Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

 

There again they take their orders from Ratchild don't they?

 

and the socialist policy of the party is State domination of people, acting as the ultimate authority. bigger government, more rules, more oppression ... (sounds like the UK rogue Cabinet as well doesnt it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, jesuitsdidit said:

I haven't heard Labour calling for discussion of the Great Barrington Declaration or of ex Pfizer VP Yeadon's views.

Where's Jeremy Corbyn? Probably the last real Politician we'll ever see.

 

Labour are no Opposition if they just agree with the Government (or even push the Government to implement their own policy).

 

UKIP appear to have awoken from their slumber and are starting to get their act together again:

 
 
 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BossCrow said:

Or going out like Tony would be a nice option, if the UK government hadn't restricted my access to this kind of firepower (the bloody cowards that they are).

 

 

i also like the scenario from the movie inglourious basterds

small groups of guerrilla soldiers proactively taking the fight to the enemy

100 government scalps would be a nice start 😀

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Grumpy Owl said:

 

Labour are no Opposition if they just agree with the Government (or even push the Government to implement their own policy).

 

UKIP appear to have awoken from their slumber and are starting to get their act together again:

 
 
 

 

 

That should be retweeted to the MAX. Good for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.png.09c598c08cdb487c062b2aa463562540.png

 

image.png.a8a7bc7e08abb115ccc924c569754891.png

 

The only explanation is that the test during the summer was delayed or designed to give out false results to hide the correlation. Interesting correlation around 17th September. 

 

Or they could have lied about the total testing completed over the summer months to hide the correlation. 

Edited by SimonTV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they have completed 25 million tests and 1 million people came back positive. We can assume that another 1 million people are positive based on the size of the population. 

 

That would mean we have a statistical herd immunity already in place with 2 million infected with a rate of 4 deaths per day per 1 million people.

 

That would mean if everyone was infected the worst case scenario would be a death rate 120 people per day per 1 million people, assuming 100% positive infection rate. Worst case with 100% infection rate assuming the same death rate, it would be 3600 per day or 100k per month. 

 

Sorry my math is struggling comparing apples and oranges here. 

Edited by SimonTV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jesuitsdidit said:

I haven't heard Labour calling for discussion of the Great Barrington Declaration or of ex Pfizer VP Yeadon's views.

Where's Jeremy Corbyn? Probably the last real Politician we'll ever see.

 

Corbyn supports Zero Covid, New Zealand style indefinite mandatory quarantine camps.

Leftist are the ones whove been non stop calling for more draconian shit to crash the economy if you havent noticed?

Maybe you been under a rock.

Thats the problem, there is no opposition.

 

Corbyn is silent about his brother being arrested for free speech 5 times on speakers corner.

Corbyn cucked out over Brexit & Jewish supremacy.

Corbyns full on open borders.

I dont get why anyone from a conspiracy perspective would even mention his name?

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Jode said:

My assumption is non mask wearers wouldn't be the type to go for a test either? Where as mask wearers would .... 

 

 

Yes without mandatory testing, it is questionable whether the remaining 50%+- of the population will get test voluntarily. 

 

With 25 million tests completed there realy is no need to test the other half of the population as it can be assumed, I think. 

 

Now assuming we believe in the tests in the first place, these tests done by in August are still valid? If the infection rate is increasing then they might need to do the tested again and again and again. How else can we know if these 24 million negative results are now actually positive or not? 

 

If these 24 million people who tested negative are either immune or still open to being infected? What is the purpose of a test if you don't know if someone was exposed and never became infected or was never exposed by the time the test was taken? 

 

If we assume everyone in the population has been exposed and only 2 million+- are infected then the rate of infection would not climb any further. If all 25 million people that did the test, re do the test now, would they all come back with the same result? At the rate of change between positive and negative results, we could then determine if the positive case rate is increasing over time. 

Edited by SimonTV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked and unlocked this topic
  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...