Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, MR-E said:

the more non essential shop owners realize that they have got nothing left to lose right now, we need them all to stand up to whats happening... what crime has been committed? my understanding  common law stands above acts & statute law .has anybody suffered Any harm loss or injury? If you run a 'none essential' shop or a pub you cannot work from home, so you have to open the shop or pub to go to work. There is no such thing as none essential. It's your livelihood and any of your employees livelihoods. Income is a necessity.

It only takes 1 spark to start a fire lots of sparks to cause an anus inferno......


now hang on, i am not talking about the shop keeper dissenting or trying to do things differently

i am talking about the resurgence of the strawman/ freeman-on-the-land approach which this shop fella is clearly being informed by


to clarify and with reference to Gareths posted article on homepage


consent and do not consent is fine and dandy on the street, with contracts and agreements

saying 'the statute law doesnt apply to people, only common law does ' is also fine and dandy


but heres the kicker

when one becomes the defendant in a court case, the law is whatever the claimant says it is

there is no 'i do not consent' blathering. a defendant is subject to the law, the law of the case

if the claimant writes down 'defendant broke the law and didnt wear a face mask'  --- saying

"i do not consent" or "i disagree the law actually says this.."  < is more than foolish, it is ignorant.


the freeman-on-the-land group should be avoided as it will only lead to big BIG BIG trouble and those advising will run a mile. they are full of -sh** and pushing an agenda. i very much suspect they are of the black bloc, extinction rebellion, BLM origins .. to cause chaos, provoke civil unrest , spread ignorance that 'the system doesnt work' or the judges are all corrupt etc ... its classic neo-marxist approach to western law practice


n.b it is vital, as Bill Thornton and Karl Lenz say in many many speeches and in practice at court, settle the issue before court if possible .... and when at court always be the claimant / counter claimant ... never be the defendant .. EVER!

you become counterclaimant and with your court [of record] proceed according to the common law




Edited by zArk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it’s a bit off topic but I’ve just been reading through my local mp George Eustaces voting history. Now I knew he was a complete arsehole but after reading this the guys a psychopath. Literally hates any human or natural existence unless your obscenely wealthy or privately owned. Has voted consistently against any working class hope. Used to buy my meat at his family farm before but now I’ll eat my dogs shite first.

Anyway excuse the rant, back to what the other arseholes are doing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 Oct 2020 — PETER HITCHENS: Save democracy and vote for my None Of The Below Party - Mail Online
8 Sep 2019 — I suggest a slot for ' None of the below' at the top of every ballot paper. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

Why aren't the MPs leading the pushback on this blatant attack on the people?


Why is it being left to ordinary people who can get bashed, fined, intimidated and incarcerated by the Police.


The MPs are either cowards or complicit.


I think the MPs are manipulated by the media and the fear propaganda just like the general population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour Party has shown its true colours.

Labour and Tory are in Lockstep on this.

It's like a ratchet, each helps the other.


I can pretty much say with near certainty that Labour is just as controlled as Tory. Certainly at senior level.


I don't know how someone like Starmer can be bought so easily. Maybe he has some penchants that we don't know about. Maybe he's just incompetent like most of them and needs a secure job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Former Top Judge Brands COVID19 Curbs Tyrannical

Published on November 2, 2020

Written by Steve Doughty, Daily Mail



Lockdowns and other Government-imposed Covid curbs contain all the ingredients of totalitarianism, a former Supreme Court judge warns. Orders to remain at home and rafts of new laws to restrict what people can do amount to a ‘breathtaking’ infringement of democratic rights, advises Lord Sumption.

He has repeatedly warned that ministers have been exceeding their rightful powers but these criticisms are his strongest yet. He told the Cambridge Law Faculty that the use of coercion to try to quell the pandemic is unprecedented in British history, even in wartime, and that it runs against basic freedoms.

Lord Sumption accused ministers of using the police to suppress opposition to their policies, of creating new criminal offences without the legal right to do so, and of grabbing unconstitutional powers by issuing misleading guidance.

 Lord Sumption says the methods used by ministers will undo the unity of society and will lead to long-term authoritarian government and that ministers avoided Parliament through the Public Health Act which let them introduce lockdowns and other measures without the same level of scrutiny by the House of Commons or Lords.

He made the statements at the Cambridge Freshfields annual law lecture, where he  accused the Government of ‘tendentiously’ presenting guidance as if it was law – such as the two-metre social distancing rule. He said the Government gave police ‘unprecedented discretionary’ enforcement powers, some of which were used to suppress opposition to its policies, The Telegraph reports.

Lord Sumption spoke of new criminal offences brought into being on the ‘mere say-so of ministers’, with the fines of up to £10,000 ‘truly breathtaking’ constitutionally.  This has been achieved through the ‘language of impending doom’, ‘alarmist’ projections and statistical manipulation, he said.

He gave a chilling warning that the Government’s actions pose a severe threat to reshape the relationship between the state and the public in a shift to a more authoritarian style of politics, which will survive past the current crisis.  The intervention comes amid growing tension over rules meant to reduce infections, such as the Tier Three restrictions in northern England.

Lord Sumption, who stepped down from the Supreme Court in 2018, warns that the effects of coronavirus coercion are corrosive of democracy and will lead to resentment among those worst affected, including the poor and the young.  He added that the methods used by ministers will undo the unity of society and will lead to long-term authoritarian government.

The move by the First Minister of Wales, Mark Drakeford, to stop shops selling goods said to be non-essential as part of a ‘firebreak’ policy has led to both public anger and widespread ridicule.

Read more




  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Revealed: COVID19 Is Really A CDC Computer-Generated ‘Virus’

Published on November 2, 2020

Written by Makia Freeman



CDC (Center for Disease Control) scientists made some COVID admissions that totally destroy the official COVID narrative in a study published in June 2020 entitled Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States.

The interesting thing about this whole scamdemic is that when you dig deep enough, the truth is out there – and it is admitted by official sources – however it does take a lot of persistence to cut through the propagandistic maze of disinfo.

In this article, we’re going to take a look at the significance of what the CDC scientists revealed, namely that for their research involving the allegedly new virus SARS-CoV-2, they only used 37 base pairs from actual sample tissue and filled in the rest (around 30,000 base pairs) with computer generated sequences, i.e. they made it up!

The other of the COVID admissions is equally as stunning: after testing they found that SARS-CoV-2 could not infect human tissue.

#1 COVID Admission: The Computer-Generated Frankenstein Virus: CDC Scientists Admit Only Using 37 Base Pairs From Real Tissue To Assemble SARS-CoV-2

In a previous article, I talked about how SARS-CoV-2 is a stitched-together, Frankenstein virus, because it is a computer-generated, digital, abstract creation, not a real living virus. It has never been properly purified and isolated so that it could be sequenced from end-to-end once derived from living tissue; instead, it’s just digitally assembled from a computer viral database. The CDC scientists state they took just 37 base pairs from a genome of 30,000 base pairs! That means that about 0.001% of the viral sequence is derived from actual living samples or real bodily tissue. Here is the quote:

“Whole-Genome Sequencing

We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs.”

Interestingly enough, in the next paragraph, the CDC scientists say they used “quantitative PCR” for further analysis/construction, which goes against what Kary Mullis, the inventor of PCR, once said – namely that “quantitative PCR is an oxymoron” since PCR is inherently a qualitative technique not a quantitative one. I have covered how badly the PCR test is being misused throughout this entire COVID scamdemic in other articles such as this one. In his article Only Poisoned Monkey Kidney Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’ Dr. Thomas Cowan highlights this scientific fraud:

“… we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.

To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”

Pure or true science attempts to prove whether something is so; hence true science has no room for politics, majority rules or consensus. Yet, according to Cowan, consensus was used to determine which digital SARS-CoV-2 model was the most real fake model:

“The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”

#2 COVID Admission: CDC Scientists Found That SARS-CoV-2 Didn’t Infect Human Tissue

A big part of the official story we were told was that COVID was a new, dangerous and unpredictable disease that was both fast-spreading and lethal. Well, it’s apparently not very lethal since the CDC scientists found that it couldn’t even infect human cells in vitro. They tested the ‘virus’ (not really, but solutions they claim contain samples of SARS-CoV-2) on 3 different types of human tissue cultures (human adenocarcinoma cells [A549], human liver cells [HUH 7.0] and human embryonic kidney cells [HEK-293T]). The ‘virus’ was not able to infect any of the 3 human tissue cultures. Here’s the quote:

“… we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), in addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. We also examined an available big brown bat kidney cell line (EFK3B) for SARS-CoV-2 replication capacity. Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24 h postinfection … No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to >107 PFU at 24 h postinfection. In contrast, HUH7.0 and 293T cells showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS-CoV-2 infection. These results are consistent with previous susceptibility findings for SARS-CoV and suggest other common culture systems, including MDCK, HeLa, HEP-2, MRC-5 cells, and embryonated eggs, are unlikely to support SARS-CoV-2 replication. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 did not replicate in bat EFK3B cells, which are susceptible to MERS-CoV. Together, the results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 maintains a similar profile to SARS-CoV in terms of susceptible cell lines.”

CPE stands for cytopathic effect or cytopathogenic effect and refers to structural changes in cells caused by viral invasion. No CPE was found in any of the human tissue cells, but only in the vero cells (animal cells, in this case monkey cells). The key takeaway from the above quote is that 2 cultures had only modest viral replication, the other tissue had none, and that other common human cultures are “unlikely to support SARS-CoV-2 replication” meaning SARS-CoV-2 will not infect them! So, even by the rules of their own game, SARS-CoV-2 is not an infectious agent for humans. Here’s Dr. Cowan’s analysis:

“What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community?  When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible “hosts” or models on which they can test. The first is humans. Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus.  The second possible host is animals. Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals, they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus. Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2, in an experiment that used mice. The researchers found that none of the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur. They experienced nothing like the illness called Covid 19.

The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.

The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.

My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion.”

These 2 COVID Admissions Sink The Official Narrative Even More

So there you have it: more scientific fraud in the form of these 2 COVID admissions, and yet more evidence showing there is no real virus, and whatever the ‘virus’ is, it certainly not anything to be worried about if you are a human – which I guess you probably are if you’re reading this. These COVID admissions go to show that the truth is often hidden in plain sight, and that people in positions of power must always be carefully scrutinized. We must apply critical thinking to everything that comes from official sources.

Hat tip to Sally Fallon Morrell and Dr. Thomas Cowan of the Weston A. Price Foundation.

Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles, author of the book Cancer: The Lies, the Truth and the Solutions and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and Parler.







Read more at thefreedomarticles.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you see Boris response to what risk assessment they had done to compare the cost of the lockdown vs the cost of the virus, considering Sweden is ending shielding the elderly because of the negative impact of isolation vs negative impact of the fakevirus. Answer was basically none. They have not even considered that it seems, not in any serious sense. 



  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr H said:

There was a Dr on talk radio this morning who said the nightengale hospitals were a bit of a red herring. In that yes they increased capacity of beds, but there are no staff to work there. So essentially can't be used.

I'm sure the army will fill the breach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...