Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Nemo]

Nietzsche spoke of this coming divide. In the book 'Nietzsche and the Nazis' by Stephen Hicks, this divide is explained by the inevitableby formation of these two types of man. Covid, The Great Reset and the New World Order will forment this division. This truly is the Wheat separeted from the Chaff. I always thought 'the meek shall inherit the Earth' was a good prophecy. I now believe that the meek shall inherit dust and the bold shall inherit the heavens.

 

 

Masters and Slaves

 

Part of the answer, says Nietzsche, is biological. All of organic nature is divided into two broad species-types—those animals that are naturally herd animals and those that are naturally loners—those that are prey and those that are predators. Some animals are by nature sheep, field mice, or cows—and some animals are by nature wolves, hawks, or lions. Psychologically and physically, this divide also runs right through the human species. Some people are born fearful and inclined to join a herd—and some are born fearless and inclined to seek lonely heights. Some are born sedentary and sluggish—and some are born crackling with purpose and craving adventure.

 

Some of us, to use Nietzsche’s language, are born to be slaves, and some are born to be masters. And which type you are—there is little you can do about it. There is a brute biological fact here: Each of us is the product of a long line of evolution, and our traits are evolutionarily bred into us. Just as a sheep cannot help but be sheepish and a hawk cannot help but be hawkish, each of us inherits from our parents and from their parents before them a long line of inbuilt traits. “It cannot be erased from a man’s soul what his ancestors have preferably and most constantly done.”

 

 

The master types live by strength, creativity, independence, assertiveness, and related traits. They respect power, courage, boldness, risk-taking, even recklessness. It is natural for them to follow their own path no matter what, to rebel against social pressure and conformity.

 

 

The slave types live in conformity. They tend to passivity, dependence, meekness. It is natural for them to stick together for a sense of security, just as herd animals do.

 

 

Now, Nietzsche says, let’s talk about morality, about good and bad, right and wrong. For a long time we have been taught that morality is a matter of religious commandments set in stone thousands of years ago. Not so, says Nietzsche. What we take to be moral depends on our biological nature—and different biological natures dictate different moral codes.

 

Think of it this way: If you are a sheep, then what will seem good to you as a sheep? Being able to graze peacefully, sticking close together with others just like you, being part of the herd and not straying off. What will seem bad to you? Well, wolves will seem bad, and anything wolf-like, predatory, aggressive. But what if you are a wolf? Then strength, viciousness, and contempt for the sheep will come naturally to you and seem good. There is nothing the wolves and the sheep can agree on morally—their natures are different, as are their needs and goals, as is what feels good to them. Of course it would be good for the sheep if they could convince the wolves to be more sheep-like—but what self-respecting wolf would fall for that?

 

“That lambs dislike great birds of prey does not seem strange: only it gives no grounds for reproaching these birds of prey for bearing off little lambs. And if the lambs say among themselves: ‘these birds of prey are evil; and whoever is least like a bird of prey, but rather its opposite, a lamb—would he not be good?’ there is no reason to find fault with this institution of an ideal, except perhaps that the birds of prey might view it a little ironically and say: ‘we don’t dislike them at all, these good little lambs; we even love them: nothing is more tasty than a tender lamb.’”

 

The same point holds for humans. The divide between strong and weak, assertive and timid, runs straight through the human species. The key question to ask about morality is not: Is such and such a value universally and intrinsically good? Rather the question is: What kind of person finds this value to be valuable?

 

Edited February 11, 2022 by Nemo

[SimonTV]

https://vidmax.com/video/210749-watch-as-little-kids-in-a-las-vegas-pre-school-learn-they-no-longer-will-have-to-wear-masks

 

Watch As Little Kids In A Las Vegas Pre-School Learn They No Longer Will Have To Wear Masks

[zarkov]

5 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

https://vidmax.com/video/210749-watch-as-little-kids-in-a-las-vegas-pre-school-learn-they-no-longer-will-have-to-wear-masks

Watch As Little Kids In A Las Vegas Pre-School Learn They No Longer Will Have To Wear Masks

incredible that they said from tomorrow!

Why not instantly!

 

 

[zarkov]

FEBRUARY 10, 2022: Quick stream of truth bombs by trucker

https://www.bitchute.com/video/p16edYFsKz4O/

2:20 min

[SimonTV]

https://freewestmedia.com/2022/02/04/czech-doctor-denounced-pandemic-of-stupidity/

 

Czech doctor denounces ‘pandemic of stupidity’
Czech doctors have had enough of their corrupt representative body. Because, similar to France, Austria and Germany, the head of the medical association there, Milan Kubek, had been pressuring members with dissenting opinions about Covid-19, harshly disciplining them and scaring citizens with fake claims.

[SimonTV]

[SimonTV]

[numnuts]

On 2/8/2022 at 9:59 AM, Nemo said:

Well well well, look at this morning's news. I said they'd blame Boris for inflammatory language. They did this to Trump, we literally copy their play book. 9/11 - 7/7, WMD's - Tony Blairs a cunt. Trump - Boris. Trump incites riots - Boris incites violence and put the fear into Keir. They have no imagination. One thing I like about Boris that I liked about Trump, is the fucking balls on these guys. You gotta respect their balls.

No 10 has no intention of apologising after protesters surround Sir Keir Starmer

 

The U.S., insofar as changing anything major, via a vote for the Republicans or Democrats fell in the 1980's. Donald Trump is a PTB 'Divide And Conquer' mega-stooge, who isn't even authorised to write his own tweets. He also ripped off the American people, for trillions more.

 

While there does seem to be some genuine bitchiness going on, between BoJo and Consitpated Keir; and while BoJo now does seem to be defying the Hidden Hand; BoJo isn't going to be leading the metaphorical revolution. When I see Whitty and Vallance being led off in chains, for starters, then I might believe it. All BoJo is currently doing, is blocking the PTB's bunghole from continually shitting on us. He is our emergency nappy and it might not last much longer.     

 

 

 

On 2/8/2022 at 2:46 PM, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Starmer is an odious creature. He craves power all right and if he gets it, the UK will be dragged into a never-ending series of lockdowns, forced injections, and draconian laws. Covid will be front and centre for the foreseeable future and I wouldn't mind betting that Labour will go all out to cancel Brexit.

 

Let's say that Consitpated Keir had 0% to do with the non-prosecution of Savile. His primary allegiance is certainly not to the folks of the U.K. and, if that doesn't make someone treacherous, then I don't know what does. It is far, far, far worse, than failing to prosecute the likes of Jimmy Savile.

 

 

 

On 2/8/2022 at 5:30 PM, HeartSpirit said:

It has been my observation over more than 60 years that most people vote for a party not individual. So they either vote the same as usual, or if their normal party has been in power and not done well, they vote for the opposite party. Very few people that I have know look outside the main 2 parties. 

 

Yes, because their TV screens have conditioned them to believe that they must vote for two main parties. Going back to eggs and chickens, again, I think that folks need to only vote for good quality independent candidates. They can then form political blocks and choose a prime minister, after arriving at Westminster.

 

After the coalition government ended in 2015, the PTB sought to terminate the Lib Dems, as a political concept in the U.K.. Tim Farron was made leader, they were constantly ridiculed and they never got any positive coverage. Then, they were deemed useful again post-Brexit referendum and again, just recently, in the North Shropshire by-election. Funny.   

 

 

 

On 2/9/2022 at 5:50 PM, Number6 said:

Boris Johnson is warned against scrapping Covid rules to 'get out of a hole' on Partygate as he say ALL curbs - including self-isolation after testing positive - can go by the end of THIS MONTH... but will Scotland and Wales ignore him?

So after nearly 3 years of ordering people to follow ridiculous rules because there is a deadly virus mooching around everything is fine and dandy now, lol. Something does not sit right with me. This is a smokescreen for a bigger diabolical plan.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10493765/Boris-Johnson-declares-Covid-rules-MONTH.html

 

Scotland and Wales can't ignore what BoJo does, in terms of English regulations, as the borders are open and there is a lot of cross border travel on the U.K. mainland. The same applies to the whole island of Ireland and the U.K. mainland. Whenever the PTB are on the back foot, then why do some folks always say 'It must be a smokescreen'? No, the PTB are on the back foot and they will ultimately fail.  

 

 

 

On 2/9/2022 at 9:16 PM, Frankieboy said:

 

Urgent warning to anyone who’s had Covid over fatal complication that strikes months later
 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/health/17594853/urgent-warning-anyone-covid-fatal-complication-strikes/
 

Clearing snow now this. getting ridiculous now !

 

We need to start a list of health conditions that can't be attributed to Covid, in some way. I think that it will be a very short list. 

Edited February 11, 2022 by numnuts

[Orange Alert]

14 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

Stupid inbred cunt.

 

He sure is. Played like a puppet to get his wages for his grotesque and lavish lifestyle.

 

[SimonTV]

Protest camp anyone? 

 

[Nemo]

That's a good 'Protest Army Camp', ready to deploy en mass where ever a mass of people is needed to protest.

 

-

 

So the Canadian Freedom Convoy have shut down a bridge from America into Canada and Ford and Toyota have shut down their plants due to the blockade.

 

It's a simple truth that if you hurt their bottom line, if major companies can't not do business then they can't pay tax and the government will eventually cave.... After they use all the fascist force they can justify with lies but eventually and at the end of the day, is about the bottom line.

 

Hurt their pockets and they will be forced to deal.

Edited February 11, 2022 by Nemo

[Ziggy Sawdust]

6 hours ago, jack121 said:

 

Israel is preparing the world for the coming of the dajjal or antichrist, that's what this whole pandemic scam is really all about, to weaken all the other countries and its people, so when the dajjal makes his appearance in about ten years time, the world's population will drop to their knees and proclaim him the saviour.

That's why all the jews are running back to israel, that's why israel is bombing the palestinians, to drive them out so they can build the dajjal temple.

It's all about devil worshipping and satanism, something the elites have been doing for years.

As for the people, they are going to die in their millions, the worst oppression of all time, worse than ww1 and ww2 put together. It's going to be bad. If you look at the shit show that has happened so far, that is just a warm up, real evil is coming.

 

Out of likes (as usual)

[Ziggy Sawdust]

6 hours ago, alexa said:

 

Israel will take over the world for a short while, great post Jack 

 

Jews are just 0.19% of the world's population.

 

[Ziggy Sawdust]

6 hours ago, alexa said:

Queen faces days of Covid testing and will be 'closely monitored' by Palace doctors after officials REFUSED to say if she has virus following meeting with Prince Charles two days before he was positive.

DM

 

Looks like they are paving the way for the announcement that the Queen is dead.

 

About fucking time.

Coffin dodging par excellence.

[Ziggy Sawdust]

6 hours ago, alexa said:

'He's gone. I don't want anything to do with him': Woman announces she's leaving her husband because he got a Covid BOOSTER SHOT - as anti-vaccine mandate protests erupt in New Zealand.

A New Zealand antivaxxer says she is leaving her husband because he got the booster shot, saying she 'didn't want anything to do with him', as protesters occupying grounds outside the country's parliament spilled into a third day. Hundreds of cars, trucks and motorbikes carrying thousands of people drove from across the country and converged in Wellington on Tuesday morning to protests against Jacinda Ardern's hardline pandemic policies.

DM

 

Would you ?

 

I'd kick my old woman to the kerb if she took the satan juice.

[Nip]

17 minutes ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

I'd kick my old woman to the kerb if she took the satan juice.

 

"My body, my choice" ?

[webtrekker]

Pfizer Adds Warnings to Their Financial Review That Safety Data “May Impact Business”

By Patricia Harrity on February 11, 2022 • ( Leave a comment )

 

It would appear that Pfizer is anticipating some bad news, as evidenced by several redline changes in their Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2021 Earnings release on February 8, 2022. These changes seem to be centred around disclosures of unfavourable safety data. We could assume they are aware that the ordered release of their COVID vaccine Clinical trial data may cause them a few issues.

 

 

 

According to Rubicon Capital’s Kelly Brown who in his own words, is an “accidental & unofficial COVID-19 data analyst, “Pfizer added new and peculiar items deep in its business risk disclosures re: clinical trial data”

He notes on a Twitter post that “the changes centre around disclosures of unfavourable safety data.” For example, in the fourth quarter, Pfizer added: the line “or further information regarding the quality of pre-clinical, clinical or safety data, including by audit or inspection.”

 

 

 

 

These changes that are referenced above, were found in Pfizer’s earnings releases. The links are below.

Quarter 4: s28.q4cdn.com/781576035/file…

Quarter 3: s28.q4cdn.com/781576035/file…

To Recap

A freedom of information act request (FOIA) resulted in Pfizer being ordered to produce data which amounted to over 329,000 documents. However, it would seem that there was an attempt for the information to be buried when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) challenged the FOIA in court. Justice Department Lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow them an unthinkable 55 years to process the request.

 

This would have meant that 500 pages a month would have been released, meaning that the safety of the Pfizer product kept under wraps until 2076. This request was refused and courts ordered the compliance with the FOIA. The FDA were to turn over the documents and as reported here at the Expose the first batch of data was released. Even within the first few pages it was clear that the vaccine approved for emergency use authorisation was not safe.

 

In one document titled Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, it is evident that in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including over 1200 deaths (source) .

 

Pfizer vaccines adverse events “confidential” document, showed thousands of conditions under a heading termed “Special Interest” these conditions may develop post-Pfizer vaccination meaning that every person who had taken the jab were not in  possession of the facts or the risk involved by taking it. In other words, informed consent was never obtained.

 

The Pfizer report concluded that the “review of available data” was good enough and demonstrated a “favourable benefit-risk balance” for the rushed vaccine.

 

Pfizer’s Misleading Risk Reduction Report

However, Pfizer reported that their vaccine showed a 95% efficacy, which sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, but that is not actually what that number means.

 

The 95% figure refers to the relative risk reduction (RRR), but it does not tell you how much your overall risk is supposed to be reduced by the vaccine, that can be determined by the absolute risk reduction (ARR).

 

In the Pfizer trial 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the jab were said to have developed that which was deemed to be COVID. In the unjabbed placebo group 162 individuals were said to have developed COVID-19.

 

This means that even unjabbed the risk of contracting COVID was very low at 0.88% and the jab was said to have reduced this figure to .04%, which means that the absolute risk reduction that would be the main reason to have the Pfizer jab is 0.04%.

 

The 95% refers to the relative difference between the 0.88 and 0.04% which is a 95% relative risk reduction and relative risk reduction is well known to be a misleading number which is why the FDA recommend using the absolute risk reduction instead (source)

The 1% Overall Benefit

That would not do though, as Pfizer would be sure that people would not be so keen to have a jab that offered less than 1% overall benefit.

 

Nor would they have been so keen if they had known the actual potential risks of taking the jab.

 

 

Possible Outcomes from the Pfizer cominarty Jab

 

And more………….. (source)

 

Pfizer appeared to have known that they needed to cover their financial bases from potential liability Pfizer asked for liability protection due to their, to put it in mildly, “misleading” promotion of their product. Pfizer received blanket immunity from liability through the EUA, however, this product is deadly yet it is others who are being financially burdened.

 

 

Pfizer was even accused of “bullying” Latin American governments during negotiations to acquire its Covid-19 vaccine, and the company has asked some countries to put up sovereign assets, such as embassy buildings and military bases, as a guarantee against the cost of any future legal cases, according to an investigation by the U.K.-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

 

However, if Pfizer are found to have been fraudulent it eviscerates all contracts which will mean that liability from vaccine damage will rest firmly with them (Source).

 

 

They are still making plans for the babies to be jabbed.

 

Pfizer have continued to shown reluctance to release the clinical trial documents, that really should have been made available prior to the vaccine rollout to enable true informed consent. With what we already know through their first batch of documents released, it really begs the question- What more are they trying to hide? What more could there possibly be? And importantly, why have the not been held to account already for the harm they have caused?

 

It seems that even if Pfizer were now to say their vaccine was not safe and effective, the covid cult, would be calling them antivaxxers!!

 

Lets hope the data release will quickly Impact the Pfizer business.

Finally I though this was interesting and also hopeful.

 

---

Edited February 11, 2022 by webtrekker

[SimonTV]

 

[Trufflepig]

 

1 hour ago, webtrekker said:

Pfizer Adds Warnings to Their Financial Review That Safety Data “May Impact Business”

By Patricia Harrity on February 11, 2022 • ( Leave a comment )

 

It would appear that Pfizer is anticipating some bad news, as evidenced by several redline changes in their Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2021 Earnings release on February 8, 2022. These changes seem to be centred around disclosures of unfavourable safety data. We could assume they are aware that the ordered release of their COVID vaccine Clinical trial data may cause them a few issues.

 

 

 

According to Rubicon Capital’s Kelly Brown who in his own words, is an “accidental & unofficial COVID-19 data analyst, “Pfizer added new and peculiar items deep in its business risk disclosures re: clinical trial data”

He notes on a Twitter post that “the changes centre around disclosures of unfavourable safety data.” For example, in the fourth quarter, Pfizer added: the line “or further information regarding the quality of pre-clinical, clinical or safety data, including by audit or inspection.”

 

 

 

 

These changes that are referenced above, were found in Pfizer’s earnings releases. The links are below.

Quarter 4: s28.q4cdn.com/781576035/file…

Quarter 3: s28.q4cdn.com/781576035/file…

To Recap

A freedom of information act request (FOIA) resulted in Pfizer being ordered to produce data which amounted to over 329,000 documents. However, it would seem that there was an attempt for the information to be buried when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) challenged the FOIA in court. Justice Department Lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow them an unthinkable 55 years to process the request.

 

This would have meant that 500 pages a month would have been released, meaning that the safety of the Pfizer product kept under wraps until 2076. This request was refused and courts ordered the compliance with the FOIA. The FDA were to turn over the documents and as reported here at the Expose the first batch of data was released. Even within the first few pages it was clear that the vaccine approved for emergency use authorisation was not safe.

 

In one document titled Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, it is evident that in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including over 1200 deaths (source) .

 

Pfizer vaccines adverse events “confidential” document, showed thousands of conditions under a heading termed “Special Interest” these conditions may develop post-Pfizer vaccination meaning that every person who had taken the jab were not in  possession of the facts or the risk involved by taking it. In other words, informed consent was never obtained.

 

The Pfizer report concluded that the “review of available data” was good enough and demonstrated a “favourable benefit-risk balance” for the rushed vaccine.

 

Pfizer’s Misleading Risk Reduction Report

However, Pfizer reported that their vaccine showed a 95% efficacy, which sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, but that is not actually what that number means.

 

The 95% figure refers to the relative risk reduction (RRR), but it does not tell you how much your overall risk is supposed to be reduced by the vaccine, that can be determined by the absolute risk reduction (ARR).

 

In the Pfizer trial 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the jab were said to have developed that which was deemed to be COVID. In the unjabbed placebo group 162 individuals were said to have developed COVID-19.

 

This means that even unjabbed the risk of contracting COVID was very low at 0.88% and the jab was said to have reduced this figure to .04%, which means that the absolute risk reduction that would be the main reason to have the Pfizer jab is 0.04%.

 

The 95% refers to the relative difference between the 0.88 and 0.04% which is a 95% relative risk reduction and relative risk reduction is well known to be a misleading number which is why the FDA recommend using the absolute risk reduction instead (source)

The 1% Overall Benefit

That would not do though, as Pfizer would be sure that people would not be so keen to have a jab that offered less than 1% overall benefit.

 

Nor would they have been so keen if they had known the actual potential risks of taking the jab.

 

 

Possible Outcomes from the Pfizer cominarty Jab

 

And more………….. (source)

 

Pfizer appeared to have known that they needed to cover their financial bases from potential liability Pfizer asked for liability protection due to their, to put it in mildly, “misleading” promotion of their product. Pfizer received blanket immunity from liability through the EUA, however, this product is deadly yet it is others who are being financially burdened.

 

 

Pfizer was even accused of “bullying” Latin American governments during negotiations to acquire its Covid-19 vaccine, and the company has asked some countries to put up sovereign assets, such as embassy buildings and military bases, as a guarantee against the cost of any future legal cases, according to an investigation by the U.K.-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

 

However, if Pfizer are found to have been fraudulent it eviscerates all contracts which will mean that liability from vaccine damage will rest firmly with them (Source).

 

 

They are still making plans for the babies to be jabbed.

 

Pfizer have continued to shown reluctance to release the clinical trial documents, that really should have been made available prior to the vaccine rollout to enable true informed consent. With what we already know through their first batch of documents released, it really begs the question- What more are they trying to hide? What more could there possibly be? And importantly, why have the not been held to account already for the harm they have caused?

 

It seems that even if Pfizer were now to say their vaccine was not safe and effective, the covid cult, would be calling them antivaxxers!!

 

Lets hope the data release will quickly Impact the Pfizer business.

Finally I though this was interesting and also hopeful.

 

---

 

Interesting, I just looked at the chart.

 

The little hats will have shorted this stock weeks ago leaving the retail investor already on huge losses. I have read that the 737 max crashes were done to destroy Boeing and the BP disaster was all set up with the Wall Street satan worshippers poised ahead of the crowd to make a killing too, excuse the expression.

 

Make money on the market in either direction if you're in the club and you know the plan.

[Mikhail Liebestein]

On 2/9/2022 at 8:44 PM, Mikhail Liebestein said:

Now that everyone is bored of new variants, what we really need is a new virus.

Not now, Lassa fever! England records two cases of Ebola-like virus that can cause vaginal bleeding and comas among family returning from West Africa

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10493517/Not-Lassa-fever-England-records-two-cases-Ebola-like-virus-family-members.html

 

 

 

Fortunately I don't have a Vagina, nor do I intend to get one!!! 

 

 

 

Clearly another emergency lockdown on the way:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10503063/England-records-Lassa-fever-death.html

 

Get those chastity belts on; lockdown those vaginas!

 

[alexa]

2 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

Jews are just 0.19% of the world's population.

 

 

It's not the Jew's we should really worry about, it's when their Messiah arrives. 

[Shake]

1 hour ago, webtrekker said:

Pfizer Adds Warnings to Their Financial Review That Safety Data “May Impact Business”

By Patricia Harrity on February 11, 2022 • ( Leave a comment )

 

It would appear that Pfizer is anticipating some bad news, as evidenced by several redline changes in their Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2021 Earnings release on February 8, 2022. These changes seem to be centred around disclosures of unfavourable safety data. We could assume they are aware that the ordered release of their COVID vaccine Clinical trial data may cause them a few issues.

 

 

 

According to Rubicon Capital’s Kelly Brown who in his own words, is an “accidental & unofficial COVID-19 data analyst, “Pfizer added new and peculiar items deep in its business risk disclosures re: clinical trial data”

He notes on a Twitter post that “the changes centre around disclosures of unfavourable safety data.” For example, in the fourth quarter, Pfizer added: the line “or further information regarding the quality of pre-clinical, clinical or safety data, including by audit or inspection.”

 

 

 

 

These changes that are referenced above, were found in Pfizer’s earnings releases. The links are below.

Quarter 4: s28.q4cdn.com/781576035/file…

Quarter 3: s28.q4cdn.com/781576035/file…

To Recap

A freedom of information act request (FOIA) resulted in Pfizer being ordered to produce data which amounted to over 329,000 documents. However, it would seem that there was an attempt for the information to be buried when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) challenged the FOIA in court. Justice Department Lawyers representing the FDA asked a federal judge to allow them an unthinkable 55 years to process the request.

 

This would have meant that 500 pages a month would have been released, meaning that the safety of the Pfizer product kept under wraps until 2076. This request was refused and courts ordered the compliance with the FOIA. The FDA were to turn over the documents and as reported here at the Expose the first batch of data was released. Even within the first few pages it was clear that the vaccine approved for emergency use authorisation was not safe.

 

In one document titled Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports, it is evident that in just the first 90 days of the vaccine’s roll out under the FDA’s EUA – from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021 – there were TENS OF THOUSANDS of reported adverse reactions, including over 1200 deaths (source) .

 

Pfizer vaccines adverse events “confidential” document, showed thousands of conditions under a heading termed “Special Interest” these conditions may develop post-Pfizer vaccination meaning that every person who had taken the jab were not in  possession of the facts or the risk involved by taking it. In other words, informed consent was never obtained.

 

The Pfizer report concluded that the “review of available data” was good enough and demonstrated a “favourable benefit-risk balance” for the rushed vaccine.

 

Pfizer’s Misleading Risk Reduction Report

However, Pfizer reported that their vaccine showed a 95% efficacy, which sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, but that is not actually what that number means.

 

The 95% figure refers to the relative risk reduction (RRR), but it does not tell you how much your overall risk is supposed to be reduced by the vaccine, that can be determined by the absolute risk reduction (ARR).

 

In the Pfizer trial 8 out of 18,198 people who were given the jab were said to have developed that which was deemed to be COVID. In the unjabbed placebo group 162 individuals were said to have developed COVID-19.

 

This means that even unjabbed the risk of contracting COVID was very low at 0.88% and the jab was said to have reduced this figure to .04%, which means that the absolute risk reduction that would be the main reason to have the Pfizer jab is 0.04%.

 

The 95% refers to the relative difference between the 0.88 and 0.04% which is a 95% relative risk reduction and relative risk reduction is well known to be a misleading number which is why the FDA recommend using the absolute risk reduction instead (source)

The 1% Overall Benefit

That would not do though, as Pfizer would be sure that people would not be so keen to have a jab that offered less than 1% overall benefit.

 

Nor would they have been so keen if they had known the actual potential risks of taking the jab.

 

 

Possible Outcomes from the Pfizer cominarty Jab

 

And more………….. (source)

 

Pfizer appeared to have known that they needed to cover their financial bases from potential liability Pfizer asked for liability protection due to their, to put it in mildly, “misleading” promotion of their product. Pfizer received blanket immunity from liability through the EUA, however, this product is deadly yet it is others who are being financially burdened.

 

 

Pfizer was even accused of “bullying” Latin American governments during negotiations to acquire its Covid-19 vaccine, and the company has asked some countries to put up sovereign assets, such as embassy buildings and military bases, as a guarantee against the cost of any future legal cases, according to an investigation by the U.K.-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism.

 

However, if Pfizer are found to have been fraudulent it eviscerates all contracts which will mean that liability from vaccine damage will rest firmly with them (Source).

 

 

They are still making plans for the babies to be jabbed.

 

Pfizer have continued to shown reluctance to release the clinical trial documents, that really should have been made available prior to the vaccine rollout to enable true informed consent. With what we already know through their first batch of documents released, it really begs the question- What more are they trying to hide? What more could there possibly be? And importantly, why have the not been held to account already for the harm they have caused?

 

It seems that even if Pfizer were now to say their vaccine was not safe and effective, the covid cult, would be calling them antivaxxers!!

 

Lets hope the data release will quickly Impact the Pfizer business.

Finally I though this was interesting and also hopeful.

 

---

Why does the letter "f" in that grotesque name look like a cobra snake? 

[Saved]

8 hours ago, Itsa said:

I wonder what odds I could get for the Queen and Charlie both croaking it of Covid and then installing William as the king 

I might have a cheeky tenner on it.

William has the air of somebody who has been groomed from birth to be king. I never got that same sense with Charles and still don't. Out of interest I checked the odds and the books are closed at the two I checked, one saying that there is not usually a market for succession - though you can bet on the colour of some baby's hat at a first public showing and numerous other silliness.

[SimonTV]

23 minutes ago, Trufflepig said:

 

 

Interesting, I just looked at the chart.

 

The little hats will have shorted this stock weeks ago leaving the retail investor already on huge losses. I have read that the 737 max crashes were done to destroy Boeing and the BP disaster was all set up with the Wall Street satan worshippers poised ahead of the crowd to make a killing too, excuse the expression.

 

Make money on the market in either direction if you're in the club and you know the plan.

 

They probably creating a pump and dump scenario so that they can sell stock themselves. 

[alexa]

9 hours ago, Itsa said:

I wonder what odds I could get for the Queen and Charlie both croaking it of Covid and then installing William as the king 

I might have a cheeky tenner on it.

 

What's the odds on both Charles & William snuffing it and Prince George becoming King ?