Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[SoundOfSilence]

4 hours ago, skitzorat said:

yeah that inflection is terrifying, isn't it.

He's not a very bright boy, but that emphasis put a chill down my spine.

They've already 'normalized' taking people from their homes last year...

Here's their legalisation enabling them to do it.

 

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1956/0065/latest/whole.html#DLM307082

 

Isn't the vax considered a "preventive treatment"?!

 

Its not as defined as some Aussie states ones - who openly declare and state in writing police can underdress you and inject you.. going so far as to break down the "responsibilities" of the police during the process to ensure edicate such as having woman cops undress woman and probably refer to the "patient" by their preferred pronouns!

 

(I'm being silly with the pronoun bit, but im serious about the rest!)

While I am not familiar with NZ law that reads more like dealing with localized outbreaks (farms, legionnaires disease in air conditioning etc.)  rather than mass quarantining a population.

 

Of course that doesn't mean that is how the judges will apply it.

 

A lot of judges are exposed pedophiles. So will do what they are told.

[DarianF]

2 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

Going by his criteria I’m guessing I’m anti-vax then

 

Anti-vaxx? Oh well you must also be a white supremacist, violent neo nazi, according to their standard criteria.

[Sheepy]

There will always be people who cash in on any major situation, there has certainly been plenty of them. The depopulation is a slow but sure outcome and you might not even notice it. 

[SoundOfSilence]

3 hours ago, skitzorat said:

it gets worse!

 

(doesn't make her any less alphabet agency,) but SHE IS A REAL PERSON! 

 

Just like the Democrats of the KKK.

 

Like a dog returning to its own vomit they always return to their roots.

[Firebird]

12 minutes ago, DarianF said:

 

Anti-vaxx? Oh well you must also be a white supremacist, violent neo nazi, according to their standard criteria.

 

As well as a misogynist, sexist, transphobic, heteronormative, hard working racist!!

[skitzorat]

11 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

While I am not familiar with NZ law that reads more like dealing with localized outbreaks (farms, legionnaires disease in air conditioning etc.)  rather than mass quarantining a population.

 

Of course that doesn't mean that is how the judges will apply it.

 

A lot of judges are exposed pedophiles. So will do what they are told.

You're right -sorry I forgot to add that the 2020 Convid Act below supersedes that original 1956 Health Act, but incorporates those specifics..

 

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2020/0012/latest/whole.html

 

[Golden Retriever]

27 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

Rousing words indeed GR. Been busy a lot recently so a bit behind everything. Anything particular about 21/12. By the way 2112 by rush open tracks sum up everything happening today. Worth a listen

 

No idea if there is a relevance to 21 December historically

 

Lockerbie happened that day, but Ther Bernican isn't referring to that afaik

[Sheepy]

Anyway, the first and foremost thing the Westminster party are is survivors, the tune is changing, because they know full well we are not joking, we will shut the place down and board it up.

How 'Freedom Day' saved UK from Europe's Covid Xmas chaos (msn.com)

[skitzorat]

3 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

No idea if there is a relevance to 21 December historically

 

Utilizing the Power of the Solstice?

 

Edited November 22, 2021 by skitzorat

[Ziggy Sawdust]

3 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

Fucking hell. Please share.

 

 

 

[Ziggy Sawdust]

1 hour ago, skitzorat said:

 

pass me a sick bucket.

 

 

 

You're welcome

 

 

Fuck me.....look at the Adam's Apple on it!

[skitzorat]

This guys nails it in 1min.

 

[Mitochondrial Eve]

8 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

I don't disagree Eve within the resistance, but from my own experience in Spain, although the mask mandate outside was dropped in June this year, still at least 60% of people wear them and the vast majority are women. There has never been a movement by mothers (nor fathers to be fair) to stop the use of masks in schools in Spain from 6 years up, which has been in FORCE for 18 months now

 

And I hate to point the finger at women in general, but nurses are usually women and they are the

ones normally injecting children. So as a female, I am disappointed.

 

 

Like you, I don't enjoy pointing fingers and I am averse to sweeping generalisations too. As @numnuts has pointed out, division is not what is needed which is what I fear generalisations can cause.

 

It is a mystery to me why there seems to be more women actively taking a stand against Covid measures than men. I would have expected it to be more equal as, in disagreement with Simon, I don't believe either gender is more susceptible to manipulation and coercion. I am sure we could all be manipulated if our particular buttons are pushed.

 

Round these parts, I haven't noticed any difference between men and women as to who is still wearing those awful things on their faces. It seems 50/50 here, and the numbers overall have dropped back considerably.

 

I cannot even imagine the mindset of any person injecting children with an experimental product, nor that of the parents - both male and female - wiling to allow it. Words fail me, and I wonder how and why any protective instinct towards the nation's children has been completely abandoned. The denial and cognitive dissonance is beyond belief and, even being a conspiracy theorist before the plandemic erupted, never would I have imagined two years ago that any of this would have been possible.

[Ziggy Sawdust]

2 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

That's just a propaganda meme

 

Not sure if they really ever came for the Communists Skitz, as is now being portrayed by

Communists in the Sage Group and behavioural scientists worldwide.

 

 

Out of likes.

[Mitochondrial Eve]

Courtesy of the DI headlines today.

 

[skitzorat]

Offtopic - but the Media is our enemy.

 

So you maybe aware a pedo literal black supremist who got out on $1000 (maybe even $500) bail a couple of days ago drove at top speed through a mostly white Christmas parade of children and elderly - devastating terror attack/hate crime- on one of Americans most sacred holiday weekends, Thanksgiving - and the New York Times front page is literal parody. 

 

Edited November 22, 2021 by skitzorat

[Firebird]

2 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

Offtopic - but the Media is our enemy.

 

So you maybe aware a pedo literal black supremist who got out on $1000 (maybe even $500) bail a couple of days ago drove at top speed through a mostly white Christmas parade of children and elderly - devastating terror attack/hate crime- on one of Americans most sacred holiday weekends, Thanksgiving - and the New York Times front page is literal parody. 

 

 

They also said it was just a S.U.V. plowing into a parade. A minor news item. Who cares? Joe is ''definitely succeeding''.

 

Lets go Brandon.

 

[SoundOfSilence]

8 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

You're right -sorry I forgot to add that the 2020 Convid Act below supersedes that original 1956 Health Act, but incorporates those specifics..

 

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2020/0012/latest/whole.html

 

Ouch!

 

 

 

If anyone is interested Section 51 of the Australian Constitution provides the Federal Government can legislate for (my emphasis):

 

(xxiiiA)  the provision of maternity allowances, widows' pensions, child endowment, unemployment, pharmaceutical, sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription), benefits to students and family allowances;

 

I think this provision was inserted around 1948. About the time of the Nuremberg trials.

 

It applies to the Federal and State Governments. It applies to States because it is an implied Constitutional right.

 

The concept of civil conscription was considered by the High Court in British Medical Association v Commonwealth (1949) 79 CLR 201; [1949] HCA 44 (7 October 1949).

 

That case involved federal legislation which required medical practitioners to comply with a particular federal medical determination as part of a scheme to provide pharmaceutical benefits.

 

In other words, it covers the validity of legislation which compelled medical practitioners to render a particularly medical-pharmaceutical service.  In his written judgement Justice Williams stated:

 

"Accordingly, in my opinion, the expression invalidates all legislation which compels medical practitioners or dentists to provide any form of medical service” 

 

Similarly, in his written decision Justice Webb commented:

 

"If Parliament cannot lawfully do this directly by legal means it cannot lawfully do it indirectly by creating a situation, as distinct from merely taking advantage of one, in which the individual is left no real choice but compliance” 

 

Webb J also stated:

 

"If Parliament cannot lawfully do this directly by legal means it cannot lawfully do it indirectly by creating a situation, as distinct from merely taking advantage of one, in which the individual is left no real choice but compliance.” (at p293) 

 

In other words, coercion is also caught.

 

The judgment applies equally to anyone compelled to accept a medical service.

 

This case was more recently acknowledged in Wong v Commonwealth; Selim v Professional Services Review Committee  where the High Court also indicated that the prohibition of civil conscription must be construed widely, to invalidate any law requiring medical practitioners (expressly or by practical compulsion) to work for the Commonwealth government or any Australian State. Simply put, no law in Australia can compel any medical service on behalf of the Australian government. 

 

Of course that was an earlier High Court.

 

I doubt it will be followed.

 

I suspect the pathetic pedophiles occupying the benches of State Courts will ignore it and then the High Court will decline to take the case.

 

There is not going to be a political or judicial solution to this.

 

Peaceful non-compliance.

 

Just ignore them. Do not comply.

 

[skitzorat]

1 minute ago, Firebird said:

 

They also said it was just a S.U.V. plowing into a parade. A minor news item. Who cares? Joe is ''definitely succeeding''.

 

Lets go Brandon.

 

 

They've decided to run with the narrative he was fleeing another crime and it was unintentional!!!! 

 

 

And even the "independent" solely-Jacinda/NZ govt funded-totally not international, NZ media is running with it, already.

 

 

 

[SoundOfSilence]

15 minutes ago, Mitochondrial Eve said:

 

Like you, I don't enjoy pointing fingers and I am averse to sweeping generalisations too. As @numnuts has pointed out, division is not what is needed which is what I fear generalisations can cause.

 

It is a mystery to me why there seems to be more women actively taking a stand against Covid measures than men. I would have expected it to be more equal as, in disagreement with Simon, I don't believe either gender is more susceptible to manipulation and coercion. I am sure we could all be manipulated if our particular buttons are pushed.

 

Round these parts, I haven't noticed any difference between men and women as to who is still wearing those awful things on their faces. It seems 50/50 here, and the numbers overall have dropped back considerably.

 

I cannot even imagine the mindset of any person injecting children with an experimental product, nor that of the parents - both male and female - wiling to allow it. Words fail me, and I wonder how and why any protective instinct towards the nation's children has been completely abandoned. The denial and cognitive dissonance is beyond belief and, even being a conspiracy theorist before the plandemic erupted, never would I have imagined two years ago that any of this would have been possible.

Women, on average, are more likely to vote for big government.

 

It's the nurturing instinct. For example, women will generally vote for welfare measures that provide for children etc.

 

Men on the other hand are less likely to vote for such measures. They think logically and will rationalize the injustice of taking money of stealing someone's wealth to give to someone else.

 

Of course this only bears on why have ended up with great big out of control tyrannical government.

 

As for a lot of milquetoast men doing nothing that has been socially engineered for generations.

 

Getting women into the workplace wasn't about equality.

 

It was designed to break up the traditional family unit. A family man is more likely to resist tyrants. 

[SoundOfSilence]

5 minutes ago, skitzorat said:

 

They've decided to run with the narrative he was fleeing another crime and it was unintentional!!!! 

 

 

And even the "independent" solely-Jacinda/NZ govt funded-totally not international, NZ media is running with it, already.

 

 

 

Running from a knife fight?

 

So he's a coward as well as a cold-blooded murdering scum!

[skitzorat]

1 minute ago, SoundOfSilence said:

Running from a knife fight?

 

So he's a coward as well as a cold-blooded murdering scum!

Preaching to the choir here - but a timely reminder the media literally wants us dead - and not just white people, all of us, but - jabs aside -  it's a jarring example.

 

What CNN posted yesterday/day before - I'm sure it didn't have any bearing on a literal supremist... 

 

 

[Nobby Noboddy]

5 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

Women, on average, are more likely to vote for big government.

 

It's the nurturing instinct. For example, women will generally vote for welfare measures that provide for children etc.

 

Men on the other hand are less likely to vote for such measures. They think logically and will rationalize the injustice of taking money of stealing someone's wealth to give to someone else.

 

Of course this only bears on why have ended up with great big out of control tyrannical government.

 

As for a lot of milquetoast men doing nothing that has been socially engineered for generations.

 

Getting women into the workplace wasn't about equality.

 

It was designed to break up the traditional family unit. A family man is more likely to resist tyrants. 

Those fuckers always multi-purpose their weapons.

Getting women into work also nearly doubled the tax-theft profile.

Feminism has fucked our relationships and made our children suffer.

Men (me included) bought into this shit and emasculated themselves, when we should have said 'NO!'

[Velma]

10 hours ago, skitzorat said:

Chief Minister of Australia's Northern Territory (the $5K fine guy) going full psycho!

 

 

 

"You are anti-vaxx." And? So what? Is it a crime? Fuck off! You are not my dad. Thank God.

 

Had I taken the first vaccine, under the provision that it would grant me immunity from ‘covid’ and guarantee a return to normality, the freedom to work, travel and socialise without further interference, only to be told after it had been administered that it entitled me to none of these rights, not even immunity to the said disease as prescribed, I would be suing the relevant authorities for compelling me to have an experimental compound injected into my bloodstream, under a false pretext. Not only did this jab fail to deliver these promised benefits, it requires a second and the third dose and probably more, which will not deliver the remedy or normality either. Extraordinarily, we are told that ‘cases’ continue to rise, therefore, the vaccination programme has been a total failure, ineffective and fraudulent and should be halted forthwith.

 

So glad I am anti-all-vaxx.

Edited November 22, 2021 by Velma

[skitzorat]

26 minutes ago, Firebird said:

A minor news item. Who cares?