Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Ziggy Sawdust]

4 hours ago, Frankieboy said:

 

Spotted in Zürich Main Station

 

Girl walking around with «Steckt euch euren Covid-Pass in den Arsch.» (Stick your Covid I.D. up your arse)

 

https://www.20min.ch/story/vater-klebt-toechterchen-steckt-euch-euren-covid-pass-schild-auf-ruecken-235407944717

 

so called Experts are saying Father of child should be charged with Child abuse because child does`nt fully understand the Text!

 

Dog off a lead in a food shop.

Wouldn't see that in the UK.

[Ziggy Sawdust]

3 hours ago, webtrekker said:

Grr ... That fucking Benjamin Butterknob is on the Vile show again.

 

WARNING:

Watching television can seriously damage your mental health.

[Ziggy Sawdust]

3 hours ago, Frankieboy said:

 

The three-time Wimbledon winner and former coach Boris Becker has criticized Novak Djokovic's behavior. "I think he's making a big mistake not to get vaccinated," wrote the German tennis legend in a guest post for the Daily Mail. This mistake threatens what remains of his career and the chance to perpetuate himself as the best player in history. Becker trained the Serbs from 2013 to 2016. During this time, Djokovic won six Grand Slam tournaments, including the Australian Open, and became number one again in the world. Becker advises Djokovic to vaccinate Becker continued to write that he was in contact with Djokovic's current coach, Goran Ivanisevic, after they arrived at Melbourne Airport. But he stayed in another room because everything was okay with his visa. He has not yet spoken to Djokovic, but "I would advise him to get vaccinated - whether he would listen to me is another matter," said Becker. The rules are to be accepted, he emphasized.

 

 

 

Fuck off Becker you wanker.

[Nemuri Kyoshiro]

1 hour ago, Bombadil said:

When at night I’m struggling to sleep, I tend to read a lot of random stuff. I’m sure we all do!

one thing that seems very prominent at the moment Is in msm comment sections. The masses imo are not waking up to what’s going on. Theyre actually only arguing for end to convid measures  because they think they’ve done enough. They mostly still want us hung, drawn and quartered so to speak.

they all seem to need to think that their so called enlightened views are their own idea not a copy and pasted, rinse and repeat idea.

Even if this all blew over tomorrow we would still be seen as pariahs in the history books of tomorrow.

Personally if never get to set foot in another concert hall, tourist attraction or whatever the msm seem to think is so essential to our lives, I wouldn’t give a flying fuck. All these measures have done have reassured me that my thinking over the years was correct and that my love of the natural world is all I need to flourish spiritually, mentally and physically.

 

I tend to read books in the evening when I can't sleep. Comments, I find, are monopolized by the hive mind, or by 77th. They tend to reinforce the narrative. They have hundreds of thousands of usernames, and sophisticated equipment that can flood the so-called public space with lies. There must be some genuine comments from the brain-dead community but anyone who bucks the trend will be rounded on. Stay away from it and remember that the MSM does not represent the true voice of the people, only the voice of those who own the media.

 

I'm with you on the cultural aspects. I'm lucky insofar as I got to wander around art galleries and museums when I was young. I have my DVD collection if I want to listen to a concert or watch a film. It's not the same as being at the venue but what pleasure is there in attending if you have to wear a mask, get a shot, and crawl on your belly for the privilege?

 

I love the natural world too. I know I will never get to go on a safari now or visit far-away places again. I accept that and have learned to love what is near to me and accessible. You are right to develop your spiritual side and it sounds like your daughter is on the same path. If raising a child to be a kind and compassionate person,  is one's only achievement in life, then it is a great one and worthy of praise. So many children today are lost.

[Nemuri Kyoshiro]

6 minutes ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

Dog off a lead in a food shop.

Wouldn't see that in the UK

I doubt that even the dog would eat vegan salmon.

[bobb]

57 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

New short documentary the PCR test deception

 

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xYtBf4QkXPpE/

 

And I will say this again, if you test for SMALL POX WITH THE PCR YOU WILL FIND IT

Does this mean everyone carries small pox within their bodies, YES IT FUCKING DOES, IS EVERYONE DYING FROM SMALL POX,  ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID!!!!!

[Saved]

7 hours ago, Dazzer said:

I'm not sure there isn't one poster on a footy forum I read that hasn't tested 'positive' despite being double jabbed or boostered, and I'm talking a lot of people here. Half of them must know it's a load of shite or at least have doubts but don't want to face the truth.

Added to the fact that if they know (and they do) that everybody spreads it why are they still pushing for younger kids to get it? The only reason kids were getting pushed to take it was to stop the spread, well that's a load of horse shit so why not stop jabbing kids. It's truly mind boggling. 

Their minds are unable to follow any single thread of logic to its conclusion. By the time they almost get to that point, another thought takes over and drags them down another road. Again, they follow that road but are unable to get to the end point. Throughout the process they forget the first road they travelled down, which is a good job because it contradicts the road they are currently on. There is a third derailing thought that is about to take them off this second road, which in turn will be forgotten about until such time they are taken full circle to where they started.

 

Not one single thought can be followed to its conclusion. It gets sabotaged every single time. Double-speak is so prevalent from our point of view but cannot be discerned by those that have given themselves over to a lie (by now a lattice of lies). 

 

Go to work. Don't go to work. Work from home if you can. If you must go to work try not to go to work. You must work from home. 

 

Do you remember the confused, contradictory instructions in the first lockdown? I was reading the comments on the official Facebook page of the Tories and they had people on there saying:

 

"I give in. What is wrong with you people? It is simple to understand - work if you must but do so from home. What is hard to understand about that?" They would deliberately omit the words "....do so from home IF YOU CAN"

 

These people (I believe) were placed in these threads across various news pages to confuse the issue further and to instil in people's minds the notion that if they didn't comprehend the simple message they must be the thickest people on earth. And so was born a repeating pattern of confusion (the language of deceivers) and increasing amounts of people fell for the double-speak because they did not want to appear to be thick to their peers.

 

Twenty two months ago we watched them land in the web. Today we observe them from outside of the web, rolling themselves up in silk balls ready to be made a meal of, so entangled they are in so many strands of different lies.

[bobb]

4 minutes ago, Saved said:

Their minds are unable to follow any single thread of logic to its conclusion. By the time they almost get to that point, another thought takes over and drags them down another road. Again, they follow that road but are unable to get to the end point. Throughout the process they forget the first road they travelled down, which is a good job because it contradicts the road they are currently on. There is a third derailing thought that is about to take them off this second road, which in turn will be forgotten about until such time they are taken full circle to where they started.

 

Not one single thought can be followed to its conclusion. It gets sabotaged every single time. Double-speak is so prevalent from our point of view but cannot be discerned by those that have given themselves over to a lie (by now a lattice of lies). 

 

Go to work. Don't go to work. Work from home if you can. If you must go to work try not to go to work. You must work from home. 

 

Do you remember the confused, contradictory instructions in the first lockdown? I was reading the comments on the official Facebook page of the Tories and they had people on there saying:

 

"I give in. What is wrong with you people? It is simple to understand - work if you must but do so from home. What is hard to understand about that?" They would deliberately omit the words "....do so from home IF YOU CAN"

 

These people (I believe) were placed in these threads across various news pages to confuse the issue further and to instil in people's minds the notion that if they didn't comprehend the simple message they must be the thickest people on earth. And so was born a repeating pattern of confusion (the language of deceivers) and increasing amounts of people fell for the double-speak because they did not want to appear to be thick to their peers.

 

Twenty two months ago we watched them land in the web. Today we observe them from outside of the web, rolling themselves up in silk balls ready to be made a meal of, so entangled they are in so many strands of different lies.

 

This is an epic piece of writing in truth, thank you for this.

 

MODS WE WANT AN EPIC BUTTON TO AWARD POSTERS WITH, THANK YOU.

[webtrekker]

Judge Rejects FDA's 75 Year Delay On Vax Data, Cuts To Just 8 Months

by Tyler Durden

 

Friday, Jan 07, 2022 - 06:11 AM

A federal judge has rejected a request by the FDA to produce just 500 pages per month of the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine - and has ordered them to produce 55,000 pages per month. Assuming there are roughly 450,000 pages, that means it will take just over eight months for the world to see what's under the hood.

 

 

Attorney Aaron Siri, who represents the plaintiff in the case, has provided this stunning update via his blog, Injecting Freedom:

 

 

 

[webtrekker]

1 hour ago, HAARPING_On said:

 

Out of likes. Have already resigned myself to the fact I will never leave this country again, maybe not go to another gig etc etc. The last 12 months have hardened my stance beyond recognition. The harder they push, the more I dig my heels in. 

 

Same here, and if we're going to be stuck forever in this bloody country then we need to make damn sure it's worth living in by standing up against the bastards trying to destroy it!

 

 

 

[Saved]

7 hours ago, alexa said:

 

Why is it they always like to pick on these Northerners, they always seem to come off the worst when anything happens ?

 

 

6 hours ago, karmaxxxx said:

I honestly do not know tbh and i am a northerner likes of Manchester Liverpool and others up here, have a history through the ages of uniting against overarching by the ptb, and it does seem to be gaining momentum up here again. i see 50\50 mask wearers now even in the schools. so i guess the ptb are going to keep pushing and last time that happened i witnessed as a young person our cities burning as riots broke out and eventual spread country wide. but i think this is what they want tbh, i just hope it goes feck you we not playing anymore do one and they dont get there violence but we will see

 

Because they want to maintain the story that London is the epicentre of all things good in the UK. From the PM to the Queen, it is the place where the greatest gravitate to and the only instantly recognisable city in the whole of the UK to people from all over the world.

 

Over time, we have been conditioned to believe that the further North you go the more backward people become.

 

I find that the more North I go the warmer the people, the better the food and (when I used to drink) the better the beer. In my going all over the country football years from 1975-1985 I also found that the further North you went, the harder were the hooligans. Hence the term Southern Softies. Places like Middlesbrough and Halifax were nightmares to travel to because the firms were fearless. Some linked this to many being from hard areas devastated by unemployment, hard drinking fathers, an environment of violence.

 

The North seems to be punished the most when cut-backs and the movement or destruction of industries happen. London is perennially protected (at least to the casual eye) though we know it is largely a third world shit hole - it is Westminster that is protected. I reckon that the halls of power in Westminster fear the men of the North. I reckon that they are envious of them. 

 

Of all the complexities of the human condition, envy is the one thing that always seeks to destroy or spoil to make itself feel better. I also think that if it goes bang in the form of widespread rioting, the North will be the hardest to subdue. For all the brainwashing, feminising of men, the men of the North will have the largest remnant of males that haven't given themselves over to oestrogen and soppy modern day woke Liberalism.

 

If I was choosing a street army I would choose 300 Northerners over 3000 from the Home Counties any day of the week. 

[Ziggy Sawdust]

3 hours ago, bobb said:

 

Here you go, this is a very nice breakdown of events on Jan 6th 2021 capitol hill state side of the pond scum, if anyone is in any doubt about media and Government lies and deception after watching this, then you are beyond help, seek out a wall and bash your head in, saves me doing it, thank you for your cooperation.

 

 

That's a great video.

[SimonTV]

https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-7th-january-2022

 

UK Column News - 7th January 2022

[Nobby Noboddy]

 

[Saved]

4 hours ago, PatriotGirl said:

These spineless cowards disgust me

I used to wonder why cowards were numbered with liars but now fully understand. The consequences of cowardice are horrific and none more so than in this current age. Elderly people, babies - the most vulnerable of people - are fodder because of cowardice.

 

"But I did not whoremonger or lie or murder or mess with kids. I even have an impressive list of these works I did in your name"

 

Cowardice is without doubt grievous to the Lord and therefore should be to those who belong to Him. I just never saw it until this last year or so.

[Bombadil]

1 hour ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

 

I tend to read books in the evening when I can't sleep. Comments, I find, are monopolized by the hive mind, or by 77th. They tend to reinforce the narrative. They have hundreds of thousands of usernames, and sophisticated equipment that can flood the so-called public space with lies. There must be some genuine comments from the brain-dead community but anyone who bucks the trend will be rounded on. Stay away from it and remember that the MSM does not represent the true voice of the people, only the voice of those who own the media.

 

I'm with you on the cultural aspects. I'm lucky insofar as I got to wander around art galleries and museums when I was young. I have my DVD collection if I want to listen to a concert or watch a film. It's not the same as being at the venue but what pleasure is there in attending if you have to wear a mask, get a shot, and crawl on your belly for the privilege?

 

I love the natural world too. I know I will never get to go on a safari now or visit far-away places again. I accept that and have learned to love what is near to me and accessible. You are right to develop your spiritual side and it sounds like your daughter is on the same path. If raising a child to be a kind and compassionate person,  is one's only achievement in life, then it is a great one and worthy of praise. So many children today are lost.

Fair comment about the media. Was forgetting to look at it the right wayI also read an awful lot. But in the wee hours tend to read on pad or listen to audio books. Also have big dvd collection and Mike’s of wooded and unformed countryside nearby.

love the winter but I’m really looking forward to the first day of enough warmth to fall asleep under a tree

[SimonTV]

https://t.me/disclosetv/6366

 

Quote

JUST IN - Austria: Mandatory vaccination reportedly postponed until April due to "technical implementation problems." 

In addition, data protection experts criticize the project because it introduces a kind of an unlawful dragnet search.

To date, more than 61,000 complaints against compulsory vaccinations have been submitted to the Austrian Parliament.

@disclosetv

 

 

[Ziggy Sawdust]

5 minutes ago, Nobby Noboddy said:

 

 

Horse teeth and a horse dick.

[Bombadil]

2 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

https://t.me/disclosetv/6366

 

 

At least a delay is positive. Thought there would be more complaints though.

[epsom]

 

 

In Court, Facebook Admits ‘Fact Checks’ Are Pure Opinion

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE -

“Fact checks” are nothing but a biased censoring mechanism, and now we have proof of this fact, thanks to a lawsuit brought against Facebook by journalist John Stossel

 

In court documents, Facebook admits that fact checks are “statements of opinion” and not factual assertions

 

Facebook recently censored a whistleblower report published by The British Medical Journal (BMJ), one of the oldest and most respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world, variably labeling the article as “False,” “Partly false” or “Missing context.” Some users reported they could not share the article at all

 

The fact check inaccurately referred to The BMJ as a “news blog,” failed to specify any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong, and published the fact check under a URL containing the phrase “hoax-alert”

 

The BMJ calls the fact check “inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.” In an open letter addressed to Mark Zuckerberg, The BMJ urges Zuckerberg to “act swiftly” to correct the erroneous fact check, review the processes that allowed it to occur in the first place, and “generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall”

 

 

 

We’ve long suspected that fact checking organizations are nothing but a biased censoring mechanism more interested in manipulating opinion than establishing actual

facts, but now we have absolute proof, thanks to a lawsuit brought against Facebook by journalist John Stossel.^1,2

 

In 2020, a Facebook fact checker called Science Feedback slapped “False” and “Lacking context” labels on two videos posted by Stossel. The videos featured Stossel’s

interviews with experts who discussed the negligible role of climate change in the 2020 California forest fires. While they did not deny climate change is real, they proposed there were other, likely more contributing factors, such as poor forest management.

Why were his videos flagged as misinformation? According to Facebook fact checkers, Stossel was “misleading” people when he claimed that “forest fires are caused by poor forest management, not climate change.” But according to Stossel, he never actually

made that claim.

 

According to Stossel, the labels damaged his reputation as an investigative journalist and resulted in a loss of followers. Interestingly, when Stossel contacted Science Feedback about its fact checks, two reviewers agreed to be interviewed. With regard to the first video that got flagged, they admitted they’d never even watched it. In the case of the second video, a reviewer explained that they “didn’t like [his] tone.” As noted by The New York Post:³

 

“That is, you can’t write anything about climate change unless you say it’s the

worst disaster in the history of humanity and we must spend trillions to fight it.”

 

“The problem is the omission of contextual information rather than specific ‘facts’ being wrong,” the fact checker told Stossel, who says:⁴

 

“What? It’s fine if people don’t like my tone. But Facebook declares my post ‘partly false,’ a term it defines on its website as including ‘factual inaccuracies.’ My video does not contain factual inaccuracies ... I want Facebook to learn that censorship — especially sloppy, malicious censorship, censorship without any meaningful appeal process — is NOT the way to go. The world needs more

freedom to discuss things, not less.”

Facebook Claims Fact Checks Are ‘Protected Opinion’

 

So, Stossel sued for defamation, and this is where it gets good, because to defend

Facebook, its lawyers had to at least temporarily resort to telling the truth. In their legal brief, they argue that fact checks are protected under the First Amendment because they are OPINIONS, not assertions of facts! Commenting on the case, climate change blogger Anthony Watts writes:⁵

 

“Facebook just blew the ‘fact check’ claim right out of the water in court. In its response to Stossel’s defamation claim, Facebook responds on Page 2, Line 8 in the court document that Facebook cannot be sued for defamation (which is making a false and harmful assertion) because its ‘fact checks’ are mere statements of opinion rather than factual assertions.

Opinions are not subject to defamation claims, while false assertions of fact can be subject to defamation ... So, in a court of law, in a legal filing, Facebook admits that its ‘fact checks’ are not really ‘fact’ checks at all, but merely ‘opinion assertions.’

This strikes me as public relations disaster, and possibly a looming legal disaster for Facebook, PolitiFact, Climate Feedback and other left-leaning entities that engage in biased ‘fact checking.’

Such ‘fact checks’ are now shown to be simply an agenda to suppress free speech and the open discussion of science by disguising liberal media activism as something supposedly factual, noble, neutral, trustworthy, and based on science. It is none of those.”

 

Facebook Censors The British Medical Journal

 

Stossel is far from alone in being censored these days. In the video above, he points out other noteworthy experts who have been censored for their opinions and educated stances, such as environmentalist Michael Shellenberger, once hailed by Time Magazine

as a “hero of the environment,” statistician and environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg, once

declared “one of the most influential people of the 21st century,” and science writer John Tierney.

 

“

As Facebook has now admitted in court, these so- called fact checks are nothing more than a declaration of preferred opinion. They’re statements of approved narrative. They have nothing to do with the

verification of facts._”

Of course, I am no stranger to censorship either, having been falsely labeled as one of the “biggest misinformation agents” on the entire internet when it comes to the COVID jab. In these times of Orwellian Doublespeak, I consider this one of most significant

achievements I have ever achieved.

 

Think about it for a moment. The entire mainstream media has agreed that I am the most influential spreader of the truth about COVID on the internet. Even my friend and

major freedom fighter, Bobby Kennedy, was only No. 2. I couldn’t be more delighted with their award. I might even have it inscribed on my tombstone.

Most recently, Facebook even censored The British Medical Journal (BMJ) over an

article that highlighted potential problems with Pfizer’s COVID jab trial, and The BMJ is one of the oldest and most respected peer-reviewed medical journals in the world!

In early November 2021, The BMJ published a whistleblower report⁶ that claimed there were serious data integrity issues in the Pfizer COVID jab trial. The article was censored by Facebook and labeled variably as either “False,” “Partly false” or “Missing context.”

Some users reported the article could not be shared at all.

 

The Facebook fact check of The BMJ article was done by Lead Stories, a Facebook contractor. The headline of its “fact check” rebuttal read: “Fact Check: The British

Medical Journal Did NOT Reveal Disqualifying and Ignored Reports of Flaws in Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.”⁷

 

 

‘Inaccurate, Incompetent and Irresponsible’ Fact Checking

 

In response, The BMJ has slammed the fact check, calling it “inaccurate, incompetent

and irresponsible.”^8,9,10 In an open letter¹¹ addressed to Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, The BMJ urges Zuckerberg to “act swiftly” to correct the erroneous fact check, review the processes that allowed it to occur in the first place, and “generally to reconsider your investment in and approach to fact checking overall.” As noted by The BMJ in its letter, the Lead Stories’ fact check:¹²

 

Inaccurately referred to The BMJ as a “news blog”

Failed to specify any assertions of fact that The BMJ article got wrong

Published the fact check on the Lead Stories’ website under a URL that contains the phrase “hoax-alert”

Lead Stories refused to address the inaccuracies when contacted by The BMJ directly. The BMJ also raises “a wider concern” in its letter:

“We are aware that The BMJ is not the only high quality information provider to have been affected by the incompetence of Meta’s fact checking regime. To give one other example, we would highlight the treatment by Instagram (also

owned by Meta) of Cochrane, the international provider of high quality systematic reviews of the medical evidence.

Rather than investing a proportion of Meta’s substantial profits to help ensure the accuracy of medical information shared through social media, you have

apparently delegated responsibility to people incompetent in carrying out this crucial task.

Fact checking has been a staple of good journalism for decades. What has happened in this instance should be of concern to anyone who values and relies

on sources such as The BMJ.”

 

 

Fact Checkers Are as Biased as They Come

 

When it comes to fact checking, it’s high time everyone understood that fact checks are not done by independent, unbiased parties who are sifting through facts to make sure a given piece is accurate.

As Facebook has now admitted in court, these so-called fact checks are nothing more than a declaration of preferred opinion. They’re statements of approved narrative. They have nothing to do with the verification of facts. As reported by the New York Post:¹³

 

“The Post has faced this same gauntlet too many times. In February 2020, we published a column by Steven W. Mosher asking if COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Lab. This was labeled ‘false’ by Facebook’s fact-checkers.

Of course, those supposed ‘independent’ scientific reviewers relied on a group of experts who had a vested interest in dismissing that theory — including EcoHealth, which had funded the Wuhan lab.

When Twitter ‘fact checked’ and blocked The Post’s stories about Hunter Biden’s laptop as ‘hacked materials,’ what was the basis? Nothing. It wasn’t hacked; the company’s staff just wanted an excuse. Guess they didn’t like our tone. In both

these cases, our ‘fact checks’ were lifted, but only after it no longer mattered.”

 

The New York Post also points out that “The fact-check industry is funded by liberal moguls such as George Soros, government-funded nonprofits and the tech giants themselves.”¹⁴ Science Feedback, for example, received seed funding from Google.¹⁵

 

Journalism’s icon, the Poynter Institute — which runs the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) — also funded Science Feedback to build what Poynter describes as “a database of fact checks and of websites that spread misinformation the most.”

In a round robin of circular funding, IFCN’s revenues come from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, Facebook and government entities such as the U.S. Department of State.¹⁶ To top it off, Science Feedback’s crowdfunding is run through the University of California, Merced, so they can avoid taxes in the United States.¹⁷

 

 

Fact Checkers Protect the Technocratic Agenda

 

One of the primary funders of the fake fact checking industry that The Post failed to mention is the drug industry. NewsGuard and other fact checking organizations are

loaded with Big Pharma conflicts of interest, and their bias in favor of the drug industry is undeniable.

Fact checking organizations are also clearly influenced by technocratic organizations such as the World Economic Forum, which is leading the call for a Great Reset.

NewsGuard, for example, is partnered with Publicis,¹⁸ one of the world’s largest PR companies that has a huge roster of Big Pharma clients, and Publicis in turn is a partner of the World Economic Forum.

NewsGuard also received a large chunk of its startup capital from Publicis. No doubt, Big Pharma and The Great Reset are tightly intertwined and work together toward the same goal, which is nothing less than world domination and the enslavement of the global population under a biomedical police state.

 

PR Posing as Free Press Has Unleashed Fake News Pandemic

 

Publicis actually appears to be coordinating the global effort to suppress information that runs counter to the technocratic narrative about COVID-19, its origin, prevention and treatment — suppression and censorship that has been repeatedly aimed at this website specifically.

It is part of an enormous network that includes international drug companies, fact checkers and credibility raters like NewsGuard, Google and other search engines, Microsoft, antivirus software companies like Trend Micro, public libraries, schools, the

banking industry, the U.S. State Department and Department of Defense, the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum.

Mind you, this is not a comprehensive list of links. It’s merely a sampling of entities to give you an idea of the breadth of connections, which when taken together explain how certain views — such as information about COVID-19 and vaccines — can be so effectively suppressed and erased from public discourse.

To understand the power that PR companies such as Publicis wield, you also need to realize that PR has, by and large, replaced the free press. This has had a devastating effect, and I don’t think I’m overstating the matter when I say that it is PR masquerading as news that gave birth to the whole “fake news” phenomenon.

However, in true Orwellian double-speak, these same fake PR-news pushers claim everyone else is peddling fake news. They want us to believe their PR is the truth, even though its typically devoid of data and flies in the face of verifiable facts.

 

China’s Hidden Influence

 

In addition to fact checkers doing the bidding of Big Pharma and the technocratic elite, the public is also being deceived and manipulated by Chinese propaganda. In a December 20, 2021, New York Times article,¹⁹ Muyi Xiao, Paul Mozur and Gray Beltran details how China manipulates Facebook and Twitter to further its own authoritarian

aspirations.

 

According to Xiao, Mozur and Beltran, China’s government has “unleashed a global online campaign” to bolster its image and suppress accusations of human rights

abuses. To that end, it hires companies to flood social media with fake accounts that are then used to advance China’s agenda worldwide.

This includes creating content on demand, identifying and tracking critics that live

outside of China, running bot networks to flood social media with tailored propaganda messages to steer discussion and more — strategies referred to as “public opinion

management.”

Disturbingly, while the Chinese government has long hunted down dissenting voices inside the country and forced them to recant, they’re now hunting Chinese dissenters worldwide.

Any user who has connections to the mainland can find themselves in a situation where their family members in China are detained or threatened until or unless they delete the offending post or account. People of Chinese descent who live in other countries may

also be detained by police if they return to mainland China, based on the opinions they’ve shared online.

 

China Aims for More Sophisticated Propaganda

 

According to the documents the trio obtained, the Chinese police are also working on more sophisticated propaganda maneuvers. For example, rather than relying on bot

farms and fake troll profiles to create an appearance of public opinion, they’re looking to grow popular accounts that have an organic following, so that these accounts can later be taken over by government to push whatever propaganda is desired at that time.

These are known as “profiles for hire.” As explained in the article, “The deeper engagement lends the fake personas credibility at a time when social media companies are increasingly taking down accounts that seem inauthentic or coordinated.”

 

Facebook Itself Is an Opinion Management Tool

 

Of course, Facebook and Twitter lend themselves to this kind of manipulation because they are essentially “public opinion management” tools. Even if they didn’t start out that way (and that’s a big if), they’ve certainly grown into it. There can be no denying that both platforms have been instrumental in censoring information about COVID-19 on behalf of the drug industry and global technocracy.

As reported by The National Pulse,²⁰ email correspondence between Dr. Anthony Fauci and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg reveals Zuckerberg even agreed to send Fauci

reports on Facebook users’ sentiments to “facilitate decisions” about COVID-19 lockdowns. An April 8, 2020, email from Zuckerberg reads in part:²¹

 

“... If we’re looking at a prolonged period of tightening and loosening shelter restrictions around the country, then if there are aggregate, anonymized data reports that Facebook can generate to facilitate these decisions, for example, we’d be happy to do this ...

We’ve kicked off a symptom survey, which will hopefully give a county-by- county leading indicator of cases to inform public health decisions. If there are other aggregate data resources that you think would be helpful, let me know ...”

As noted by The National Pulse, this is a “stark example” of how Big Tech corporations and government agencies collude and use user data to restrict our freedoms and liberties.²²

 

 

Government Colludes With Big Tech to Circumvent Constitution

 

Indeed, aside from this, we’ve also had clear examples of politicians colluding with Big Tech to censor on behalf of the government, in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution. This is why I sued U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

In early September 2021, Warren sent a letter²³ to Andy Jassy, chief executive officer of Amazon.com, demanding an “immediate review” of Amazon’s algorithms to weed out books peddling “COVID misinformation.”^24,25,26

 

Warren specifically singled out my book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” co-written with

Ronnie Cummins, founder and director of the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), as a prime example of “highly-ranked and favorably-tagged books based on falsehoods

about COVID-19 vaccines and cures” that she wanted banned.

 

As a government official, it is illegal for her to violate the U.S. Constitution, and pressuring private businesses to do it for her is not a legal workaround. Since she willfully ignored the law, Cummins and I, along with our publisher, Chelsea Green

Publishing, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who wrote our foreword, sued Warren,²⁷ both in her official and personal capacities, for violating our First Amendment rights.

The federal lawsuit, in which Warren is listed as the sole defendant, was filed November 8, 2021, in the state of Washington.

 

‘Fact Checks’ Are Brainwashing Attempts

 

Is there a fact checking organization you can rely on? The simple and direct answer is no. They all exist for a single purpose — to metaphorically “shout over” anyone whose views differ from the officially sanctioned narrative on a given topic and suppress the truth that interferes with the implementation of their agenda.

It’s like two people trying to have a conversation about something while a third person keeps interjecting, screaming at the top of their lungs “THINK THIS! SAY THIS!”

Who needs that? They’re useless. By reading them and giving them any credence, all

you’re doing is filling your head with propaganda and increasing your likelihood of falling into the pervasive mass delusional psychosis we’re seeing all around us. It’s just one big brainwashing attempt. With any amount of luck, Facebook’s court admission that fact checks are mere opinion pieces will end up triggering the fact blockers’ demise.

 

Sources and References

 

 

¹ wattsupwiththat.com John Stossel Lawsuit against Meta Platforms (PDF)

² WND December 10, 2021

^{3, 13, 14} New York Post December 14, 2021

⁴ New York Post December 13, 2021

⁵ wattsupwiththat.com December 9, 2021

^{6, 11, 12} The BMJ 2021;375:n2635

^{7, 8} Reclaim the Net December 17, 2021

⁹ Medscape December 20, 2021

¹⁰ ZeroHedge December 20, 2021

¹⁵ Science Feedback Partners, Funders & Donors

¹⁶ Poynter IFCN Transparency Statement

¹⁷ Influence Watch Science Feedback

¹⁸ Twitter Publicis Health Media April 27, 2021

¹⁹ New York Times December 20, 2021 (Archived)

^{20, 21, 22} National Pulse December 14, 2021

²³ Warren’s letter to Andy Jassy September 7, 2021

²⁴ National Interest September 12, 2021

²⁵ The Guardian September 13, 2021

²⁶ New York Times September 8, 2021

²⁷ Chelsea Green November 8, 2021

 

 

[epsom]

Judge Rejects FDA's 75 Year Delay On Vax Data, Cuts To Just 8 Months

 

BY TYLER DURDEN

FRIDAY, JAN 07, 2022

 

A federal judge has rejected a request by the FDA to produce just 500 pages per month of the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine - and has ordered them to produce 55,000 pages per month. Assuming there are roughly 450,000 pages, that means it will take just over eight months for the world to see what's under the hood.

 

 

 

Attorney Aaron Siri, who represents the plaintiff in the case, has provided this stunning update via his blog, Injecting Freedom:

 

On behalf of a client, my firm requested that the FDA produce all the data submitted by Pfizer to license its Covid-19 vaccine. The FDA asked the Court for permission to only be required to produce at a rate of 500 pages per month, which would have taken over 75 years to produce all the documents.

 

I am pleased to report that a federal judge soundly rejected the FDA’s request and ordered the FDA to produce all the data at a clip of 55,000 pages per month!

 

This is a great win for transparency and removes one of the strangleholds federal “health” authorities have had on the data needed for independent scientists to offer solutions and address serious issues with the current vaccine program – issues which include waning immunity, variants evading vaccine immunity, and, as the CDC has confirmed, that the vaccines do not prevent transmission.

 

No person should ever be coerced to engage in an unwanted medical procedure. And while it is bad enough the government violated this basic liberty right by mandating the Covid-19 vaccine, the government also wanted to hide the data by waiting to fully produce what it relied upon to license this product until almost every American alive today is dead. That form of governance is destructive to liberty and antithetical to the openness required in a democratic society.

 

In ordering the release of the documents in a timely manner, the Judge recognized that the release of this data is of paramount public importance and should be one of the FDA’s highest priorities. He then aptly quoted James Madison as saying a “popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy” and John F. Kennedy as explaining that a “nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”

 

The following is the full text of the Judge’s order, a copy of which is also available here.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

PHMPT, Plaintiff v. FDA, Defendant, No. 4:21-cv-1058-P

 

ORDER

 

This case involves the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). Specifically, at issue is Plaintiff’s FOIA request seeking “[a]ll data and information for the Pfizer Vaccine enumerated in 21 C.F.R. § 601.51(e) with the exception of publicly available reports on the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System” from the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). See ECF No. 1. As has become standard, the Parties failed to agree to a mutually acceptable production schedule; instead, they submitted dueling production schedules for this Court’s consideration. Accordingly, the Court held a conference with the Parties to determine an appropriate production schedule.[1] See ECF Nos. 21, 34.

 

“Open government is fundamentally an American issue” – it is neither a Republican nor a Democrat issue.[2] As James Madison wrote, “[a] popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy; or, perhaps, both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance: And a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”[3] John F. Kennedy likewise recognized that “a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”[4] And, particularly appropriate in this case, John McCain (correctly) noted that “[e]xcessive administrative secrecy . . . feeds conspiracy theories and reduces the public’s confidence in the government.”[5]

 

Echoing these sentiments, “[t]he basic purpose of FOIA is to ensure an informed citizenry, [which is] vital to the functioning of a democratic society.” NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 242 (1977). “FOIA was [therefore] enacted to ‘pierce the veil of administrative secrecy and to open agency action to the light of public scrutiny.’” Batton v. Evers, 598 F.3d 169, 175 (5th Cir. 2010) (quoting Dep’t of the Air Force v. Rose, 425 U.S. 352, 361 (1976)). And “Congress has long recognized that ‘information is often useful only if it is timely’ and that, therefore ‘excessive delay by the agency in its response is often tantamount to denial.’” Open Soc’y Just. Initiative v. CIA, 399 F. Supp. 3d 161, 165 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (quoting H.R. REP. NO. 93-876, at 6271 (1974)). When needed, a court “may use its equitable powers to require an agency to process documents according to a court-imposed timeline.” Clemente v. FBI, 71 F. Supp. 3d 262, 269 (D.D.C. 2014).

 

Here, the Court recognizes the “unduly burdensome” challenges that this FOIA request may present to the FDA. See generally ECF Nos. 23, 30, 34. But, as expressed at the scheduling conference, there may not be a “more important issue at the Food and Drug Administration . . . than the pandemic, the Pfizer vaccine, getting every American vaccinated, [and] making sure that the American public is assured that this was not [] rush[ed] on behalf of the United States . . . .” ECF No. 34 at 46. Accordingly, the Court concludes that this FOIA request is of paramount public importance.

 

“[S]tale information is of little value.” Payne Enters., Inc. v. United States, 837 F.2d 486, 494 (D.C. Cir. 1988). The Court, agreeing with this truism, therefore concludes that the expeditious completion of Plaintiff’s request is not only practicable, but necessary. See Bloomberg, L.P. v. FDA, 500 F. Supp. 2d 371, 378 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2007) (“[I]t is the compelling need for such public understanding that drives the urgency of the request.”). To that end, the Court further concludes that the production rate, as detailed below, appropriately balances the need for unprecedented urgency in processing this request with the FDA’s concerns regarding the burdens of production. See Halpern v. FBI, 181 F.3d 279, 284–85 (2nd Cir. 1991) (“[FOIA] emphasizes a preference for the fullest possible agency disclosure of such information consistent with a responsible balancing of competing concerns . . . .”).

 

Accordingly, having considered the Parties’ arguments, filings in support, and the applicable law, the Court ORDERS that:

 

1. The FDA shall produce the “more than 12,000 pages” articulated in its own proposal, see ECF No. 29 at 24, on or before January 31, 2022.

 

2. The FDA shall produce the remaining documents at a rate of 55,000 pages every 30 days, with the first production being due on or before March 1, 2022, until production is complete.

 

3. To the extent the FDA asserts any privilege, exemption, or exclusion as to any responsive record or portion thereof, FDA shall, concurrent with each production required by this Order, produce a redacted version of the record, redacting only those portions as to which privilege, exemption, or exclusion is asserted.

 

4. The Parties shall submit a Joint Status Report detailing the progress of the rolling production by April 1, 2022, and every 90 days thereafter.[6]

 

SO ORDERED on this 6th day of January, 2022.

 

[1] Surprisingly, the FDA did not send an agency representative to the scheduling conference.

 

[2] 151 CONG. REC. S1521 (daily ed. Feb. 16, 2005) (statement of Sen. John Cornyn).

 

[3] Letter from James Madison to W.T. Barry (August 4, 1822), in 9 WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON 103 (S. Hunt ed., 1910).

 

[4] John F. Kennedy, Remarks on the 20th Anniversary of the Voice of America (Feb. 26, 1962).

 

[5] America After 9/11: Freedom Preserved or Freedom Lost?: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 108th Cong. 302 (2003).

 

[6] Although the Court does not decide whether the FDA correctly denied Plaintiff’s request for expedited processing, the issue is not moot. Should the Parties seek to file motions for summary judgment, the Court will take up the issue then.

[epsom]

 

 

None of the 4 main vaccine companies products will complete their experimentation stage until late 2022 / early 2023.

( BTW. Being in the experimental stage allows them to "mess /change’ the product at will… and changes have been found in them to date.
This can mean that they can alter the constituent levels of the poisonous elements to suit their agenda.
There are reports of the Booster shot being much stronger.    

That being said, I find it difficult to know how they can be APPROVED before the experimental trials have finished.

[SimonTV]

https://t.me/justynawalker/194

 

Novak father does a speech about globalist tyranny 

[webtrekker]

 

 

 

[rebornsteve]

Reiner conference live now. Yeadon to be on soon...

https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/s86:9