Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, Human10 said:

I thought they've already stopped playing covid... Level 3 to 2? WTF? 😒

Indeed , no one (in their right mind) gives a damn what these fools say anymore.

It makes me laugh, these downgrades from level whatever to whatever, when, in March 2020, covid was not even considered a High Consequence Inffectous Disease anyway.
Muppets.
hcccccccccccc.jpg

...but they went and shut the country down anyway?  Destroyed the economy, bla bla blah we've heard it all before haven't we....
 

 

Edited by sickofallthebollocks
added sentence
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, numnuts said:

 

Someone please do correct me, if I am wrong. Not only did poor us in the U.K. not have the 'Covid' narrative challenged at all by the opposition, as was the case throughout much of The West, but we uniquely even had Constipated Keir continually calling for 'longer and tougher' lockdowns.

 

 

That is exactly what transpired. We have no opposition. Next election we better get ready to vote for independents.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

What are the Monster Raving Lunatic Party up to these days? I might give them a once over - whatever madcap idiocy they're supporting will be infinitely more sensible than the others have up their sleeves. 

 

You can't surely can't vote for them, far too mainstream.

 

You need take a look at Lord Buckethead or failing that Count Binface:

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting video comparing a study which followed a large group of vaccinated children v unvaccinated children.
However, not sure about how accurately this can be relied upon as in the study there were 2700 vaxxed children and only 560 unvaxxed children?
Wouldn't the vax versus unvaxxed figures have to be roughly the same to be reliable figures?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Lfqc8ERGW8aR/

jjjjjj.jpg

Edited by sickofallthebollocks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Indeed , no one (in their right mind) gives a damn what these fools say anymore.

It makes me laugh, these downgrades from level whatever to whatever, when, in March 2020, covid was not even considered a High Consequence Inffectous Disease anyway.
Muppets.
hcccccccccccc.jpg

...but they went and shut the country down anyway?  Destroyed the economy, bla bla blah we've heard it all before haven't we....
 

 

Those poor bastards who caught Covid on March 18th, 2022.

A moment of silence, please.

Edited by KingKitty
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tinfoil Hat said:

Weren't we the 1st to get the jab? (Or have I remembered that wrong?) If so, it's 100% certainty that we were meant to be the guineapigs by which they judged how things would go down across further afield. Are the British known to be especially compliant, soft & dense? 

 

How about .... Yes !

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, blatantly over the top stuff from the Chinese. I still reckon the Chinese were targeted with 'something' untransmissible at the 2019 Military World Games, which The West then branded as 'Covid', and they want to avoid a repeat performance.

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Military_World_Games

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/62756131

 

'2023 World Indoor Athletics Championships: Nanjing event postponed for third time.'

Edited by numnuts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://beckernews.com/blockbuster-lawsuit-exposes-confidential-memo-showing-bidens-big-tech-collusion-to-halt-covid-misinformation-46726/

 

As part of a lawsuit seeking to uncover the Biden administration’s sweeping collusion with Big Tech firms to rig U.S. elections for the Democratic Party and to ensure that Americans can’t have open and honest discussion of their personal health decisions, it has come out that the CDC contacted Facebook to target discussion of ‘Covid misinformation’ that in some cases turned out to be entirely substantiated.

 

“Over 50 officials in President Joe Biden’s administration across a dozen agencies have been involved with efforts to pressure Big Tech companies to crack down on alleged misinformation, according to documents released on Aug. 31,” the Epoch Times reported....

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was no mega-truther, but he was no masonic mass media bitch either. He ceratinly had no time for the fairy tales of the McCanns. In my opinion, it is probable that the vaccine hastened his demise. RIP. 

 

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-62714293

 

'Bill Turnbull: Former BBC Breakfast presenter dies aged 66.'

 

 

 

Edited by numnuts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Dickwan said:

His books are $25 each from his website. Fairly expensive but then he self-publishes and distributes them himself. He does not sell on Amazon. 

 

As for your assertion he was only a mere traffic cop, that's simply untrue. If you've sourced your info from Wikipedia then you've been misled. He's had an ongoing struggle to have his wiki entry corrected, but they simply refuse to do so. 

 

Sorry to be so blunt, but I've corresponded in some depth with the man over the last decade and your aspersions about his honesty rankle a bit. There is a concerted effort to discredit Paulides in everything he does, and it rather seems (based on what you posted above) you've been a victim of this insidious campaign.

 

Off topic, granted, but I had to chime-in. Maybe we need a missing 411 thread.

 

 

As i personally don't know the man, I'm repeating what I've heard, hence my use of the word 'apparently'. You know the bloke? Fab, i don't but these rumours right or wrong do pop up a fair bit, and when discussing someone, it's fair to mention potential criticisms.  I didn't even mention what he was allegedly dismissed for, so it was hardly a character assassination, more of a 'keep an open mind type thing'. I also followed his dispute with fellow researcher Steph Young, which I feel he over reacted about at the time, so I'm just going off what I've seen and heard. 

For the record I have purchased most of his books including his bigfoot ones, and have enjoyed them.

 

His research defo needs a thread though, as I love his interviews and docs.

Edited by Athenry04
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2022 at 3:39 AM, Macnamara said:

 

I think the way they are going to coerce and coral us into their new technocratic gulag is through the control of FOOD. I think they intend to starve the human population into submission

 

Food is going to be weaponised

 

We are seeing an orchestrated shortage of food being created and its for this reason that i keep saying that people need to start wrapping their heads around localised, decentralised food production whether it is people turning over their gardens and window boxes to food production or getting involved with, local community gardens or supporting local, established food producers instead of the globalised supermarkets that will all go along with the agenda

 

 

 

I was listening to John Bush this morning and he was saying that the way things will probably go is that the social control system is that it will be based on your 'carbon' score. Everything you will do has a 'carbon footprint' and you have to earn points to buy stuff in the system based on your credit rating. Ive not heard anyone talk about this and was under the impression that how it may go down is that the internet is turned off for a bit. Everyone panics, when its turned back on you cant access your bank or money as everything will be at zero. Then the system will announce that access is by way of vax and that it will be limited depending on your social credit score etc.

Which scenario is more likely do you think, or could it be different for different countries? According to Bush this is the carbon version is already in place and ramping up int he states. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Athenry04 said:

 

As i personally don't know the man, I'm repeating what I've heard, hence my use of the word 'apparently'. You know the bloke? Fab, i don't but these rumours right or wrong do pop up a fair bit, and when discussing someone, it's fair to mention potential criticisms.  I didn't even mention what he was allegedly dismissed for, so it was hardly a character assassination, more of a 'keep an open mind type thing'. I also followed his dispute with fellow researcher Steph Young, which I feel he over reacted about at the time, so I'm just going off what I've seen and heard. 

For the record I have purchased most of his books including his bigfoot ones, and have enjoyed them.

 

His research defo needs a thread though, as I love his interviews and docs.

One of you make a thread them. I’m interested to learn more. Haven’t read his books yet but will start when I have time. I’ve watched all the videos that I can find. Quite a few.

Ultimately whatever his background it is quite rare to find someone who gives this much of shit about others. Alive or dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bombadil said:

One of you make a thread them. I’m interested to learn more. Haven’t read his books yet but will start when I have time. I’ve watched all the videos that I can find. Quite a few.

Ultimately whatever his background it is quite rare to find someone who gives this much of shit about others. Alive or dead.

 

Will do pal, his work is heartbreaking on occasions. The Dennis Martin case is particularly disturbing, and yeah the guy defo does care, that is clear in his presentations and interviews. Which forum is best for a thread?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Athenry04 said:

 

Will do pal, his work is heartbreaking on occasions. The Dennis Martin case is particularly disturbing, and yeah the guy defo does care, that is clear in his presentations and interviews. Which forum is best for a thread?

Mysteries/ The paranormal/ the unexplained looks like a good fit Imo.

Cab you please send me a thread link when you have made it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

THIS IS A MUST READ! ...

 

Independent researchers find no mRNA in COVID jabs

Vials subjected to a variety of independent microscopic and spectroscopic observations and analyses have shown little nucleic acid material and lots of graphene oxide.

Pseudonym

Aug 30

There exists a certain COVID vaccine harm theory that mRNA and its attendant spike protein are the means of vaccine delivery, as well as vaccine injury and harm.

However, independent scientists from a variety of countries across the Americas and Europe have examined all or nearly all varieties of COVID vaccine brands and all of them independently found no evidence of mRNA in the vials.


FIRST, it is important to point out that the “mRNA” alleged to be in the vials is not messenger RNA but rather modified synthetic polynucleotide strands, ie, modRNA. They are not real human biologics, but genetically modified synthetic molecules, ie, a work of chemistry and not strictly biology.

So was modRNA found in the COVID vaccine vials examined by independent researchers in the past year and a half? No, it was not.

This writer has reviewed nearly all of the publicly available micrographs and spectroscopy studies of the contents of these vials, and will keep reviewing more.

What researchers found instead of modRNA or mRNA was mostly graphene oxide with metal contaminant, including heavy metals such as aluminum and cadmium (constituents of “quantum dots”). Synthetic lipid material was not much remarked upon but found in only a very small amount. One researcher found the Trypanosoma  cruzi parasite in the Pfizer vaccine.

Graphene, a relatively new nanomaterial derived from the mineral graphite, was observed in various forms, such as “nanosheets” and “nanotubes” (tubules), suggesting its self-assembling capability as described in the scientific literature.

However, researchers also found lots of graphene “schrapnel” that had not assembled into any form, but was found in bits and chunks. This graphene schrapnel had otherwise conjoined with heavy metals and other toxic adjuvants to form graphene symplasts (chunks or aggregates of organic and inorganic material).

What is graphene oxide?

Graphene is a nanomaterial derived from the mineral graphite, which is a hexagonal crystalline form of carbon. Graphene has been engineered to be one-atom thick and to exist in a variety of physical forms such as sheets and tubes (nanotubes, as noted). 

It is the thinnest material known to humans.

Graphene oxide has been found to be electromagnetically and thermally conductive; it can thus amplify and receive electromagnetic signals. Yet it is also heat-resistant. It is 200 times stronger than steel and lighter than paper, and yet flexible and elastic as well as transparent.

For these reasons and more, graphene has been credited with the potential to unleash a new industrial revolution on par with that of the Internet. Europe and Asian nations, as well as American institutions, have dedicated significant sums of money (in the billions) to developing graphene nanomaterials–based technologies and products.

It was reported last year that European countries, including most saliently Spain, had already spent $1 billion on investment into graphene-based materials and technologies. The global graphene composites market is expected to be $20B by 2028.

Graphene is planned to be used in textiles, “health care”, photovoltaics and film, among many other applications, and has been found anecdotally in condoms and sanitary napkins.

Although graphene was identified earlier in the 20th century (early 1960s), the vast amount of scientific literature demonstrates this establishment investment fully, starting from when single-layer graphene was first identified and produced in 2004.

There were already 9,000 patents for graphene-based products as of 2013, according to one older graphene blog.

Unfortunately, graphene oxide is toxic to humans. Its nano size allows it to enter cells and wreak havoc on red blood cells in particular, as it is naturally magnetically drawn to the iron content in blood and to the body’s major fields: the heart and brain. Red blood cells clump around graphene and cannot flow through the bloodstream and take up oxygen. Graphene causes major blood stagnation, which leads to clots.

Graphene oxide is, as noted, strongly electromagnetically, thermally and acoustically conductive. This means graphene will react to these types of stimuli, because it is capable of absorbing and transmitting energy.

Graphene is also oxidative, acidic, strongly inflammatory, and physically razor-sharp – one-atom-thick razor sharp. It can not only slice through blood vessels and endothelia (tissue linings), but it can also strongly interact with cell membranes and DNA. 

Graphene oxide thus employs many mechanisms of harm in the body, resulting in hemorrhage and clotting, as well as necrosis and apoptosis (cell death).

It is also thought that graphene oxide is genotoxic. 

So this and future blog posts are meant to share the facts as they are known to only too few: The actual scientific evidence shows the COVID injections are not gene therapy shots, but graphene shots.

And, the actual scientific evidence also shows that the graphene shots can explain the severe clotting damage seen by embalmers of vaccinated persons better than current popular theories.

You will notice that most alt media outlets will downplay the graphene if it is mentioned at all. Graphene is not just an adjuvant or another heavy metal. Want to have a look at those characteristics again? 

Certainly we continue to investigate.

Upshot: There is no evidence of mRNA in the jab! There is evidence of graphene!


The independent Spanish-language scientific research group La Quinta Columna first identified graphene oxide in the vaccine vials via micro-Raman spectroscopy studies done by Dr. Jose Campra in summer of 2021.

(Independent media watchers should be sure to remember that Whitney Webb and Ryan Cristian of The Last American Vagabond poo-pooed these findings and tried to debunk them out of the gate. Certainly they are not science reporters, so how were they so sure as to what was in the vial, as it had never before been independently investigated?)

Quinta Columna’s research was confirmed by South American and European researchers as well as researchers in New Zealand and the US.

PhD and founder of a graphene nanomaterials company, the German Andreas Noack, who also wrote his PhD thesis about graphene oxide, further confirmed that the studies had correctly identified graphene oxide but that it was in its more harmful reduced form.

After he spoke about this in a public video last summer, his girlfriend reported that he died shortly thereafter. 

Veteran American lab researcher and virologist Dr. Poornima Wagh, whose father was an industry lab researcher and in whose lab she began her longtime career, confirmed that she and her research group of 20 have found no mRNA in any of the vials. Her group has tested over 2,000 vials of vaccines of nearly every brand in existence using Raman spectroscopy, she says.

Significantly, Wagh’s group found that the ingredients of all of the vaccines were the same across brands, which is surprising given the fact that different “delivery platforms” and ingredients are said to have been used in the vaccines.

Yet, despite the fact that the researchers found the jabs all contained the same ingredients, Wagh also said her group found 35 different levels of toxicity amidst this similarity.

Wagh’s group also claimed to find hydrogel-type materials that are alleged to turn into crystalline antennae. Indeed, the vaccines’ gelatinous character has been observed by Quinta Columna researcher Ricardo Delgado, a bioinformatician, who observed samples over time, among others.

(More on the work of Dr. Wagh’s lab in the next post, because they also tried to isolate the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus and were unsuccessful. Wagh’s researchers found only human material, and no viral material.)

I also highly highly recommend her interview with Dr. Lee Merritt.

Neuroscientist Dr. Kevin McCairn says he found no mRNA in his Pfizer and Moderna samples using scanning electron microscopy X-ray detection analysis. McCairn says he did not find the elemental signatures of nitrogen or phosphorus, key components of nucleic acid material, when he tested Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. He also reported small amounts of lipid via Raman spectroscopy.

McCairn is also soliciting donations for further research.

Quinta Columna–affiliated Dr. Monteverde from Argentina has reported evidence produced by veteran Spanish biologist Juan Garberi that no RNA replication occurred in either of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines and therefore no “messenger RNA” could have been present.

The most comprehensive studies offered to the public so far (Wagh’s are not available), done by American naturopath Dr. Robert O. Young, also support the findings of the scientists affiliated with Spanish research group La Quinta Columna, Drs. Wagh, McCairn and others.

Young found mostly graphene-based nano-forms, as well as micron-size aggregates, or symplasts, of mostly organic elements, C and O mostly, which is constitutive of graphene, as well as Na and Cl (salt), and smaller amounts of metals including aluminum, silicon, cadmium and mercury.

He also identified the trypanosoma parasite in the Pfizer vaccine — if it is truly that and not some novel synthetic graphene-based micro-”organism”, which was also observed as researchers observed the material over time.

However, there may be some truth to this finding, as Dr. Mark Bailey’s excellent but flawed paper, “The Covid-19 Fraud War on Humanity”, showed a similar parasite in the blood of an unfortunate injected. Is Figure 4 not similar to the syncytium Dr. Young says is associated with this parasite? It appears so.

(Bailey’s paper was unfortunately rejected by the New Zealand court system, but I recommend it to everyone to share with the caveat of: there is no proof the jab is a gene editor.)

Young also performed one conventional RNA quantification of the Pfizer sample, via a spectrophotometer, to obtain the frequency of UV bands correlated to RNA.

Here is a key section of Young’s paper:

“The Quantification of mRNA in the Pfizer Vaccine

The quantification of RNA in the Pfizer sample was carried out with conventional protocols (Fisher).

According to NanoDropTM 2000 spectrophotometer calibration check specific software (Thermofisher), the UV absorption spectrum of total aqueous fraction was correlated to 747 ng/ml of unknown absorbing substances.

However, after RNA extraction with commercial kit (Thermofisher), quantification with RNA specific Qbit fluorescence probe (Thermofisher) showed that only 6 ng/ml could be related to the presence of RNA. The spectrum was compatible with the peak of rGO at 270nm.

According to microscopic images presented here, most of this absorbance might be due to graphene-like sheets, abundant in the fluids suspension in the sample.

The conclusions are further supported by high fluorescence from the sample with maximum at 340 nm, in accordance with peak values for rGO. It must be reminded that RNA does not show spontaneous fluorescence under UV exposure.” (bold added)

This result indicates that both UV absorbance and fluorescence data showed consistency with reduced graphene oxide, which is the form Noack indicated is in the injection.

Young found only absorbance data corresponding to RNA for a small portion of the sample.

His spectroscopic data showed a little nitrogen and phosphorus for Pfizer and Moderna, a little nitrogen for Astra Zeneca and neither for Janssen. RNA or “viral vector” vaccines should have some nitrogen and phosphorus there.

The FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) letter for the Pfizer-BionTech vaccine approved a dose of .3 ml containing 30 mcg mRNA for up to six doses totaling 1.8 ml, to be diluted with sodium chloride at a roughly 1:1 ratio. The FDA approved five or six doses per vial, with Pfizer offering six doses per vial. Moderna offers seven doses per vial, two above the FDA’s approval.

As per the Pfizer EUA letter, the Product Description states:

“The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is supplied as a frozen suspension in multiple dose vials; each vial must be diluted with 1.8 mL of sterile 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP prior to use to form the vaccine. The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine does not contain a preservative.

Each 0.3 mL dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine contains 30 mcg of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2.”

Dr. Young found a mere 6 nanograms/ml of RNA. Yet there should be 180 mcg in an 1.8 ml vial, which is 100 mcg/ml. That’s 0.006% of the stated amount of RNA in the vial.

This is a trace amount.

Certainly what Young found does not match the product description and contains little to none of the stated active ingredient.

Thermofisher, the manufacturer of the Nanodrop RNA extraction kit used by Young, reports, “The NanoDrop instrument’s... detection limit for total RNA concentration is 1.5 μg/mL, affecting its accuracy and precision at low concentration levels.”

These facts taken together indicate that this is a miniscule concentration of RNA. It’s basically none.

In fact, Dr. Young has shown in many videos that graphene is the primary destructive agent in the injection, and not an mRNA-based process that produces a spike protein. He and others have explained the ubiquitous appearance of spikes on dying or damaged cells as the result of some toxin or stressor or deficiency condition.

The Quinta Columna researchers and others have also found evidence of digital device identifiers called Mac addresses emanating from the COVID-vaccinated, and certainly the magnetic phenomena displayed by jab victims has been widely observed across social media.

In order to entertain a theory of gene editing, you have to have some genetic material that could persist and cause changes. The gene editing theory looks unlikely when you have little to no genetic material.

And there is much more evidence against the gene editing theory of the COVID jab, which will be covered here.

However, in the conclusion of his important paper, Dr. Young unfortunately belies his own and others’ results. He states:

"The Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen drugs are NOT "vaccines" but complexed Reduced Graphene Oxide or Graphene Hydoxide nano particulate aggregates of varying nano elements attached to genetically modified nucleic acids of mRNA from animal or vero cells and aborted human fetal cells as viewed and described above." (bold added)

First, as noted above, AstraZeneca and Janssen were not RNA-based injections. But there was only found a little nitrogen in the AstraZeneca and neither nitrogen nor phosphorus in the Janssen. Still if they were supposed to be synthetic or modified “viral vectors”, there should be some nitrogen and phosphorus.

So Dr. Young’s statement as to those jabs cannot be true.

Second, Dr. Young only quantified RNA in one of the vials, which was Pfizer, which was the best choice as it is most deadly and most widely administered in the US. He reported a trace concentration of RNA, 6 nanograms/ml vs. the officially stated 180 mcg per 1.8 ml vial expected per the FDA’s Emergency Use Approval for the Pfizer vaccine. That is a difference on an order of more than 10,000!

He did not perform RNA quantification with the Moderna, but he is raising money for his research and this might be something he could do.

Dr. Young’s conclusion as stated above does not note the micron sizes of symplasts and objects although his imagery does as shown in his published paper.  

He also provides a rather specific description of mRNA nucleic acids being attached to the nano-aggregates. However, Dr. Young cannot say he observed an attachment, because he could not have observed an attachment. He didn’t show a micrograph of an attachment if he saw one.

Was there enough there to observe an attachment? Not likely.

Also this specific description also suggests something like a bunch of RNA was observed. It does not appear that there could have been at those concentrations, and there was much greater presence of graphene and heavy metals than any presence of RNA.

Also he spends a bit of time on the derivation of the RNA, giving it extra importance, when the results did not show that.

Dr. Young showed mainly the same initial imagery as the other researchers: graphene nanoforms and schrapnel. 

Dr. Young basically took the last half of his concluding statement from the literature, referring to how “viruses” / RNA are produced in the lab, generally.

This writer does not know the exact alleged source of the alleged modified RNA as of yet, and this “RNA technology” is now the subject of a Moderna lawsuit against Pfizer.

However, whatever the source is said to be, it’s not in the vial.

What Young and the other researchers found is extremely significant and should not be dismissed without review.


Young shared his evidence in his first and all-important Corona Investigative Committee interview with lawyers Rainer Fuellmich and Viviana Fischer.

Yet, during this interview Dr. Young played along with a narrative that he does not espouse and that his results contradict, by claiming he found mRNA and implying that it works as suggested and even like Royal Lee’s protomorphogens, which are nuclear components purified — nucleic acids being much among them as well as proteins — and used therapeutically in natural medicine.

So, Dr. Young did by way of this comparison, endorse this mRNA theory. 

But he did not find evidence of this theory.

There is forming an alternative view of graphene, that it is an adjuvant. Even Dr. Wagh downplayed graphene in her public presentations, and did not educate people as to its novelty and importance.

Perhaps she is unaware, or simply did not wish to speak on something outside her expertise, if it is, but the only “novel” pathogen in the whole COVID scenario is graphene. All others are known.

Evidence suggests graphene oxide is a primary ingredient of the COVID mass injections and no mere adjuvant.

In fact, Dr. Young demonstrated evidence and stated in his many videos with Ramola D, the Everyday Concerned Citizen reporter, that graphene is the mechanism of harm and that the harm is done directly to our blood, and specifically to our red blood cells.

Unfortunately, Dr. Young is a friend and colleague of former government employee Dr. Judy Mikovits, whom he speaks of so highly despite the fact that their work is totally conflicting. In fact, Dr. Young essentially espouses Otto Warburg’s cancer theory (acidosis) while Mikovits thinks cancer — and everything else — can be caused by viruses. 

Mikovits is in touch with most of the top alt media reporters. 


All evidence from independent researchers shows no one found mRNA in the COVID injections. Young reported a small quantity in Pfizer, but at orders-of-magnitude lesser concentration than that stated in Pfizer’s EUA letter so as to be negligible. He did not quantify any RNA in Moderna.

As noted, all researchers found graphene oxide as well as metal contaminants.

The results of multiple independent researchers show that graphene, and not RNA, is likely a primary active ingredient in the COVID injections.

Blood analysis findings, autopsists’ as well as morgue and embalmers’ findings also show that graphene is very probably responsible for the types of damages we see, but this will have to be shown.

Such findings of graphene oxide and other toxicants provide powerful evidence against the spike protein / gene editing theory of jab harm and evidence for graphene as the primary toxicant with other adjuvant toxicants.

Moreover, researchers who observed the vials over time observed lots of micron-sized and also square objects. These square, micron-sized objects sometimes evolved to show networked patterns akin to circuitry, suggesting graphene-based technology.

No mere salt crystals these.

And, as noted, electronically animated nano-objects began to form as vials were observed over time, as graphene is electromagnetic in nature.

Also consider:

It would be very expensive for pharma companies to really pack these vials full of modified RNA as described and then maintain the 70 degrees below zero temperatures to maintain it across a supply chain. Former Ventavia employee and whistleblower Brook Jackson reported that the temperature was not maintained at what passed for Pfizer’s clinical trials.

Labor-intensive lab processes such as creating RNA are neither cost-effective nor mass-reproducible. UMass-Amherst lab researchers admitted as recently as last year that “RNA therapeutics” were not cost-effective due to the lengthy and expensive process of RNA purification and again, only in August of 2021, created a process to remedy this.

That is to say, RNA production had not achieved scale at least commercially, as of August 2021.

A process that demands multiple rounds of cell culturing (serial passaging) as is supposed in the idea of a synthetic viral “bioweapon” is certainly not mass reproducible at the levels suggested by a global vaccination program.

Big Pharma is essentially now subsidized by government and has merged with it. Whitney Webb now reports Moderna’s booster RNA is being made by a CIA-linked company called National Resilience, or Resilience. One of its primary products is said to be “RNA modalities”.

Yet, these companies who are closely connected to the US deep state, some of whom like Moderna have never made a product before, who claim RNA is their business — despite such business not even being at scale in the industry as of exactly one year ago — have produced RNA vaccines with no RNA in the vials? This is what it seems.

Is it pseudoscience or pseudoreality? Probably both.


Please subscribe and stay tuned. I am a new Substacker and I would like to share the latest independent data and common sense scientific arguments here.

I am completely independent. My background is in biomedical studies, political history, journalism and the world’s traditional medical systems including Ayurveda, Chinese medicine and herbalism.

If you find errors or wish to contribute, please let me know in comments.

Best wishes to all of you. Thank you for remaining open.

Those who can remain open are the hope of the world.

 

Source: https://pseudoscience.substack.com/p/independent-researchers-find-no-mrna

 

[My thoughts, after reading the above ...]

So, to my mind, the mRNA claim was a decoy, probably conjured up to gain approval for an untested vaccine in a ridiculously short space of time.

 

If they had admitted to the shots being 90-odd percent graphene oxide then they would have aroused suspicion in everyone because GO has never been known as a treatment for any virus, let alone Covid, and would undoubtedly never have gained approval.

 

It's all starting to make sense to me now and the gaps are starting to fill in. If it is ever proved in court that the shots contain little to no mRNA and are primarily GO then the whole scam collapses and heads will certainly roll.

 

This is a whole new ball game now and needs to be watched closely.

 

 

 


 

Edited by webtrekker
  • Like 6
  • Thanks 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...