Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[SimonTV]

https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/fda-restricts-jjs-covid-19-vaccine-due-blood-84529687

 

J&J now restricted in the US due to "rare but serious risk"

[SimonTV]

[SimonTV]

[jedidiah]

1 hour ago, DaleP said:

 

You wrote it beautifully. Welcome to the mad house. You can finally do whatever you want and be one of them.

Was thinking, it's tough enough for us already and wishing the kids all the best in future.......

well, I said 1.5 years for another disaster because that's one in the know revealed...i.e. what's coming.

Whatever happens, I'm alright chuck. lol I've been studying for the exit. In case you get stuck in hell, remember to call for a god that you know....if all fails...people usually calls for Shaitan for help and he answers.

 

I do what I do without being one of them.

 

And I’ve known it’s a madhouse for ever.

 

The only hell is here now - or we make our own? 

Not too sure about the second yet.

 

 I don’t know any ‘gods’, never been introduced; I won’t take anything on faith.

 

I’ll take my chances with whatever and rely on myself.

[Macnamara]

so conspiracy theorists were right to call them 'clot shots'......so when do we get our apology?

FDA LIMITS use of Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine due to risk of life-threatening blood clots - a year after it lifted pause on one-shot regimen taken by 18 million

• The FDA is limiting the use of the Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 vaccine
• It is now only authorizing the jab to people 18 or older for whom other COVID vaccines aren't available or aren't appropriate
• Those 18 and older who otherwise would not get a COVID vaccine are also authorized to use the Johnson and Johnson jab
• The decision comes after an investigation revealed those who got the vaccine were at increased risk for thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome
• The syndrome creates blood clots and decreases blood platelet levels
• Symptoms started in those cases just one to two weeks after receiving the jab 

By Melissa Koenig For Dailymail.Com

Published: 22:42, 5 May 2022 | Updated: 01:57, 6 May 2022

The Food and Drug Administration announced Thursday it will restrict the use of the Johnson & Johnson one-shot COVID-19 vaccine after an investigation revealed that those who got the jab were at increased risk of developing life-threatening blood clots.

The agency is now only authorizing the pharmaceutical giant's Janssen COVID vaccine to people 18 or older for whom other authorized or approved vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to those 18 years or older who otherwise would not get a COVID vaccine.

The decision comes following an investigation into reports of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) - a rare and potentially life-threatening disease that creates blood clots and creates low levels of blood platelets - from those who have received the vaccine. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10787553/FDA-limits-use-Janssen-COVID-19-vaccine.html

 

[Macnamara]

13 hours ago, MarcusOmouse said:

The good news is that the inquest here understand what caused her death. Little by little I guess.

The bad news is that there are too many people who haven't figured this out yet.

It's fukn heartbreaking.

 

they create a tsunami of lies to have a shock and awe impact on the public's psyche so that they all become terrified of the new bogeyman: 'covid 19'

 

then they control the truth spigot to have a slow release of the truth so that it never really sinks in to the public consciousness

 

drip, drip, drip v's tsunami

Edited May 6, 2022 by Macnamara

[Mr H]

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

so conspiracy theorists were right to call them 'clot shots'......so when do we get our apology?

You could be waiting for eternity 

[Macnamara]

4 minutes ago, Mr H said:

You could be waiting for eternity 

 

i'm still waiting for an apology on roundup....

[Firebird]

16 hours ago, Macnamara said:

so conspiracy theorists were right to call them 'clot shots'......so when do we get our apology?

FDA LIMITS use of Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccine due to risk of life-threatening blood clots - a year after it lifted pause on one-shot regimen taken by 18 million

• The FDA is limiting the use of the Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 vaccine
• It is now only authorizing the jab to people 18 or older for whom other COVID vaccines aren't available or aren't appropriate
• Those 18 and older who otherwise would not get a COVID vaccine are also authorized to use the Johnson and Johnson jab
• The decision comes after an investigation revealed those who got the vaccine were at increased risk for thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome
• The syndrome creates blood clots and decreases blood platelet levels
• Symptoms started in those cases just one to two weeks after receiving the jab 

By Melissa Koenig For Dailymail.Com

Published: 22:42, 5 May 2022 | Updated: 01:57, 6 May 2022

The Food and Drug Administration announced Thursday it will restrict the use of the Johnson & Johnson one-shot COVID-19 vaccine after an investigation revealed that those who got the jab were at increased risk of developing life-threatening blood clots.

The agency is now only authorizing the pharmaceutical giant's Janssen COVID vaccine to people 18 or older for whom other authorized or approved vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to those 18 years or older who otherwise would not get a COVID vaccine.

The decision comes following an investigation into reports of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) - a rare and potentially life-threatening disease that creates blood clots and creates low levels of blood platelets - from those who have received the vaccine. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10787553/FDA-limits-use-Janssen-COVID-19-vaccine.html

 

 

So how does that fit the conspiracy narrative if these institutions give warnings about the jabs?

 

Guys... it's always been about a rushed, panicked response to a new virus. This led to fear and censorship, and I also believe it led to a blooper where the cure (induced spike protein) creates issues similar to the virus itself.

 

My god, throughout these two years I've been right most of the time, in contrast to conspiracists and also sheeple that favour censorship, jab mandates etc.

 

 

[Firebird]

1 hour ago, Morpheus said:

So do us all a favour and trot off for your 3 clot shots. Be mindful to come back and let us know how you get on.

 

I see no reason to take the shots.

[Frankieboy]

Baby overhears parents talking of getting him Jabbed!

 

 

 

 

[Mr H]

11 minutes ago, Firebird said:

 

So how does that fit the conspiracy narrative if these institutions give warnings about the jabs?

 

Guys... it's always been about a rushed, panicked response to a new virus. This led to fear and censorship, and I also believe it led to a blooper where the cure (induced spike protein) creates issues similar to the virus itself.

 

My god, throughout these two years I've been right most of the time, in contrast to conspiracists and also sheeple that favour censorship, jab mandates etc.

 

The virus is real. It is new and the response of any body (literally) is unknown beforehand. The same is true for a jab that mimics a spike protein.

It means both sides have been wasting time quarrelling and not accepting the complexity of it all. It's easier to believe in fantastical stories on one side where 5g creates a virus and everyone jabbed is dead within a year OR enforced mandates and bogus restrictions on the other side where the jab is 100% safe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I think you raise an interesting question, but this does not prove your point imo. From my experience of the Government and these organisations is that they gas light you. Slip in a half truth here, and a full truth there. Just as an example. The Bank of England yesterday warned of 10% inflation and they will do whatever it takes to bring this down. Now yes inflation is rising, no there inflation numbers are not correct, and they have no intention of bringing it down anytime soon otherwise their actions wouldn't have been a 0.25% interest rate increase! 

 

So I don't think the occasional truth or half truth means the whole conspiracy around covid is untrue.

[Bombadil]

1 minute ago, Firebird said:

 

Why are they so open about the adverse side effects of the jabs ?

Theyre actually not are they and you know it. Trickling out info on msm after being exposed by Scientists and Doctors.

[Firebird]

1 hour ago, Mr H said:

I think you raise an interesting question, but this does not prove your point imo. From my experience of the Government and these organisations is that they gas light you. Slip in a half truth here, and a full truth there.

 

It's my observation that this happens on all sides.

[Firebird]

1 hour ago, Bombadil said:

Theyre actually not are they and you know it. Trickling out info on msm after being exposed by Scientists and Doctors.

 

The Daily Mail has been posting these stories for over a year now. Adverse side effects have been recognized early on.

 

The problem is with politicians who lie and tell the public the jabs are 100% safe.

 

[Mr H]

1 minute ago, Firebird said:

 

It's my observation that this happens on all sides.

Totally agree.

[Bombadil]

Just now, Firebird said:

 

The Daily Mail has been posting these stories for over a year now. Adverse side effects have been recognized early on.

 

The problem is with politicians who lie and tell the public the jabs are 100% safe.

 

When was the last time you saw an article on the bbc for example talking about the confirmed 1000's of vaccine deaths. Never! 

[Bombadil]

2 minutes ago, Firebird said:

The problem is with politicians who lie and tell the public the jabs are 100% safe.

 

Yet the vast majority dont read the daily mail. They watch msm news, who in turn talk about what the government response etc is. Youve just contradicted yourself.

 

 

[Firebird]

1 hour ago, Bombadil said:

Yet the vast majority dont read the daily mail. They watch msm news, who in turn talk about what the government response etc is. Youve just contradicted yourself.

 

 

 

Daily Mail is pretty much mainstream media for conservatives and populists.

[HAARPING_On]

23 minutes ago, Firebird said:

 

Daily Mail is pretty much mainstream media for conservatives and populists.

 

... With a readership of 875,000 out of a population of 67 million in the UK... And unless an article is headline news most of those readers may not even read it.

 

https://www.abc.org.uk/product/2115

 

And according to the BBC's "disinformation reporter" Mariella Spring, it's BBC policy to refuse to entertain anyone who suggests the vaccine is anything less than safe or effective, thereby shutting down any attempt at debate.

 

No wonder people struggle to decide for themselves what the truth might be.

Edited May 6, 2022 by HAARPING_On
spelling

[Macnamara]

1 hour ago, Firebird said:

So how does that fit the conspiracy narrative if these institutions give warnings about the jabs?

 

the role of the corporate media is PERCEPTION MANAGMENT

 

The conspiracy is possible because the corporate media shapes the perceptions of the bulk of people. If that breaks down then the hold they have over peoples minds breaks down. This is why we will see greater censorship online this year

 

So to create the ruling perception in the minds of the public they have created HYSTERICAL belief that there is a deadly virus out there just waiting to strike everyone down and that in order to protect yourself from this you have to go out and get three jabs of mRNA injections

 

Since then however there have been high profile sportspeople dying and collapsing and also some voices in the medical world warning about problems. So the media has to at least pay lip service to this but they are not creating the same hype around the dangers of the jabs that they created about the alleged novel coronavirus

 

which means that in the tug of war over perceptions within the public mind the initial perception is still winning. The media could easily turn that round by reporting the truth about the jabs on the same scale and vigour as their reportage on the alleged virus and the very fact that they don't is an indicator of their guilt and complicity in the entire casedemic

[Nemo]

US limits use of Johnson & Johnson vaccine over rare blood clots

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has restricted the use of Johnson & Johnson's COVID vaccine for adults due to the risk of a rare blood clotting syndrome.

 

The J&J shot is authorised for those aged 18 and above and is one of the three COVID-19 jabs cleared for use in the United States.

 

The agency said the J&J shot could be administered in cases where authorised or approved vaccines were not accessible or if an individual was less keen on using the other two shots.

 

The FDA said its analysis had determined that the risk of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome after the administration of the shot warrants limiting of the authorisation.

 

J&J has not yet responded to requests for comment.

Edited May 6, 2022 by Nemo

[Macnamara]

2 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

So to create the ruling perception in the minds of the public they have created HYSTERICAL belief that there is a deadly virus out there just waiting to strike everyone down and that in order to protect yourself from this you have to go out and get three jabs of mRNA injections

The Anxiety Pandemic Created by SAGE’s Project Fear

There follows a guest post by Dr. Mark Stephen Nesti, a Chartered Psychologist, Consultant Performance Psychologist and former Associate Professor of Psychology in Sport, who is very concerned about the long term ramifications of the societal anxiety deliberately generated during the pandemic to increase compliance. He is author of Meaning and Spirituality in Sport and Exercise – Psychological Perspectives.

Much has been said about how fear has been used to drive the narrative and help impose restrictions on personal liberty we have faced during the pandemic. In this article I would like to suggest that anxiety, rather than fear itself, has become the much bigger concern, and one whose effects will haunt us for years to come.

If we take a step back for a moment, we can see that psychological language has been in the spotlight throughout the last two years. Some sections of the media and various bodies of experts have undoubtedly used their influence to generate fear in the general public. Although fear can paralyse our thoughts and actions, I believe that what we have actually been subject to has been a deliberate attempt to generate massive levels of societal anxiety. As a psychologist, I believe that anxiety, rather than fear, will turn out to be a major health problem facing individuals in the years ahead. Due to a number of complex factors operating at personal and community levels, the incidence of clinical and sub-clinical anxiety has never been higher in the U.K. population. The data to support this claim are well known, and yet, we have just been through a situation where psychologists on SAGE supported by others have deliberately stoked anxiety to increase compliance around various Covid measures.

It is quite usual in everyday speech to use terms like fear and anxiety interchangeably. Most of the time this is not a problem, and reflects a basic and commonly held view that these terms describe an uncomfortable emotion which is a reaction to a perceived or real threat. In fact, however, these words describe different psychological conditions with important distinctions. If we look at fear first, a key feature is that it is always related to a specific cause. In straightforward terms, we always know what it is we are afraid of, and our response involves either ‘fight or flight’. Now, if we reflect on our own personal experience, we know that anxiety is quite different to fear, not least because it is often much harder to state exactly what we are so anxious about. Indeed, the best definitions of anxiety describe it as apprehension about a future event, and one thing we can say about the future is that it is by definition very uncertain. The way the pandemic narrative has changed so often over the course of the last two years, uncertainty about the efficacy of masks, the lethality of different strains of the virus, doubts about whether non-symptomatic transmission is possible, and changes in advice about who should be vaccinated, are just some of the sources of anxiety we have been subject to.

read on here https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/05/the-anxiety-pandemic-created-by-sages-project-fear/

 

[Anti Facts Sir]

1 hour ago, Firebird said:

 

The Daily Mail has been posting these stories for over a year now. Adverse side effects have been recognized early on.

 

Always reported as "extremely rare" on the very few occasions it makes the media, and then always with a caveat about the jabs being safe and effective.

 

Same with sportspeople dropping all over the place. Bring this to the public's attention, like ex-footballer Matt Le Tissier, and you get slandered by the Daily Mail's chief sports columnist.

 

Print media and the teevee all toe the same line....nothing to see here. 

[Mr H]

DM really going for it today!

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10788751/How-Swedens-Covid-gamble-paid-Nation-suffered-FEWER-deaths-pandemic-majority-Europe.html

 

How Sweden's Covid gamble paid off: Scandinavian nation has suffered FEWER deaths in pandemic than majority of Europe - despite defying scientific advice by refusing to impose strict lockdowns

• Nearly 15million deaths have been caused by Covid or its impact on overwhelmed health systems, WHO says 
• Figure is more than double 6.2million confirmed virus deaths, most of which occurred in US, Brazil and India
• Anti-lockdown Sweden logged a lower death rate than many European nations that imposed strict curbs
• UK ranks roughly in the middle of an EU table of excess death rates, coming 15th out of the 27 member states 
• Just 20 countries - including the UK and the US - accounted for more than 80 per cent of the excess deaths