Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Morpheus]

So what's going to be used in its place?

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/huge-cdc-withdraws-use-pcr-test-covid-finally-admits-test-can-not-differentiate-flu-covid-virus/

 

[SoundOfSilence]

7 hours ago, Sit down, Waldo said:

Boris Johnson - "90% of the patients in the ICU are people who are not boosted"

 

Love the way he mumbles 'ventilation' through his mask as well.

The mask will be immediately removed once the cameras are turned off.

[webtrekker]

Remember folks, it's not the mid-flights that are the most dangerous concerning vaxxed pilots, it's the take-offs and landings ...

 

Horrific tale from a real pilot.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uZHG1WemkHPO/

 

 

 

[webtrekker]

1 hour ago, Macnamara said:

Latest Evidence Shows that the Vaccines are More DANGEROUS than Originally Thought by Dr. Yeadon

By Dr Mike Yeadon, Previous Chief Scientist and VP of Pfizer

 

My good friend Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, with whom we & others wrote a series of open letters to the European Medicines Agency, is utterly distraught.

Listen carefully.

He & his colleague, a pathologist, have confirmed that, even in people who’ve died post-covid19 vaccination & where their death was not attributed to the adverse effects of vaccination, in almost all cases DID die as a result of vaccination.

The numbers killed by these vaccines is much worse than we thought, already.

But it’s what they’ve just discovered that’s much worse.

We knew of blood clots from expressing spike protein.

We were aware of autoimmune attack on ones own tissues expressing spike protein to which our killer lymphocytes were primed, such as myocarditis.

But what’s new is the revelation that lymph node cells are also being invaded by the gene-based agents and marking THEM for auto destruction.

When you destroy that part of the immune system, which we loosely call “immune surveillance”, every manner of nasty, latent infections, by viruses & also bacteria, explode, uncontrolled.

Hundreds of millions of people are going to die of unrestrained tuberculosis, Epstein Barr virus, toxoplasmosis etc etc etc

AND on top of this, the daily accidental production of cancer cells, normally deleted swiftly by immune surveillance, before they can divide, ceases.

Guess what happens next?

I don’t care where you’ve sat during this ridiculous “pandemic”.

Whether you’ve gone along with it, knowing it was an overreaction. Or even in ignorance.

I am telling you right now: IF YOU PERSONALLY HAVING WATCHED THIS CHOOSE TO SETTLE BACK TO WATCH A FILM, INSTEAD OF CALLING SOME PEOPLE YOU KNOW & TELLING THEM ABOUT IT, THE END OF HUMANITY IS A SHARED BURDEN WITH THE PERPETRATORS.

Please put this on every platform.

Swamp the ‘fact checkers’.

Please do it now.

Rescue our civilisation while there are innocents to save, ESPECIALLY our children & grandchildren.

Thank you sincerely,

Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

See Dr Sucharit Bhakdi’s full video:

https://sarahwestall.com/latest-evidence-shows-that-the-vaccines-are-more-dangerous-than-originally-thought-by-dr-yeadon/

 

Bhakdi. Now there's a REAL scientist!

 

 

 

[SoundOfSilence]

6 hours ago, coronaisdead said:

Well, I have noticed everybody getting sick around my job and in general.  Of course I think all it is is a weaker immune system, due to massive panic and fear everywhere.  But people are complaining of being sick for 3-4 weeks, I had something similar for 2 weeks or so I cant brush it off as being in their head.  Usually the common flu lasts a couple of days.  Not sure what to believe in anymore.  I know COVID is a big PSYOP to bring in draconian lockdowns/transhumanism and eventually NWO.  But the fear and panic is rampant.  Feels like they are draining peoples hopes.  Maybe its cause im in the northeast it feels like this.  A couple of days in the sun on the beach would probably sort it all out.  Im just curious, what all these illnesses are going around.  Not sure I subscribe to germ theory any more, especially virology which is a big sham.  But what is it then? Are they spraying some shit in the air?  Is the 5G active now? Whats next in the pipeline for these bastards.  

It could be any number of reasons. But it won't be viral.

 

More and more researchers are concluding that flu like symptoms are as a result of the expression of toxins from cells.

 

The virus theory was that parts of genetic material (not living) got into the cells (and then spread into other cells using magic). There are huge flaws with this model as other posters have pointed out.

 

But the presence of this genetic material being purged by cells can also be caused by toxins.

 

There is a very interesting correlation with seasonal colds and flus and the presence of radio waves or radiation.

 

Up until the invention of radio flus and colds were not seasonal but rather occurred on average every decade. Researchers have discovered that this decadal disease coincided with increased solar activity. So electro magnetic radiation from the sun is the likely cause.

 

Creating the same symptoms can be done through:

 

5G (or any of the others)

Aerosol sprays

Surface contamination

 

Or any other method of delivering toxins into the human body.

 

The clot shots are a bit different since they turn the human body into a spike protein factory.

 

There is strong evidence of shedding. Likely through surface contamination.

 

The fact that people get sick is in no way, of itself, evidence of a virus.

 

 

 

 

[SoundOfSilence]

9 hours ago, Itsa said:

Not sure of your location but in the U.K nobody was wearing masks even when they announced omicron (where I am at least, I live in the biggest unvaxxed area outside of London). This morning me and the polish girl who works there were the only ones in the shop who weren't wearing one. Quite a few of them are coughing and spluttering into their face nappies now, makes me feel sick. 

 

 

Born in London. Spent a lot of time overseas. I now find myself in an antipodean tyranny.

 

So my goal for 2022 is to stay out of a Kung Flu death camp. Given that Xi Jing Ping is covetous of my country's minerals, and is therefore likely to occupy it, I think that chance may be increased if I stop making comparisons between Xi Jing Ping and Winnie the Pooh.

 

But probably better to end up there than go along with these dysfunctional tossers.

 

I wonder how long it is going to take the jabbed and idiots with face nappies to realize that we're not getting sick while they are?

[SoundOfSilence]

6 hours ago, Saved said:

I suspect that if the whole narrative around killer coronavirus variants falls apart - to a degree where the vast majority reject all further jabs and the powers lose the upper hand - they WILL release something very nasty indeed.

 

One hundred percent.

 

6 hours ago, Saved said:

 

Regarding population reduction, we still have the possibility of this generation being or becoming infertile due to even the first rounds of jabs, let alone the conveyor belt of second jabs and boosters.

 

The next year to three years is going to be telling.

 

Indeed!

[SoundOfSilence]

1 hour ago, Morpheus said:

So what's going to be used in its place?

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/12/huge-cdc-withdraws-use-pcr-test-covid-finally-admits-test-can-not-differentiate-flu-covid-virus/

 

[NG10]

I've not done my evening read of this thread yet, but I want to put this here.

 

I've long thought there's a correlation between deaths and ventilators. I was reading something somewhere a couple of nights ago about the unvaccinated being put on ventilators and the vaccinated not - which given low numbers would massively skew the percentage of unvaccinated dying of or with Covid. The apparent reasoning is something to do with passing virus on to hospital staff - I need to find this info. 

 

Last year, I read up a lot on the side effects of being on a ventilator. They can cause lung damage, and if you're already weakened by a virus, this can be exasperated. The longer you're on a ventilator, the more chance you have of dying (I think that's how it works). 

 

I think it is worth putting in an FOI to see how many people have died in hospital having been on a ventilator in the last 18 months - then mirroring that data with the associated daily/weekly Covid deaths over time. But I'd also like to know the percentage of people on ventilators who are vaxxed/unvaxxed. 

 

I'm pretty certain that the outcome will show quite clearly a conspiracy to kill off unvaccinated to skew data to push the jabs. 

 

On the jabs, I downloaded this image last night, I'm not sure of the source as I was half asleep, but I'll try and find it now and add it in. The point of the graph shows that effectiveness of these vaccinations wanes with each dose, and that they're counter effective with Omricon. Apologies for not having the source right now. 

[NG10]

I've not done my evening read of this thread yet, but I want to put this here.

 

I've long thought there's a correlation between deaths and ventilators. I was reading something somewhere a couple of nights ago about the unvaccinated being put on ventilators and the vaccinated not - which given low numbers would massively skew the percentage of unvaccinated dying of or with Covid. The apparent reasoning is something to do with passing virus on to hospital staff - I need to find this info. 

 

Last year, I read up a lot on the side effects of being on a ventilator. They can cause lung damage, and if you're already weakened by a virus, this can be exasperated. The longer you're on a ventilator, the more chance you have of dying (I think that's how it works). 

 

I think it is worth putting in an FOI to see how many people have died in hospital having been on a ventilator in the last 18 months - then mirroring that data with the associated daily/weekly Covid deaths over time. But I'd also like to know the percentage of people on ventilators who are vaxxed/unvaxxed. 

 

I'm pretty certain that the outcome will show quite clearly a conspiracy to kill off unvaccinated to skew data to push the jabs. 

 

On the jabs, I downloaded this image last night. The point of the graph shows that effectiveness of these vaccinations wanes with each dose, and that they're counter effective with Omricon. 

 

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v2.full.pdf+html

[NG10]

Sorry, added link but quoted my first post

[NG10]

I've also spent a lot of time following the case of Carlos Tejada, the Deputy Editor for Asia for the New York Times, who posted a video just before Christmas mocking unvaxxed as he'd had his booster earlier that day, to die of a heart attack the following day. I'm not sure if I've seen it here. 

 

Anyway, something about it drew me to do some social media snooping - his sister in law made an interesting comment about them being granted "special permission on humanitarian grounds" to quarantine at the family home in Korea and not at a Government hotel quarantine. 

 

Family haven't blamed the vax. Not one person in that network. New York Times failed to mention he'd been vaxxed the day prior. It would be the ideal case for somebody to "out" what is going on, and I'm convinced some families must be being paid off. You lose your 40something husband, son, brother, etc to a heart attack the day after a booster, and you don't as much mention the vax? Let alone blame it. 

 

I would post screenshots but it's somebody's private Facebook account and I'm not sure that's allowed. But they posted opening "Our long-time dear friend Carlos Tejada" which may come up in a search. 

[Not Thoth]

Now, I may be as thick as a whale omelette, but don't the phrases "more than 93%" and "as much as 93%" contradict each other on this "fact check"?

 

[Concerned Citizen]

1 hour ago, webtrekker said:

Remember folks, it's not the mid-flights that are the most dangerous concerning vaxxed pilots, it's the take-offs and landings ...

 

Horrific tale from a real pilot.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uZHG1WemkHPO/

 

 

 

 

This information below has been posted before but perhaps worth repeating in response to the vid referred to here.

Here are some numbers from a Publication put out by the Air Line Pilot people.
air-line-pilot-oct-nov-2021.pdf (alpa.org)
www3.alpa.org/Publications/air-line-pilot-oct-nov-2021/air-line-pilot-oct-nov-2021.pdf
link above - see page 15 of the Oct / Nov 2021 publication

Some numbers (summary of page 15 but do check the numbers)
Memoriam
Year   Deaths
2019       1
2020      6
2021    111 (this is only for first 9 months of the year, Jan - Sept 2021)
mmmm, wonder why this information gets rejected / deleted if put out on other platforms.
The above publication is available - the link should take you to a pdf

[SoundOfSilence]

31 minutes ago, Not Thoth said:

Now, I may be as thick as a whale omelette, but don't the phrases "more than 93%" and "as much as 93%" contradict each other on this "fact check"?

 

Not necessarily.

 

It's all total nonsense (their data) but there is a difference between efficacy and effectiveness.

 

It's manipulated statistics.

 

The high number will be efficacy. Despite their mislabeling it.

 

The unmentioned number will be effectiveness which is likely to be very low.

 

What is the difference between efficacy and effectiveness? | Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance 

 

"WHAT IS EFFICACY?

A vaccine with an efficacy of 90% in a trial, for instance, means there was a 90% reduction in cases of disease in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated (or placebo) group. But efficacy in laboratory conditions does not always translate to effectiveness, and so an efficacy trial can overestimate a vaccine’s impact in practice."

 

...

 

"Effectiveness of a vaccine is measured in what epidemiologists call observational studies because participants are not randomly assigned to a treatment versus a placebo group.  For example, case-control studies assess effectiveness by comparing the vaccination status of individuals who develop the disease (cases) with a group of individuals without the disease (controls) who are also representative of the population from which the cases arise. If the vaccine is effective, the cases are more likely to be the unvaccinated individuals.

 

Vaccines do not always need to have an exceptionally high effectiveness to be useful, for example the influenza vaccine is 40-60% effective yet saves thousands of lives every year."

 

 

[whatthefoxhat]

1 hour ago, Concerned Citizen said:

 

This information below has been posted before but perhaps worth repeating in response to the vid referred to here.

Here are some numbers from a Publication put out by the Air Line Pilot people.
air-line-pilot-oct-nov-2021.pdf (alpa.org)
www3.alpa.org/Publications/air-line-pilot-oct-nov-2021/air-line-pilot-oct-nov-2021.pdf
link above - see page 15 of the Oct / Nov 2021 publication

Some numbers (summary of page 15 but do check the numbers)
Memoriam
Year   Deaths
2019       1
2020      6
2021    111 (this is only for first 9 months of the year, Jan - Sept 2021)
mmmm, wonder why this information gets rejected / deleted if put out on other platforms.
The above publication is available - the link should take you to a pdf

Try going to PPRUNE (private pilots rumour network forum) and asking about the numbers...you'll be banned in an instant....Fucking lemmings

[whatthefoxhat]

1 hour ago, SoundOfSilence said:

Not necessarily.

 

It's all total nonsense (their data) but there is a difference between efficacy and effectiveness.

 

It's manipulated statistics.

 

The high number will be efficacy. Despite their mislabeling it.

 

The unmentioned number will be effectiveness which is likely to be very low.

 

What is the difference between efficacy and effectiveness? | Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance 

 

"WHAT IS EFFICACY?

A vaccine with an efficacy of 90% in a trial, for instance, means there was a 90% reduction in cases of disease in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated (or placebo) group. But efficacy in laboratory conditions does not always translate to effectiveness, and so an efficacy trial can overestimate a vaccine’s impact in practice."

 

...

 

"Effectiveness of a vaccine is measured in what epidemiologists call observational studies because participants are not randomly assigned to a treatment versus a placebo group.  For example, case-control studies assess effectiveness by comparing the vaccination status of individuals who develop the disease (cases) with a group of individuals without the disease (controls) who are also representative of the population from which the cases arise. If the vaccine is effective, the cases are more likely to be the unvaccinated individuals.

 

Vaccines do not always need to have an exceptionally high effectiveness to be useful, for example the influenza vaccine is 40-60% effective yet saves thousands of lives every year."

 

 

Word soup cooked by an extremely incompetent chef....There's an old saying 'Bullshit baffles brains''....they're milking this one for all its worth

[zarkov]

 

COVID-19 VIRUS? WHAT VIRUS? IT DOES NOT EXIST - DR MARK BAILEY SLAM DUNK

https://www.bitchute.com/video/pz6fLzpIsLnJ/

 

"You comply because you want it to end.

       But it wont end because you comply"

 

Edited December 30, 2021 by zarkov

[SoundOfSilence]

Below is a link to the video which is believed to have got Dr Robert Malone (inventor of MRNA technology) suspended from Twitter.

 

It points out why Pfizer's control groups were so bad.

 

It also highlights how the 95 percent efficacy number is manipulated.

 

 

The Pfizer Inoculations For COVID-19 – More Harm Than Good – VIDEO – Canadian Covid Care Alliance 

 

[SoundOfSilence]

If you have 40 minutes the above video is excellent.

 

It sets out exactly how Pfizer manipulated the data. Shocking!

 

If you prefer the pdf:

 

https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-COVID-19-Inoculations-More-Harm-Than-Good-REV-Dec-16-2021.pdf 

[jack121]

5 hours ago, NG10 said:

I've not done my evening read of this thread yet, but I want to put this here.

 

I've long thought there's a correlation between deaths and ventilators. I was reading something somewhere a couple of nights ago about the unvaccinated being put on ventilators and the vaccinated not - which given low numbers would massively skew the percentage of unvaccinated dying of or with Covid. The apparent reasoning is something to do with passing virus on to hospital staff - I need to find this info. 

 

Last year, I read up a lot on the side effects of being on a ventilator. They can cause lung damage, and if you're already weakened by a virus, this can be exasperated. The longer you're on a ventilator, the more chance you have of dying (I think that's how it works). 

 

I think it is worth putting in an FOI to see how many people have died in hospital having been on a ventilator in the last 18 months - then mirroring that data with the associated daily/weekly Covid deaths over time. But I'd also like to know the percentage of people on ventilators who are vaxxed/unvaxxed. 

 

I'm pretty certain that the outcome will show quite clearly a conspiracy to kill off unvaccinated to skew data to push the jabs. 

 

On the jabs, I downloaded this image last night, I'm not sure of the source as I was half asleep, but I'll try and find it now and add it in. The point of the graph shows that effectiveness of these vaccinations wanes with each dose, and that they're counter effective with Omricon. Apologies for not having the source right now. 

 

I don't know how they can do it,strap someone down to a ventilator, knowing that their actions are going to kill the patient, that in a few short hours the family of the patient are going to be absolutly devastated, that an innocent soul who caused them no harm whatsoever is going to be murdered.

And what was his great and henious crime?  He lived. As simple as that

life should be great, something to be treasured and enjoyed, a path of learning and discovery - not this 

[alexa]

3 hours ago, whatthefoxhat said:

Word soup cooked by an extremely incompetent chef....There's an old saying 'Bullshit baffles brains''.

 

In other words gobbledygook 

 

 

[alexa]

I know this has been posted before but I reckon we need to take another look, as this shows how close we are to this becoming a reality.

 

 

Edited December 30, 2021 by alexa

[wingwang]

7 hours ago, Not Thoth said:

Now, I may be as thick as a whale omelette, but don't the phrases "more than 93%" and "as much as 93%" contradict each other on this "fact check"?

 

 

Just on the fly here...

 

Look up Absolute Vs Relative Risk Reduction...

 

ARR vs RRR...

[campanar]

1 hour ago, jack121 said:

 

I don't know how they can do it,strap someone down to a ventilator, knowing that their actions are going to kill the patient, that in a few short hours the family of the patient are going to be absolutly devastated, that an innocent soul who caused them no harm whatsoever is going to be murdered.

And what was his great and henious crime?  He lived. As simple as that

life should be great, something to be treasured and enjoyed, a path of learning and discovery - not this 

Because.. health service work is self selecting, if you can't emotionally be around dying people then you don't. So it leaves the ones who don't care, at best, up to the likes of Dr Harold Shipman (who killed up to 270 of his patients) and Nurse Beverley Allit.

It's not something you think of until you've worked inside a health service. Sure there are some really nice people, but a minority.