Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, webtrekker said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes GB News are asking some questions, but is it because they are jumping on the bandwagon because more people are waking up to

the lies.

 

Who is the CEO of GB News?

 

Angelos Frangopoulos worked for Murdoch's Sky News in Australia and Arabia Sky News,

so should we take GB News seriously?

 

Here is some more information about him from university days.

 

"A proud member of the Charles Sturt University community, Angelos was named CSU’s Pro-Chancellor, Sydney.

Angelos now lives in the UK continuing his journalism career as CEO of 2020"

 

https://alumni.csu.edu.au/current-alumni/meet-our-alumni/search/profiles/angelos-frangopoulos-_-ba-communication-journalism-1988

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GB_News

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After self-censoring shame over lockdown, how can journalists stay silent on vaccine danger? - by Bob Moran
 

 

TOWARDS the end of 2020, editors of major UK media outlets were summoned, one by one, and not for the first time, to individual briefings at Downing Street.  
 

Apparently, all the meetings followed the same format. Each editor was shown into Boris Johnson’s office, where Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance gave a presentation about how a devastating next wave of ‘Covid’ was going to kill 500,000 people and cripple the NHS.
 

The usual bogus decontextualised data and ludicrously misleading graphs were waved in their faces. Then the two witch-doctors slithered out of the room and Johnson instructed the editors to get behind a winter lockdown. 
 

At this point, one editor decided to interrogate the Prime Minister. He said something along these lines: ‘Come on, you know as well as I do that all of that was complete nonsense. No country on Earth experienced half a million deaths in the first wave and they’re telling us to expect it in a second wave? There’s no justification for another lockdown – why are you doing this?’ 
 

Boris Johnson adopted a haunted and helpless expression, gestured towards the door through which Whitty and Vallance had just exited and said: ‘I’ve got to do what they tell me.’ 
 

I heard this story in early 2021 from a colleague at the Telegraph. I won’t name the editor it refers to, but I will say it was not a Telegraph editor. I can’t prove that it happened although I have no reason to doubt its veracity.  
 

I think it’s an interesting anecdote, particularly given the stage we have reached in this dreadful saga. It suggests that the perceived relationship between the media, the scientists and the politicians was not exactly as many assumed.  
 

If true, it confirms that the Prime Minister was not in charge of the country during one of the most significant periods in its history, and that this was something apparent to several highly influential journalists. 
 

One might say that it would have been irresponsible or very bad form for the journalist concerned to go away and write up the details of a private, off-the-record conversation with the Prime Minister. On the other hand, you could argue that the conventional rules and standards of journalistic practice had been flagrantly disregarded for many months at that point, so why worry?  

 

At the very least, this encounter ought to have sent shockwaves through Fleet Street. Investigations should have been launched. Serious questions needed to be asked about how our country was being governed and by whom.  
 

The people of the UK were being subjected to some of the most extreme, tyrannical, immoral, unnecessary and legally dubious policies ever concocted. If there was uncertainty about where exactly these policies were coming from and who had the final say, the public surely had a right to know. 
 

By the end of 2020, many people had realised that the mechanics of democracy did not seem to be functioning as we had been told. Those asking the very reasonable question of who exactly was calling the shots were being labelled bonkers conspiracy theorists.  
 

Yet here was the Prime Minister himself confirming that he was not in control and, it seems, agreeing that these policies were mad, yet it wasn’t considered newsworthy. People were dying, lives were being ruined, all as a direct result of the insane measures dictated by some nebulous level of authority. But the narrative had to be protected at all costs. 

 

Now things have shifted slightly. Operation Backtrack has begun. A childish and transparent blame game is well under way. Certain journalists are stepping forward to ‘expose’ the great scandal of lockdowns. Because it’s now safe to do so.  
 

They want you to think that they’ve recently discovered this. They haven’t. They knew corruption and scandal was widespread at the top of government a long time ago and decided that it needn’t concern you. 

Obviously, this does not apply to all journalists. There have been many in the expanding alternative media who have, from the beginning, raised the alarm and asked the right questions. Alas, none of them was being invited to these clandestine meetings at Number Ten. 
 

Journalists are not supposed to be gatekeepers of the truth. They shouldn’t get to decide what truths the public are allowed to hear any more than doctors should get to decide who gets treated and who doesn’t.  

We need journalists who seek the truth above all else and upon finding it, however unpleasant or inconvenient it may be, give it to the people without hesitation. We need them now more than ever. 
 

The media has decided it’s time to reflect on lockdowns and pretend that it’s just become clear that they may have constituted a massive criminal act.  

 

However, an even bigger scandal, a more heinous crime, is continuing today. And these journalists are doing the same thing again. How long do we have to wait before they start writing their columns about the great vaccine scandal? 

 

It’s tempting to write these people off. Perhaps we should take the view that they’ve had their chance and failed miserably in their responsibilities. But I would rather see them search deeply for any moral conscience they have left, find the requisite levels of courage and integrity and start doing their jobs. 

 

How many more months will they spend sitting comfortably on the truth, watching millions of people suffer at the hands of a lie?
 https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/after-self-censoring-shame-over-lockdown-how-can-journalists-stay-silent-on-vaccine-danger/ 

 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, numnuts said:

 

 

Seriously, any time I saw some so-called journalists in a room with Chris Whitty, it was like watching well trained cock suckers in action. Hanging on his every word. Never, and I mean never, asking a difficult question. No matter how much it begged to be asked. He was their God! Why?

 

They have been psychologically lobotomised. The left side of their brain has stopped working. That's why they can no longer see graphs and numbers. 20.000 dead are invisible to them.

Edited by Freaky Dragonfly
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth that the media was paid off and was indeed part of this scamdemic is now beginning to surface.

Certain individuals need to be tried for treason and given a public flogging for the misery they have helped inflict on the UK public.

 

Hanging isn't good enough for them. 🤬

  • Like 5
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, legion said:

After self-censoring shame over lockdown, how can journalists stay silent on vaccine danger? - by Bob Moran
 

 

TOWARDS the end of 2020, editors of major UK media outlets were summoned, one by one, and not for the first time, to individual briefings at Downing Street.  
 

Apparently, all the meetings followed the same format. Each editor was shown into Boris Johnson’s office, where Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance gave a presentation about how a devastating next wave of ‘Covid’ was going to kill 500,000 people and cripple the NHS.
 

The usual bogus decontextualised data and ludicrously misleading graphs were waved in their faces. Then the two witch-doctors slithered out of the room and Johnson instructed the editors to get behind a winter lockdown. 
 

At this point, one editor decided to interrogate the Prime Minister. He said something along these lines: ‘Come on, you know as well as I do that all of that was complete nonsense. No country on Earth experienced half a million deaths in the first wave and they’re telling us to expect it in a second wave? There’s no justification for another lockdown – why are you doing this?’ 
 

Boris Johnson adopted a haunted and helpless expression, gestured towards the door through which Whitty and Vallance had just exited and said: ‘I’ve got to do what they tell me.’ 
 

I heard this story in early 2021 from a colleague at the Telegraph. I won’t name the editor it refers to, but I will say it was not a Telegraph editor. I can’t prove that it happened although I have no reason to doubt its veracity.  
 

I think it’s an interesting anecdote, particularly given the stage we have reached in this dreadful saga. It suggests that the perceived relationship between the media, the scientists and the politicians was not exactly as many assumed.  
 

If true, it confirms that the Prime Minister was not in charge of the country during one of the most significant periods in its history, and that this was something apparent to several highly influential journalists. 
 

One might say that it would have been irresponsible or very bad form for the journalist concerned to go away and write up the details of a private, off-the-record conversation with the Prime Minister. On the other hand, you could argue that the conventional rules and standards of journalistic practice had been flagrantly disregarded for many months at that point, so why worry?  

 

At the very least, this encounter ought to have sent shockwaves through Fleet Street. Investigations should have been launched. Serious questions needed to be asked about how our country was being governed and by whom.  
 

The people of the UK were being subjected to some of the most extreme, tyrannical, immoral, unnecessary and legally dubious policies ever concocted. If there was uncertainty about where exactly these policies were coming from and who had the final say, the public surely had a right to know. 
 

By the end of 2020, many people had realised that the mechanics of democracy did not seem to be functioning as we had been told. Those asking the very reasonable question of who exactly was calling the shots were being labelled bonkers conspiracy theorists.  
 

Yet here was the Prime Minister himself confirming that he was not in control and, it seems, agreeing that these policies were mad, yet it wasn’t considered newsworthy. People were dying, lives were being ruined, all as a direct result of the insane measures dictated by some nebulous level of authority. But the narrative had to be protected at all costs. 

 

Now things have shifted slightly. Operation Backtrack has begun. A childish and transparent blame game is well under way. Certain journalists are stepping forward to ‘expose’ the great scandal of lockdowns. Because it’s now safe to do so.  
 

They want you to think that they’ve recently discovered this. They haven’t. They knew corruption and scandal was widespread at the top of government a long time ago and decided that it needn’t concern you. 

Obviously, this does not apply to all journalists. There have been many in the expanding alternative media who have, from the beginning, raised the alarm and asked the right questions. Alas, none of them was being invited to these clandestine meetings at Number Ten. 
 

Journalists are not supposed to be gatekeepers of the truth. They shouldn’t get to decide what truths the public are allowed to hear any more than doctors should get to decide who gets treated and who doesn’t.  

We need journalists who seek the truth above all else and upon finding it, however unpleasant or inconvenient it may be, give it to the people without hesitation. We need them now more than ever. 
 

The media has decided it’s time to reflect on lockdowns and pretend that it’s just become clear that they may have constituted a massive criminal act.  

 

However, an even bigger scandal, a more heinous crime, is continuing today. And these journalists are doing the same thing again. How long do we have to wait before they start writing their columns about the great vaccine scandal? 

 

It’s tempting to write these people off. Perhaps we should take the view that they’ve had their chance and failed miserably in their responsibilities. But I would rather see them search deeply for any moral conscience they have left, find the requisite levels of courage and integrity and start doing their jobs. 

 

How many more months will they spend sitting comfortably on the truth, watching millions of people suffer at the hands of a lie?
 https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/after-self-censoring-shame-over-lockdown-how-can-journalists-stay-silent-on-vaccine-danger/ 

 

 

I was just about to post that exact same article! Thanks legion. 👍

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t know what’s worse, the architects of what we’re now experiencing playing the victim, or actual victims replying to the above Tweet saying ‘You can’t win Devi xx’ as if there were no real ramifications to lockdowns.

Edited by ar55
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ar55 said:

I don’t know what’s worse, the architects of what we’re now experiencing playing the victim, or actual victims replying to the above Tweet saying ‘You can’t win Devi xx’ as if there were no real ramifications to lockdowns.

They've got to be bots or just fuckin morons. If I had twatter, I'd take a ban to insult everyone of those dick heads for the lavish praise they've just heaped on this seditious and traitorous cunt. Never forget what these bastard's have done and let's hold them to account. 

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

 

Yes GB News are asking some questions, but is it because they are jumping on the bandwagon because more people are waking up to

the lies.

 

Who is the CEO of GB News?

 

Angelos Frangopoulos worked for Murdoch's Sky News in Australia and Arabia Sky News,

so should we take GB News seriously?

 

Here is some more information about him from university days.

 

"A proud member of the Charles Sturt University community, Angelos was named CSU’s Pro-Chancellor, Sydney.

Angelos now lives in the UK continuing his journalism career as CEO of 2020"

 

https://alumni.csu.edu.au/current-alumni/meet-our-alumni/search/profiles/angelos-frangopoulos-_-ba-communication-journalism-1988

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GB_News

 

 

I may be wrong, but EST comes to mind

 

Angelos Frangopoulos CEO OF GB NEWS

 

fbc7ba49ab9bb80059a3b570fb59f5eea1e1511f

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, legion said:

After self-censoring shame over lockdown, how can journalists stay silent on vaccine danger? - by Bob Moran
 

 

TOWARDS the end of 2020, editors of major UK media outlets were summoned, one by one, and not for the first time, to individual briefings at Downing Street.  
 

Apparently, all the meetings followed the same format. Each editor was shown into Boris Johnson’s office, where Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance gave a presentation about how a devastating next wave of ‘Covid’ was going to kill 500,000 people and cripple the NHS.
 

The usual bogus decontextualised data and ludicrously misleading graphs were waved in their faces. Then the two witch-doctors slithered out of the room and Johnson instructed the editors to get behind a winter lockdown. 
 

At this point, one editor decided to interrogate the Prime Minister. He said something along these lines: ‘Come on, you know as well as I do that all of that was complete nonsense. No country on Earth experienced half a million deaths in the first wave and they’re telling us to expect it in a second wave? There’s no justification for another lockdown – why are you doing this?’ 
 

Boris Johnson adopted a haunted and helpless expression, gestured towards the door through which Whitty and Vallance had just exited and said: ‘I’ve got to do what they tell me.’ 
 

I heard this story in early 2021 from a colleague at the Telegraph. I won’t name the editor it refers to, but I will say it was not a Telegraph editor. I can’t prove that it happened although I have no reason to doubt its veracity.  
 

I think it’s an interesting anecdote, particularly given the stage we have reached in this dreadful saga. It suggests that the perceived relationship between the media, the scientists and the politicians was not exactly as many assumed.  
 

If true, it confirms that the Prime Minister was not in charge of the country during one of the most significant periods in its history, and that this was something apparent to several highly influential journalists. 
 

One might say that it would have been irresponsible or very bad form for the journalist concerned to go away and write up the details of a private, off-the-record conversation with the Prime Minister. On the other hand, you could argue that the conventional rules and standards of journalistic practice had been flagrantly disregarded for many months at that point, so why worry?  

 

At the very least, this encounter ought to have sent shockwaves through Fleet Street. Investigations should have been launched. Serious questions needed to be asked about how our country was being governed and by whom.  
 

The people of the UK were being subjected to some of the most extreme, tyrannical, immoral, unnecessary and legally dubious policies ever concocted. If there was uncertainty about where exactly these policies were coming from and who had the final say, the public surely had a right to know. 
 

By the end of 2020, many people had realised that the mechanics of democracy did not seem to be functioning as we had been told. Those asking the very reasonable question of who exactly was calling the shots were being labelled bonkers conspiracy theorists.  
 

Yet here was the Prime Minister himself confirming that he was not in control and, it seems, agreeing that these policies were mad, yet it wasn’t considered newsworthy. People were dying, lives were being ruined, all as a direct result of the insane measures dictated by some nebulous level of authority. But the narrative had to be protected at all costs. 

 

Now things have shifted slightly. Operation Backtrack has begun. A childish and transparent blame game is well under way. Certain journalists are stepping forward to ‘expose’ the great scandal of lockdowns. Because it’s now safe to do so.  
 

They want you to think that they’ve recently discovered this. They haven’t. They knew corruption and scandal was widespread at the top of government a long time ago and decided that it needn’t concern you. 

Obviously, this does not apply to all journalists. There have been many in the expanding alternative media who have, from the beginning, raised the alarm and asked the right questions. Alas, none of them was being invited to these clandestine meetings at Number Ten. 
 

Journalists are not supposed to be gatekeepers of the truth. They shouldn’t get to decide what truths the public are allowed to hear any more than doctors should get to decide who gets treated and who doesn’t.  

We need journalists who seek the truth above all else and upon finding it, however unpleasant or inconvenient it may be, give it to the people without hesitation. We need them now more than ever. 
 

The media has decided it’s time to reflect on lockdowns and pretend that it’s just become clear that they may have constituted a massive criminal act.  

 

However, an even bigger scandal, a more heinous crime, is continuing today. And these journalists are doing the same thing again. How long do we have to wait before they start writing their columns about the great vaccine scandal? 

 

It’s tempting to write these people off. Perhaps we should take the view that they’ve had their chance and failed miserably in their responsibilities. But I would rather see them search deeply for any moral conscience they have left, find the requisite levels of courage and integrity and start doing their jobs. 

 

How many more months will they spend sitting comfortably on the truth, watching millions of people suffer at the hands of a lie?
 https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/after-self-censoring-shame-over-lockdown-how-can-journalists-stay-silent-on-vaccine-danger/ 

 

 

Lots of people talk about the lockdowns, but Bob also highlights the almost impossible to deny dangers of the injections.

 

STAND+FIRM+200.jpg?format=500w

 

Moderna+&+Child+300.jpg?format=300w

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ar55 said:

I don’t know what’s worse, the architects of what we’re now experiencing playing the victim, or actual victims replying to the above Tweet saying ‘You can’t win Devi xx’ as if there were no real ramifications to lockdowns.

 

...And this pathetic little weasel isn't far from the top of that treason  list.

Keep flogging the narrative Devi, with any luck it'll be you who's getting the flogging in the very near future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Morpheus said:

They've got to be bots or just fuckin morons. If I had twatter, I'd take a ban to insult everyone of those dick heads for the lavish praise they've just heaped on this seditious and traitorous cunt. Never forget what these bastards have done and let's hold them to account. 

 

Spot on Morph. Well said.

 

👏👏👏

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Human10 said:

Current data of all deaths from Euromomo:

It could be vaccine, 5G and delayed treatments... In Poland they have dense 5G forests. Close to these things I felt like I was going to faint... 🙄

I'm afraid excess of deaths will be excuse for another wave of bulling and covid will be blamed again (with unvaccinated on top) 😔

image.png.3b5c98dfb602fc8e9fae1c7f8c786382.png

image.png.e07fbc28390dfb4c38568701ba995e03.png

 

 

 

Definitely on the rise.

 

Uk mortality summer months from ONS:

 

Image

 

https://twitter.com/dontbetyet/status/1564969877516976128?s=20&t=MQgw-1-GANZHa_gl1ku9Kw

 

image.png.1aa322796d5849d9f97bd0e8d1282247.png

 

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/weekending12august2022

Image

Unvaxalined very low risk of dying from convid. Not that I really find any of this has credibility, as they are all tested several times in hospital anyway & then labelled a convid death as we all know..its all pseudo bollocks. 45x PCR. 28/60 days any reason blah blah..

 

I believe is going to be carnage this winter from jab 5 & superflu shot..plus those that refuse to get jabbed (vaids) & will be plenty distractions whilst grim reaper on overtime.

 

Government looking embarrassing admitting the jab is not good for pregnancy, but now trying to go back to saying it is still recommend.

 

Image

Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/summary-public assessment-report-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine

Confusion CON fusion! in a Babylon.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, legion said:

After self-censoring shame over lockdown, how can journalists stay silent on vaccine danger? - by Bob Moran
 

 

TOWARDS the end of 2020, editors of major UK media outlets were summoned, one by one, and not for the first time, to individual briefings at Downing Street.  
 

Apparently, all the meetings followed the same format. Each editor was shown into Boris Johnson’s office, where Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance gave a presentation about how a devastating next wave of ‘Covid’ was going to kill 500,000 people and cripple the NHS.
 

The usual bogus decontextualised data and ludicrously misleading graphs were waved in their faces. Then the two witch-doctors slithered out of the room and Johnson instructed the editors to get behind a winter lockdown. 
 

At this point, one editor decided to interrogate the Prime Minister. He said something along these lines: ‘Come on, you know as well as I do that all of that was complete nonsense. No country on Earth experienced half a million deaths in the first wave and they’re telling us to expect it in a second wave? There’s no justification for another lockdown – why are you doing this?’ 
 

Boris Johnson adopted a haunted and helpless expression, gestured towards the door through which Whitty and Vallance had just exited and said: ‘I’ve got to do what they tell me.’ 
 

I heard this story in early 2021 from a colleague at the Telegraph. I won’t name the editor it refers to, but I will say it was not a Telegraph editor. I can’t prove that it happened although I have no reason to doubt its veracity.  
 

I think it’s an interesting anecdote, particularly given the stage we have reached in this dreadful saga. It suggests that the perceived relationship between the media, the scientists and the politicians was not exactly as many assumed.  
 

If true, it confirms that the Prime Minister was not in charge of the country during one of the most significant periods in its history, and that this was something apparent to several highly influential journalists. 
 

One might say that it would have been irresponsible or very bad form for the journalist concerned to go away and write up the details of a private, off-the-record conversation with the Prime Minister. On the other hand, you could argue that the conventional rules and standards of journalistic practice had been flagrantly disregarded for many months at that point, so why worry?  

 

At the very least, this encounter ought to have sent shockwaves through Fleet Street. Investigations should have been launched. Serious questions needed to be asked about how our country was being governed and by whom.  
 

The people of the UK were being subjected to some of the most extreme, tyrannical, immoral, unnecessary and legally dubious policies ever concocted. If there was uncertainty about where exactly these policies were coming from and who had the final say, the public surely had a right to know. 
 

By the end of 2020, many people had realised that the mechanics of democracy did not seem to be functioning as we had been told. Those asking the very reasonable question of who exactly was calling the shots were being labelled bonkers conspiracy theorists.  
 

Yet here was the Prime Minister himself confirming that he was not in control and, it seems, agreeing that these policies were mad, yet it wasn’t considered newsworthy. People were dying, lives were being ruined, all as a direct result of the insane measures dictated by some nebulous level of authority. But the narrative had to be protected at all costs. 

 

Now things have shifted slightly. Operation Backtrack has begun. A childish and transparent blame game is well under way. Certain journalists are stepping forward to ‘expose’ the great scandal of lockdowns. Because it’s now safe to do so.  
 

They want you to think that they’ve recently discovered this. They haven’t. They knew corruption and scandal was widespread at the top of government a long time ago and decided that it needn’t concern you. 

Obviously, this does not apply to all journalists. There have been many in the expanding alternative media who have, from the beginning, raised the alarm and asked the right questions. Alas, none of them was being invited to these clandestine meetings at Number Ten. 
 

Journalists are not supposed to be gatekeepers of the truth. They shouldn’t get to decide what truths the public are allowed to hear any more than doctors should get to decide who gets treated and who doesn’t.  

We need journalists who seek the truth above all else and upon finding it, however unpleasant or inconvenient it may be, give it to the people without hesitation. We need them now more than ever. 
 

The media has decided it’s time to reflect on lockdowns and pretend that it’s just become clear that they may have constituted a massive criminal act.  

 

However, an even bigger scandal, a more heinous crime, is continuing today. And these journalists are doing the same thing again. How long do we have to wait before they start writing their columns about the great vaccine scandal? 

 

It’s tempting to write these people off. Perhaps we should take the view that they’ve had their chance and failed miserably in their responsibilities. But I would rather see them search deeply for any moral conscience they have left, find the requisite levels of courage and integrity and start doing their jobs. 

 

How many more months will they spend sitting comfortably on the truth, watching millions of people suffer at the hands of a lie?
 https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/after-self-censoring-shame-over-lockdown-how-can-journalists-stay-silent-on-vaccine-danger/ 

 

 None of the politicians are in charge of anything, they are bought and paid for mouthpieces only, as are the press, tv & entertainment, most of the internet.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

well said that woman, (nicola charles from neighbours apparently?)
in particular the 'divide us using colour, sex, beliefs' to keep our eyes off the real enemy::

 

 

 

 

Neighbours' Nicola Charles claims she didn't appear in finale episode because she's 'unvaccinated' | Daily Mail Online

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/29/2022 at 5:36 PM, Bombadil said:

Interested to know more about his past. Do you have any links to his books free online? They cost a fortune

 

He has lots of interviews on youtube, well worth listening to, and free unlike he books, which are expensive. The 411 mystery is very strange.

 

Regarding his past, he left his job after being convicted of fraud, and was never a detective but a traffic cop apparently. None of this necessarily negates his research, but does conjur a few red flags over his honesty.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

 

Definitely on the rise.

 

Uk mortality summer months from ONS:

 

Image

 

https://twitter.com/dontbetyet/status/1564969877516976128?s=20&t=MQgw-1-GANZHa_gl1ku9Kw

 

image.png.1aa322796d5849d9f97bd0e8d1282247.png

 

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsregisteredweeklyinenglandandwalesprovisional/weekending12august2022

Image

Unvaxalined very low risk of dying from convid. Not that I really find any of this has credibility, as they are all tested several times in hospital anyway & then labelled a convid death as we all know..its all pseudo bollocks. 45x PCR. 28/60 days any reason blah blah..

 

I believe is going to be carnage this winter from jab 5 & superflu shot..plus those that refuse to get jabbed (vaids) & will be plenty distractions whilst grim reaper on overtime.

 

Government looking embarrassing admitting the jab is not good for pregnancy, but now trying to go back to saying it is still recommend.

 

Image

Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/summary-public assessment-report-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine

Confusion CON fusion! in a Babylon.

 

 

Yes, this is confusing. However, at the end of the webapge is a link to the pdf it summarises. Our stance on this is under attack because of 

This summary was last updated in June 2021.

even though the webpage clearly states 

Updated 16 August 2022

If you read the pdf it says

"This summary was last updated in June 2021."

but it also says

"The results of the non-clinical developmental and reproductive toxicity study will not be available until early 2021. Therefore, BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy"

So clearly for June 2021 they had no evidence. At some point after that they get some and change the advice.

 

Putting pregnancy aside, the worrying thing is all the other tests, at a point where they were jabbing millions a day worldwide, that weren't carried out - no cancer test. Which still hasn't been carried out, for some reason they don't mention this in the patient information leaflet.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/patient-information-leaflet-for-covid-19-vaccine-pfizerbiontech

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/summary-of-product-characteristics-for-covid-19-vaccine-pfizerbiontech

Genotoxicity/Carcinogenicity

Neither genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies were performed. The components of the vaccine (lipids and mRNA) are not expected to have genotoxic potential.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...