Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, XelNaga said:

Oh, and the most important thing, how much money you have, or even more important, how much your daddy have.

 

I don't think money can save people. Might buy them time, but once the ADL or the outrage mob is on your case then your livelihood is probably screwed regardless.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

I don't think money can save people. Might buy them time, but once the ADLor the outrage mob is on your case then your livelihood is probably screwed regardless.

I'm not so sure about that my friend. Money rules this world, it's the "ultimate power" here.

 

With enough of it, you can pay to eliminate anyone who stands in your way.

 

Or you can simply change your identity and move.

 

We, regular folks, can't do none of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, XelNaga said:

I'm not so sure about that my friend. Money rules this world, it's the "ultimate power" here.

 

With enough of it, you can pay to eliminate anyone who stands in your way.

 

Or you can simply change your identity and move.

 

We, regular folks, can't do none of that.

 

I think it's more about who controls the money.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HAARPING_On said:

The tide seems to be turning all of a sudden but I do wonder, is this actually part of the script?

 

hugo talks has made some clips anticipating a 'big reveal' of the link between the jabs and the excess deaths. The problem is that the horse has already bolted: the jab is already in over half of the worlds population and in 50 million brits

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those that are overrepresented in finance, governments, and the media, etc, some of them (not all) believe in some radical religious doctrine which says that they will own everything in the end times, which is basically in line the "you will own nothing and be happy" crap.

 

Say the wrong things and you risk banks cutting ties with you and having assets freezed.

 

That's what I meant about money. Sorry, I should have made that clear.

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deadline Passes For Pfizer To Submit Results Of Post-Vaccination Heart Inflammation Study To US Regulators

by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Jan 12, 2023 - 02:44 PM

Authored by Zachary Stieber  via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The deadline has passed for Pfizer to submit the results of a study exploring the frequency of heart inflammation following receipt of the company’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Pfizer was required by the U.S. and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct multiple studies on its vaccine after the FDA approved the shot in August 2021 because regulators determined that without the studies, there would not be sufficient data to assess the “known serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis,” or heart inflammation and a related condition.

Regulators were also concerned about the potential risk of subclinical myocarditis, or heart inflammation without typical symptoms.

The FDA told Pfizer to carry out six studies, with various deadlines for completion and reporting final results to the agency. The first final deadline arrived on Dec. 31, 2022.

Pfizer was required to submit a report on the study, which was to assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis following administration of a third dose of Pfizer’s vaccine, or a booster shot, in people aged 16 to 30.

It’s unclear whether Pfizer met the deadline. The company and the FDA did not respond to requests for comment, and neither have issued any information about the study or its results since the deadline passed.

According to the FDA, Pfizer had until June 30, 2022, to complete the study and then another six months to prepare and submit the final results.

In a Dec. 8, 2022, memorandum explaining why the FDA authorized Pfizer’s bivalent booster without any clinical data, FDA officials noted that Pfizer was “conducting additional safety-related post-authorization/post-marketing studies for the PfizerBioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, including post-marketing requirements to assess known serious serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis and an unexpected serious risk of subclinical myocarditis..”

‘Shouldn’t Have to Ask’

The results of the study should be shared promptly, according to Jessica Adams, a former regulatory officer at the FDA.

“We shouldn’t have to ask or demand this information. We should expect that it’d be promptly shared by default,” Adams wrote on Twitter.

Dr. Janet Woodcock, the agency’s principal deputy director, told Adams in an email that the FDA is “not allowed to comment on potential actions on regulated products.”

It’s not clear how reporting results on a study relates to potential regulatory actions.

In light of the growing amount of evidence related to post-vaccination adverse events, some others are questioning the FDA’s delay in sharing information on the study.

Why are FDA officials dragging their feet on making Pfizer’s prospective study data on subclinical myocarditis available to the public when evidence has been published in the medical literature that Pfizer’s pre-EUA clinical trials revealed ‘a 36 percent higher risk of serious adverse events in vaccinated participants in comparison to placebo recipients,'” Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, told The Epoch Times via email.

She was citing a reanalysis of the original trial data that found vaccinated participants had a higher risk of serious adverse events.

With 79 percent of Americans having received at least one COVID shot and so many vaccinated young adults, especially physically fit athletes suffering heart attacks and sudden deaths, public health officials should insist that the company with the biggest market share of the COVID vaccine business in the U.S. be completely transparent about what it knows about the biological mechanisms of heart inflammation induced by the mRNA COVID vaccine Pfizer maintains is both safe and effective,” Fisher added.

Warning

The FDA added a warning about myocarditis following Pfizer and Moderna vaccination to patient and health care provider fact sheets in June 2021. Both vaccines utilize messenger RNA (mRNA) technology. Prospective vaccine recipients were told the risk of myocarditis was increased after vaccination, particularly after the second dose of the two-dose primary series.

If certain symptoms appeared after vaccination, such as chest pain or shortness of breath, people were told to immediately seek medical care.

U.S. authorities, and some officials elsewhere, have since acknowledged that the vaccines cause heart inflammation.

“The current evidence supports a causal association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis and pericarditis,” Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, a top CDC official, said during a meeting in 2022.

Some cases of the post-vaccination inflammation have ended in death.

Some 5,163 reports of post-vaccination myocarditis, pericarditis, or myopericarditis have been filed with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive early warning system that alerts officials to possible side effects from vaccines. The reports don’t prove a connection with a vaccine but are an undercount of the true number of cases, research has found and authorities have acknowledged.

More than 800,000 other adverse events following receipt of the Pfizer vaccine have been lodged with the system.

Moderna Studies

The FDA also required Moderna to conduct post-approval studies after approving the company’s shot in early 2022.

Moderna was told to carry out six studies, the same number as Pfizer, focusing on assessing the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis, the long-term impact of myocarditis, and the occurrence of subclinical myocarditis.

Two studies were due to be completed by Dec. 31, 2022, but the deadlines for submission of the results to the FDA aren’t until June 30, 2023.

Other deadlines for the Moderna and Pfizer studies stretch months or even years into the future, including one in 2025 and one in 2028.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/deadline-passes-pfizer-submit-results-post-vaccination-heart-inflammation-study-us

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, greatdayforfreedom said:

 

So did I,  thought that too. I am quite shocked that a lot of celebrities appeared  to have had the real thing, and not the saline.

 

really? most celebrities strike me as being not very intelligent

 

that's why they are allowed to be on the television: because they won't say anything remotely radical

 

they are there to create a pool of mediocrity for your mind to bathe in

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Say the wrong things and you risk banks cutting ties with you and having assets freezed.

Ain’t that the damn truth. 
Any Meta platform will delete my account two days after creating it. 
Banks play along.

If you seem confused or ask questions about bank charges they file a report and suspect you of fraud. No joke

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Dude, you were talking about ‘going after the people responsible’ in the name of ‘self defence’ because they’re killing people, to me that sounded like you might be referring to something a bit risky, that’s all. 
Let’s put this one to bed mmmmkay?  
 

ps what kind of weed DO you smoke?

I take it you’re an American, if that’s the case then it’s Girl Scout Cookies all the way for yous lot 

 

 

well you went the wrong way. Yes I meant taking people out but no in a way of guns and machete. Don't work in the physical world.

 

As for weed, I used to but I don't smoke no more. I don't need to when I have DMT in me. 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, wingwang said:

Her old man still hasn't returned my blender...

 

Your comment puzzled me and I had a sleepless night but I think I've got it.

I'm not a fan of Elvis btw.

I think you were referring to his song "Love Me Blender"..... 🤣

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was standing in front of my neighbour's house and she came home. We've never met before. We got chatting about our local crime issue. She's getting on but she had fire in her to fight back. I know a lot more of what's going on around and suddenly having to explain ins and outs of our problems but still unable to explain fully because it leads to a deeper end. Then I thought, she must be jabbed, I didn't ask but quite possibly because she was wearing a fitre fitted mask outside. I didn't mention about Covid/vaccine/mask but I thought to myself....if she learns what I know....her world would tip and I didn't know where I would start even though I'd stick to facts/official documents only. Not being nobbish or anything but we have come so far, so higher up.....that it is at the level that clueless people would find it hard to follow/understand the complexity of the agenda (depopulation, vaccine truth, microchipping, rituals etc). People usually asks "how do you know so much?" well it's years of reading, watching materials, isn't it..... I'll have a few to say to most people now and just concentrate on me getting up there even higher.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

It’s a tricky one, some say they will, some say they won’t.

Maybe after the chips fall and all the western pensioners are dead? 

 

2 hours ago, Youknownothingbutyou said:

China will rule the world economy

what?

 

China will not be ruling the world. It's not on the illuminati card. 😁

Although ¥ sign could be interpretted as either Yen or Yuan.

Everything will be eaten by the big monster fish that has a pyramid eye. Pound will be able to stay longer than the dollar.

s-l1600.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Velma said:

 

Normies saying nothing to see here because the Presley's had a history of heart attacks.

 

The Andrew Bridgen ploy is looking deliberate to equate anti-vaxxers with antisemitism.

 

 

Speaking of history:

 

Screenshot_20230113_183454.jpg.17d9ae2fd4db99e7d1151a99675b7e94.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Nip said:

 

And here am I thinking so-called Celebs got saline. Oh dear ! Must do better.

 

20 hours ago, greatdayforfreedom said:

 

So did I,  thought that too. I am quite shocked that a lot of celebrities appeared  to have had the real thing, and not the saline.

 

The celebrity angle should not be a real surprise because of the amount of exposure in the public's mind, by the way anyone notice anything different about Simon Cowell, too many trips to Epstein Island perhaps, or one to many boosters for the road, 🤔

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-11631723/Dapper-Simon-Cowell-winks-enjoys-date-night-glam-fianc-e-Lauren-Silverman.html

EXCLUSIVE: Simon Cowell, 63, continues to show radically different features as he enjoys date night with glam fiancée Lauren Silverman, 45

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...