Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

They have nano particles on the public ingredients list though. 

Who knows what they've put in it, we only have wild speculation and hysteria from certain quarters. 

 

What's in it I don't know, something in there is definitely killing people because we've seen the rise in sudden deaths, but is it the result of self-assembling graphene oxide? I don't believe there's enough evidence to suggest there is. 

 

What we do know is it appears to be killing over 50's and people who exercise a lot. Other than that, I'm not sure there's enough verifiable evidence to conclude this is the case. 

 

A bit like venom aids in the water, I think we need to consider stepping back and logically think about what is being presented and consider the veracity of such claims. Just my take of course, no one has to believe fuck all I say, but I'll continue to remain skeptical of this kind of stuff until it can be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. 

Edited by Morpheus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Who knows what they've put in it, we only have wild speculation and hysteria from certain quarters. 

 

What's in it I don't know, something in there is definitely killing people because we've seen the rise in sudden deaths, but is it the result of self-assembling graphene oxide? I don't believe there's enough evidence to suggest there is. 

 

What we do know is it appears to be killing over 50's and people who exercise a lot. Other than that, I'm not sure there's enough verifiable evidence to conclude this is the case. 

 

A bit like venom aids in the water, I think we need to consider stepping back and logically think about what is being presented and consider the veracity of such claims. Just my take of course, no one has to believe fuck all I say, but I'll continue to remain skeptical of this kind of stuff until it can be proved beyond all reasonable doubt. 

 

We know what is it in because it has been examined under the microscope and analyzed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

We know what is it in because it has been examined under the microscope and analyzed. 

So every analyses video you've seen is real? Would it not be beyond the realms of possibility that the people presenting such information may be controlled opposition?

Edited by Morpheus
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SimonTV said:

 

Did I say that? Seems like you are making that claim not me. 

Sorry Simon, I changed the post because I saw what I wrote was not actually what I was attempting to infer. Apologies, I know it's not your suggestion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ingredient lists of the vaccines that was made public was shocking in of itself. The secret trade mark contents is probably even more shocking. Some of the ingredients they list are marked as not fit for human consumption when you look them up individually. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SimonTV said:

https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=295&part=1&gen=99

 

This is one of the most reasonable videos on the topic of what is in the covid vaccines. When people from all around the world find the same thing under the microscope, then it is likely that is what in the vaccines. 

How are these people getting samples to review under microscopes? Are they stealing them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SimonTV said:

The ingredient lists of the vaccines that was made public was shocking in of itself. The secret trade mark contents is probably even more shocking. Some of the ingredients they list are marked as not fit for human consumption when you look them up individually. 

I don't disagree Simon, but self-assembling nano tech? In the words of Joe Biden, come on man! 

 

Now something is definitely in there and I do not deny it, but I don't believe it's that. 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Morpheus said:

I don't disagree Simon, but self-assembling nano tech? In the words of Joe Biden, come on man! 

 

Now something is definitely in there and I do not deny it, but I don't believe it's that. 👍

 

Looking at some of the videos of protein based blood clots being pulled out of the jabbed. Then seeing the microscopic proteins on graphene sheets. It realy makes one wonder if these microscopic artifacts can increase in size. I wouldn't call it self assembly, this idea of nano particle network etc, *shrug* there is studies on such technology and the way some of these microscopic artifacts behave and connect to each other is very concerning. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Morpheus said:

Because you don't know for any degree of certainty what they are showing is from the legitimate shot. 

 

If you watched the video they discuss that. So you think these people are all faking the same microscopic images from all around the world? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SimonTV said:

 

If you watched the video they discuss that. So you think these people are all faking the same microscopic images from all around the world? 

I don't think anything, you asked me a question and that's my rationale for my skepticism. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

I don't think anything, you asked me a question and that's my rationale for my skepticism. 

 

You are implying that these people producing microscopic images are not credible or at the least we should doubt it for no reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SimonTV said:

 

You are implying that these people producing microscopic images are not credible or at the least we should doubt it for no reason. 

I'm sorry, we are in the conspiracy game and a rule of thumb is to question everything and you think that's no reason to doubt information I'm being presented? I think I'm very right to question this and the people presenting it. I'll watch the video you posted above and I'll get back to you with what I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

I'm sorry, we are in the conspiracy game and a rule of thumb is to question everything and you think that's no reason to doubt information I'm being presented? I think I'm very right to question this and the people presenting it. I'll watch the video you posted above and I'll get back to you with what I think. 

 

I didn't say there was no reason to doubt, I said that you said it should be doubt for no reason. Big difference. 

 

You can question everything for no reason if you want to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets put it together then. What do we know. 

 

We have the public ingredients. We have pictures of the vaccines under a microscope. Do the pictures of what we have seen under the microscope match the description of the ingredients that has been released. If not, then what would the covid vaccines look like under a microscope, the "verified" images. 

 

The best knowledge we have of what it looks like is what has been already released. 

 

https://media.128ducks.com/file_store/2175d012e0c7dea33b0460e8c4b9d04d4994551ffb6b4d16471a5e7f5c75553b.mp4

Edited by SimonTV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have been fucked over for the past 2 years & want normality to return but seems a distant memory. 

Societal structure has been artificially dismantled, were being funnelled to a specific outcome as we all know!

 

Desperation is setting in. 

Speculation is a natural response and sometimes hard to keep in check under such circumstances.

 

Reductionism is how they work - divide and conquer. Then divide some more and fragment.

Meet resistance!  then  divide again!

Seems the best route to dismantle interrogation and tarnish conspiracy theory further!

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is kind of irrelevant what the secret ingredients are (not that we should stop trying to understand and analysis what is in these things). We know they are harming many people and contain nano particles that can alter the DNA. That should be enough to concern most people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

I didn't say there was no reason to doubt, I said that you said it should be doubt for no reason. Big difference. 

 

You can question everything for no reason if you want to. 

Why are suggesting I'm doubting something for no reason? I have legitimate concerns when I see supposedly graphene oxide dancing around on a plate on a shite pixelated camera like it's a scene from Venom. (This is what I've seen and I'm not suggesting what you have posted is anything like this)

 

And here's another thing, why is the camera quality shit on some of these videos? We have cameras capable of seeing the moon in great detail, but we can't film a clear image on some of these videos? It beggars belief. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...