Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bombadil said:

Theyre actually not are they and you know it. Trickling out info on msm after being exposed by Scientists and Doctors.

 

The Daily Mail has been posting these stories for over a year now. Adverse side effects have been recognized early on.

 

The problem is with politicians who lie and tell the public the jabs are 100% safe.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Firebird said:

 

The Daily Mail has been posting these stories for over a year now. Adverse side effects have been recognized early on.

 

The problem is with politicians who lie and tell the public the jabs are 100% safe.

 

When was the last time you saw an article on the bbc for example talking about the confirmed 1000's of vaccine deaths. Never! 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Firebird said:

The problem is with politicians who lie and tell the public the jabs are 100% safe.

 

Yet the vast majority dont read the daily mail. They watch msm news, who in turn talk about what the government response etc is. Youve just contradicted yourself.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bombadil said:

Yet the vast majority dont read the daily mail. They watch msm news, who in turn talk about what the government response etc is. Youve just contradicted yourself.

 

 

 

Daily Mail is pretty much mainstream media for conservatives and populists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Firebird said:

 

Daily Mail is pretty much mainstream media for conservatives and populists.

 

... With a readership of 875,000 out of a population of 67 million in the UK... And unless an article is headline news most of those readers may not even read it.

 

https://www.abc.org.uk/product/2115

 

And according to the BBC's "disinformation reporter" Mariella Spring, it's BBC policy to refuse to entertain anyone who suggests the vaccine is anything less than safe or effective, thereby shutting down any attempt at debate.

 

No wonder people struggle to decide for themselves what the truth might be.

Edited by HAARPING_On
spelling
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Firebird said:

So how does that fit the conspiracy narrative if these institutions give warnings about the jabs?

 

the role of the corporate media is PERCEPTION MANAGMENT

 

The conspiracy is possible because the corporate media shapes the perceptions of the bulk of people. If that breaks down then the hold they have over peoples minds breaks down. This is why we will see greater censorship online this year

 

So to create the ruling perception in the minds of the public they have created HYSTERICAL belief that there is a deadly virus out there just waiting to strike everyone down and that in order to protect yourself from this you have to go out and get three jabs of mRNA injections

 

Since then however there have been high profile sportspeople dying and collapsing and also some voices in the medical world warning about problems. So the media has to at least pay lip service to this but they are not creating the same hype around the dangers of the jabs that they created about the alleged novel coronavirus

 

which means that in the tug of war over perceptions within the public mind the initial perception is still winning. The media could easily turn that round by reporting the truth about the jabs on the same scale and vigour as their reportage on the alleged virus and the very fact that they don't is an indicator of their guilt and complicity in the entire casedemic

  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

US limits use of Johnson & Johnson vaccine over rare blood clots


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has restricted the use of Johnson & Johnson's COVID vaccine for adults due to the risk of a rare blood clotting syndrome.

 

The J&J shot is authorised for those aged 18 and above and is one of the three COVID-19 jabs cleared for use in the United States.

 

The agency said the J&J shot could be administered in cases where authorised or approved vaccines were not accessible or if an individual was less keen on using the other two shots.

 

The FDA said its analysis had determined that the risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome after the administration of the shot warrants limiting of the authorisation.

 

J&J has not yet responded to requests for comment.

Edited by Nemo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

So to create the ruling perception in the minds of the public they have created HYSTERICAL belief that there is a deadly virus out there just waiting to strike everyone down and that in order to protect yourself from this you have to go out and get three jabs of mRNA injections

The Anxiety Pandemic Created by SAGE’s Project Fear

There follows a guest post by Dr. Mark Stephen Nesti, a Chartered Psychologist, Consultant Performance Psychologist and former Associate Professor of Psychology in Sport, who is very concerned about the long term ramifications of the societal anxiety deliberately generated during the pandemic to increase compliance. He is author of Meaning and Spirituality in Sport and Exercise – Psychological Perspectives.

Much has been said about how fear has been used to drive the narrative and help impose restrictions on personal liberty we have faced during the pandemic. In this article I would like to suggest that anxiety, rather than fear itself, has become the much bigger concern, and one whose effects will haunt us for years to come.

If we take a step back for a moment, we can see that psychological language has been in the spotlight throughout the last two years. Some sections of the media and various bodies of experts have undoubtedly used their influence to generate fear in the general public. Although fear can paralyse our thoughts and actions, I believe that what we have actually been subject to has been a deliberate attempt to generate massive levels of societal anxiety. As a psychologist, I believe that anxiety, rather than fear, will turn out to be a major health problem facing individuals in the years ahead. Due to a number of complex factors operating at personal and community levels, the incidence of clinical and sub-clinical anxiety has never been higher in the U.K. population. The data to support this claim are well known, and yet, we have just been through a situation where psychologists on SAGE supported by others have deliberately stoked anxiety to increase compliance around various Covid measures.

It is quite usual in everyday speech to use terms like fear and anxiety interchangeably. Most of the time this is not a problem, and reflects a basic and commonly held view that these terms describe an uncomfortable emotion which is a reaction to a perceived or real threat. In fact, however, these words describe different psychological conditions with important distinctions. If we look at fear first, a key feature is that it is always related to a specific cause. In straightforward terms, we always know what it is we are afraid of, and our response involves either ‘fight or flight’. Now, if we reflect on our own personal experience, we know that anxiety is quite different to fear, not least because it is often much harder to state exactly what we are so anxious about. Indeed, the best definitions of anxiety describe it as apprehension about a future event, and one thing we can say about the future is that it is by definition very uncertain. The way the pandemic narrative has changed so often over the course of the last two years, uncertainty about the efficacy of masks, the lethality of different strains of the virus, doubts about whether non-symptomatic transmission is possible, and changes in advice about who should be vaccinated, are just some of the sources of anxiety we have been subject to.

read on here https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/05/the-anxiety-pandemic-created-by-sages-project-fear/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Firebird said:

 

The Daily Mail has been posting these stories for over a year now. Adverse side effects have been recognized early on.

 

Always reported as "extremely rare" on the very few occasions it makes the media, and then always with a caveat about the jabs being safe and effective.

 

Same with sportspeople dropping all over the place. Bring this to the public's attention, like ex-footballer Matt Le Tissier, and you get slandered by the Daily Mail's chief sports columnist.

 

Print media and the teevee all toe the same line....nothing to see here. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DM really going for it today!

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10788751/How-Swedens-Covid-gamble-paid-Nation-suffered-FEWER-deaths-pandemic-majority-Europe.html

 

How Sweden's Covid gamble paid off: Scandinavian nation has suffered FEWER deaths in pandemic than majority of Europe - despite defying scientific advice by refusing to impose strict lockdowns

  • Nearly 15million deaths have been caused by Covid or its impact on overwhelmed health systems, WHO says 
  • Figure is more than double 6.2million confirmed virus deaths, most of which occurred in US, Brazil and India
  • Anti-lockdown Sweden logged a lower death rate than many European nations that imposed strict curbs
  • UK ranks roughly in the middle of an EU table of excess death rates, coming 15th out of the 27 member states 
  • Just 20 countries - including the UK and the US - accounted for more than 80 per cent of the excess deaths
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Firebird said:

 

I see no reason to take the shots.

 

I do. If you fancied taking part in unpaid medical trials and even more beneficial if your bank balance wouldn't cover the cost of a visit to Dignitas where uncle Kraut schwab would probably be there to make you very welcome.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TheConsultant said:

I thought they were trying to hide those docs for like 80 years or something, or are those something else I am misremembering?

 

There was a court case and the files were ordered to be released a lot quicker than that. Can't remember the exact figure but x amount of pages per month. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, SimonTV said:

Yea they only talk about them as being "rare" or "worth the risk". 

 

I agree that the adverse side effects are rare. I don't know anyone vaccinated with the issues posted here. However, I also don't know anyone who is dead or extremely ill due to covid. With covid it is also rare to die or get very very sick, as any govt stats can show us.

 

''Worth the risk''. You can't really know. If you are the unlucky one then that's what you are. Again, this applies to both the jab and the virus.

 

There's a lot of uncertainty and there are two camps on the extreme sides of the covid discussion that want complete security.

 

Camp A: Jabs are 100% bad for everyone. They will all die from it. There is no virus or it's just a cold, and ivermectine/HCQ would have stopped it (even though it wasn't an issue or didn't exist.....)

Camp B: Jabs are 100% safe and everyone needs to take them, or be penalized. The virus has a super high death rate.

 

It's basically CNN versus Breitbart. Their views are the winners in this media era.

 

And since there is little conversation going on (for years now between different demographics and classes) people on both sides just radicalize more and more and more.

 

 

Edited by Firebird
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheConsultant said:

I thought they were trying to hide those docs for like 80 years or something, or are those something else I am misremembering?

 

A US Judge said NO to that request and forced them to be released. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ended up reading the chat of vaxed and their adverse reactions on John Campbell's youtube the other day (not sure what led me there, maybe was posted on here). The comment section was lots of unexpected deaths, sometimes 2/3 members of families, miscarries and the usual strokes and heart issues.

 

It is no joke and the awake on here won't buy bullshit, someone coming on here and trying to disinform as the vax damage confirmation comes out must be a real fool.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...