Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

numnuts

By numnuts,
in Covid-19 & NWO

 Share

Recommended Posts

numnuts

numnuts

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, Sexpistol50 said:

She reminds me of Donald Pleasance daughter Angela

ap4.png

 

I did like that little story. Talking about Donald Pleasance, he recently joined the freemasons and won a load cash with Clarkson on 'Who wants to be a millionaire?'.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shadowmoon

shadowmoon

Posted
Posted

Common Purpose - charity with private agenda...

The meeting went along the lines of:

 

There is an influenza virus currently affecting the world which is the real health issue but it is ultimately nothing to be overly concerned about plainly speaking.

People were knowingly wrongly given the wrong flu jab across the UK in winter 2019 following event 201, this resulted in inflammation of the larynx and people complained of having the sensation of broken glass in their throats.

 

Following this, the rhetoric of covid 19 was spun as a virus which could attack immune systems and hence the associated panic until society was shut down resulting in Scenario (1). Scenario (1) resulted in the now well-known campaign Stay at Home, Protect the NHS, Save Lives and the adoption of social distancing.

 

Covid 19 deaths are being caused by external issues such as weak immune systems, smoking, alcohol dependency, mental health issues and cancer and that people with these pre-existing conditions would have been susceptible to death anyway...

 

It was stated that the media would start an “enforcement campaign” in September which would pull no punches and be as “dishonestly honest” about speaking of covid 19 were people to ignore the advice. Considerations for sentencing offenders could range from a £5,000.00 fine to 18 months imprisonment both

 

 

https://www.carolinestephens.net/post/common-purpose-charity-with-private-agenda-yet-agenda-is-anything-but-neutral-taxpayers-beware

 

 

some excerpts form a vid posted last night, its actually  easier to read the article than view the vid.!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sidlittle

Sidlittle

Posted
Posted
52 minutes ago, Alnitak said:

When the  Health Professionals start to question things the whole scam will fall apart. 

 

Its starting now, a good article in the British Medical Journal written by the Editor. 

 

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425

 

Kamran Abbasi, executive editor

    1. “It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test.1011”

     

 


hmmm,  ‘suboptimal PCR test’  , I notice here if you follow the reference they are talking false negatives rather than the true blight , which is of course false positives.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Morpheus

Morpheus

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

Common Purpose - charity with private agenda...

The meeting went along the lines of:

 

There is an influenza virus currently affecting the world which is the real health issue but it is ultimately nothing to be overly concerned about plainly speaking.

People were knowingly wrongly given the wrong flu jab across the UK in winter 2019 following event 201, this resulted in inflammation of the larynx and people complained of having the sensation of broken glass in their throats.

 

Following this, the rhetoric of covid 19 was spun as a virus which could attack immune systems and hence the associated panic until society was shut down resulting in Scenario (1). Scenario (1) resulted in the now well-known campaign Stay at Home, Protect the NHS, Save Lives and the adoption of social distancing.

 

Covid 19 deaths are being caused by external issues such as weak immune systems, smoking, alcohol dependency, mental health issues and cancer and that people with these pre-existing conditions would have been susceptible to death anyway...

 

It was stated that the media would start an “enforcement campaign” in September which would pull no punches and be as “dishonestly honest” about speaking of covid 19 were people to ignore the advice. Considerations for sentencing offenders could range from a £5,000.00 fine to 18 months imprisonment both

 

 

https://www.carolinestephens.net/post/common-purpose-charity-with-private-agenda-yet-agenda-is-anything-but-neutral-taxpayers-beware

 

 

some excerpts form a vid posted last night, its actually  easier to read the article than view the vid.!

Yeah I watched this. She claims that if you've been looking at conspiracy theories online that you face the above £5k fine, banned from internet use for 5-10 years, plus community service. 🤔😒 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shadowmoon

shadowmoon

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Yeah I watched this. She claims that if you've been looking at conspiracy theories online that you face the above £5k fine, banned from internet use for 5-10 years, plus community service. 🤔😒 

 

It took me ages to get it working, 3 different browsers before it played.

None of what she says would surprise me now.

That I could be imprisoned for writing on this very site..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Morpheus

Morpheus

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, shadowmoon said:

 

It took me ages to get it working, 3 different browsers before it played.

None of what she says would surprise me now.

That I could be imprisoned for writing on this very site..

It wouldn't surprise me either, but at this juncture, it's a stretch. Let's put it into perspective, how many of us here are in a family where you're the only one who's into this kind of thing? Hazarding a guess, it's probably 8/9 out of 10 of us on here. 

 

So, first of all, they bring this in. As far as I am concerned the law is not retrospective so cannot apply until it's law. Easy then, you pack it in when it comes in. They can't prosecute for before that point, so it would seem silly to bring it in. On top of that, every ISP would be snitching on all their customers. Well, they'll have no customers left. I can only see a China style blocking of websites, I cannot foresee what she is saying as its way beyond what would be reasonable now. 

 

That's not to say it won't come in eventually, it just won't be anytime soon I don't think. Not beyond the realms of possibility, I just think she's fear mongering and I don't believe her info is credible. 👍🏻

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Baws

Baws

Posted
Posted

Popped in to a local shop earlier for some tobacco, saw some pringles on a deal so grabbed a box along with a wee cider to wash them down. 

 

Approaching the counter there was a large floppy signage thing on the floor along with an empty basket. I lent over it to place said items down and ask the lady why? Looked like they were placed for a leak I thought but it was a basket not a bucket!

 

Lady barks at me about corona virus pandemic, 2 meters etc, I said I’d never seen it before in the shop, but she insisted it’s always there when she’s working.

 

Anyways... she tells me “That’ll be £19.84 😂😂😂

 

Me.. “I’d like the receipt for that thanks🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Golden Retriever

Golden Retriever

Posted
Posted (edited)

British Medical Journal 13 November 2020

 

"When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die"

 

"Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth.

 

Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.  Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.

 

The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.

 

Next, a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities. The report’s publication was delayed by England’s Department of Health; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then, following a public outcry, was published as part of a follow-up report. Authors from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media. Third, on 15 October, the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper, a UK government scientist, was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “difficult political landscape.”

 

Now, a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19. The prime minister’s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests. It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test.

 

The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ, which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers. Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office. Why was it important to procure this product without due scrutiny? Prior publication of research on a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ’s publication policy. As if to prove a point, Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ’s press release about the research paper."

 

More here ....

 

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_term=hootsuite&utm_content=sme&utm_campaign=usage

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pete675

pete675

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, AndyJ said:

Clearly the nasal swab method of testing wasn't harsh enough ...

 

 

Emt5SjlWEAAyKCE.jpg

 

 

The dawn of the Covid Bottom Inspectors.

 

Viz gives a more accurate - and  prophetic picture of the way we're heading - than the fake news from the Guardian and Daily Mail ever did.

 

 

 

023_viz211_bottominspectors.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...