Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, SimonTV said:

 

Didn't he dress up as a doctor when he went to the hospital last year? I could have sworn we had a similar conversation with Boris dressed up in something else. I wonder if he is choosing his own clothes at this point.

He's like Mr Benn ...a cartoon from the 70's (perhaps earlier) where this strange fella in a bowler hat went into  a strange shop and got 'dressed up' ....that about sums him up

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Sexpistol50 said:

Boris Johnson is the new Mr Ben , 

Here he is turning up at a dawn raid 🤣 looking like a Flump 

screenshot-2014-10-22-20-23-47.png

NINTCHDBPICT000698460498.jpg

a37ad6fd311d520d7ec49ad03ec037f9.jpg

You have a fine mind sir i hadn't seen your post....i work backwards from the latest (weird way of catching up i know...but i t works) ...we came to the same conclusion !!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evidence is insufficient to back mandatory NHS staff vaccination, says House of Lords committee

A House of Lords committee has raised several concerns about the proposed legislation to make vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 mandatory for all NHS staff in England, particularly whether the benefits of vaccinating the remaining 8% of NHS workers were proportionate and how the NHS would cope with losing the 5.4% who don’t want to be vaccinated.1

The Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee said that the government’s plans had not been thoroughly thought through, leaving the House of Lords unable to scrutinise the proposed legislation.

On 9 November England’s health and social care secretary, Sajid Javid, announced that all staff who work in health and social care settings regulated by the Care Quality Commission will have to be fully vaccinated by 1 April 2022.2 “We must avoid preventable harm and protect patients in the NHS, protect colleagues in the NHS, and protect the NHS itself,” he said.

But in a report published on 30 November the committee said that the benefit of increasing the protection from vaccinating staff who had not yet taken up offers of the jab “may be marginal” and that the government had failed to publish any contingency plans on how it would cope with the loss of staff who do not want the vaccine.

The report said that of the 208 000 NHS staff who weren’t currently vaccinated 54 000 (26%) would take up the vaccine under the law and 126 000 (61%) would leave their jobs.

“Given the legislation is anticipated to cause £270m in additional recruitment and training costs and major disruption to the health and care provision at the end of the grace period, very strong evidence should be provided to support this policy choice. DHSC [Department for Health and Social Care] has not provided such evidence,” it said.

The committee also criticised the department for failing to include in the legislation practical detail about how expressions such as “face to face” or “otherwise engaged” would be applied, referring instead to guidance to be produced in the future.

The committee’s chair, Robin Hodgson, said, “We fully support high levels of vaccination, but DHSC is accountable to parliament for its decisions and needs to give us a clear statement of the effect of these regulations, the effect of doing nothing, and any other solutions considered, so parliament fully understands all the consequences of what it is being asked to agree to. This is particularly important when the NHS is already under such pressure.

“DHSC has provided no single coherent statement to explain and justify its intended policy, and this undermines the ability of the House to undertake effective scrutiny of the proposed legislation.”

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2957

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dewin said:

Evidence is insufficient to back mandatory NHS staff vaccination, says House of Lords committee

A House of Lords committee has raised several concerns about the proposed legislation to make vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 mandatory for all NHS staff in England, particularly whether the benefits of vaccinating the remaining 8% of NHS workers were proportionate and how the NHS would cope with losing the 5.4% who don’t want to be vaccinated.1

The Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee said that the government’s plans had not been thoroughly thought through, leaving the House of Lords unable to scrutinise the proposed legislation.

On 9 November England’s health and social care secretary, Sajid Javid, announced that all staff who work in health and social care settings regulated by the Care Quality Commission will have to be fully vaccinated by 1 April 2022.2 “We must avoid preventable harm and protect patients in the NHS, protect colleagues in the NHS, and protect the NHS itself,” he said.

But in a report published on 30 November the committee said that the benefit of increasing the protection from vaccinating staff who had not yet taken up offers of the jab “may be marginal” and that the government had failed to publish any contingency plans on how it would cope with the loss of staff who do not want the vaccine.

The report said that of the 208 000 NHS staff who weren’t currently vaccinated 54 000 (26%) would take up the vaccine under the law and 126 000 (61%) would leave their jobs.

“Given the legislation is anticipated to cause £270m in additional recruitment and training costs and major disruption to the health and care provision at the end of the grace period, very strong evidence should be provided to support this policy choice. DHSC [Department for Health and Social Care] has not provided such evidence,” it said.

The committee also criticised the department for failing to include in the legislation practical detail about how expressions such as “face to face” or “otherwise engaged” would be applied, referring instead to guidance to be produced in the future.

The committee’s chair, Robin Hodgson, said, “We fully support high levels of vaccination, but DHSC is accountable to parliament for its decisions and needs to give us a clear statement of the effect of these regulations, the effect of doing nothing, and any other solutions considered, so parliament fully understands all the consequences of what it is being asked to agree to. This is particularly important when the NHS is already under such pressure.

“DHSC has provided no single coherent statement to explain and justify its intended policy, and this undermines the ability of the House to undertake effective scrutiny of the proposed legislation.”

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2957

 

All well and good but how does that fat ittle kinderegg fuckwit javid know that theres going to be a need for vaccinations on the 1st of april 2022 ?

I use the term 'vaccination' most advisedly and hope he gets run over by an hgv...detest the little baldy ovoid shaped cnut

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, whatthefoxhat said:

Thats bollocks....i've experienced having the oxygen and carbon dioxide replaced with another gas TWICE totally by accident...your fucking blood boils ....you feel as if you are on fire inside.....and how the fuck would they know ? ....they resussing people that changed their mind ?....bullets are cheaper

Well I won't be buying one of those then. Thanks.

Be sure to submit a customer review on Amazon, won't ya?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SimonTV said:

 

I remember now, he was wearing high vis for no reason on his emergency very emergency propaganda message last year. Now he is wearing a police outfit talking about crime. I thought about a funny come back but I failed to come up with one this time. One thing we now know is that Doris likes playing dress up.

It will be Christmas soon..... I expect he'll be dressing up as satan santa.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Orange Alert said:

 

He sure does like dressing up. Just a few examples.

11667780.jpg?display=1&htype=0&type=resp

 

0_Boris-Johnson-visits-Siemens-Rail-fact

 

10102897.jpg?display=1&htype=0&type=resp

 

0_BRITAIN-SCOTLAND-POLITICS-HEALTH-VIRUS

 

 

 

c49db845-screen-shot-2021-09-15-at-13.48

 

11958689.jpg?display=1&htype=0&type=resp

 

0_Batley-and-Spen-by-election.jpg

 

Has he got a twat account?

Send all these images and a request of what you want him to dress up next.

Ask him if he's publishing a photo album collection of all those years as well. 😁

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, whatthefoxhat said:

I'm actually at the point now where facts figures,deaths,lies,coercion and threats are all absolute bollocks to me now

I've always been a 'Bolshie fucker' and always refused to obey 'orders' when i can see no evidence or meaningful reason why i should be doing something

I'm at saturation point now with the fuckwittery

 

Bring it on

 

I have 'surprises'

What took you so long. We've all been waiting for you. lol

So bored, so passed it....ages ago. Just can't take this seriously any longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, SimonTV said:

 

 

haha that is more than the UK. They have 11 vaccine boosters per person in the country haha

 

Even if every person was willing to take 11 boosters the amount of time they have to keep between them would mean they would expire before they could all be used. I assume there will be some delay in production and delivery otherwise they would be wasting billions of dollars. This is probably like a 10 year batch, 10 years worth of this deadly mRNA. Can you imagine what these people will be like after 10 years of these mRNA. I think dead best describes them. 

 

Monthly booster jab = a year supply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A question....

If you don't know how the law works, how are you going to get your rights back???

 

I've started a new thread about a law study group.

We need as many people including kids learning the law which will go a long way from clearing your debt, employment issues to all kinds of stuff we need to face especially now. Once you learn, you can take care of your local people. As long as money is involved, people will want to know this stuff. Let's squash the narratives. This is the only way.

 

https://forum.davidicke.com/index.php?/topic/23976-law-study-group-home-schooling/

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

KIWI CHURCH LEADERS DEFY ARDERN’S THREATS TO VACCINATE OR FACE A $15K FINE  

A feisty Kiwi pastor has told Jacinda Ardern and her Labor Party vaccination cabal to shove their shots and get their noses out of church business. Ardern is threatening to fine church leaders $15,000 if they are not vaccinated by December 3.

 

Pastor Carl Bromley of the Life Connection Missionary Baptist Fellowship in Christchurch says Ardern has crossed the line of respect between church and state. Ardern’s socialist-fascist regime is also trying to silence another high-profile and outspoken pastor, Brian Tamaki, who has been loaded with onerous bail conditions on charges of breaching so-called health orders by running a protest rally.

 

Ardern’s corrupt Covid cabal primarily includes her “nice guy” chief health bureaucrat Ashley Bloomfield, Covid 19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins, and Health Minister Andrew Little. Just like the Australian state premiers and their Covid cabals, these sad specimens of Kiwi political corruption follow orders from above e.g. the WHO, the global banks, big pharma and the Fauci-Gates-Rockefeller operation.

 

They have dug themselves into a hole of blind obedience to a corrupt narrative and they have no alternative but to dig deeper in the hope that the populations will follow them into the dystopian hell they are creating.

 

The slick and slimy Hipkins says he expects children aged five to 11 to start being vaccinated before the end of January, based on the notoriously compromised US FDA giving Pfizer the go ahead for five to 11-year-olds, subject to New Zealand approval from their regulator Medsafe.

 

Ardern claims she won’t push vaccination for children, but protesters across the country are making their distrust of her “promises” known, forcing her to cancel her appearances at country vaccination centres. Ardern’s next PR project will be her marriage over Christmas to her spin doctor husband Clarke Gayford.

 

The media will fall over themselves portraying this “oh so lovely event” in the seaside city of Gisborne as almost the equivalent of a royal wedding. Ardern’s circle of leftie supporters in the international media will be on to it as well. But will it be a public relations coup that leaves a bitter taste in the mouths of the many Kiwis destroyed by lockdowns, fines and now coerced vaccination.

 

The protests of pastors Bromley and Tamaki and others like megachurch pastor Peter Mortlock, touch upon the fundamental battle for the rights and freedoms that Ardern is systematically destroying on behalf of her globalist masters.

 

Whether or not you agree with Bromley’s hard-line theology, freedom of religion, speech and thought are essentially the same thing, hence their inclusion in the US Constitution’s First Amendment. They are also fundamental to English common law in the English Bill of Rights 1688 and international law.

 

The right at common law to informed consent to medical treatment is based on the law of trespass ie you have the right to bodily integrity free from uninvited threats and assault from individuals or the state. This is also recognised in the Nuremberg Code.

 

“I’ve got a message for Jacinda Ardern, Chris Hipkins, Ashleigh Bloomfield, Andrew Little and any other of their cronies: Get your noses out of God’s business. God has a message for them from His word: God is not mocked,” Bromley announced on a YouTube message below. He went on to accuse Ardern and company of shaking their fist at God and said this would induce divine judgment.

 

Tamaki, the outspoken head of a South Auckland’s Destiny Church, told the New Zealand Herald he would rather “live in dangerous freedom than live in peaceful slavery”.

On Twitter he posted: “So a segregated, divided NZ is just around the corner with The Vaxxed No Vaxxed divide. We have been conditioned for some time now in the workplace, shops, businesses, services and among our own families. Is this what we want NZ? Is this the future for our kids?”

 

Mortlock, despite his megachurch’s corporate charity status with wages paid by the government, supported Tamaki’s recent protest and referred his congregation to the website of the organisers, the Freedom and Rights Coalition. “I was asked to be involved in it way back and I’ve taken a back seat in it, but enough to say if you want to go I just want to let you know about it. I think sooner or later we are going to have to make a stand – a stand for our rights, the way our freedoms are being stripped away.”

 

What makes it difficult for Tamaki, Bromley and Mortlock is that other churches are playing ball with the tyranny while a large, apathetic segment of the population simply go along with their mainstream media’s blatant lying and falling for Ardern’s sickly “charm”.

Bromley recently held a service in defiance of the country’s so-called “alert level 4” which bans gatherings outside of households. A YouTube post of a confrontation between Bromley and police was removed “for medical misinformation” – a code for Ardern’s censorship of anti-government information.

 

New Zealand’s NewsHub service made the following comment about anti-vaccine protests that would be laughable if it were not serious:

“Some anti-lockdown activists have compared New Zealand’s restrictions to the horrific Nazi regime of the 1930s, but there are marked differences between the two.

 

“While the Government’s alert level 4 regulations are designed to stop people falling ill and dying from COVID-19, the Nazi Party actively sought to marginalise, imprison and exterminate groups it deemed undesirable, particularly Jews and political dissidents.”

 

 

 

 

“So you can take your legislation, you can take your mandate and you can take a flying leap. And I suggest you pull your head in, otherwise you’re going to find yourself coming up against a judgment from God that you are just not prepared for … $15,000 fine for not taking a jab? You can go and take a flying leap because this pastor, this man of God is not bowing down to your tyranny, your evil, nor your ungodliness.”

https://truthcomestolight.com/kiwi-church-leaders-defy-arderns-threats-to-vaccinate-or-face-a-15k-fine/

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SimonTV said:

Look out for unexplained car accidents involving young people colliding with things. Most likely collapsing, seizing at the wheel, having a heart attack at the wheel etc. 

What are the odds that white card in his pocket they took and read was not from his recent injection and he was on his way home?

 

 

 

*Vaxidents*

 

Been happening since the start.

 

VERY INTERESTING TRUCK DRIVER POSTS

"I have a startup company and as such I work every day of the week. Every day I'm on the road heading back and forth from home to my office in the Raleigh-Durham area via I-40.
Recently, I have noticed a massive uptick in seemly bizarre accidents. Vehicles of all kinds, usually singular, running off the road and crashing. Not in bad weather. Not in the middle of the night. Just all of the a sudden.
I have also noticed folks driving kind of "dazed" looking, weaving about, stopping erratically and in particular not driving at speed -- usually like 10 mph below the speed limit on secondary roads, but very fast on primaries.
I've driven in the local market for a very long time and I have not seen this kind of behavior before. Wondering if its the beginning of Vaxxed brain damage of some kind???"
____
Now that you mention it...its been happenning here in aus too.
Just a spate of pointless accidents. No cause...just running off the road into ditches and rivers...into poles...into other cars..
For no reason. Not even speeding. Its like everyone is having sudden heart attacks or blackouts behind the wheel.

 


__
I've been noticing this over the past 2 to 3 weeks but it has become really much more pronounced in the last week. I also seen something similar with parking. I see people driving around parking lots looking for a spot to park in, driving past open spots repeatedly and then finally choosing some random spot to park in. Like they couldn't "choose" one. Really strange.
__
Maine here. Delivery driver.Definitely good observation that i have made myself. The part about people driving ridiculously slow now, barely even keeping with the speed limit. I don't even wait for them anymore, I usually blow past them in the opposite lane, get a quick look at them, and there is definitely a light being dimmed in the upstairs department.

Really getting bad in the last few weeks, luckily I am in vacation so I have avoided the roads, so can't say if things have gotten worse, but its to the point that i had many thoughts recently to quitting my delivery job. I honestly don't fear dying from a covid, my big fear is being taken out while driving by someone having a bad reaction to the vaccine.
__
My father in law is aggressively pro-vax. In the the last couple of days he is having dizzy spells and is very light headed. He is vaxxed by the way. He has stopped driving due to these symptoms. Can see this causing many accidents among the vaxxed.
__
I have observed a note worthy amount of head on collisions, and high impact with trees across the USA, Also a noteworthy amount of unrestrained operators
__
I've ridden in my sisters SUV in recent days with her to visit a hospitalized relative. She is a nurse and was vaxxed about 3 months ago. She was driving very erratically and sort of drifting though lanes. I've never known her to be in an accident in decades of driving... but she had some close calls the last couple of days. She doesn't push the vaxx as hard as she did back in January either.. possibly because she has had some symptoms might suspect the "kill shot"? But she doesn't mention anything
__
Went out Friday- southern tier NY, very rural - shopping in Hornell. When I returned home I immediately told my spouse how crazy 19 was (towards the Interstate), many trucks driving right near the double lines, cars weaving as though the driver was in another world.

__

Was the injection of an mRNA vaccine a key contributor to my cousin's driving behavior and her death? I don't know, as she was alone in her car and none of my relatives provide any details about the state of her health prior to the accident.

Judging by the description of the vehicular incidents that have been posted on Jim Stone's blog, I sense that a vax may have been a contributing factor to the death of my cousin, whose was 72 years old at the time of the fatal accident.

__

Seems like this kind of thing is starting to happen pretty frequently. Reader Linda sent the following:

It is happening here in rural So. Calif. desert too! Drivers are swerving into oncoming traffic. Quite challenging on narrow mountain roads! I am happy that I drive a 3/4 ton pick up truck!

I really feel that this is how the "zombie apocolypse" begins. Things are going to become extremely strange in the days to come!

Thanks for the update!

Linda

https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=171076

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next up on the demonization list! The unboostered! hahahahah

 

We don't even need David Icke level skills ofpredicting the future these days lol

 

hahaha - I love how they change their headlines - like Forbes and the "change DNA" headline recently - these people are beyond giving a fuck when they press submit and push their divisive articles out now - (and that goes for all media) - it was probably a colleague who pulled them up and suggested they change the headline.

 

image.png.59ad7a18cdde5ede9527a7a4e7fe31b7.png

 

..the "booster Era" 🤣

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pfizer Recorded 1,223 Possible Vaccine Deaths During First 90 Days of COVID Vaccine Rollout

BYARJUN WALIA

DECEMBER 6, 2021

 

 

IN BRIEF

  • The Facts:

    • Documents released by the FDA in accordance with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request reveal that Pfizer recorded 1,223 vaccine related deaths December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021.

    • Tens of thousands of other serious adverse reactions were noted, yet the emergency authorization for these products still went forward.

    • The FDA is attempting to delay releasing other associated documents until 2076.

  • Reflect On:

    • Why aren't stories like this covered by the mainstream media?

    • What would the implications be if the public were told how many injuries were occurring?

       

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request made by the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency group has revealed that Pfizer was aware of 1,223 possible vaccine related deaths within the first 90 days of their COVID vaccine rollout.

Table 1. in Pfizer’s documents accounts 42,086 reactions to their COVID-19 vaccine over a 90-day period from December 1st. 2020 – February 28th, 2021. 25,379 reactions were ‘medically confirmed’ while 16,707 were ‘not-medically confirmed.’ Pfizer also redacted the total number of vaccine doses that had been administered up to this point.

The Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency group is comprised of approximately 30 professors and scientists who are passionate about medical transparency – something we shouldn’t have to fight for.

C umulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Records Reports

According to Pfizer, an event that’s not medically confirmed comes as a result of reports that come in without medical records and other necessary documents to make a confirmation.

Pfizer also notes that,

In some reports, clinical information (such as medical history, validation of diagnosis, time from drug use to onset of illness, dose, and use of concomitant drugs) is missing or incomplete, and follow-up information may not be available.”
An accumulation of adverse event reports (AERs) does not necessarily indicate that a particular AE was caused by the drug; rather, the event may be due to an underlying disease or some other factor(s) such as past medical history or concomitant medication.”
Pfizer Document.

The documents have also revealed that Pfizer was well aware of tens of thousands of other adverse and serious adverse reactions within months of distribution. This includes 1,403 cases of cardiovascular issues and many cases of vaccine induced heart complications.

The FOIA request to obtain these documents was made to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), who at first did not release them. A court order forced them to comply and begin releasing documents. A joint court order explains that the FDA has proposed to produce 500 pages per month. Based on its calculated number of pages, this would mean that it would complete its production in nearly 55 years, in 2076. This is how long it would take for the public to have clarity on why the FDA approved these vaccines.

Until the entire body of documents provided by Pfizer to the FDA are made available, an appropriate analysis by the independent scientists that are members of Plaintiff is not possible. Would the FDA agree to review and license this product without all the documents? Of course not. These independent, world-renowned scientists should be provided the same forthwith.”
Court Order

This is not a surprise, a systematic review in PLOS journal analysed 28 studies and found that adverse events were less likely to appear in published journal articles than unpublished studies (e.g. industry-held data).

Other concerning data from the Pfizer trials was outlined by whistleblower testimony of Brooke Jackson. An article in the British Medical Journal brought light to her claims that some Pfizer COVID vaccine trial data was falsified. The company she worked for, Ventavia, one of the companies contracted to perform vaccine trials for Pfizer, even tried to discredit her claims as false by saying she did not work on the Pfizer trials. But later released documents showed Ventavia was lying.

More documents pertaining to the Pfizer data are set to be released in the coming weeks. Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency filed another motion that would force the FDA to expedite the release of requested documents as well.

Despite the findings outlined in this initial batch of documents, the FDA still thought it was necessary and appropriate to authorize emergency use for these products. In doing so, those who have been, and were injured, by COVID vaccines are not eligible for compensation via the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.

To date, the program has shielded pharmaceutical companies from liability while payouts to victims come from taxpayer dollars. To date the program has paid more than $4 billion to people and families of vaccine injured people in the United States. Vaccines are liability-free products.

Since COVID vaccines were deployed, vaccine adverse event reporting systems around the world are recording a record number of injuries. By October 15th, 2021, adverse events reported worldwide passed 2,344,240 for COVID vaccines alone in the World Health Organization (WHO) reporting system VigiAccess.

Many researchers have also pointed out the potential for underreporting as well. According to multiple studies, it’s known that serious adverse reactions to prescription drugs, for example, are extremely underreported, perhaps up to 95 percent.

But what about serious adverse reactions to vaccines? A study published on October 7, 2021 in the Journal Toxicology Reports estimates that underreporting of deaths as a result of the COVID vaccines may have resulted in a number 1000 times less than what the actual number is.

They also cite a widely distributed Harvard Pilgrim study published in 2010 which suggested that less than 1 percent of vaccine injuries are reported. This includes serious adverse reactions.

Approximately 50 percent of COVID vaccine injuries reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System within the last 30 year are all from COVID shots. As of October 15, 2021, Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) recorded 122,833 serious adverse events, of those 17,128 resulted in death, post administration of COVID vaccines. This includes cases from around the globe, not just the US. You can look up the latest numbers here.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...