Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

Sage warns lockdown by december:   (lampshade LMAO)   dailyfail reports 'putting christmas at risk'   - you couldn't write this fucked up shit could you?  Oh they just did:

here:        https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8887775/SAGE-experts-warn-second-wave-deadlier-first.html?ito=push-notification&ci=44969&si=19098210

 

image.png.af8fc7e431e709b8f0dd61a52b0afeab.png

Edited by sickofallthebollocks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sickofallthebollocks said:

Sage warns lockdown by december:   (lampshade LMAO)   dailyfail reports 'putting christmas at risk'   - you couldn't write this fucked up shit could you?  Oh they just did:

here         :https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8887775/SAGE-experts-warn-second-wave-deadlier-first.html?ito=push-notification&ci=44969&si=19098210

 

image.png.af8fc7e431e709b8f0dd61a52b0afeab.png

 

Second wave lampshade 😂 Fuck me these names just keep getting sillier. I think we should have a circle-jerker lockdown to tackle the spread. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm old. I'm happy to live a sedentary life, therefore “lockdown” hasn't affected my life one iota, apart from the inconvenience of doing basic things, like shopping. I haven't observed their rules anyway and still go wherever I want, unmasked. Although, I know elderly people whose life revolved around various activities, which gave them a motive to get up in the morning and go out. Whether it's bowls or darts, swimming or singing, they have been denied these small pleasures. Not to mention being forcibly parted from family, friends and aquaintances. Many of them now live in fear, because they trust their government and the media.

 

However, when I was young, my life centered around socialising, pubs, clubs, parties, music festivals and dancing. Okay, I was a wastrel, but I cannot imagine having been wrested from this lifestyle and compelled to remain separated from society, transfixed to a computer screen, or phone. When I was even younger, I played hockey, badmington and netball. Children can't even enjoy football now. Youngsters are prevented from attending certain classes, cinema, bowling, gym, rugby, choirs, so many things we took for granted.

 

If this energy is continually stifled and redirected into a 'virtual world' the psychological impact and detrimental effect on health, will have long-term, devastating consequences. I don't have a crystal ball, I'm not “New Age” so I can't predict how this pent-up frustration and resentment will vent itself, but it will create a dysfunctional generation, who no longer know what normal is. So much potential, creativity and ambition is stagnating, with little hope for a better furure. The WEC tells us we will own nothing, but be happy. I beg to differ.

Edited by Velma
  • Like 11
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Petition - Establish a peoples scientific and medical panel 

 

Government response

 

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/549552

 

Quote

 

The Government understands how important it is to have expert scientific advice as it controls COVID-19. The Government Office for Science is headed by the government’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance who together with Chris Whitty the chief medical officer chairs the meetings of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies. The Government Office for Science maintains a register of world-renowned scientific experts who have indicated they would be willing to participate in a SAGE meeting. It is essential that the government has instant access to the very best scientific advice from appropriate scientific experts when dealing with its response to the worldwide Covid 19 pandemic. The government considers that the expertise of its chief government scientific adviser together with the expertise of the Government Office for Science are best placed to know who the appropriate experts are. An important feature of the system is that the experts are independent and are free to express his or her opinion without any external influence. To ensure the government has ready access to the advice it needs it is essential that the appropriate expert may provide his or her opinion at short notice; this can only be achieved by reliance upon a detailed knowledge of which experts are appropriate which is located in the Government Chief Scientific Advisor and the Government Office for Science.

The government does not consider that selecting any scientist by popular referenda would ensure that the most appropriate scientific expert was selected and the time that such referenda would take would cause significant delay and hamper the government’s ability to be provided with the necessary scientific advice in the shortest possible time. The Government Office for Science is continually reviewing and updating its list of experts in conjunction with leading UK scientific experts. The government is confident that the list of experts represents a broad range of scientific opinion and is the most suitable method to ensure that the government is provided with world-renowned and world leading scientific advice.

The strategic framework for the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) is to be found on this link:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/80087/sage-guidance.pdf

Defining SAGE membership is to be found at p18 onwards.

This publicly available publication provides detailed information about SAGE its remit and role.

Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

 

 

SAGE is corrupt.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Velma said:

I'm old. I'm happy to live a sedentary life, therefore “lockdown” hasn't affected my life one iota, apart from the inconvenience of doing basic things, like shopping. I haven't observed their rules anyway and still go wherever I want, unmasked. Although, I know elderly folk whose life revolved around various activities, which gave them a motive to get up in the morning and go out. Whether it's bowls or darts, swimming or singing, they have been denied these small pleasures. Not to mention being forcibly parted from family, friends and aquaintances. Many of them now live in fear, because they trust their government and the media.

 

However, when I was young, my life centered around socialising, pubs, clubs, parties, music festivals and dancing. Okay, I was a wastrel, but I cannot imagine having been wrested from this lifestyle and compelled to remain separated from society, transfixed to a computer screen, or phone. When I was even younger, I played hockey, badmington and netball. Children can't even enjoy football now. Youngsters are prevented from attending certain classes, cinema, bowling, gym, rugby, choirs, so many things we took for granted.

 

If this energy is continually stifled and redirected into a 'virtual world' the psychological impact and detrimental effect on health, will have long-term, devastating consequences. I don't have a crystal ball, I'm not “New Age” so I can't predict how this pent-up frustration and resentment will vent itself, but it will create a dysfunctional generation, who no longer know what normal is. So much potential, creativity and ambition is stagnating, with little hope for a better furure. The WEC tells us we will own nothing, but be happy. I beg to differ.

out of likes - but brilliantly said. 👊

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting stuff on the daily mail article...

 

"The Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) has presented the PM with projections which suggest the peak of the second wave will be lower than it was in the first wave. 

However, the peak is expected to last for longer, with high numbers of daily deaths likely to continue for months, resulting in a 'lampshade' second wave."

 

Ah, like seasonal flu then......😴 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, anomie said:

interesting stuff on the daily mail article...

 

"The Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) has presented the PM with projections which suggest the peak of the second wave will be lower than it was in the first wave. 

However, the peak is expected to last for longer, with high numbers of daily deaths likely to continue for months, resulting in a 'lampshade' second wave."

 

Ah, like seasonal flu then......😴 

 

They clearly don't want it to end, they are changing their baselines constantly and their minds daily about what constitutes a risk or what does not. They are trying their best to make a mountain out of a mole hill. 

 

Edited by SimonTV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, anomie said:

interesting stuff on the daily mail article...

 

"The Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) has presented the PM with projections which suggest the peak of the second wave will be lower than it was in the first wave. 

However, the peak is expected to last for longer, with high numbers of daily deaths likely to continue for months, resulting in a 'lampshade' second wave."

 

Ah, like seasonal flu then......😴 

 

Yeah or any other endemic virus. They are acting like this is the first time this has happened in history.

 

"Hospitals are full". Yes, a lot like any other winter where old and frail bodies struggle to dea with the cold and lack of sun. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Velma said:

I'm old. I'm happy to live a sedentary life, therefore “lockdown” hasn't affected my life one iota, apart from the inconvenience of doing basic things, like shopping. I haven't observed their rules anyway and still go wherever I want, unmasked. Although, I know elderly people whose life revolved around various activities, which gave them a motive to get up in the morning and go out. Whether it's bowls or darts, swimming or singing, they have been denied these small pleasures. Not to mention being forcibly parted from family, friends and aquaintances. Many of them now live in fear, because they trust their government and the media.

 

However, when I was young, my life centered around socialising, pubs, clubs, parties, music festivals and dancing. Okay, I was a wastrel, but I cannot imagine having been wrested from this lifestyle and compelled to remain separated from society, transfixed to a computer screen, or phone. When I was even younger, I played hockey, badmington and netball. Children can't even enjoy football now. Youngsters are prevented from attending certain classes, cinema, bowling, gym, rugby, choirs, so many things we took for granted.

 

If this energy is continually stifled and redirected into a 'virtual world' the psychological impact and detrimental effect on health, will have long-term, devastating consequences. I don't have a crystal ball, I'm not “New Age” so I can't predict how this pent-up frustration and resentment will vent itself, but it will create a dysfunctional generation, who no longer know what normal is. So much potential, creativity and ambition is stagnating, with little hope for a better furure. The WEC tells us we will own nothing, but be happy. I beg to differ.

 

Plus one Velma.  I think we are a similar age.

 

The younger generation, my son included on the whole don't have a problem with not having

face to face contact and socialising in person.  On the whole, they are happy with virtual friendships.

 

It worries me that some of the younger generation working from home or unemployed at home

will become very lonely and depressed. 

 

Although I need to respect I am of a different generation to my son, I believe there

has been an agenda for a long time to distance social contact.  Human beings thrive imo when

they are with other people ... to hug, to laugh, to debate and to love each other.

 

It's not the same via a computer.

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Plus one Velma.  I think we are a similar age.

 

The younger generation, my son included on the whole don't have a problem with not having

face to face contact and socialising in person.  On the whole, they are happy with virtual friendships.

 

It worries me that some of the younger generation working from home or unemployed at home

will become very lonely and depressed. 

 

Although I need to respect I am of a different generation to my son, I believe there

has been an agenda for a long time to distance social contact.  Human beings thrive imo when

they are with other people ... to hug, to laugh, to debate and to love each other.

 

It's not the same via a computer.

 

 

 

Absolutely. Being in my late 20s I don't entirely agree with that. Most millenials still want to go out and live, breath, laugh, sing, dance, have sex, etc... but the social justice narritive has been getting hammered into people's heads for the last decade or so and no there is an awful culture of virtue signalling and being righteous so people won't think you are horrible. Young people are willing to depress themselves because it's "the right thing"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Plus one Velma.  I think we are a similar age.

 

The younger generation, my son included on the whole don't have a problem with not having

face to face contact and socialising in person.  On the whole, they are happy with virtual friendships.

 

It worries me that some of the younger generation working from home or unemployed at home

will become very lonely and depressed. 

 

Although I need to respect I am of a different generation to my son, I believe there

has been an agenda for a long time to distance social contact.  Human beings thrive imo when

they are with other people ... to hug, to laugh, to debate and to love each other.

 

It's not the same via a computer.

 

 

My nieces and nephews - all 18,19,20,22 years old- seemed so alive on social media. I saw them in person a few Christmases ago and all four of them sat there like lemons with nothing to say. None of them had any conversational skills whatsoever. None of them had a sense of humour in the flesh, though were full of banter online. After numerous efforts to engage them I suggested they should all go into the garden and communicate with me via Facebook, which they nervously laughed at.

 

Seen them all once since then but it was clear they never forgave me for a light hearted observation. Incredibly bold behind a screen - some of their interactions with others would make your toes curl - but utter fannies in real life.

 

And that's the problem. Many of this generation have had their lives divided whereby they are adults online and babies in real life. The part that 'grows up' is a fantasy person they have created. 

 

In short, an environment has been created where people are terrified of real contact, real relationships, live conversations, real growth.

 

When the internet disappears (as we know it) I suspect they'll all drop dead at the terror of realising they are alone - and always were.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Who put that idea in their heads?

 

For me a relentless campaign of media campaign promoting far left divisive and science-denying politics, mixed with the psychological toxicity of social media and virtue signalling.

 

I believe this was a concerted campaign to set the stage for an event such as this. Reprogramming to push social pressure to boiling point, have everyone obsessing over being moral and just. Promote unscientific ideas such as that gender is a social construct to make people more open to any idea with authority behind it, no matter how absurb.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Saved said:

My nieces and nephews - all 18,19,20,22 years old- seemed so alive on social media. I saw them in person a few Christmases ago and all four of them sat there like lemons with nothing to say. None of them had any conversational skills whatsoever. None of them had a sense of humour in the flesh, though were full of banter online. After numerous efforts to engage them I suggested they should all go into the garden and communicate with me via Facebook, which they nervously laughed at.

 

Seen them all once since then but it was clear they never forgave me for a light hearted observation. Incredibly bold behind a screen - some of their interactions with others would make your toes curl - but utter fannies in real life.

 

And that's the problem. Many of this generation have had their lives divided whereby they are adults online and babies in real life. The part that 'grows up' is a fantasy person they have created. 

 

In short, an environment has been created where people are terrified of real contact, real relationships, live conversations, real growth.

 

When the internet disappears (as we know it) I suspect they'll all drop dead at the terror of realising they are alone - and always were.

 

12140821_10153664404303908_4543162738336113513_n.png.e9aa479fd6bfd41c5ea70995d3900298.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Gone Fishing...
4 hours ago, jesuitsdidit said:

“By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.” — Russell Blaylock, MD

 

Well. 

That makes it totally safe for most of the population seeing how they are either brain dead already or do not possess a brain at all.. 

BC 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...