Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Nip said:

 

Ooops !

 

millions of people take the drug globally.....that's a pretty big oops......still its not as big an oops as jabbing over 4 billion people with covid bioweapon jabs....

 

makes you wonder what oops they have planned that can top that....

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rebornsteve said:

if a company genetically modifies something, then it is no longer natural and is owned by said company.

 

And to back up your statement a court has ruled in the states that if your DNA has been altered you are not considered Human and have no Human rights, i have yet to find the article but i will find it, how much of it affects people is anyone's guess but it needs attention as to whether it is authentic/valid a ruling, 👍

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sock muppet said:

 

And to back up your statement a court has ruled in the states that if your DNA has been altered you are not considered Human and have no Human rights, i have yet to find the article but i will find it, how much of it affects people is anyone's guess but it needs attention as to whether it is authentic/valid a ruling, 👍

 

This article points to what i am on about but not the thing i was referring to.

https://rense.com/general96/if-you-have-been-vaxed-you-are-now-owned.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, alexa said:

Former Dragons' Den star Rachel Elnaugh, who once said Chris Whitty 'will hang' for recommending the Covid jab to children, has set up a safe haven for anti-vaxxers

Rachel Elnaugh, 58, has raised nearly £1million with a group called Phoenix Rose to buy 70 acres of Derbyshire forest for the 'safe haven' for anti-vaxxers. The group, which is also called the 'Inner Sanctum' initiative, bought the Cressbrook Dale Estate in June 2022 and are holding 'shamanic rituals' on the land. The sanctuary is the latest unusual move for the businesswoman, who faced severe criticism in 2021 for her anti-vax opinions.

 

image_2023-01-07_075132331.png.49abe159ee998fb109045f2e9c620d81.png

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11608611/Dragon-Rachel-Elnaugh-said-Chris-Whitty-hang-set-safe-haven-anti-vaxxers.html

 

Good on her......

It's the daily fail, so 95% of the story will be slanderous fiction made up by some incel sweaty fat desk jockey with a bedroom full of star wars figures, rainbow flags and blm paraphernalia.

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

patents according to manmade law.....so we, the people, need to pause to consider if those manmade laws are lawful according to the ancient common law of this land and according to natural law and when we do that we see that they are not lawful and that they cannot own people and we need to then BEHAVE as such and not recognise their claimed 'authority'

Freeman on the land type thing? 
 

Of course those laws are unlawful and ridiculous but they have guns and lethal technology, and judging by history, they ain’t afraid of using them.
 

Even so, things will get so out of hand that people will have no choice but to stand up and say ‘NO’. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Nip said:

 

.... and when you show them the evidence, they kinda say, "OK, but where's the evidence ?" Brainwashed muppets !

 

Some people can;t handle the truth:

 

https://www.beliefnet.com/wellness/galleries/10-reasons-why-we-avoid-truth.aspx

 

If you are fully jabbed the last thing you would want to know is the truth. Let them be. It is hard when you have to watch loved ones doing it but what to do? I am too old to fight so I have decided to just become a passive observer.

 

Amuse me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Macnamara said:

The Peer Review System is Worthless and Dangerous

6th January 2023

The majority of journalists and some members of the public tend to regard the peer review system as a vital part of the scientific process.

If a new piece of research is published they will dismiss it as worthless if it hasn’t been ‘peer reviewed’.

I’ve got bad news for them.

The peer review system is not just worthless – it is dangerous and designed to perpetuate errors, misconceptions and faulty reasoning.

The problem is that the ‘peers’ who are chosen to ‘review’ a scientific paper or a piece of scientific research will invariably be members of a small group of individuals who are committed to supporting the establishment – and who almost certainly have financial links to the establishment. If they are peer reviewing a medical paper they will, in 99 times out of 100, have links to the pharmaceutical industry.

Scientists who are asked to review a piece of research will be part of the system they are reviewing. They will depend for their livelihood on reputations built on supporting the establishment. The scientist who doesn’t do what he is expected to do, and who welcomes original thinking, will soon be exiled and find himself unemployable. His work won’t be published in the standard journals. A scientist who questions accepted beliefs (however blatantly wrong they may be) will not be asked to ‘peer review’ anything.

And the problem, of course, is that the pharmaceutical industry is known to be riddled with corrupt people and corrupt practices.

Scientific research which is original, and of real value, will be suppressed if it is considered to be inconvenient to the pharmaceutical industry and/or the medical establishment.

There is no doubt that the peer review system will used to suppress valuable new ideas and essential truths.

It is, for example, largely because of the peer review system that valuable, valid information about covid-19 and the vaccination programmes currently being promoted, is demonised by the media and the public.

It is thanks to the peer review system that four out of ten patients given drugs suffer side effects (some lethal) and why one in six hospital patients have been made ill by doctors. It is thanks to the peer review system that scores of allegedly thoroughly tested drugs have had to be withdrawn.

In a world where truth was of importance, the peer review system would be regarded as worthless and discredited; it is corrupt and serves merely to maintain the lies promoted by the medical establishment – which is, of course, owned by the pharmaceutical industry.

https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/peer-review-system-worthless-and-dangerous

They get the results they pay for at the speed of science.

Every important aspect of the uk system has been captured.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Freaky Dragonfly said:

 

If you are fully jabbed the last thing you would want to know is the truth. Let them be. It is hard when you have to watch loved ones doing it but what to do? I am too old to fight so I have decided to just become a passive observer.

 

Amuse me.

 

Ditto

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

mRNA being a patented technology, that technology has changed the recipient’s genes/DNA. New DNA- new species, owned by their makers like a clone or a consumer product. 
I may be wrong

 

Mmmm, That's made me start thinking of what it might be like being 'owned' by Amazon. I am 'baffled' though,  so still practicing medicine

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Freaky Dragonfly said:

 

If you are fully jabbed the last thing you would want to know is the truth. Let them be. It is hard when you have to watch loved ones doing it but what to do? I am too old to fight so I have decided to just become a passive observer.

 

Amuse me.

Ay let them be.  The past three years has been enough of an ordeal.

Knowing the truth will destroy them.

 

Shit is that what the government thinks? I’ve just censored myself and done their job for them. Blimey😦

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

mRNA being a patented technology, that technology has changed the recipient’s genes/DNA. New DNA- new species, owned by their makers like a clone or a consumer product. 
I may be wrong

Change your dna by how much?

if it would change your dna drastically, youd be dead in months maximum. See radiation victims

this sounds like fearmongering more then anything else.

 

ive been following reddit conspiracy forum for years

the bots are out in full force to tell the normies that sudden death is normal in young athlethes since age immortal, and it works

 

is there clear data of lets say the 90’s sudden death for age 15 to 35 and compare to 2022?

 

 

 

 

Edited by Youknownothingbutyou
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nip said:

 

Mmmm, That's made me start thinking of what it might be like being 'owned' by Amazon. I am 'baffled' though,  so still practicing medicine

Of course you are Dr.Nip! 
 

Maybe if you were owned by Amazon you might get decent share opportunities. Or maybe YOU’D be the share. Trackable,Traceable, TRADABLE 
 

I imagine working for Amazon would be like being under A Scanner Darkly type of surveillance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Youknownothingbutyou said:

Change your dna by how much?

if it would change your dna drastically, youd be dead in months maximum. See radiation victims

this sounds like fearmongering more then anything else.

 

ive been following reddit conspiracy forum for years

the bots are out in full force to tell the normies that sudden death is normal in young athlethes since age immortal, and it works

 

is there clear data of lets say the 90’s sudden death for age 15 to 35 and compare to 2022?

 

 

 

 

Maybe. Dead in months is changing to dead in one or two years 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

how do they own the vaxxed?

 

44 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

mRNA being a patented technology, that technology has changed the recipient’s genes/DNA. New DNA- new species, owned by their makers like a clone or a consumer product. 
I may be wrong

 

That should really be 'that technology has UNKOWNINGLY and FRAUDULENTLY changed the recipient’s genes/DNA. New DNA.'

 

Surely no such patents can hold effect when used without the informed consent of the individual after being made fully  aware of the consequences.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Captainlove said:

I have tried to speak with the sheeple its a waste of time they just think your crazy. They cant believe anything other that what the MSM says. There impossible to try and reason with. But your point about the traitors is a valid one.

 

I would say, at this stage, just walk away. No point in wasting energy arguing with a brick wall.

Remember, it's their choice to remain ingnorant and yes ignorance kills. Oh well....

It's their lesson that they have to be recycled.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

 

And to back up your statement a court has ruled in the states that if your DNA has been altered you are not considered Human and have no Human rights, i have yet to find the article but i will find it, how much of it affects people is anyone's guess but it needs attention as to whether it is authentic/valid a ruling, 👍

 

1 hour ago, Youknownothingbutyou said:

how do they own the vaxxed?

 

https://downthechupacabrahole.com/2021/11/23/doctor-issues-dire-warning-to-the-vaccinated-you-are-now-patented-property/

 

https://conspiracyologist.wixsite.com/home/post/us-supreme-court-how-to-patent-humans-use-synthetic-mrna-absolute-must-read

 

1 hour ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

Freeman on the land type thing? 
 

Of course those laws are unlawful and ridiculous but they have guns and lethal technology, and judging by history, they ain’t afraid of using them.
 

Even so, things will get so out of hand that people will have no choice but to stand up and say ‘NO’. 

 

No. Under the International law.

I'm not a lawyer but I'd imagine that implication is great. Jabbed may not be covered by the Human rights act for a start.

Edited by DaleP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...