Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Human10]

3 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

The first time they built nightingale hospitals it was a bit unsettling because although i didn't believe in a deadly virus narrative the possibility that some other cause of mass death such as the roll out of 5G could cause anticipated problems. However no mass die offs materialised and the hospital overflows were unused.

 

Now they are doing it again and once again it raises the question of which of two reasons are they doing it:

 

1) they expect mass sickness and deaths due to the jabs (which they'd blame on a 'variant')

2) that the entire thing is just a giant money exchange where public funds are directed to freemasonic firms and individuals who gorge themselves on the public contracts

 

The first time round it looks like it was definately number 2 and no doubt the backscratchers in the lodge are getting rich off this latest plunder of public funds too but will we also see deaths from the jabs?

NHS plans new Nightingale facilities

13-Jan-2022

The NHS is setting up new Nightingale surge hubs at hospitals across the country as part of preparations for a potential wave of Omicron admissions.

Temporary structures capable of housing around 100 patients will be erected in the grounds of eight hospitals across the country, with work starting as early as this week.

https://www.buildingbetterhealthcare.com/news/article_page/NHS_plans_new_Nightingale_facilities/198027

Maybe I ask for too much but - shouldn't someone pay for tax payer's wasted money for the first facility and expired vaccines? Instead they are moaning on Boris partying... At least it didn't cost us money...

[Macnamara]

2 minutes ago, Human10 said:

Maybe I ask for too much but - shouldn't someone pay for tax payer's wasted money for the first facility and expired vaccines? Instead they are moaning on Boris partying... At least it didn't cost us money...

 

the partying of the politicians simply shows that as they used behavioural psychology to scare the shit out of old grannies the politicians and civil servants themselves knew that there was no risk

 

if there was a risk they would not have been doing it.

 

As for paying for everything we are seeing a MASSIVE wealth redistribution from the public to the mega-corporations who are providing all of the jabs, PPE, sanitiser, ventilators and hardware that makes up these pop-up hospitals

 

marquees alone cost a fortune. Its daylight robbery of the british public. With one hand they inject poison into us and with the other hand they steal our money

[Grumpy Owl]

17 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

Now they are doing it again and once again it raises the question of which of two reasons are they doing it for:

 

1) they expect mass sickness and deaths due to the jabs (which they'd blame on a 'variant')

2) that the entire thing is just a giant money exchange where public funds are directed to freemasonic firms and individuals who gorge themselves on the public contracts

 

It will be 2) again, just like last time round.

 

They did the whole 'Nightingale' thing last time around to scare and fear the public, then quietly closed down and dismantled them when it turned out they weren't actually needed.

 

Millions of pounds spent (wasted) on building and equipping these temporary hospitals, which were never needed.

 

Now they're planning to do it all again, and it makes you wonder "what happened to all that stuff that was bought for those Nightingale hospitals before". Probably ended up 'donated' to private hospitals and clinics.

 

So round we go again, and its not just the freemasonic connections, but Common Purpose likes to siphon off public money into the hands of private individuals and companies.

 

 

[zArk]

Just now, DaleP said:

 

Even in the court of the sea, they can use terms like "ABC Ltd -v- Persons unknown" surely, we can do similar by saying 'by the followers of .....' and you could claim that you belong to this group as and when it becomes applicable to you? OR an individual who are affected financially?

To be clear, it's their system. It's their rules. They own the jurisdiction. We are observers and alot of times stupidly consent to them.

 

Legal laws , case law etc etc are categorised specifically for certain events with precision ( the vast majority )

 

We aren't allowed to play in their domain

 

Lawyers and solicitors are trained thoroughly in the hierarchical system and taught their language

 

Dabbling in legalese is like watching a baby trying to kick a football...cute, entertaining but no competition 

 

Unless you are injured, harmed or at a loss I can't see a claim

[Celticdevil]

29 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

The first time they built nightingale hospitals it was a bit unsettling because although i didn't believe in a deadly virus narrative the possibility that some other cause of mass death such as the roll out of 5G could cause anticipated problems. However no mass die offs materialised and the hospital overflows were unused.

 

Now they are doing it again and once again it raises the question of which of two reasons are they doing it for:

 

1) they expect mass sickness and deaths due to the jabs (which they'd blame on a 'variant')

2) that the entire thing is just a giant money exchange where public funds are directed to freemasonic firms and individuals who gorge themselves on the public contracts

 

The first time round it looks like it was definately number 2 and no doubt the backscratchers in the lodge are getting rich off this latest plunder of public funds too but will we also see deaths from the jabs?

NHS plans new Nightingale facilities

13-Jan-2022

The NHS is setting up new Nightingale surge hubs at hospitals across the country as part of preparations for a potential wave of Omicron admissions.

Temporary structures capable of housing around 100 patients will be erected in the grounds of eight hospitals across the country, with work starting as early as this week.

https://www.buildingbetterhealthcare.com/news/article_page/NHS_plans_new_Nightingale_facilities/198027

I think you got it spot on Mac follow the money

[Macnamara]

1 minute ago, Grumpy Owl said:

It will be 2) again, just like last time round.

 

I hope so GO

 

1 minute ago, Grumpy Owl said:

Millions of pounds spent (wasted) on building and equipping these temporary hospitals, which were never needed.

 

I seem to remember what looked like scaffolding inside the marquees and scaffolding isn't cheap. Just on the scaffolding and marquees alone it will have been millions

 

They marquee out the entire practice pitch at hampden park for the football and that costs the best part of a million quid for the marquees alone

 

1 minute ago, Grumpy Owl said:

its not just the freemasonic connections, but Common Purpose

 

same thing GO; same people, same masonic network.

 

Speaking of common purpose i watched UKColumn last night and they showed a clip of that doctor who spoke to savid javid, talking on good morning britain and his voice sounded tremulous where in the other two times i have heard him speak publically he sounded confident

 

Also it looked to me like his bottom lip was split and swollen as if someone had punched him in the mouth. This makes me wonder if he has been threatened:

 

see @21 minutes onwards here https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-news/uk-column-news-14th-january-2022

 

 

[zArk]

34 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

NHS plans new Nightingale facilities

Hypnotist uses keywords to reactivate their subjects

'nightingale' reaches back in time to reignite that fear response among other things

 

 

[Sit down, Waldo]

Calls / texts from my doctors practice have dried up recently but I did receive a letter a couple of days ago saying there were now exciting alternatives to the jab. The space underneath was blank...pretty certain they should've typed something in there. I don't know if they're stupid or have just sent the letter prematurely.

[Human10]

10 minutes ago, zArk said:

Hypnotist uses keywords to reactivate their subjects

'nightingale' reaches back in time to reignite that fear response among other things

 

 

I know - it triggers wearing masks on open air... 

[DaleP]

21 hours ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

 

I heard something along these lines on a talk show a few years back. It might have been Mike Adams. Anyway, there was an analysis done on some organic foods and it turns out they were fertilized with human bio-sludge or "night soil" as it's otherwise known. The analysis detected drug residue from anti-depressants, birth control pills, and other drugs. If memory serves, the produce was grown in either Mexico or one of the south-western states. 

 

It is common for Mexicans to use human waste as fertilizer so you'd get sick if you are a raw fooder e.g. fresh fruits, smoothies etc...

[Celticdevil]

I was a chippy two days ago outside waiting on my meal 10 peeps came and went only one sheeple dude wore a face nappy.

im seeing it everywhere in Scotland they’ve ditched the nappies.

People are waking up but not waking up to the bullshit if you get my meaning but small steps to fckn freedom.

[Grumpy Owl]

26 minutes ago, Sit down, Waldo said:

Calls / texts from my doctors practice have dried up recently but I did receive a letter a couple of days ago saying there were now exciting alternatives to the jab. The space underneath was blank...pretty certain they should've typed something in there. I don't know if they're stupid or have just sent the letter prematurely.

 

"exciting alternatives to the jab"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[this space left intentionally blank]

[DaleP]

6 hours ago, Truthspoon said:

I foresee a time when we unjabbed are going to have to act like dopey retards in order to fit in with the brain damaged prick lovers.

 

It'll be like Zombie invasion...or Invasion of the Body Snatchers, and they will spot you as 'unjabbed' and dobb you in, if you show too much obvious intelligence in your speech memory and movements....

 

I just tell them that I'm an alien....that will confuse them even further while thinking what to say to me.

[MarcusOmouse]

Just listened to the best Sunday wire  I probably ever heard.

And extremely pertinent to this thread.

It is a 3 hour show, but it does cover the entire gamut of issues we discuss on here.

 

My own conclusions ? The tide is turning for sure.

Be strong.

 

https://21stcenturywire.com/2022/01/16/episode-404-covid-world-roadshow-with-special-guests/

 

 

[DaleP]

3 hours ago, Morpheus said:

Autonomous cars my friend, hooked up to the IOT taking you direct to your destination whilst you relax and immerse yourself in zuckertwats metaverse gulag. 

 

Yeah but they are not safe either as we have seen some accidents video.

[Macnamara]

3 hours ago, Morpheus said:

Autonomous cars my friend, hooked up to the IOT taking you direct to your destination whilst you relax and immerse yourself in zuckertwats metaverse gulag. 

 

its not just about where autonomous cars will take you but where they will NOT take you

 

once no one owns their own car and the cars are driverless and controlled by AI the car will dictate to you where you are allowed to go and where you are not allowed to go

 

suddenly all the 'rewilded' land will be off limits to you and only open to those with the right credentials

[k_j_evans]

23 hours ago, sleepos2 said:

 

No, it was a third party control group of some sort and they even issued a lanyard card to say this person is not to be vaccinated. I can't find it now though... 

Sounds like you are thinking of the vax control group coop - not an official body

[J47]

22 hours ago, Macnamara said:

 

The doctor admits that he has seen young people DIE in his hospital after taking the jab

 

So if doctors are seeing young people dying after taking the jab then why the hell are they not enmasse shouting that from the rooftops?

 

They have a DUTY OF CARE to their patients to give them INFORMED CONSENT about the dangers

 

In the case of that doctor we will take it into account that he has at least spoken up when it comes for his turn to stand in the dock at the nuremburg trials but what excuse are other doctors going to have especially the GP's who have been jabbing everyone?

just out of interest, do you work for the NHS ?

[Morpheus]

16 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

 

its not just about where autonomous cars will take you but where they will NOT take you

 

once no one owns their own car and the cars are driverless and controlled by AI the car will dictate to you where you are allowed to go and where you are not allowed to go

 

suddenly all the 'rewilded' land will be off limits to you and only open to those with the right credentials

I know, just none of that was going to fit in my half comical reply Mac.

[Macnamara]

3 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

I know, just none of that was going to fit in my half comical reply Mac.

 

that's cool i was just piggy-backing your comment to make a point that i wanted to make!

 

Its something that i want to put out there into the public consciousness so that people can see the potential danger here with self-driving cars

 

of course they wll be sold to people as this great thing that makes peoples lives easier because they don't have to traverse rush hour traffic and can sit back with a book but that is just the sugar which they hide the taste of the poison with

 

the poison is that they will massively restrict out movement and to anyone out there who thinks that is just paranoid conspiracy theorising i would say to them that we have been talking about how 'social credit scores' will be used to assess whether people can travel or not and sure enough that is what we have seen in china. Also people should ask themselves if prior to covid they ever thought that they would be confined to their own homes and even told to limit their movement to their region of the country as we have seen with the lockdowns

 

if people still can't see where this is all trending then frankly they need their head examined

[Macnamara]

11 minutes ago, J47 said:

just out of interest, do you work for the NHS ?

 

no. do you?

[Morpheus]

1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

 

that's cool i was just piggy-backing your comment to make a point that i wanted to make!

 

Its something that i want to put out there into the public consciousness so that people can see the potential danger here with self-driving cars

 

of course they wll be sold to people as this great thing that makes peoples lives easier because they don't have to traverse rush hour traffic and can sit back with a book but that is just the sugar which they hide the taste of the poison with

 

the poison is that they will massively restrict out movement and to anyone out there who thinks that is just paranoid conspiracy theorising i would say to them that we have been talking about how 'social credit scores' will be used to assess whether people can travel or not and sure enough that is what we have seen in china. Also people should ask themselves if prior to covid they ever thought that they would be confined to their own homes and even told to limit their movement to their region of the country as we have seen with the lockdowns

 

if people still can't see where this is all trending then frankly they need their head examined

Oh totally agree. As @Nemuri Kyoshiro said, Johnny cab style off total recall. I saw all this coming around 3-4 years ago with the changes in the RTA scheme and traffic laws. Soon you will not be suing each other, instead we will be suing the manufacturer because it's their AI that will be at fault and not the passengers. 

 

However, since these vehicles are going to be battery propelled, they're basically moving bombs and that's not an exaggeration. Put a lithium battery in water, it explodes, crush lithium battery and it explodes. What do people think is going to happen when it crashes into something? It'll fuckin explode that's what. But hey, we're saving the planet right.

[Macnamara]

8 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Soon you will not be suing each other, instead we will be suing the manufacturer because it's their AI that will be at fault and not the passengers.

 

except in the same way the state exempted the covid jab manufacturers they will exempt the driverless car manufacturers too

 

they will be able to carry on doing this for as long as people believe that parliament has the absolute power to pass any law it wishes even if it tramples on the common law rights of individuals

[Frankieboy]

 

[Trufflepig]

6 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Oh totally agree. As @Nemuri Kyoshiro said, Johnny cab style off total recall. I saw all this coming around 3-4 years ago with the changes in the RTA scheme and traffic laws. Soon you will not be suing each other, instead we will be suing the manufacturer because it's their AI that will be at fault and not the passengers. 

 

However, since these vehicles are going to be battery propelled, they're basically moving bombs and that's not an exaggeration. Put a lithium battery in water, it explodes, crush lithium battery and it explodes. What do people think is going to happen when it crashes into something? It'll fuckin explode that's what. But hey, we're saving the planet right.

I often wondered what these whack jobs were banging on about with their carbon neutral by 2030-2050 target crap before the ronahoax came along.

 

Unfortunately as the agenda has unfolded the commie plan of the psychopaths has been easier to puzzle together. What really pisses me off is the arrogance as I lived close enough to the flight path for Oxford airport and last Jan whilst we couldn't book a flight if we wanted to private jets taking these cunts to and fro were pretty frequent.

 

Absolutely want to restrict the masses whilst they carry on as normal. If they succeed which I don't believe they will monitoring/restricting us will be part of the plan.