Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

So how many cigarettes people will need to smoke per day in order to get a protection sock? 🤨

I take it nicotin chewing gums are useless?

 

Good question and i can not honestly answer this in a specific amount, but i smoke about 30g per week as roll ups, as for chewing gum then i would expect that to be just as effective as nicotine patches or smoking it and just like caffeine and THC from cannabis is part of a group of compounds that can traverse the blood/brain barrier.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

So how many cigarettes people will need to smoke per day in order to get a protection sock? 🤨

I take it nicotin chewing gums are useless?

 

They need to change the messaging on the fag packets.

 

"A packet a day, keeps the Dr away!" 😅

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/24/2022 at 3:25 PM, sickofallthebollocks said:

Regarding this (test kits ordered way back in 17/18)   - wasn't it decided it was a fake after all?  I forget?
co1.jpg
If you have the time look at this:  (I couldn't get the PDF to open to have a look at thier reply.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/covid_19_test_kits_purchases_in

c02.jpg

co3.jpg

co4.jpg

 

co5-PG.jpg

 

co6.jpg

 

co7.jpg
co8e.jpg
co9.jpg

co10.jpg
co11.jpg

 

 

co13e.jpg

co14.jpg

co15.jpg

 

 

 

So Mr Lakeman's account has been suspended? I wonder why. 🤔

 

As for the first image which you sribbled 'Hello!'

 

Reuter fact checker says that it never said Covid-19 test, the tests didn't exist back in 2017/18.

World Bank link here. Fact checker is right. https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/all/year/2018/tradeflow/exports/partner/wld/nomen/h5/product/902780

Oh wait!

 

BUT it appears that the page was updated edited. By 27th September 2020, 'Covid-19' all removed.😏

See the Wayback machine, the page first appeared on 4th Sept 2020.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200904061301if_/https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/902780

 

Liars!

 

PS - I think this is the video Mr Lakeman mentions in the post dated 18th June 2020.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAnM9XhUdio

 

Edited by DaleP
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Diesel said:

 

American Blue is a Native American brand of tobacco that they are trying to get the warnings off. Apparently, there is no link between cancer and this tobacco in history. It's grown and sold without chemicals, so if your going to smoke maybe look into.

 

Just to back up what you're saying there that tobacco has always been a part of tribal culture going way back in time, but i think another thread might be in order to explore this topic properly, and it is the case that chemicals are added to the tobacco when packaged for sale which seems to be the root cause of all problems associated with it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/24/2022 at 3:25 PM, sickofallthebollocks said:

If you have the time look at this:  (I couldn't get the PDF to open to have a look at thier reply

 

@sickofallthebollocks

What part of this did you have difficulty with, has it now been downloaded or does this still need to be done, another thing is there any restrictions on sharing the information on DIS forum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case if you haven't watched it in full. Re: CHRISPR

By looking at his face, I reckon he is fully CHRISPRED.... see yellow patches on his face? He's a believer!!

 

 

I couldn't watch beyond 6 mins. It's sick man.

Edited by DaleP
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaleP said:

In case if you haven't watched it in full. Re: CHRISPR

By looking at his face, I reckon he is fully CHRISPRED.... see yellow patches on his face? He's a believer!!

 

 

I couldn't watch beyond 6 mins. It's sick man.

 

Thankfully, I am the age I am

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Covidiot said:

 

Then why go through the trouble of injecting anyone at all? Why not just release a bioweapon virus? Surely if self spreading "vaccines" are a thing we must admit that "viruses" must also be a thing? That being the case and having a self spreading "virus" or "protein" why bother with a mass vaccination campaign? And if depop being the goal why a slow burn? If you can inject ~80% and have them "shed" to the other 20% why not go for maximum lethality and get it over with rather than risk angry masses as they slowly wake up and die off?

 

My opinion is that the vaxx is the bioweapon. Shedding I don't believe in. Could it be that the vaxxed are now harbouring more colds etc that they could be passing on to the unvaxxed causing minor illness? Yes I believe so the vaxxed immune sysytems are probably trashed. 

 

If we believe that the vaxxed are walking around and going to kill us via vax shedding then we are ultimately black pilled and there is literally no point in even discussing it as we are done for. I refuse to believe it but if it's true fuck it least I won't have to live in the hellish dystopia planned for the survivors!

 

 

Surely to believe in a spike protein, you would also have to believe there is a virus in the first place. It has been proven viruses were made up 'science' from the 1800's  when the next round of control was started by banksters, then taught as a mainstream belief in schools and further education.

Shedding IMO is also rubbish. A good rule of thumb is to remember at all times, we get what we believe in. Humans are particularly good at justifying stuff to themselves. "I feel sick therefore it has to be xxx....." In reality, we create that sickness with our own thought process and belief system.

Every part of 'science' has been hijacked, including the so called natural health sector. Like everything else, its there to confuse. Ive seen some really whacky ideas on health in the natural sector in the last two years and those in the so called new age movement can be some of the worst for nutty ideas.

The vax isnt just about death, its more about getting our soul removed and uploading us to the AI system so we are then under total control. Yes many will die because they were probably already sick and didnt know it, others are simply poisoned by the jab.

The jab is speeding the process, along with the fear mongering.

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DaleP said:

How is that so?

You can have a 'vaccine' which doesn't contain virus....like Covid-19 vaxx.

SP isn't a virus.

all part of the same pretend science. All vaccines are dangerous/ poisonous. A virus is a made up thing. Spike proteins are part of the same vax / fear narrative. Its ALL fake. NONE of it has been proven by anyone 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RobinJ said:

all part of the same pretend science. All vaccines are dangerous/ poisonous. A virus is a made up thing. Spike proteins are part of the same vax / fear narrative. Its ALL fake. NONE of it has been proven by anyone 

So you are saying there isn't SP in the Covid vaxx either? 🤨

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/22/2022 at 10:05 AM, HAARPING_On said:

Also posted in a separate thread of its own but worth putting here for reference:

 

Covid 19 Public Enquiry (UK) Share Your Experience

This is an important post as we need to get the word out and the message across to the government about the horrors that we as a nation have experienced due to their “policies”. The Covid 19 Public enquiry is asking for people to come forward and “share their experiences” of what has happened in the last 2 ½  years and we need let them know the full horror of what has gone on.

 

It's going to be nothing more than a carefully managed masonic carnival. For example, the terms of reference will be a big joke, loads of time will be wasted, no meaningful blame will be apportioned and nothing will change. As ever, it will be a 'Public Inquiry' in name only. I think that folks would do far more good handing out leaflets, about what they think has happened, down their local high street. Each to their own though.  

 

 

 

On 11/22/2022 at 1:23 PM, Dickwan said:

I hope lots of disgruntled folk respond - they can ignore one or two negative submissions, but hundreds (maybe even thousands) could cause them difficulties. At the very least they would have to acknowledge that not everyone fell for the official covid narrative. Or maybe I'm being a bit naive... but even still, it'll be cathartic to openly call them - in a formal context - murderers and liars.

 

They will ignore everything that they choose to ignore. They will want folks to let off some steam that will end up going nowhere. Somewhat similar to sheeple shaking their fists at Hancock in the jungle. Just the other night, Julie 'Unbabe: Piglet In The City Of London' Sketchyham was openly asking 'Has Matt Hancock now redeemed himself?' on ITV's 'News At Ten'. Whatever you say, Julie...  

 

 

 

On 11/22/2022 at 9:06 PM, sickofallthebollocks said:

Ice Cube said fuck y'all and your $9M to the covid shot.

 

I wouldn't take a Covid vaccine for all of the money in the world.

 

 

 

On 11/23/2022 at 2:05 PM, Nip said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-63719246

 

Nice try. Good to get the exposure, though

They died suddenly - then the anti-vax trolling started

 

I thought that this was a very weak attempt at a hit piece. If this is the best that the PTB can currently come up with, then they must be desperate.

 

 

 

On 11/19/2022 at 10:37 AM, Observations said:

I always keep in mind that part of the party gate saga is the plan to destroy any faith in decent backbenchers and the parliamentary process, in order to fast track the corporations / charities / philanthropists ... being openly in charge. Before the relentless 'austerity' post 2008 ... they used the expenses scandal to encourage resentment of the MP's, and to put them all in the same boat. 

 

Partygate was primarily initiated as part of the wider effort to get rid of BoJo. The M.P.'s expenses saga started off in 2004, after Heather Brooke started nosing around. When she was on the cusp of victory, some 5 years or so later, The Daily Telegraph suddenly leapt in to action. This was after the documents were 'leaked' to them and, even though they might try to deny it, they basically took credit for everything that Heather Brooke had done. This is what the PTB do, when they can't keep the lid on something any more. They take ownership of it. All of that was never meant to come out and Heather Brooke is a national hero.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Brooke#Freedom_of_Information_writing_and_activism

 

Furthermore, after looking at what her work involved, before coming to the U.K., I can't help but wonder about her mum's car accident. This is the sort of shit that the PTB do. I really do hope that wasn't the case though.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Brooke#Early_career

 

'She then became a crime reporter for the Spartanburg Herald-Journal, where she reported on murder cases and uncovered flaws in South Carolina's forensic crime lab. Describing herself as "burnt out" from covering over 300 murders, Brooke took a break from journalism. When her mother died in a car accident in 1996, and her father moved back to England, she no longer had family in America and decided to relocate to the United Kingdom.'

Edited by numnuts
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, sock muppet said:

 

Good question and i can not honestly answer this in a specific amount, but i smoke about 30g per week as roll ups, as for chewing gum then i would expect that to be just as effective as nicotine patches or smoking it and just like caffeine and THC from cannabis is part of a group of compounds that can traverse the blood/brain barrier.

I heard recently, it may have been McCullough, that it is the body’s defence against the actual inhaled smoke via goblet cells that ultimately provides the protection against the flu, sorry covid, ‘virus’.

 

a relevant article…

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7995400/


 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...