Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

numnuts

By numnuts
in Covid-19 & NWO

 Share

Recommended Posts

legion

legion

Posted
Posted

I found this long comment - 

 

" The various UK available ‘vaccines’ were, according to the manufacturers, explicitly to be delivered by intramuscular injection NOT intravenous injection.


Dr. John Campbell (find him at his YouTube site) pointed out that the only way to ensure intramuscular and not intravenous delivery (he was a nurse trainer) is to aspirate the needle – this involves inserting the needle then pulling back slightly on the plunger, if blood appears in the vaccine you are in a vein or artery, remove the needle and bin the shot and try again. Experienced vaccinators (not the majority who were involved) have a ‘failure’ rate of around 1 in a thousand. Is that the sort of rate of vaccine injury being seen?


I asked my local health board if ‘aspiration’ was being carried out as a matter of routine considering the manufacturers were specific on the issue, the reply I received was that is wasn’t required – the obvious question then was “by whom”, as by then it was accepted that microclotting was a thing with all the vaccines (though the AstraZeneca shot causes a different form of potentially fatal clotting than the Pfizer or Moderna). Apparently the decision to not aspirate was taken in 2004 for unknown reason, commercial perhaps, or so as not to question the safety of vaccines in General begging the question “why do manufacturers still specify how the vaccine is to be delivered?” NB The manufacturers said in their EUA applications that the vaccine would stay at the site of injection in the muscle – something the release of the animal testing the Japanese medical authorities received showed they knew to be untrue (a barefaced lie?) with every organ in the body receiving the lipid nano particles with the highest concentration in the ovaries, spleen, and testes. "

 

- under this Craig Murray article - 

entitled - 

(Scottish) Covid Inquiry Mystery 

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2022/10/covid-inquiry-mystery/ 

 

Lots of truthful comments keep getting deleted by the over zealous Mods but quite a few stay on long enough for people to see.. 

If you can comment on there and it stays on there - let us know 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SimonTV

SimonTV

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, legion said:

I found this long comment - 

 

" The various UK available ‘vaccines’ were, according to the manufacturers, explicitly to be delivered by intramuscular injection NOT intravenous injection.


Dr. John Campbell (find him at his YouTube site) pointed out that the only way to ensure intramuscular and not intravenous delivery (he was a nurse trainer) is to aspirate the needle – this involves inserting the needle then pulling back slightly on the plunger, if blood appears in the vaccine you are in a vein or artery, remove the needle and bin the shot and try again. Experienced vaccinators (not the majority who were involved) have a ‘failure’ rate of around 1 in a thousand. Is that the sort of rate of vaccine injury being seen?


I asked my local health board if ‘aspiration’ was being carried out as a matter of routine considering the manufacturers were specific on the issue, the reply I received was that is wasn’t required – the obvious question then was “by whom”, as by then it was accepted that microclotting was a thing with all the vaccines (though the AstraZeneca shot causes a different form of potentially fatal clotting than the Pfizer or Moderna). Apparently the decision to not aspirate was taken in 2004 for unknown reason, commercial perhaps, or so as not to question the safety of vaccines in General begging the question “why do manufacturers still specify how the vaccine is to be delivered?” NB The manufacturers said in their EUA applications that the vaccine would stay at the site of injection in the muscle – something the release of the animal testing the Japanese medical authorities received showed they knew to be untrue (a barefaced lie?) with every organ in the body receiving the lipid nano particles with the highest concentration in the ovaries, spleen, and testes. "

 

- under this Craig Murray article - 

entitled - 

(Scottish) Covid Inquiry Mystery 

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2022/10/covid-inquiry-mystery/ 

 

Lots of truthful comments keep getting deleted by the over zealous Mods but quite a few stay on long enough for people to see.. 

If you can comment on there and it stays on there - let us know 😉

 

Any claims about contamination or failures in with regards to administering the vaccine are nothing more than excuses at this point.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted

JABBED?

DJ Mighty Mouse, 48, dies in his sleep at Spanish villa: Music producer suffered aortic aneurysm

  • The DJ, whose real name is Matthew Ward, has died suddenly in Spain 
  • He was a pioneer of the house and disco revival in the UK in the 2000s
  • Two days before his death he teased new music to his devoted fans 

By Jack Newman For Mailonline

Published: 09:14 BST, 26 October 2022 | Updated: 11:50 BST, 26 October 2022

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11355889/DJ-Mighty-Mouse-dies-sleep-Spanish-villa.html

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nip

Nip

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

JABBED?

DJ Mighty Mouse, 48, dies in his sleep at Spanish villa: Music producer suffered aortic aneurysm

  • The DJ, whose real name is Matthew Ward, has died suddenly in Spain 
  • He was a pioneer of the house and disco revival in the UK in the 2000s
  • Two days before his death he teased new music to his devoted fans 

By Jack Newman For Mailonline

Published: 09:14 BST, 26 October 2022 | Updated: 11:50 BST, 26 October 2022

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11355889/DJ-Mighty-Mouse-dies-sleep-Spanish-villa.html

 

Oh well !

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
HAARPING_On

HAARPING_On

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, rebornsteve said:

Cult DJ Mighty Mouse dies ‘suddenly’ aged 48 after suffering aortic aneurysm…

https://metro.co.uk/2022/10/26/mighty-mouse-dead-cult-dj-mighty-mouse-dies-suddenly-17639076/
 

 

there maybe trademark issues with…

 

5DF84E4E-9B75-4EA4-90F4-C950641D5CC7.jpeg

 

... And of course, absolutely no mention that he was likely JABBED. 

 

No doubt the doctors were "baffled."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, legion said:

Dr. John Campbell (find him at his YouTube site) pointed out that the only way to ensure intramuscular and not intravenous delivery (he was a nurse trainer) is to aspirate the needle

 

The dark occultists didn't just hoodwink over half of humanity into taking a jab just to kill a random few through intravenous delivery

 

that is not the inside story here

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted
Just now, HAARPING_On said:

 

... And of course, absolutely no mention that he was likely JABBED. 

 

No doubt the doctors were "baffled."

 

middle aged people dropping dead suddenly is completely normal. Your government is in control. Go back to sleep britain. You are free to do as we tell you

(Bill Hicks paraphrased)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Macnamara

Macnamara

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

Any claims about contamination or failures in with regards to administering the vaccine are nothing more than excuses at this point.

 

they are in damage limitation mode

 

also expect the old ''not all drugs are 100% safe but on balance these jabs have saved more lives than they have cost''.....that ones a classic

Link to comment
Share on other sites
legion

legion

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, SimonTV said:

 

Any claims about contamination or failures in with regards to administering the vaccine are nothing more than excuses at this point.

 

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

 

The dark occultists didn't just hoodwink over half of humanity into taking a jab just to kill a random few through intravenous delivery

 

that is not the inside story here

 

I think that it is worth noting yet another aspect of this crime.. 

 

Vaxxinators clearly not following instructions and no one in authority checking if they are.. 

 

One more nail amongst 100s.. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
truepositive

truepositive

Posted
Posted
On 10/24/2022 at 1:52 AM, BornFreeNowAgain said:

I admire your optimism I really do. I tend to be a little more cynical these days. We only need to look at how people begin to 'accept' the truth, but nothing really changes. You look at 911 and the fact that many surveys show the majority don't believe the official story, and yet nothing is done, nobody is brought to justice. You see the fact that Jimmy Saville was protected by the BBC for many years, and yet the BBC carries on without any consequences, there are many more examples. 

 

People will at some point still need to act and take that power back. I do agree that this will be easier in vast numbers, but you look at the mass protests where there are millions of people, and yet most still go about their business within that system hoping that the system will change, so they don't need to. 

 

I am perhaps not explaining my point very well as it is only very recently that I have come to this conclusion. But I think at some point, talk and awareness needs to lead to action. It seems people are waiting for enough numbers, but when is enough and how will we even know we have reached those numbers. If people are still waiting now, when will they start the action. 

The complexity of the world is now so enormous that the mind cannot possibly translate these particular datasets into direct and concrete action. I couldn't do it either without very specific context, and there are always unanswered questions left once you start seeing the world as a holistic thing despite its appearance otherwise. It's just like how you cannot talk about 'the economy' without touching on dozens of other subjects, or 'the spleen' without connecting to numerous other parts of the body. Behind the scientifical vantage points towards the last couple of years, there are also many spiritual and metaphysical considerations.

 

Information is good but it needs to be delivered within a psychologically and emotionally suited framework. Arguing facts versus other facts based on slightly different studies or datasets or interpretations of both of those only to walk into a wall of cognitive dissonance is pointless. It's often much more effective to use multiple varying approaches, and to adress people at their -dominant- identification/ logical level. (see https://nlppod.com/nlp-logical-levels/). It's obviously a bit of a simplification but you would be surprised how many people feel almost existentially tied to one of these 'modes', and therefore very threatened when you tread upon them in some obvious way. Whenever that happens it's usually best to use an indirect method, which starts as simple as asking 'what do you feel about' instead of 'think'.

 

This is not really an answer to question you asked though, i realize.

-'Safety in numbers' is a thing that could relate to several of these 'levels' at once, with a clear tinge of tribalism in it.

-The reluctance to initiative is another thing, trained risk aversive behavious in parts at least.

-There is a factor of 'choice paralysis'; 'so now i know something needs to be done, but where the hell do i start?'

-There is an emerging recognizance of 'empathy affected by distance' in some psychological research, but no clear conclusions as to why it's a thing. No explanation from me either right now.

-Reluctance to change goes hand in hand with a partially evolutionary development of strong habitual behaviors leading to (physical) automation, which cannot be 'unlearned' simply by intellectual recognition.

-Cognitive dissonance can be very strong when 'core' beliefs are challenged, not just the ones tied to someone's dominant 'logical level' but also those tied to that by association with other 'important personality traits'.

-Also, generally speaking people seem conditioned to think in dislike and aversion when considering the world around them, and their opposites only when it comes to personal taste and preferences regarding trivial, 'local' and sociocultural topics.

 

The last 100 years in particular are rife with transitions from education to schooling, independence to learned helplessness, logic and reason to blind acceptance of presumed authority and so on. We also moved from localization and mutual support structures to economies of endless upscaling, from robustness to fragile just-in-time systems and governments going from facilitating to mandating, creating a self referential feedback loop of managerial culture spreading out into the world at large. We took a fundamental wrong fork in the road that cannot be fixed with incremental steps of 'improvement' building upon the structures as they currently exist, we need to go back to what worked before all of this happened, and build back up from there, because recent promises of a shining future have failed to deliver for most of us, and will continue to do so.

 

The subconscious/ intuitive realization of that is stifling alot of people, and causes the inaction. The idea that we do in fact need a reset of our own making, not a different colouring in of the current pictorial. Civilization is worth saving but society and large parts of current culture most definitely are not. Start small, stay local, deglobalize.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...