Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

I have not noticed that on the forums I go on (only one actually from my local team), they still seem quite asleep to the scam although to be fair I have not seen anything posted about the scam for months since the site admin threatened to ban people. Maybe it is starting to become 'Public Knowledge' as Chris Martneson (Peak Prosperity) calls it, as opposed to 'Private Knowledge'. Maybe we really are on the cusp of the shift taking place, I truly hope so. 

Same with the one I visit (Wolves). The dreadful woman who runs the site is very much like that psychotic nurse in the mask above and is also a walking contradiction.

 

She permits pro vax talk but all talk of things relating to 'Covid' are not allowed. She is all for inclusivity but does not allow any talk of 'religion' that might shine a favourable light on Christianity. She is an atheist (and I suspect a Marxist) but posted a 'God bless the Queen' thread for those that want to express their views - as long as they are pro Monarchy.

 

I felt (when banned 18 months ago) that all opinions contrary to whatever the media trot out threaten advertising revenue. This site has around 20k members, so they must be generating a decent amount of money and obviously want to keep it so.

 

I so despise a lot of the posters on there that when my team lose I rub my hands together and visit that site to view the tears.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saved said:

Same with the one I visit (Wolves). The dreadful woman who runs the site is very much like that psychotic nurse in the mask above and is also a walking contradiction.

 

She permits pro vax talk but all talk of things relating to 'Covid' are not allowed. She is all for inclusivity but does not allow any talk of 'religion' that might shine a favourable light on Christianity. She is an atheist (and I suspect a Marxist) but posted a 'God bless the Queen' thread for those that want to express their views - as long as they are pro Monarchy.

 

I felt (when banned 18 months ago) that all opinions contrary to whatever the media trot out threaten advertising revenue. This site has around 20k members, so they must be generating a decent amount of money and obviously want to keep it so.

 

I so despise a lot of the posters on there that when my team lose I rub my hands together and visit that site to view the tears.

😃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, RobinJ said:

That makes me wonder if she may have been dead long before it was announced. Could have been months for all we know.

 

In that case, Bojo is still prime minister rather than Liz and the current govt is a phoney. Unless the handover was made in secret by Charles before the official proclamation, but in then would it be legal. 

Edited by Campion
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

**Heads-up - Read the following warning before reading the full Expose article ...

 

This article reports accurately the findings of this study. However, this is not always the case with The Expose. The articles they are publishing need to be read with discernment, as the headline at times draws conclusions not justified by the information offered.. 

In this case The Expose attaches to this seemingly accurate report, another report, already published by them at least once,  with the headline   ‘scientists believe that graphene is being transmitted from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated.’ The report, however, only stated that graphene was found in the blood of the unvaccinated children of vaccinated parents. The report did NOT offer an explanation as to how this came to be. However, The Expose jumped to the conclusion that this ‘proves’ shedding; there could be another explanations not yet investigated.

Why does The Expose report in this misleading way? Therefore I have deleted this part of their title:  '& Scientists believe the vaccinated are transmitting it to the Unvaccinated.'

The scientists did not draw that conclusion, yet. They simply presented the information . To say they did  misconstrues  the work of these scientists and misleads the public. Is there a ‘fear’ element being inserted here? Just a rhetorical question.

 

Danceaway

 

Ok, now that you know that, please feel free to continue reading this important article ...

 

 

UK Lab Report discovers Graphene in the Covid-19 Vaccines

https://expose-news.com/2022/09/10/uk-lab-report-graphene-covid-vaccines/

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Campion said:

 

In that case, Bojo is still prime minister rather than Liz and the current govt is a phoney. Unless the handover was made in secret by Charles before the official proclamation, but in then would it be legal. 

 

It's another weird one, on a par with the question mark over the authenticity of Biden's Presidency. Things are not getting any more straight-forward these days, are they!

Edited by Tinfoil Hat
Typo
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth is getting out, this appears to be from mainstream media in the  Philippines:

 

https://lifestyle.inquirer.net/409269/data-suggests-sudden-adult-death-syndrome-due-to-vaccines/

 

"...this proclivity fomented by government and industry for never-ending booster shots is akin to a scam of the highest order."

 

So-called Sudden Adult Death Syndrome might now lead to a re-examination of SIDS. I know they don't count the dead when there's money to be made, but the whole scam has now become so blatant that soon the completely obvious will be apparent to all.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/9/2022 at 11:58 PM, RobinJ said:

 

I find it interesting that they have not said what she died of, is that so they can concoct a story later...? According to news today she was dead before Harry got there. 

Also, another weird fact, the queens death was announced in Canada at least 4 hours before the palace announced it. Then it was smashed down as fake news everywhere. That makes me wonder if she may have been dead long before it was announced. Could have been months for all we know.

Now they will spend billions on a side show of a funeral and most likely a coronation of the next adrenochrome addicted paedo baby eater in line.

 

She died last year when the FT or Standard (I forget which) ran the headline about London bridge falling down.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Athenry04 said:

 

She died last year when the FT or Standard (I forget which) ran the headline about London bridge falling down.

Cancelling of appearances, hologram in carriage, allegedly some photoshop, alleged deep fake christmas message etc. I think so too.
 


This was 5 months ago, but relates to protocol in the event of the Queens death.

6moths ago:

 

Edited by TheConsultant
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

Could be the same lizard changing skins, casting off the old one worn for many years and then climbing into a new one.

 

If it was a movie, I'd make her Camilla, hey not a bad idea. Lol. Setting up Queen Consort. Oh, you said new skin 😆 

 

That reminds me, I heard someone on the tributes say she was comfortable in her own skin. I almost love it when they say things like that. It's so blatant, and yet such a natural sounding expression. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/9/2022 at 9:58 AM, RobinJ said:

 

I find it interesting that they have not said what she died of, is that so they can concoct a story later...? According to news today she was dead before Harry got there. 

Also, another weird fact, the queens death was announced in Canada at least 4 hours before the palace announced it. Then it was smashed down as fake news everywhere. That makes me wonder if she may have been dead long before it was announced. Could have been months for all we know.

Now they will spend billions on a side show of a funeral and most likely a coronation of the next adrenochrome addicted paedo baby eater in line.

 

There is a 5 hour time difference between UK and (Eastern) Canada...(8 hours for Western Canada). If Eastern Canada got the news at 1.30 pm it would be 6.30 pm in UK. I think thats what the confusion was. 

 

I was travelling on a plane from the UK on the day she died and she was still alive when I left UK at 11.45am. (Canada 6.45 am) I arrived back in Canada at approx 1.45pm (6.45 pm UK time). I got a text from within Canada at 3pm (8pm UK time) to say the Queen had died...followed by the guy driving the airport bus saying he had just heard the Queen had died. it would seem the News hit Canada around 6.30pm/7pm UK time (1.30pm/2pm Canada time, which would appear at first glance to be 5 hours prior to actual time.)

 

I thought I read that only Charles and Anne were there prior to her death?

Edited by Beaujangles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Campion said:

 

In that case, Bojo is still prime minister rather than Liz and the current govt is a phoney. Unless the handover was made in secret by Charles before the official proclamation, but in then would it be legal. 

 

what do they care for the laws? The can do whatever they like without any repercussions. A lot of their dark shit is out in the open now though. Time will tell.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Beaujangles said:

 

There is a 5 hour time difference between UK and (Eastern) Canada...(8 hours for Western Canada). If Eastern Canada got the news at 1.30 pm it would be 6.30 pm in UK. I think thats what the confusion was. 

 

I was travelling on a plane from the UK on the day she died and she was still alive when I left UK at 11.45am. (Canada 6.45 am) I arrived back in Canada at approx 1.45pm (6.45 pm UK time). I got a text from within Canada at 3pm (8pm UK time) to say the Queen had died...followed by the guy driving the airport bus saying he had just heard the Queen had died. it would seem the News hit Canada around 6.30pm/7pm UK time (1.30pm/2pm Canada time, which would appear at first glance to be 5 hours prior to actual time.)

 

I thought I read that only Charles and Anne were there prior to her death?

huh? Im not sure that makes sense. Why would it be announced anywhere except UK first? Someone f'd up. Maybe you misunderstood me. I  was told by my Canadian friends she had died, I checked BBC web site at that time-they said she was ill and Harry was on route. I did a web search too and found loads of 'its a hoax' proclamations. 4 hours later BBC announced she was dead. It was announced in Canada before UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, RobinJ said:

huh? Im not sure that makes sense. Why would it be announced anywhere except UK first? Someone f'd up. Maybe you misunderstood me. I  was told by my Canadian friends she had died, I checked BBC web site at that time-they said she was ill and Harry was on route. I did a web search too and found loads of 'its a hoax' proclamations. 4 hours later BBC announced she was dead. It was announced in Canada before UK.

 

It makes sense...lol. My kids didnt hear about it until same time as UK...and theyre in Canada. If a tabloid/News in Canada released the News at say 3 pm Canada time it would be 8pm in UK. I can see that causing a mixup. I dont know anyone in Canada who had the News before 1.30 pm Canada time (EST). I didnt say Canada heard it first as from what I have seen and heard they got the News after the UK...not much after. It was released in UK at 6.30pm ish. Thats 1.30pm  in Eastern Canada...and 10.30 am Western Canada time as there is a time difference. UK is five hours ahead of Canada time.

Edited by Beaujangles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Beaujangles said:

 

My kids didnt hear about it until same time as UK...and theyre in Canada. If a tabloid in Canada released the News at say 3 pm Canada time it would be 8pm in UK. I can see that causing a mixup. I dont know anyone in Canada who had the News before 1.30 pm Canada time (EST). I didnt say Canada heard it first as from what I have seen and heard they got the News after the UK...not much after. It was released in UK at 6.30pm ish. Thats 1.30pm  in Eastern Canada...and 10.30 am Western Canada time as there is a time difference. UK is five hours ahead of Canada time.

it was a main news channel something like CBS they said. ( cant remember the letters!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shift is happening because now the plan is to implement CBDC's worldwide after 'we conclude' worldwide debt is untenable. All these 'energy crisis stimulant packages' are riding directly into that playbook. At some point half of Europe will be declared insolvent, some others crisis erupts, and the decree will come out. China is included in this mess. Its all meant to steer towards a global currency with 'better backing'. Hmm sounds like it could fail hard too...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Dazzer said:

Are people still posting about covid on your forum? The one I go on has been pretty dead for a while which is an indication that doubt has started to creep in. There was a period at the start of the summer where double/triple vaxxed were coming on saying that they`ve had covid, some for the 2nd or 3rd time, when they were told that the jabs would stop infection (something that they now know to be bullshit).

 

For me if the jabs were a success they would have been all over the thread virtue signalling and condemning those who had not taken them, this has not happened, their silence if deafening. 

 

Like I said, maybe I`m just being hopeful and full of shite... 

On the forum I go on there is very little talk about it now. This could be because the admin person started to get the shits because every thread seemed to turn in to covid ad at that time there was still the virtue signalling in big doses.

 

But it could be that your theory is correct more recently as there has been little talk about it, not even attempts at talking about it. So I think you could be right that these people now know they have been conned and are just keeping quiet about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, pete675 said:

The truth is getting out, this appears to be from mainstream media in the  Philippines:

 

https://lifestyle.inquirer.net/409269/data-suggests-sudden-adult-death-syndrome-due-to-vaccines/

 

"...this proclivity fomented by government and industry for never-ending booster shots is akin to a scam of the highest order."

 

So-called Sudden Adult Death Syndrome might now lead to a re-examination of SIDS. I know they don't count the dead when there's money to be made, but the whole scam has now become so blatant that soon the completely obvious will be apparent to all.

An ex-friend of mine's fiance died from a 'brain aneurysm' and was only in her early 30's in the Philippines. No doubt she was jabbed as the pressure there was extreme. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, alexa said:

CORONATION STREET BRAINWASHING TO NORMALISE HEART ATTACKS - BETTER VERSION.

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=SSD348WK1S67

 

image_2022-09-11_065800977.png.915d45d3fe84a2647bc9b5f9d7249df3.png

 

It wasn't just the footballer callapsing in that episode, their was loads of other shit about fake Moon landings, chips in the vax, etc.

 

Coronation Street was the only soap I used to watch, only because my wife enjoys it and I have to drag myself away from the computer sometimes!

 

I liked the humour, the accents and the more down to earth storylines, unlike that miserable, suicide-inducing crap they call Eastenders. However, Im not going to watch it any more. I can't believe they've even infiltrated tv soaps in this way. Fuck 'em!

 

 

 

Coronation Street Propaganda 🤣 / Hugo Talks

 

2022-09-11_13-31-43.png.2794fff8ff8c2d0f0e9a94332c356078.png

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/v0TKmInapQ2J/

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...