Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheAwakened said:

We all know why. Its a script.


But I find the UK is worse than the USA because at least there Trump pushes back against it in some ways. 


Same as in Brazil the president there is against any sort of lockdown. 


The UK just seems terrible.


UK Establishment has no ability to fight back. They are Completely Compromised.


Too many children's Lollipop Parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:


UK Establishment has no ability to fight back. They are Completely Compromised.


Too many children's Lollipop Parties.

The UK is a proper sellout Country. When David Icke talks about "the web" I see the UK has part of the inner web of LIES. 


We have a very docile population as well which adds insult to injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites











  • The RT PCR TEST is fatally flawed, which is why its inventor stated it should never be used to diagnose infectious disease 

  • According to the US Center for Disease Control, the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been isolated

  • The initial computer modelling that was used to justify the lockdowns, has been shown to be so badly flawed that experts have said "no serious scientist gives any validity", yet lockdown has remained 

  • Lockdowns are not recommended by W.H.O.

  • The low death rate, even in countries without lockdowns, indicates there is no emergency

  • There are safe medications known to be effective treatments and preventatives, yet these have been prohibited and a rushed vaccine is being forced upon us

  • The guidelines for codifying the statistics allow for them to be inflated 

  • Financial incentives are provided in return for positive test results

  • Major conflicts of interest appear to be involved in critical decision making

Our governments have locked down the healthy, instead of better protecting the vulnerable. More than 80% of those with COVID-19 have either very mild symptoms, or none at all. Asymptomatic transmission is highly unlikely (between 0 & 2%) and yet the government remains wedded to locking down its people, causing catastrophic social and economic harm. Even the World Health Organization do not advocate for lockdowns as the primary means of controlling the virus. Yet the police are expected to continue to enforce these measures and at risk of being forced to vaccinate against a disease that is showing not to be virulent, with a vaccine that has had no long-term safety studies and then forcing it upon the population. 


As we watch on with fear as Europe's flu season begins, covid-19 cases spike and governments start implementing even more harsh lockdowns. it's difficult to feel positive as we bear witness to what appears to be a cycle we are likely to encounter again.

The questionable tactics employed in the name of public health interests, must be reviewed thoroughly to ensure proper process is adhered to preserve our health, while also upholding our sovereignty and basic human rights.


It is said the definition of insanity is to repeat the mistakes of the past, expecting a different result. Watching the upheaval in Europe tells us that the people have learned and spoken, but the government hasn't listened. We cannot afford to make the same mistakes again.

Central to the government response is the enforcement of their restrictions. Our police forces have been propelled into unprecedented circumstances and demanded to enforce arbitrary rules without due diligence and in the unfolding chaos, we have been witness to the paradox of brutality in the name of health and well-being.

In the process public trust in government and the police is corroding almost as rapidly as suspicions around their intentions, questioning agendas, corporate influence, nepotism, partiality and how Chief Health Officers that were not elected, can dictate in what appears to be an autocracy.


The central plot in the George Lucas classic Star Wars, is a battle between an evil Empire and a virtuous Rebellion, fighting injustice and in 2020 you can easily be excused for thinking we are living this.


But the actions of a few do not reflect the many. Our police forces protect us and many are good, honest and caring individuals who are doing their best to keep our communities safe. Is it really fair to become so apprehensive of the very people who have made it their job to serve and protect us? We can only judge them by their actions.


It is now apparent that some officers share these same concerns. Concerns about what they are being asked to do. Concerns about oppressive rule and their part enforcing them. They see the erosion of trust occurring and as human liberties and freedoms are removed from their family, friends and communities in which they live, the burden is heavy.


But one brave officer has had the courage and conviction to speak out. A Senior Constable from the New South Wales police force, Alexander Cooney has asked the Commissioner in an open letter to challenge the directions they are being given, instead of simply acquiescing to them and in the process, restore community trust and a return to normalcy.


He has started a movement he calls "Cops for Covid Truth" and his letter is a compelling read. At Advocate Me, we have thrown all our resources in supporting him and openly inviting Police Officers across all the States and Territories to join his movement.

A unity is forming here in Australia and around the world. People are demanding truth, transparency and accountability in government and with some members of the police force lending their weight to this probe, it may be the very thing that shifts the balance of power in this way.

If this really is a George Lucas battle between the virtuous and an evil Empire, it cannot endure without its storm troopers. May the force be with us.

Serene Teffaha and the team

Advocate Me

Sign to Support Us
Pick most suitable option
Police officer
Other forces
I support this



© 2020 by Cops for COVID Truth Project



  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, MR-E said:

the more non essential shop owners realize that they have got nothing left to lose right now, we need them all to stand up to whats happening... what crime has been committed? my understanding  common law stands above acts & statute law .has anybody suffered Any harm loss or injury? If you run a 'none essential' shop or a pub you cannot work from home, so you have to open the shop or pub to go to work. There is no such thing as none essential. It's your livelihood and any of your employees livelihoods. Income is a necessity.

It only takes 1 spark to start a fire lots of sparks to cause an anus inferno......


now hang on, i am not talking about the shop keeper dissenting or trying to do things differently

i am talking about the resurgence of the strawman/ freeman-on-the-land approach which this shop fella is clearly being informed by


to clarify and with reference to Gareths posted article on homepage


consent and do not consent is fine and dandy on the street, with contracts and agreements

saying 'the statute law doesnt apply to people, only common law does ' is also fine and dandy


but heres the kicker

when one becomes the defendant in a court case, the law is whatever the claimant says it is

there is no 'i do not consent' blathering. a defendant is subject to the law, the law of the case

if the claimant writes down 'defendant broke the law and didnt wear a face mask'  --- saying

"i do not consent" or "i disagree the law actually says this.."  < is more than foolish, it is ignorant.


the freeman-on-the-land group should be avoided as it will only lead to big BIG BIG trouble and those advising will run a mile. they are full of -sh** and pushing an agenda. i very much suspect they are of the black bloc, extinction rebellion, BLM origins .. to cause chaos, provoke civil unrest , spread ignorance that 'the system doesnt work' or the judges are all corrupt etc ... its classic neo-marxist approach to western law practice


n.b it is vital, as Bill Thornton and Karl Lenz say in many many speeches and in practice at court, settle the issue before court if possible .... and when at court always be the claimant / counter claimant ... never be the defendant .. EVER!

you become counterclaimant and with your court [of record] proceed according to the common law




Edited by zArk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it’s a bit off topic but I’ve just been reading through my local mp George Eustaces voting history. Now I knew he was a complete arsehole but after reading this the guys a psychopath. Literally hates any human or natural existence unless your obscenely wealthy or privately owned. Has voted consistently against any working class hope. Used to buy my meat at his family farm before but now I’ll eat my dogs shite first.

Anyway excuse the rant, back to what the other arseholes are doing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 Oct 2020 — PETER HITCHENS: Save democracy and vote for my None Of The Below Party - Mail Online
8 Sep 2019 — I suggest a slot for ' None of the below' at the top of every ballot paper. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...