.png
 

The first point is what it means that people ‘in the know’ were breaking the rules.

 

Let us quickly set aside the idea that they thought they were operating within the rules. The rules did change fast and they were confusing, but socialising indoors was not allowed. We knew it. The police knew it. The 120,000 Covid Fixed Penalty Notices attest to it.

 

Were the powers proportionate? Well, that’s something that lawyers, scientists, ethicists and everyone who had to live under the damn rules has been pondering. I say no. I always said no. Lord Sumption said no, so I think I am in very good company.

 

And it turns out that those in government did not act as though the rules were proportionate because they did not obey them. They did not seem to feel that their lives were in mortal danger. You might say they had done a reasonable job of assessing their own risk.

 

Long before lockdown, it was understood that Covid was nasty and dangerous but that the risk was highly related to age, obesity and other clinical factors. A WHO report as early as mid-February 2020 set this out. There were still unknowns but the risk factors were understood earlier than most people like to think.

 

These partygoers were not in fear of their lives, nor was Boris Johnson and nor was Professor Neil Ferguson, who earnt himself the moniker ‘Professor Pantsdown’ for travelling across London for illicit nookie. Despite being the one who predicted that hundreds of thousands of people could die, he was content to ‘risk’ the lives of two families by travelling to meet his extra-marital lover. Why? We can assume he understood the risk. That is the key to this story.

 

306ce830-2d94-419f-b114-76124d9936cf_1324x1262_webp.png.fd90b8734094b42f4ceb0a3c39c83e47.png

 

 

The risk was exaggerated and fear was amplified to induce us to follow the draconian, cruel and un-evidenced rules which had devastating consequences for peoples lives, mental health, education and the economy.

 

That doesn’t mean it was right that the partygoers broke the rules and tried to get away with it. People are right to be angry about the hypocrisy and double standards.

 

Many of us didn’t have parties for our children. My sons 16th birthday was attended by no one outside of our little household during that interminably grim third lockdown. Wedding receptions were cancelled. Hell, weddings were cancelled! Funerals were miserly affairs. Fathers weren’t at births. The casualties go on. So to see people tipsy and twirling around does stick in the craw.

 

It’s easy to push for justice, retribution and punishment when you are angry. But, if you’re angry about people dancing at parties and getting away with it, then aren’t you also angry that two students were fined £10000 each for organising a snowball fight in Leeds in January 2021? People were fined for cups of tea with neighbours, going for walks and sitting on benches. They were fined for perfectly normal human behaviour. It was disproportionate.

 

9953ae8b-d278-461d-b7f7-36524de69bfa_1060x1674_webp(1).png.9cc88d333738db0132e80fc91d9e024a.png

 

 

The fine for 'recklessly' leaving self-isolation was £4,000. That would have been a staggering 16-week salary for someone in the bottom fifth of earnings. These were the worst fines this country has known since the Dark Ages.

 

A report by the National Police Chief’s Council found that compared to the population, fines were more likely to be issued to men, to those aged 18-24, to those from ethnic minority backgrounds, and to those living in areas with higher levels of deprivation. Three quarters of FPNs were issued to white people but, proportionately, people from ethnic minorities were 2.3 times more likely than white people to receive an FPN in England and 2.8 times more likely in Wales.

 

No sane, just or compassionate society should tolerate the unfairness.

 

Which brings me to my second point: rather than seek retribution for revellers what about amnesty for all Covid lockdown rule breakers? The cases still in the courts could be cancelled. Fines could be returned. Didn’t everyone suffer enough during that terrible time?

 

After the Second World War, Winston Churchill resolved to have a ‘bonfire of state controls’ and ID cards were scrapped. We have an opportunity to consider the sort of society we want. We do not want to be left altered for the worse with biometric monitoring and vaccine passes for travel. Equally, do we want to be the kind of country that punishes people for going to parties?

 

We need a bonfire of cruelties and injustice, and pardons for all.

 

 

 

 

In short, there was no covid at all. It was all bollox. They knew it, we knew it; everyone else should have known it. Duped big time. No surprise if millions of people will never trust the government and politicians ever again; if they even had

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webtrekker said:

Amnesty for Covid Fines.

It would be better to pardon and return the 120,000 Covid fines than fine yet more partygoers.

20 Jun 2023
 
 
eb59e599-bd35-4661-8ace-3c720af4c382_1490x1134.jpg.1feca30f2b9cb25de7c8c673166ecc06.jpg

 

On the 23rd March 2020, Boris Johnson announced to the nation in a severe, wartime-style address that we must stay at home and that the police would have powers to enforce the rules. The speech was littered with threats of power, penalty, danger, death.

 

Nobody was in any doubt that we were not supposed to go to parties.

 

0ae4c557-e612-4b48-b21b-cfb388f288bb_3424x1928.webp.a36c76b79ebf452c2ab33ac5f14c7e7e.webp

 

People are understandably angry about the gross hypocrisy on display at the ‘Jingle and Mingle’ Christmas party at Conservative HQ, in the latest episode of the ‘Partygate’ scandal. There are two points I think are more important in the bigger picture.

 
bed8694c-13b7-4434-852e-ab1e12543fef_1358x1092_webp.png.faaa1faa7c0c45c55dda0f9ddb343d18.png
 

The first point is what it means that people ‘in the know’ were breaking the rules.

 

Let us quickly set aside the idea that they thought they were operating within the rules. The rules did change fast and they were confusing, but socialising indoors was not allowed. We knew it. The police knew it. The 120,000 Covid Fixed Penalty Notices attest to it.

 

Were the powers proportionate? Well, that’s something that lawyers, scientists, ethicists and everyone who had to live under the damn rules has been pondering. I say no. I always said no. Lord Sumption said no, so I think I am in very good company.

 

And it turns out that those in government did not act as though the rules were proportionate because they did not obey them. They did not seem to feel that their lives were in mortal danger. You might say they had done a reasonable job of assessing their own risk.

 

Long before lockdown, it was understood that Covid was nasty and dangerous but that the risk was highly related to age, obesity and other clinical factors. A WHO report as early as mid-February 2020 set this out. There were still unknowns but the risk factors were understood earlier than most people like to think.

 

These partygoers were not in fear of their lives, nor was Boris Johnson and nor was Professor Neil Ferguson, who earnt himself the moniker ‘Professor Pantsdown’ for travelling across London for illicit nookie. Despite being the one who predicted that hundreds of thousands of people could die, he was content to ‘risk’ the lives of two families by travelling to meet his extra-marital lover. Why? We can assume he understood the risk. That is the key to this story.

 

306ce830-2d94-419f-b114-76124d9936cf_1324x1262_webp.png.fd90b8734094b42f4ceb0a3c39c83e47.png

 

 

The risk was exaggerated and fear was amplified to induce us to follow the draconian, cruel and un-evidenced rules which had devastating consequences for peoples lives, mental health, education and the economy.

 

That doesn’t mean it was right that the partygoers broke the rules and tried to get away with it. People are right to be angry about the hypocrisy and double standards.

 

Many of us didn’t have parties for our children. My sons 16th birthday was attended by no one outside of our little household during that interminably grim third lockdown. Wedding receptions were cancelled. Hell, weddings were cancelled! Funerals were miserly affairs. Fathers weren’t at births. The casualties go on. So to see people tipsy and twirling around does stick in the craw.

 

It’s easy to push for justice, retribution and punishment when you are angry. But, if you’re angry about people dancing at parties and getting away with it, then aren’t you also angry that two students were fined £10000 each for organising a snowball fight in Leeds in January 2021? People were fined for cups of tea with neighbours, going for walks and sitting on benches. They were fined for perfectly normal human behaviour. It was disproportionate.

 

9953ae8b-d278-461d-b7f7-36524de69bfa_1060x1674_webp(1).png.9cc88d333738db0132e80fc91d9e024a.png

 

 

The fine for 'recklessly' leaving self-isolation was £4,000. That would have been a staggering 16-week salary for someone in the bottom fifth of earnings. These were the worst fines this country has known since the Dark Ages.

 

A report by the National Police Chief’s Council found that compared to the population, fines were more likely to be issued to men, to those aged 18-24, to those from ethnic minority backgrounds, and to those living in areas with higher levels of deprivation. Three quarters of FPNs were issued to white people but, proportionately, people from ethnic minorities were 2.3 times more likely than white people to receive an FPN in England and 2.8 times more likely in Wales.

 

No sane, just or compassionate society should tolerate the unfairness.

 

Which brings me to my second point: rather than seek retribution for revellers what about amnesty for all Covid lockdown rule breakers? The cases still in the courts could be cancelled. Fines could be returned. Didn’t everyone suffer enough during that terrible time?

 

After the Second World War, Winston Churchill resolved to have a ‘bonfire of state controls’ and ID cards were scrapped. We have an opportunity to consider the sort of society we want. We do not want to be left altered for the worse with biometric monitoring and vaccine passes for travel. Equally, do we want to be the kind of country that punishes people for going to parties?

 

We need a bonfire of cruelties and injustice, and pardons for all.

 

 

 

Sometimes I wonder how the fuck we got through it. Society should be permanently scarred, and in a way the majority of it is because they're carrying around the jab juice in their bodies. Maybe it's like after WW2, they're just pleased it's over and want to pretend everything's back to normal.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am aware that not everyone on here watches the BBC, but I still do sometimes. Last night Panorama broadcast an hour long programme - 'The Antidepressant Story'.

BBC iPlayer - Panorama - The Antidepressant Story. It was about the new generation of antidepressants released 35 years ago (including Prozac), supposedly free of the side effects of older drugs used to treat depression. They were also claimed to be safe and effective by the pharmaceutical industry. Evidence was uncovered that companies tried to conceal their concerns about the drugs, including Pfizer. Billions were made. It also focused on patients who had suffered side effects, including powerful withdrawal. It took some people years to come off them. Finally, research has been published about the side effects.

 

At the end, I thought that history has just repeated itself, with the 'Covid' vaccines. Their use was heavily pushed; side effects were repressed; tonnes of money was made. Who knows - in 35 years time, the first research into vaccine side effects may be published?

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nip said:

 

More athletes dropping dead. No surprise anymore. The new normal

 

legacy media people too:

 

JABBED?

Sky News and ITN presenter Rae Stewart dies aged 56 as colleagues pay tribute to 'brilliant journalist'

  • Rae Stewart had worked in journalism and communications for 20 years
  • He had also been press secretary to Nick Clegg when he was Lib Dem leader 

By Eleanor Dye

Published: 15:44 BST, 20 June 2023 | Updated: 16:37 BST, 20 June 2023

Sky News and ITN presenter Rae Stewart has died aged 56 as tributes pour in for the 'brilliant journalist', who has passed away following an 'illness'. 

Mr Stewart had worked in journalism for more than 20 years at places such as Sky, ITN, STV and GMTV. He married fellow journalist Vicki Young, the BBC's deputy political editor. 

He had also worked as head of communications for the Iraq Inquiry and was press secretary to Nick Clegg during his time as the leader of the Liberal Democrats

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12214963/Sky-News-ITN-presenter-Rae-Stewart-dies-aged-56.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

legacy media people too:

 

JABBED?

Sky News and ITN presenter Rae Stewart dies aged 56 as colleagues pay tribute to 'brilliant journalist'

  • Rae Stewart had worked in journalism and communications for 20 years
  • He had also been press secretary to Nick Clegg when he was Lib Dem leader 

By Eleanor Dye

Published: 15:44 BST, 20 June 2023 | Updated: 16:37 BST, 20 June 2023

Sky News and ITN presenter Rae Stewart has died aged 56 as tributes pour in for the 'brilliant journalist', who has passed away following an 'illness'. 

Mr Stewart had worked in journalism for more than 20 years at places such as Sky, ITN, STV and GMTV. He married fellow journalist Vicki Young, the BBC's deputy political editor. 

He had also worked as head of communications for the Iraq Inquiry and was press secretary to Nick Clegg during his time as the leader of the Liberal Democrats

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12214963/Sky-News-ITN-presenter-Rae-Stewart-dies-aged-56.html

 

I'm totally doctored

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Turbo Breast Cancer: South African Mayor, 42-Year-Old Marlene Vermaak Van Staden Had a Lump After COVID-19 Booster Shot, It Was Stage 4 Turbo Breast Cancer. She Died 10 Months Later

Global Research, June 19, 2023
COVID Intel 18 June 2023

“Turbo cancer” is a non-medical term that has arisen to describe very aggressive and rapidly progressive cancers following Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and suppression of the immune system.

I have written 14 substacks about turbo cancers so far:

And today’s focus is on turbo breast cancers.

South African Mayor, 42 year old Marlene Vermaak Van Staden had a lump after COVID-19 booster shot, it was a stage 4 turbo breast cancer, she died 10 months later on June 5, 2023

https://www.globalresearch.ca/turbo-breast-cancer-south-african-mayor-42-year-old-marlene-vermaak-van-staden-had-lump-after-covid-19-booster-shot-stage-4-turbo-breast-cancer-she-died-10-months-later/5822223

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, webtrekker said:

Amnesty for Covid Fines.

It would be better to pardon and return the 120,000 Covid fines than fine yet more partygoers.

20 Jun 2023
 
 
eb59e599-bd35-4661-8ace-3c720af4c382_1490x1134.jpg.1feca30f2b9cb25de7c8c673166ecc06.jpg

 

On the 23rd March 2020, Boris Johnson announced to the nation in a severe, wartime-style address that we must stay at home and that the police would have powers to enforce the rules. The speech was littered with threats of power, penalty, danger, death.

 

Nobody was in any doubt that we were not supposed to go to parties.

 

0ae4c557-e612-4b48-b21b-cfb388f288bb_3424x1928.webp.a36c76b79ebf452c2ab33ac5f14c7e7e.webp

 

People are understandably angry about the gross hypocrisy on display at the ‘Jingle and Mingle’ Christmas party at Conservative HQ, in the latest episode of the ‘Partygate’ scandal. There are two points I think are more important in the bigger picture.

 
bed8694c-13b7-4434-852e-ab1e12543fef_1358x1092_webp.png.faaa1faa7c0c45c55dda0f9ddb343d18.png
 

The first point is what it means that people ‘in the know’ were breaking the rules.

 

Let us quickly set aside the idea that they thought they were operating within the rules. The rules did change fast and they were confusing, but socialising indoors was not allowed. We knew it. The police knew it. The 120,000 Covid Fixed Penalty Notices attest to it.

 

Were the powers proportionate? Well, that’s something that lawyers, scientists, ethicists and everyone who had to live under the damn rules has been pondering. I say no. I always said no. Lord Sumption said no, so I think I am in very good company.

 

And it turns out that those in government did not act as though the rules were proportionate because they did not obey them. They did not seem to feel that their lives were in mortal danger. You might say they had done a reasonable job of assessing their own risk.

 

Long before lockdown, it was understood that Covid was nasty and dangerous but that the risk was highly related to age, obesity and other clinical factors. A WHO report as early as mid-February 2020 set this out. There were still unknowns but the risk factors were understood earlier than most people like to think.

 

These partygoers were not in fear of their lives, nor was Boris Johnson and nor was Professor Neil Ferguson, who earnt himself the moniker ‘Professor Pantsdown’ for travelling across London for illicit nookie. Despite being the one who predicted that hundreds of thousands of people could die, he was content to ‘risk’ the lives of two families by travelling to meet his extra-marital lover. Why? We can assume he understood the risk. That is the key to this story.

 

306ce830-2d94-419f-b114-76124d9936cf_1324x1262_webp.png.fd90b8734094b42f4ceb0a3c39c83e47.png

 

 

The risk was exaggerated and fear was amplified to induce us to follow the draconian, cruel and un-evidenced rules which had devastating consequences for peoples lives, mental health, education and the economy.

 

That doesn’t mean it was right that the partygoers broke the rules and tried to get away with it. People are right to be angry about the hypocrisy and double standards.

 

Many of us didn’t have parties for our children. My sons 16th birthday was attended by no one outside of our little household during that interminably grim third lockdown. Wedding receptions were cancelled. Hell, weddings were cancelled! Funerals were miserly affairs. Fathers weren’t at births. The casualties go on. So to see people tipsy and twirling around does stick in the craw.

 

It’s easy to push for justice, retribution and punishment when you are angry. But, if you’re angry about people dancing at parties and getting away with it, then aren’t you also angry that two students were fined £10000 each for organising a snowball fight in Leeds in January 2021? People were fined for cups of tea with neighbours, going for walks and sitting on benches. They were fined for perfectly normal human behaviour. It was disproportionate.

 

9953ae8b-d278-461d-b7f7-36524de69bfa_1060x1674_webp(1).png.9cc88d333738db0132e80fc91d9e024a.png

 

 

The fine for 'recklessly' leaving self-isolation was £4,000. That would have been a staggering 16-week salary for someone in the bottom fifth of earnings. These were the worst fines this country has known since the Dark Ages.

 

A report by the National Police Chief’s Council found that compared to the population, fines were more likely to be issued to men, to those aged 18-24, to those from ethnic minority backgrounds, and to those living in areas with higher levels of deprivation. Three quarters of FPNs were issued to white people but, proportionately, people from ethnic minorities were 2.3 times more likely than white people to receive an FPN in England and 2.8 times more likely in Wales.

 

No sane, just or compassionate society should tolerate the unfairness.

 

Which brings me to my second point: rather than seek retribution for revellers what about amnesty for all Covid lockdown rule breakers? The cases still in the courts could be cancelled. Fines could be returned. Didn’t everyone suffer enough during that terrible time?

 

After the Second World War, Winston Churchill resolved to have a ‘bonfire of state controls’ and ID cards were scrapped. We have an opportunity to consider the sort of society we want. We do not want to be left altered for the worse with biometric monitoring and vaccine passes for travel. Equally, do we want to be the kind of country that punishes people for going to parties?

 

We need a bonfire of cruelties and injustice, and pardons for all.

 

 

 

 

I said it then and I say it again, those fines are violation of the magna carta, sure the document was protesting against the kings powers, it should apply today equally against the power of the parliament. 

 

Obscene fines for an obscene government. 

Edited by SimonTV
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After much pondering and research i have come to the conclusion that the jabs are maybe accelerating peoples illness and disease. I believe they have been harvesting peoples DNA with nasal swabs and companies which want your DNA sample so you can find out where you originate from im sure you know the ones. I now know a fair few people who have got more ill, faster in the last two years,when before they were carrying on fairly well. I think they used the DNA to find weakness in the person. Of course not everyone has a DNA swab but i guess most jabbed people did.

I maybe wrong here but its a working idea that seems possible.

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Captainlove said:

After much pondering and research i have come to the conclusion that the jabs are maybe accelerating peoples illness and disease. I believe they have been harvesting peoples DNA with nasal swabs and companies which want your DNA sample so you can find out where you originate from im sure you know the ones. I now know a fair few people who have got more ill, faster in the last two years,when before they were carrying on fairly well. I think they used the DNA to find weakness in the person. Of course not everyone has a DNA swab but i guess most jabbed people did.

I maybe wrong here but its a working idea that seems possible.

 

 

 

The PCR tests were dodgy as fuck. The way they did those tests, the swab sticks had to be sent off to get the results. They also pushed them right back in to the nasal cavity and it is was proven that the fibers of the pcr test, which contained titanium, where breaking off and lodging in to the nasal cavity of the testes. What those fiber went on to do is a mystery. 

 

There was also the article suggesting that the PCR tests contained hydrogel nano particles. 

Edited by SimonTV
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...