Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, zarkov said:

 

 

He was part of the process of transitioning scientism into the new religion.

Where we are now!

Thats how we know he was a CUNT

 

That is just a whole load of coffollox's right there, you do know that Darwin was not the first to speculate about the evolution of life on Planet Stupid right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sit down, Waldo said:

 

There is something unnatural about Whitty. When he speaks his jaw moves but nothing else. No eye movement, no facial expression...it's like he's wearing a helmet.

Weirdest looking human (plastic surgery or rare condition aside) that I've ever seen. He makes even Andrew Lloyd Webber look normal.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr H said:

Not sure who brought her out of the closest. No going around Ulrika Johnson's house unless your vaxxed. Dam, what am I to do now? My plans out the window

 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/17049086/im-fed-up-with-anti-vaxxers-if-youre-not-double-jabbed-youre-banned-from-mine-on-christmas-day-says-ulrika-jonsson/


As if Ulrika would turn any man with a pulse away.. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bobb said:

What makes you think Darwin is wrong on anything?, If Darwin were alive today he would be furious at what Science is doing in his name?

For a start his random mutation - natural selection theory is deeply flawed.

 

First, at the typical rate of mutations there is not enough time. There have been calculations performed as to the rate that a species would have to mutate to transform and there simply is not enough time.

 

Second, any mutation would have to result in it being the dominant gene. Every time. But why wouldn't it get blended back into the gene pool and averaged out.

 

Third, Darwin does attempt to explain the second objection through geographical isolation. That is the mutated species (albeit a slight mutation) just happen to move away and survive while the other genes die out. Well that is just a little bit too contrived for me.

 

But take the domestic dog. Appeared about 40,000 years ago. Pure wolf DNA. No breeder today can get two wolves to produce a dog.

 

Even if a domestic dog did breed from two wolves it would be the omega and the wolf pack pecking order would not allow it to breed.

 

Darwin's theory defies logic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bobb said:

That is just a whole load of coffollox's right there, you do know that Darwin was not the first to speculate about the evolution of life on Planet Stupid right?

 

Speculate sounds about right.

Darwins purpose was not to prove evolution but to point out adaptation in the absence of God.

Adaptation and evolution are not the same thing.

 

Without God, man is above the law! man creates the law.

again - we find ourselves subsisting in a dictatorship! under scientism!

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

First, at the typical rate of mutations there is not enough time. There have been calculations performed as to the rate that a species would have to mutate to transform and there simply is not enough time.

As far as time goes the best Scientific estimates put it at 15 Billion Earth years give or take a few million, but even that assumption could be deeply flawed with respect to Earth years.

 

5 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

Second, any mutation would have to result in it being the dominant gene. Every time. But why wouldn't it get blended back into the gene pool and averaged out

It found space to thrive and occupy, and became a separate species which can not breed with the Ancestor.

 

6 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

Third, Darwin does attempt to explain the second objection through geographical isolation. That is the mutated species (albeit a slight mutation) just happen to move away and survive while the other genes die out. Well that is just a little bit too contrived for me.

See above.

 

6 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

But take the domestic dog. Appeared about 40,000 years ago. Pure wolf DNA. No breeder today can get two wolves to produce a dog.

And yet the Wolfe as far as anyone can tell IS the ancestor of all breeds of dog, and no one has been able to successfully describe why there are so many breeds, still much more work to be done here.

 

8 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

Darwin's theory defies logic.

Life itself defies logic, and yet we are here, our very own walking talking Science project that says otherwise.

 

Darwin himself said that this theory does not explain all of what we see in nature and correlation is not causation, but it is a bleedin obvious place to start ones investigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

For a start his random mutation - natural selection theory is deeply flawed.

 

First, at the typical rate of mutations there is not enough time. There have been calculations performed as to the rate that a species would have to mutate to transform and there simply is not enough time.

 

Second, any mutation would have to result in it being the dominant gene. Every time. But why wouldn't it get blended back into the gene pool and averaged out.

 

Third, Darwin does attempt to explain the second objection through geographical isolation. That is the mutated species (albeit a slight mutation) just happen to move away and survive while the other genes die out. Well that is just a little bit too contrived for me.

 

But take the domestic dog. Appeared about 40,000 years ago. Pure wolf DNA. No breeder today can get two wolves to produce a dog.

 

Even if a domestic dog did breed from two wolves it would be the omega and the wolf pack pecking order would not allow it to breed.

 

Darwin's theory defies logic.

 

would have pressed the like button but on rations again!

 

Agree - it was a point of contention when I was a student. The various genetic combinations already exist, it becomes merely a matter of selection of dominant over recessive according to environment.

 

I found this interesting and a supplement to the work of Dr. Peter Gariaev!

Science Series - Mathematics of DNA - Ulrike Granögger

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bobb said:

As far as time goes the best Scientific estimates put it at 15 Billion Earth years give or take a few million, but even that assumption could be deeply flawed with respect to Earth years.

 

Fine. But no scientist believes that life has been on the planet all that time.

 

The Cambrian explosion occurred about 600 million years ago. And I'm being generous.

 

But then our first ancestor Tiktaalik crawled out of the ocean about 370 million years ago. So we went from an amphibious fish to homo sapien sapien in that time?

 

It is a little bit disingenuous to claim we've had 15 billion years.

 

2 minutes ago, bobb said:

It found space to thrive and occupy, and became a separate species which can not breed with the Ancestor.

 

That is the claim.

 

2 minutes ago, bobb said:

And yet the Wolfe as far as anyone can tell IS the ancestor of all breeds of dog, and no one has been able to successfully describe why there are so many breeds, still much more work to be done here.

 

We can easily explain why there are so many breeds of dog. We bred them.

 

But no one can breed a dog from two wolves.

 

2 minutes ago, bobb said:

Life itself defies logic, and yet we are here, our very own walking talking Science project that says otherwise.

 

Happy to grant that.

 

It doesn't prove Darwin's theory.

 

You make that argument as if it is either Darwin's theory or life cannot exist.

 

Surely you can see the flaw in that reasoning?

 

2 minutes ago, bobb said:

Darwin himself said that this theory does not explain all of what we see in nature and correlation is not causation, but it is a bleedin obvious place to start ones investigation.

 

Why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

 

Fine. But no scientist believes that life has been on the planet all that time.

 

The Cambrian explosion occurred about 600 million years ago. And I'm being generous.

 

But then our first ancestor Tiktaalik crawled out of the ocean about 370 million years ago. So we went from an amphibious fish to homo sapien sapien in that time?

 

It is a little bit disingenuous to claim we've had 15 billion years.

 

 

That is the claim.

 

 

We can easily explain why there are so many breeds of dog. We bred them.

 

But no one can breed a dog from two wolves.

 

 

Happy to grant that.

 

It doesn't prove Darwin's theory.

 

You make that argument as if it is either Darwin's theory or life cannot exist.

 

Surely you can see the flaw in that reasoning?

 

 

Why?

I am not out to prove Darwin's theory, but rather point out a very beautiful analysis that it is, and to point out that Darwin himself would be furious at what has been asserted in his name by Science, and et voila, we have the Science crowd running wild thinking that their time in this evolution, which counts for me as a nano second, think they know all and think we are just lab rats, a cosmic fluke, with DNA being the latest play thing of theirs to molest in any way shape or form without giving a hoot about what Darwin was really saying which is that Life, Nature, the Laws of Physics are things which has sculpted the landscape so to speak, over EON'S of TIME, and yet pay no attention that if they well and truly screw up the gene pool we can not go back to the Ancestor to smooth out the road, NO, their wisdom, you can keep it, I for one listen to Darwin's clear and concise message which is, WAVE A VERY BIG RED FLAG SAYING, FOOLS GO IN WHERE ANGELS FEAR TO TREAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bobb said:

I am not out to prove Darwin's theory, but rather point out a very beautiful analysis that it is, and to point out that Darwin himself would be furious at what has been asserted in his name by Science, and et voila, we have the Science crowd running wild thinking that their time in this evolution, which counts for me as a nano second, think they know all and think we are just lab rats, a cosmic fluke, with DNA being the latest play thing of theirs to molest in any way shape or form without giving a hoot about what Darwin was really saying which is that Life, Nature, the Laws of Physics are things which has sculpted the landscape so to speak, over EON'S of TIME, and yet pay no attention that if they well and truly screw up the gene pool we can not go back to the Ancestor to smooth out the road, NO, their wisdom, you can keep it, I for one listen to Darwin's clear and concise message which is, WAVE A VERY BIG RED FLAG SAYING, FOOLS GO IN WHERE ANGELS FEAR TO TREAD.

I suspect that Darwin would be completely in support of what is being carried out in his name.

 

It is not that far to go from natural selection to artificial selection. Eugenics.

 

Yep. Darwin was a Eugenicist.

 

Eugenics and Darwin (wayoflife.org)

 

Yes, I know the Eugenics movement was largely pushed by Galton and you can't blame a man for his ideas being misapplied. However, Galton was Darwin's relative and they had obviously discussed such concepts.

 

Darwin was also heavily influenced by Thomas Malthus.

 

Plus, Darwin's family was rather inbred as he didn't want to contaminate the gene pool.

 

So I suspect he may have been all for depopulation using a poison clot shot.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bobb said:

Discussion is one thing, doing it is quite another, responsibility is a bitch when you get it wrong!

I agree.

 

I wasn't suggesting Darwin was out there doing it.

 

Merely that evidence suggests he would have supported it.

 

But to bring this discussion back on topic, there is no doubt what is happening now is artificial selection. If you buy into the argument that the poisonous clot shots have the potential to alter DNA and evolve a new human.

 

The Eugenicists never went away. They just rebranded.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bobb said:

You are very correct, get it wrong though and time will tell you how far back it is from there!

Somehow I suspect that the globalists are going to get it very wrong.

 

Or perhaps very right, given their intentions.

 

Fortunately, it seems that most people on this forum are not going to partake in this little experiment. There are some sane ones left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/14/2021 at 7:16 PM, FVCK BILLY G4TES said:

They have also infiltrated BT which has been laying fibre optic 5G networks down so they essentially have a kill switch if we don’t play nice

 

RAD group, Zohar Zisapel, the TALPIOT program etc

 

Look up RAD group and jaws shall drop 

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAD_Group

 

Zohar Zisapel has been called the "Bill Gates" of Israel 

 

 

The list of RAD Data customers is long and impressive, and includes the world’s largest telecoms, including AT&T, Bell Canada, Bharti Telecom, British Telecom, China Mobile, China Telecom, Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Singtel, T-Mobile, Verizon, and many more. The company is one of the world’s leading suppliers of equipment to telecommunication companies working in both fixed line and mobile connections, and has revenues of about $1 billion annually.

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.timesofisrael.com/at-rad-data-its-all-about-the-partners/amp/

 

I found a charming guy working for israeldefense.co.il now, before working for RAD Data Communications GmbH Otto-Hahn-Str. 28-30, 85521 Hohenbrunn - Deutschland. 

 

HRB 142590: RAD Data Communications GmbH, Munich, Otto-Hahn-Str. 28-30, 85521 Ottobrunn. Retired: Managing Director: Bin, Dror, Ramat Hasharon / Israel, born xx.xx.xxxx. Appointed: Managing Director: Kashkash, Udy, Tenafly / United States, born xx.xx.xxxx, with sole power of representation; with the authority to conclude legal transactions on behalf of the company, in their own name or as a representative of a third party.

 

https://www-webvalid-de.translate.goog/company/RAD+Data+Communications+GmbH,+Riemerling/HRB+142590?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en

 

Dror Bin appointed as CEO of Israel Innovation Authority 


The executive who has held senior positions in the high-tech, telecom, venture capital and management consulting fields will replace outgoing CEO Aharon Aharon in the near future


Cybertech | 15/02/2021

 

https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/48364

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoundOfSilence said:

It seems there are still a few good actors out there.

 

Sam Forst 'quits Home and Away' after refusing to get the Covid jab (msn.com) 

 

Obviously she's not an A-lister.

 

From what I've heard a lot of the actors below the top tier have no idea what goes on at the top level.

Home and Away / Neighbours have the potential to be career springboards.

 

Russel Crowe, Kylie, Isla Fisher, Naomi Watts, Heath Ledger, Simon Baker, Guy Pearce and around 30 or so that I have never heard of.

 

To give up that chance at least shows some integrity because most who get into show business at a young age do so because they or their handlers want stardom on the big stage.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Shy Talk said:

Indeed. 

 

So some cunty chops rings in claiming to be the stepson and that makes the call legit? Maybe I should call up pretending to be another member of his family and make spurious claims as well. Honestly, the level of dishonesty and depravity with these arseholes is becoming insufferable. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Morpheus said:

Indeed. 

 

So some cunty chops rings in claiming to be the stepson and that makes the call legit? Maybe I should call up pretending to be another member of his family and make spurious claims as well. Honestly, the level of dishonesty and depravity with these arseholes is becoming insufferable. 

 

It's the level of stupidity as well, their bargain bin psychology is embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Captain Falcon said:

 

It's the level of stupidity as well, their bargain bin psychology is embarrassing.

It is to us, but this amateur shit is gold to the normies who lap this crap up without question. LBC have some gall claiming this to be legit. Funny how there's no details of how the person died or even who they are. Absolutely criminal they're passing this off as legit. There's only two viruses knocking about and that's the media and government. Scourge of humanity.

Edited by Morpheus
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Agreed.

 

With some clever rezoning some clubs could even split their stadiums into separate venues.

 

So the West Stand is now the Omicron Club having a 9,999 capacity. The North Stand is now the Delta Club etc.

 

They just happen to have excellent views of a football match. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...