Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, noo62 said:

Yes it is Ziggy.  But that is what My sis has sent to me when I said Pfizer wont say what's in their vaccines...

 

We have the list of ingredients that they have released but some of the contents of the mRNA is protected by IP.  We suspect they use graphene nano technology. 

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccination-programme-guidance-for-healthcare-practitioners

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mysterious illness occurring in care givers in Newbrunswick.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/02/neurological-illness-affecting-young-adults-canada

 

The article mentions toxins in lobsters as one theory, but I'm thinking that perhaps the role of being a care provider might have come with certain requirements? You know, to keep people safe...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently Covid anxious people are stupid according to a study by McGill University and the Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10362429/Study-shows-worrying-COVID-leads-bad-choices-performing-poorly-cognitive-tests.html

 

...but I think we knew that. I'd include the following in the category in order of increasing stupidity.

 

1. Social distancers

2. Maskies

3. Double Maskies

4. The single jabbed

5. The double jabbed

6. The triple jabbed

7. Quadruple jabbed

8. The guy who had 10 jabs posing as others

9. The UK Government.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

INGREDIENTS OF THE KUNG FLU JAB

 

The Facebook website links through to https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/information-for-uk-recipients-on-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine?fbclid=IwAR0GgaiGrXe5kankhlBoorIGAhFbrTclr8QZ-X6VJF-wwiygyRh-yr4OPdQ 

 

Paragraph 6 contains a list of some ingredients for COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.. But it is not exhaustive from what I can see.

 

Also, a lot of ingredients are renamed to appear more benign. 

 

It does mention graphene however.

 

It refers to polyethylene glycol/macrogol (PEG) as part of ALC-0159

 

According to this website: ALC-0159 - Echelon Biosciences (echelon-inc.com) 

 

ALC-0159 is a PEGylated lipid which has been used to form lipid nanoparticles for delivery of RNA. ALC-0159 is one of the components in the BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in addition to ALC-0315, DSPC, and cholesterol. This is a reagent grade product, for research use only.

 

According to https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34525277/ 

 

lipid nanoparticles are a drug delivery system. What is going to be delivered we do not know.

 

But it is another way of referring to the carbon nanotubes forming part of the intra-body nano-network. Understanding the workings of lipid-carbon nanotube self-assembly in water (nanowerk.com) 

 

But I wouldn't justify refusing the shot on the grounds of not knowing what is in it.

 

I would use the following:

 

1. It is not a vaccine. It is a genetic modification drug.

2. It is experimental. We are the study.

3. The pharmaceutical companies colluded with regulatory bodies to cover up the deaths caused by their deadly products.

4. So far it has killed more people than all previous vaccines combined.

5. It's purported effectiveness is so temporary to make it not worthwhile.

 

If they do not find any of these arguments compelling - run like the wind!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SimonTV said:

 

Found a video on youtube where a pilot explains how to land a large aircraft in an emergency. Just have to hope you have mobile signal. 

Because of terrorist attacks after 9/11 no one can enter pilot cabin - it's locked. 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, noo62 said:

 

Why did I think they didnt have to reveal what was in the vaccine for 50 years?

What is not being revealed are the studies and other information relied on to approve the poison death shots.

 

But what has been drip fed so far is fairly devastating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

 

I'm glad I no longer fly. Imagine being on an A380 when the pilot carks it with a heart attack. Mind you, I believe they carry a couple of spare pilots on board.

If you did fly these days you'd virtually be the only passenger.

 

The rest of the plane being filled by a couple of air marshals and spare pilots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Human10 said:

Because of terrorist attacks after 9/11 no one can enter pilot cabin - it's locked. 👍

My uncle flew for BA for a number of years.

 

He said that the planes can land themselves on autopilot. They use it in bad weather. Heavy fog usually. He said it was terrifying waiting for the runaway to suddenly appear.

 

Though he is a very heavy drinker. So maybe he just doesn't remember the landings.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reiner Fuellmich: “New Findings… Enough to Dismantle the Entire (VAX COVID) Industry!”

 

20 minutes:

 

https://www.brighteon.com/2b36ce94-a9bc-41a1-9261-4d49a4cb23bc

 

A roundtable discusses the fact that the injuries and death come from certain batches.

 

By using statistical analysis they can confirm that this is deliberate.

 

The murdering pharmaceutical companies are testing the dose to see what is fatal.

 

It is also coordinated. Each pharmaceutical company seems to be taking it in turn to release hot doses.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, noo62 said:

Yes it is Ziggy.  But that is what My sis has sent to me when I said Pfizer wont say what's in their vaccines...

Well, it doesn't actually tell you what tozinameran (the technical name for the active substance) is made up of, and considering that even the Lancet thinks it is ineffective https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/fulltext ...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, k_j_evans said:

Well, it doesn't actually tell you what tozinameran (the technical name for the active substance) is made up of, and considering that even the Lancet thinks it is ineffective https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/fulltext ...

I think it is just another name for the drug.

 

But the fact that the UK government thinks it is the active ingredient gives you an idea of how thoroughly they have researched this crap before pushing it on to the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that can give me some insight on to what they think might happen in 2022 with covid DM me

 

Bit lost on what will happen next in the short term.

 

Particular the effect.of the vaccine on people etc.

 

Also why is the alternative media now reporting unvaccinated as 22.5 million and not 5 million?

 

I believe them but I'm just wondering what brought this change and if anyone has a source, etc

 

Edited by Longtermlurker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, noo62 said:

Can someone please help me out here.  I was explaining to my sis why I dont want to take the vaccine when everyone else in the family has.

 

One of the reasons I said was Pfizer wont even say what is in their vaccine, which I thought was 100% the case.  She has sent me a link to the Governement site which shows all the ingredients in the pfizer vaccine.

 

Why did I think they didnt have to reveal what was in the vaccine for 50 years?

Just a taster of what Pfizer (for example) are doing with words in order to deceive

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, noo62 said:

Can someone please help me out here.  I was explaining to my sis why I dont want to take the vaccine when everyone else in the family has.

 

One of the reasons I said was Pfizer wont even say what is in their vaccine, which I thought was 100% the case.  She has sent me a link to the Governement site which shows all the ingredients in the pfizer vaccine.

 

Why did I think they didnt have to reveal what was in the vaccine for 50 years?

Think it was more the FULL clinical results of their trials. 100% the case in USA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Saved said:

Yes, their track record of lying is horrendous.

No kidding.

 

I think they've paid out more in compensation than the tobacco companies. Based on my very crude estimate.

 

Now they have complete immunity for an experimental gene therapy from which they stand to make substantial profits.

 

I think your chances of survival would be better playing Russian roulette with a flintlock pistol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, jack121 said:

 

.

with this new system coming in, it is going to be the same thing all over again, how long before the new system is burdened by a debt mountain that they need us to pay off,

They have introduced non-jobs which are highly funded by big tech. 

This is how they are transitioning the workplace

 

Replacing productive jobs with faux jobs.

 

They fund the faux jobs 

 

Eventually all jobs will be useless but everyone mindfucked into thinking it's amazing.

 

Along the way depression sets in because deep down we know we are accomplishing nothing. Drugs and false optimism are injected in.

 

All that 'off shore' tax dodging money is leveraging the faux economy i.e environmental industry , YouTube influencers, P.R etc etc

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, noo62 said:

Can someone please help me out here.  I was explaining to my sis why I dont want to take the vaccine when everyone else in the family has.

 

One of the reasons I said was Pfizer wont even say what is in their vaccine, which I thought was 100% the case.  She has sent me a link to the Governement site which shows all the ingredients in the pfizer vaccine.

 

Why did I think they didnt have to reveal what was in the vaccine for 50 years?

I think youre going about this completely wrong will all due respect.

maybe go for a body autonomy type of discussion with you're sister, these companies and government are not trustworthy no matter the situation they can make a list of ingredients but that begs the question do you even know any of these materials being used.

If we cant tell what ingredient does what and most of these things could change over time whats the point of that discussion, i think the response from her sending the government site actually confirms that most likely it wont matter what you say.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...