Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[DaleP]

Just now, screamingeagle said:

ok 

 

but that doesn't change the fact,that psychos,satanists are in charge and have done very sinister shit to the population

The problem is they have trained us to remain focused on the problem. In this case, the psychos, satanists etc.

If we don't give energy to a person, thing, the parasites will wither. We have been giving our power away to them by holding them that they are elites and all that.

That era is ending and we are entering the new era which is community based Aquarius age. Top down pyramid is no longer. It won't work.

So we need to focus on what WE want by concentrating on our projects, not caring them. When we can main a higher vibration, problems will start to fall away.

When you change, your environment magically change.

 

Just now, screamingeagle said:

if you want someone to teach how to run first they have to know how to walk!!

YOU decide what speed you want to walk then. No more blaming others. Be responsible for your own otherwise you won't regain your power.

 

 

 

[sock muppet]

6 hours ago, Nip said:

 

Maybe we should just intermingle with the vaksed - as we do at present -, I'd suggest we simply adopt a secret hand symbol to recognize one another when we are out and about, like the mason's have. Here's my symbol suggestion:

 

 

 

No ? Maybe it's already been 'taken'. Oh never mind, then ! Alternative symbols considered.

 

 

 

 

 

5 hours ago, Freaky Dragonfly said:

 

 

 

1 hour ago, Captainlove said:

But i thought the point of this was to get communites together to fight the system? Else what are you going to do.

 

Now i know what i am going to suggest maybe a little too much and out there kind of suggestion for many to get their collective heads around without your heads exploding, but instead of secret handshakes and symbols, how about we just speak the truth to people and provide evidence of that truth when we speak to others that are not so well informed, i know it's a dangerous and perilous move to be doing, but i have been doing exactly this for just under three years now and i have to say will not stop doing this until all the traitors and murders of children are caught, processed and then when found guilty have their necks snapped publicly with a noose on the gallows, whatcha reckon, is it catchy?

 

 

Edit i almost forgot

When confronted with the term anti-vaxxer just reply with, no you are wrong, i am a pro-factxxer, so stick that in your pipe or where the Sun don't shine, that last bit i leave to your discretion depending on the circumstance encountered,

Edited January 7 by sock muppet

[Captainlove]

1 hour ago, sock muppet said:

 

 

 

Now i know what i am going to suggest maybe a little too much and out there kind of suggestion for many to get their collective heads around without your heads exploding, but instead of secret handshakes and symbols, how about we just speak the truth to people and provide evidence of that truth when we speak to others that are not so well informed, i know it's a dangerous and perilous move to be doing, but i have been doing exactly this for just under three years now and i have to say will not stop doing this until all the traitors and murders of children are caught, processed and then when found guilty have their necks snapped publicly with a noose on the gallows, whatcha reckon, is it catchy?

 

 

Edit i almost forgot

When confronted with the term anti-vaxxer just reply with, no you are wrong, i am a pro-factxxer, so stick that in your pipe or where the Sun don't shine, that last bit i leave to your discretion depending on the circumstance encountered,

I have tried to speak with the sheeple its a waste of time they just think your crazy. They cant believe anything other that what the MSM says. There impossible to try and reason with. But your point about the traitors is a valid one.

[Nip]

5 minutes ago, Captainlove said:

I have tried to speak with the sheeple its a waste of time they just think your crazy. They cant believe anything other that what the MSM says. There impossible to try and reason with. But your point about the traitors is a valid one.

 

.... and when you show them the evidence, they kinda say, "OK, but where's the evidence ?" Brainwashed muppets !

 

Some people can;t handle the truth:

 

https://www.beliefnet.com/wellness/galleries/10-reasons-why-we-avoid-truth.aspx

Edited January 7 by Nip

[sock muppet]

1 minute ago, Captainlove said:

I have tried to speak with the sheeple its a waste of time they just think your crazy. They cant believe anything other that what the MSM says. There impossible to try and reason with. But your point about the traitors is a valid one.

 

Just keep going, you know you are right and are doing the right thing, just imagine if there was no one doing what we are doing which is giving others correct information so that they can make an informed choice, at that point the responsibility rests with ignorance of which you play no role as you and me and everyone else that bears this burden shines the light in the dark, and we do it because we care.

[sock muppet]

7 minutes ago, Nip said:

 

.... and when you show them the evidence, they kinda say, "OK, but where's the evidence ?" Muppets !

 

Two questions are all that is needed so that their heads explode.

1. Where is the virus

2. What is the path of transmission

3. Watch their heads explode

 

You could provide other suggestions that make sense but those two questions are really all you need, because when they are able to answer them correctly by using good science, guess what, the call for justice will get louder,

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

9 hours ago, webtrekker said:

 

I'd be very wary of joining a close-knit group of anti-vaxxers. That's exactly where they want you, all together, ready for elimination.

 

 

 

This is true they like to group targets together, less logistics and less work- which is a double blow for community groups as it puts people off contributing or joining as trust in others gets destroyed. 
This is the whole point of infiltration. 
 

I guess in those situations, regarding people, you have to trust your gut, your feelings and your senses. 
 

How long before some fat right ‘terror’ suspects slip into her camp and start to divide the group? How about MI5 provocateurs? 
 

They are attracted to fringe groups like flies on shit.

 

Its total top down control. ANY threat to gov policy is not tolerated. 

You’ll then see bright yellow JCBs rolling down the road on council orders, tearing down structures like a scene from They Live. 
 

SCATTER!!!!

 

It would be cool though, to hang out and talk, do mushies from their patch and generally connect with likeminded people. I’m still dreaming. 

Edited January 7 by LastOneLeftInTheCounty

[Frankieboy]

Are the Jabbed OWNED!?!

 

 

 

[Nip]

35 minutes ago, Frankieboy said:

Are the Jabbed OWNED!?!

 

 

 

 

Further details would be interesting. e.g. "What does it mean, in practical terms, to own a human being and/or to be owned ?" Is it like owning a slave for example ? Can the one owned be sold ?  Can only 'purebloods' own then or can 'owners' only be corporations ? What exactly are the benefits of owning someone ? etc. Most importantly, of course, ......... "Will the 'owned' own nothing and be happy ?" All rhetorical questions, of course.

Edited January 7 by Nip

[Macnamara]

20 minutes ago, Frankieboy said:

Are the Jabbed OWNED!?!

 

no one can be owned by anyone else

 

every human being is given inalienable rights by the creator.

 

the idea of ownership is a human concept. Humans can pretend that they own each other and they can create pretend laws that say that they own each other but no one can actually own another person.

 

Don't believe me? If parliament passed a 'statute' tomorrow saying that all the unjabbed should be rounded up and shot would you believe that law to be legitimate? No of course you wouldn't because you don't really believe that anyone has that kind of absolute power. They might pretend that they have that power and they might surround themselves with armed thugs who they put in uniforms and pay to enforce those statutes but that does not make those statutes lawful or real

 

They are just the imaginings of unhinged people

[Nip]

11 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

no one can be owned by anyone else

 

every human being is given inalienable rights by the creator.

 

the idea of ownership is a human concept. Humans can pretend that they own each other and they can create pretend laws that say that they own each other but no one can actually own another person.

 

Don't believe me? If parliament passed a 'statute' tomorrow saying that all the unjabbed should be rounded up and shot would you believe that law to be legitimate? No of course you wouldn't because you don't really believe that anyone has that kind of absolute power. They might pretend that they have that power and they might surround themselves with armed thugs who they put in uniforms and pay to enforce those statutes but that does not make those statutes lawful or real

 

They are just the imaginings of unhinged people

 

But Mac, we are talking New World Order. Terms such as 'inalienable rights" . 'legitimate' and 'lawful' could potentially be abolished from our lexicon

Edited January 7 by Nip

[Macnamara]

1 minute ago, Nip said:

 

But Mac, we are talking New World Order.

 

new world pretend

 

that's not to say that pretending can't be dangerous. If you can convince people that your pretend rules are real or that your pretend currency is real then you can completely wrap those people up in your pretend reality

[Nip]

3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

new world pretend

 

that's not to say that pretending can't be dangerous. If you can convince people that your pretend rules are real or that your pretend currency is real then you can completely wrap those people up in your pretend reality

 

Let us all hope you are right, Unfortunately, the vast majority of us will likely not be in the position to decide rules if ''they! get their way. Just IMO, of course

Edited January 7 by Nip

[Mr H]

1 hour ago, Nip said:

 

.... and when you show them the evidence, they kinda say, "OK, but where's the evidence ?" Brainwashed muppets !

 

Some people can;t handle the truth:

 

https://www.beliefnet.com/wellness/galleries/10-reasons-why-we-avoid-truth.aspx

Or they refer to "fact checkers" 

[rebornsteve]

Anything naturally occurring cannot be owned.

 

if a company genetically modifies something, then it is no longer natural and is owned by said company.

 

There are numerous videos of a risk manger guy, always wears a bow tie, who studied all the patents of covid, and the vaccines…. Dr David Martin I think
 

oddly enough he has been very quiet the last few months 

Edited January 7 by rebornsteve

[Nip]

24 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Or they refer to "fact checkers" 

 

Yeah, right. Sure thing. As if the factcheckers will give us the facts / truth     

[LastOneLeftInTheCounty]

So really the conclusion that we’re all mulling over could be seen as - 

The jabbed are now genetically modified by patented technology, the owners of the patents see the jabbed as their property (delusion). 
 

The unjabbed pure bloods are still genetically independent and have no ‘owners’ so these patent owning globalists can only impose PART of their will on to them. 
 

Rounding up of pure blood unjabbed seems more likely if you put it like that

It certainly is a Brave New World

 

I’ll say it again, it’s the start of the blood wars- Transhumanist Technocratic elite in their Smart Cities Vs Pureblood real Humans in their Forrest Strongholds scattered around the world. 

Edited January 7 by LastOneLeftInTheCounty

[Nip]

12 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

So really the conclusion that we’re all mulling over could be seen as - 

The jabbed are now genetically modified by patented technology, the owners of the patents see the jabbed as their property (delusion). 
 

The unjabbed pure bloods are still genetically independent and have no ‘owners’ so these patent owning globalists can only impose PART of their will on to them. 
 

Rounding up of pure blood unjabbed seems more likely if you put it like that

It certainly is a Brave New World

 

I’ll say it again, it’s the start of the blood wars- Transhumanist Technocratic elite in their Smart Cities Vs Pureblood real Humans in their Forest Strongholds scattered around the world. 

 

Robin Hood scenario  all over again

[Macnamara]

1 hour ago, Nip said:

 

Let us all hope you are right, Unfortunately, the vast majority of us will likely not be in the position to decide rules if ''they! get their way. Just IMO, of course

 

you are missing the point. They have no power to pass certain 'rules'. The common law supercedes parliamentary statute law so they can make the statutes but it doesn't mean people need to comply if they are unlawful

 

statute law = 'legal'

common law = 'lawful'

natural law = your inalienable rights granted to you by the creator

 

however....and this is a big 'if'.....your common law rights will only stand if you and others are willing to uphold them. If we don't and we fold then......they'll get their way.

[Macnamara]

59 minutes ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

The jabbed are now genetically modified by patented technology, the owners of the patents see the jabbed as their property (delusion).

 

patents according to manmade law.....so we, the people, need to pause to consider if those manmade laws are lawful according to the ancient common law of this land and according to natural law and when we do that we see that they are not lawful and that they cannot own people and we need to then BEHAVE as such and not recognise their claimed 'authority'

[Macnamara]

7 hours ago, Macnamara said:

The Peer Review System is Worthless and Dangerous

6th January 2023

The majority of journalists and some members of the public tend to regard the peer review system as a vital part of the scientific process.

If a new piece of research is published they will dismiss it as worthless if it hasn’t been ‘peer reviewed’.

I’ve got bad news for them.

The peer review system is not just worthless – it is dangerous and designed to perpetuate errors, misconceptions and faulty reasoning.

The problem is that the ‘peers’ who are chosen to ‘review’ a scientific paper or a piece of scientific research will invariably be members of a small group of individuals who are committed to supporting the establishment – and who almost certainly have financial links to the establishment. If they are peer reviewing a medical paper they will, in 99 times out of 100, have links to the pharmaceutical industry.

Scientists who are asked to review a piece of research will be part of the system they are reviewing. They will depend for their livelihood on reputations built on supporting the establishment. The scientist who doesn’t do what he is expected to do, and who welcomes original thinking, will soon be exiled and find himself unemployable. His work won’t be published in the standard journals. A scientist who questions accepted beliefs (however blatantly wrong they may be) will not be asked to ‘peer review’ anything.

And the problem, of course, is that the pharmaceutical industry is known to be riddled with corrupt people and corrupt practices.

Scientific research which is original, and of real value, will be suppressed if it is considered to be inconvenient to the pharmaceutical industry and/or the medical establishment.

There is no doubt that the peer review system will used to suppress valuable new ideas and essential truths.

It is, for example, largely because of the peer review system that valuable, valid information about covid-19 and the vaccination programmes currently being promoted, is demonised by the media and the public.

It is thanks to the peer review system that four out of ten patients given drugs suffer side effects (some lethal) and why one in six hospital patients have been made ill by doctors. It is thanks to the peer review system that scores of allegedly thoroughly tested drugs have had to be withdrawn.

In a world where truth was of importance, the peer review system would be regarded as worthless and discredited; it is corrupt and serves merely to maintain the lies promoted by the medical establishment – which is, of course, owned by the pharmaceutical industry.

https://vernoncoleman.org/articles/peer-review-system-worthless-and-dangerous

 

EXCLUSIVE: Anti-stroke drug taken by millions found to be 'unreliable' and potentially fatal side effects were ignored, documents reveal

• Rivaroxaban is approved by NICE for the prevention of stroke and embolisms
• In 2009, a study on the blood thinner appeared to show it was safe and effective
• But now medical journal The Lancet has warned of 'inaccuracies' in the trial data

By Eve Simmons For The Mail On Sunday

Published: 22:00 GMT, 7 January 2023 | Updated: 22:01 GMT, 7 January 2023

In 2009, distinguished British medical journal The Lancet published a major study on the blood thinner rivaroxaban, which appeared to show it was safe and effective. But now the journal has warned of 'inaccuracies' in the trial data and said that it would be investigating the research further.

In 2015, an American medical magazine analysed 57 FDA reports of research misconduct – including the controversial rivaroxaban trial. It alleged 'falsification, missing records and improper storage of drugs'. The Lancet issued its warning following pressure from rival publication The British Medical Journal which, in December, presented evidence from FDA reports that alleged there were 'serious and numerous data deficiencies' in results from eight of the 16 hospitals involved in the rivaroxaban trial.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11609501/Anti-stroke-drug-taken-millions-unreliable-fatal-effects-ignored.html

[Youknownothingbutyou]

1 hour ago, LastOneLeftInTheCounty said:

So really the conclusion that we’re all mulling over could be seen as - 

The jabbed are now genetically modified by patented technology, the owners of the patents see the jabbed as their property (delusion). 
 

The unjabbed pure bloods are still genetically independent and have no ‘owners’ so these patent owning globalists can only impose PART of their will on to them. 
 

Rounding up of pure blood unjabbed seems more likely if you put it like that

It certainly is a Brave New World

 

I’ll say it again, it’s the start of the blood wars- Transhumanist Technocratic elite in their Smart Cities Vs Pureblood real Humans in their Forrest Strongholds scattered around the world. 

how do they own the vaxxed?

 

Edited January 7 by Youknownothingbutyou

[Macnamara]

JABBED?

Family's heartache as mother, 30, of five-year-old boy dies suddenly two days after partner asked for her hand in marriage

• Kirsty Cracknell died on Sunday, December 11 just before her 31st birthday 
• The 31-year-old mother-of-one had just got engaged days before she died 
• A family friend has launched a Go Fund Me to raise money for her funeral  

By Darren Boyle for MailOnline

Published: 12:35 GMT, 7 January 2023 | Updated: 12:37 GMT, 7 January 2023

A family has spoken of its heartache after a young Hull mum suddenly died after getting engaged.

Kirsty Cracknell died on Sunday, December 11 - two days before her 31st birthday. Her untimely death came just two days after her partner asked for her hand in marriage.

Tragically, at what should have been a joyful time, she passed away soon after returning to her home in east Hull. Her brother Craig spoke about how her unexpected passing has affected the family.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11609303/Familys-heartache-mother-30-five-year-old-boy-dies-suddenly.html

[Nip]

22 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

JABBED?

Family's heartache as mother, 30, of five-year-old boy dies suddenly two days after partner asked for her hand in marriage

• Kirsty Cracknell died on Sunday, December 11 just before her 31st birthday 
• The 31-year-old mother-of-one had just got engaged days before she died 
• A family friend has launched a Go Fund Me to raise money for her funeral  

By Darren Boyle for MailOnline

Published: 12:35 GMT, 7 January 2023 | Updated: 12:37 GMT, 7 January 2023

A family has spoken of its heartache after a young Hull mum suddenly died after getting engaged.

Kirsty Cracknell died on Sunday, December 11 - two days before her 31st birthday. Her untimely death came just two days after her partner asked for her hand in marriage.

Tragically, at what should have been a joyful time, she passed away soon after returning to her home in east Hull. Her brother Craig spoke about how her unexpected passing has affected the family.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11609303/Familys-heartache-mother-30-five-year-old-boy-dies-suddenly.html

 

All down to to the weather in Hull that day, I'd suggest. It probably changed 'suddenly'

Edited January 7 by Nip

[Nip]

12 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

EXCLUSIVE: Anti-stroke drug taken by millions found to be 'unreliable' and potentially fatal side effects were ignored, documents reveal

• Rivaroxaban is approved by NICE for the prevention of stroke and embolisms
• In 2009, a study on the blood thinner appeared to show it was safe and effective
• But now medical journal The Lancet has warned of 'inaccuracies' in the trial data

By Eve Simmons For The Mail On Sunday

Published: 22:00 GMT, 7 January 2023 | Updated: 22:01 GMT, 7 January 2023

In 2009, distinguished British medical journal The Lancet published a major study on the blood thinner rivaroxaban, which appeared to show it was safe and effective. But now the journal has warned of 'inaccuracies' in the trial data and said that it would be investigating the research further.

In 2015, an American medical magazine analysed 57 FDA reports of research misconduct – including the controversial rivaroxaban trial. It alleged 'falsification, missing records and improper storage of drugs'. The Lancet issued its warning following pressure from rival publication The British Medical Journal which, in December, presented evidence from FDA reports that alleged there were 'serious and numerous data deficiencies' in results from eight of the 16 hospitals involved in the rivaroxaban trial.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11609501/Anti-stroke-drug-taken-millions-unreliable-fatal-effects-ignored.html

 

Ooops !