Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Crazy as It sounds, I'm asking Jesus to help us out, and I've never done that before!

 

 

I am praying for you and will continue to do so. I knew not God's identity but God knew mine and heard my shambles of a prayer, revealing the absolute Truth to me on December 24th 2001.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

With the satanic shitstains that now run the world probably not,  but when government and businesses declare an individual can no longer be employed, interact economically, engage socially, travel, or conduct routine activities of daily living UNLESS they partake in the administration of an experimental drug trial (the covid vaccines are exactly that), it is called duress, overreaching, and coercion, which is a clear and blatant violation of the Nuremberg Code.

I am not sure that the NC applies in Britain.

 

Treaties have to be ratified or enacted into law by statute. As far as I recall there is nothing in the Human Rights Act (or whatever it is called) which reflects this.

 

But even if there were, as you said, the government would just ignore it.

 

Judges are now so corrupted through their satanic pedophilia that they eagerly comply with every brown envelope that  makes it was across their desk.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, SimonTV said:

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj-2021-068302

 

They cherry picked studies that show masks worked and ignored the ones that don't then called it a meta analysis and now Guardian makes an article based on it saying it proves masks are 53% effective at stopping covid hahahaha

 

 

The only things masks are useful for is providing snap polling of the percentage of useful idiots who have still bought into the scam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Macnamara said:

JABBED:

EXCLUSIVE: Hero surgeon killed by Covid was DOUBLE-JABBED but missed out on booster by just six days: Heartbroken wife says 'devoted' father-of-four, 45, lost Covid battle 'after catching virus on a ward' despite having second vaccine in January

  • Saila Halim revealed her husband Dr Irfan Halim had a shot last year and a second in January but still died
  • The leading surgeon passed away at Royal Brompton Hospital in London on November 14 at 7.51pm, she said
  • Mrs Halim said she did not think he had booster before he died surrounded by relatives after nine-week battle
  • She said the family had decided not to tell him his father Kamal, 75, died in another London hospital from virus
  • He was also double jabbed but died of Covid-19 at Northwick Park Hospital, north London, on September 24

By Vivek Chaudhary and James Gant For Mailonline and Connor Boyd Deputy Health Editor For Mailonline

Published: 07:03 GMT, 19 November 2021 | Updated: 17:43 GMT, 19 November 2021

The doctor, who had no known health conditions, received his second vaccine in January but was struck down by the disease on September 10, six days before Britain's booster programme was given the green-light.

As a frontline NHS worker who was vaccinated nine months ago, he would have been at the front of the queue for the crucial third shot when they were rolled out on September 16.

Speaking exclusively to MailOnline, Mrs Halim said today: 'My husband worked away from London and I'm not sure which vaccine he received but he was double vaccinated and always wore full PPE when he was on the wards.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10220205/Hero-NHS-surgeon-dies-Covid-spending-months-away-family.html

 

All these hero double jabbers clogging up our hospitals blocking us unjabbed getting treatment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Morpheus said:

From Black's Law dictionary:

 

What is MANDATORY?

305, 47 N. E. 623; Atlanta v. Wright, 119 Ga. 207, 45 S. E. 004; State v. Lewis, 76 Mo. 370; Ex parte Crane, 5 Pet. 190, 8 L. Ed. 92; Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 158, 2 L. Ed. 60; U. S. v. Butterworth, 160 U. S. 600, IS Sup. Ct 441, 42 L. Ed. 873. The action of mandamus is one, brought in a court of competent jurisdiction, to obtain an older of such court commanding an inferior tribunal, board, corporation, or person to do or not to do an act the performance or omission of which the law enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station. Where discretion is left to the inferior tribunal or person, the mandamus can only compel it to act, but cannot control such discretion. Rev. Code Iowa, 1880

 

Definition of a person:

 

What is JURIDICAL PERSON?

Entity, as a firm, that is not a single natural person, as a human being, authorized by law with duties and rights, recognized as a legal authority having a distinct identity, a legal personality. Also known as artificial person, juridical entity, juristic person, or legal person. Also refer to body corporate.

 

So if a person is a corporation and a mandate only applies to corporations/persons, therefore a mandate is consensual and therefore not enforceable upon a human being. 👍

 

Links:

 

https://thelawdictionary.org/juridical-person/

 

https://thelawdictionary.org/mandatory/

 

Mandatory comes from the Latin Mandatus. Which is a decree by parliament. Though it can include a decree by a court.

 

Mandamus is a writ from a superior court to a lower court.

 

They are two different things.

 

Regarding person there are two concepts recognised in law. A natural person - you and me.

 

And a legal person - a corporation.

 

Your conclusion would not be accepted in any court of law.

 

I wish it were true though.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

 

This is the mantra of the freemen on the land folk who also use this to attempt not to pay council tax etc

while i agree with the sentiment of not causing harm or loss and remaining honorable with any contracts you have

agreed to

to enforce this freeman stuff seems extremely difficult

the courts dismiss it they won't even hear the arguments when folk start quoting magna carta 1215

 

one of the founder members of this movement Winston shrout is currently in jail

unfortunately so many of these freeman gurus end up in jail or dead like "John the carpenter Harris" 

 

 

The reason is that it is nonsense.

 

At least as far as I have been able to discern. Though I am open to evidence.

 

But every time I look into the legal arguments underlying the theory they are woefully inadequate.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cinema in Wales is told to shut after owner REFUSES to ask customers for Covid passes - as council chiefs reveal they are 'considering further steps' and say they could keep the venue closed for up to 28 days

50720127-0-image-a-17_1637354230280.jpg

Cinema & Co in Swansea announced on Tuesday it would not enforce the rules which came in this week, extending the Covid pass scheme in Wales to cover cinemas, theatres and concert halls.

DM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

The reason is that it is nonsense.

 

At least as far as I have been able to discern. Though I am open to evidence.

 

But every time I look into the legal arguments underlying the theory they are woefully inadequate.

 

 

but thats the poiint as why its all nonsense because law and legal do not mix

 

Oxymoron

 

these con artists / commie agitators call their method 'sovereign citizen' . The two do not mix.

 

they are using a hotchpotch of common law (both Common Law and common law ) and gathering socially disaffected people in an attempt to

 

over load the court system and disrupt the waterboard or council

 

if you want common law and court of record goto Bill Thornton 1215.org or Karl Lentz

Bill has a thorough lesson on procedure, forms, honour/dishonour etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, BossCrow said:

FElO6OgXEAwaf5N.jpeg.df558510bae343a990613b3f5ac9e1df.jpegFElPhRkXEAckmOx.jpeg.22181a12f4174b0bc1f1cf0d8d33b8b4.jpeg

Let me make it very clear how this scenario pans out. Either he 100% pushes the agenda from his puppet masters or he is done for. There's already rumours of him touching young girls, so it tells us he is starting to crack. They circulate this rumour as a warning that if he does not push the agenda, he will be jailed for God knows what or assassinated or something. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, alexa said:

eh?

so the council say "shut the doors or we *could* apply to keep your doors shut for 28day"

 

🤣

28 days --- always pops up. Moon, menstrual, repayments of debt, etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

That's what everyone is talking about today. Hitler as per usual. Doesn't anyone think it odd that Austria is the first country to propose mandatory vaccines? I do.

 

This isn't in defense of National Socialism nor Hitler but in my opinion what we are seeing today is more a communistic method of totalitarinism with behavioural scientists dictating to Govenments, but fascism is the buzz word because of the holocaust narrative.

 

What we are seeing is Fascism.

 

Fascism is a type of Socialism whereby governments and corporations collaborate to control the factors of production.

 

In Nazi Fascism the government controlled the corporations. Today it is the other way around. The corporations control the government.

 

But it is still Fascism.

 

Communism is the form of Socialism where the government controls the factors of production.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, oneantisworthtenofyou said:

 

This is the mantra of the freemen on the land folk who also use this to attempt not to pay council tax etc

while i agree with the sentiment of not causing harm or loss and remaining honorable with any contracts you have

agreed to

to enforce this freeman stuff seems extremely difficult

the courts dismiss it they won't even hear the arguments when folk start quoting magna carta 1215

 

one of the founder members of this movement Winston shrout is currently in jail

unfortunately so many of these freeman gurus end up in jail or dead like "John the carpenter Harris" 

 

 

 

well thats true because the 'freeman on the land' is a load of codswhallop and will get people into a lot of trouble.

 

however using ones Court of Record is completely different.

Judges run their own Court of Record , this is the foundation of their power and authority

 

If someone agrees to be part of the 'county court' or the 'magistrates court' or the '****** court', one is subject to that court. The court is created by the Judge. The Judge is the Sovereign.

 

the 'freeman-on-the-land' or sovereign citizen or the power to the people common law brigade keep everyone in the dark so when the shit hits the fan and the Judge decides against the 'soveriegn citizen' or FOTL they scream

 

"CORRUPTION! , THE JUDGES ARE CORRUPT"

 

commie agitators. deliberately spreading ignorance of the system.

 

https://1215.org/lawnotes/misc/pro-se-problem.htm

 

Quote

Most pro se people know nothing about the official Rules of Evidence that control the judge and all parties and their lawyers.
      Most pro se people know nothing about the official Rules of Procedure that control the judge and all parties and their lawyers.
      Most pro se people have no idea what "due process" really is.
      Most pro se people can't recognize the opposing lawyer's dirty tricks.
      Most pro se people assume what "admissible evidence" is and don't know what stuff isn't.
      Most pro se people draft their pleadings and motions incorrectly - usually with far too many words!
      Most pro se people don't know why it's vital to write proposed orders for the judge to sign.
      Most pro se people don't know why, when, or how to make effective objections in court.
      Most pro se people don't understand what facts are critical to winning a case and what facts are of no consequence.
      Most pro se people muddy the legal waters with court-confusing insignificance.
      Most pro se people don't know how to find and cite controlling appellate opinions in support of their motions.
      Most pro se people don't arrange in advance of every proceeding to have a court stenographer present, so they can control the judge.
      Most pro se people waste valuable court time with non-essentials, fail to appreciate the needs of others who have other problems to bring before the court and, as a consequence, tend to make judges dread pro se cases and hate pro se people.

 

Edited by zArk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Morpheus said:

So if a person is a corporation and a mandate only applies to corporations/persons, therefore a mandate is consensual and therefore not enforceable upon a human being.

 

Karl Lentz enlightened the word game regarding 'self identification' i.e

 

at court a sovereign is a sovereign. a sovereign is not defendant. a sovereign is not 'human being'.

 

the 2 are not the same and one is their jurisdiction.

 

another word game (its a serious game) is reading who the claimant /complainant is against oneself i.e

 

'the crown' or 'CPS'. At common law, with your own court, one can demand the claimant 'appear' at court.

 

yes , CPS, not the lawyer or solicitor but with ones Court of Record require 'face your accuser" Its a superior court. Demand the appearance of 'CPS'

 

another Karl Lentz was

"read the Law that you accuse Zark of breaking"

 

a person shall not do this and that

 

"thats not Zark. Zark is not named. Wheres the fucking contract that Zark signed agreeing to be bound to that Law?"

 

If one becomes the defendant, one is subject to the claimants law. The claimants law says YOU are a person, says YOU are subject to the Law.

YOU is a person, YOU is a subject.

 

The posh folk speak propa english . Listen to the Queen or Charlie speak. Its all

 

One is pleased

One is grateful

One is .....

if you were to 'address' the Queen with "how you doing"

it would be interpreted as ignorance and rudeness. Positioning the Queen as subject to oneself

Edited by zArk
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, zArk said:

but thats the poiint as why its all nonsense because law and legal do not mix

 

Oxymoron

 

these con artists / commie agitators call their method 'sovereign citizen' . The two do not mix.

 

they are using a hotchpotch of common law (both Common Law and common law ) and gathering socially disaffected people in an attempt to

 

over load the court system and disrupt the waterboard or council

 

if you want common law and court of record goto Bill Thornton 1215.org or Karl Lentz

Bill has a thorough lesson on procedure, forms, honour/dishonour etc

I'll have a look.

 

But here is my issue.

 

None of this is taught in law schools.

 

I am not aware of it. No lawyer I have spoken to is aware of it. No barrister I have spoken to is aware of it. No QC I have spoken to is aware of it.

 

So for the theory to be correct it would have to be something that only every single judge and magistrate is aware of, but no legal practitioner. At least those whom I know.

 

Of course this is possible. But I would submit quite unlikely.

 

But my bigger problem with it is this.

 

Say I am at home quietly enjoying an adult beverage and some thug decides to break in and grab my turntable. Of course I can hold up the criminal law and point out the illegal nature of his actions.

 

But I doubt that will get me very far.

 

Criminals do not obey the law.

 

Now what if those criminals happen to be the politicians and judges. Which they do.

 

We all know that they completely disregard the law.

 

So even if this common law stuff is correct. What is to prevent it from being ignored along with all of the other laws?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SoundOfSilence said:

I'll have a look.

 

But here is my issue.

 

None of this is taught in law schools.

 

I am not aware of it. No lawyer I have spoken to is aware of it. No barrister I have spoken to is aware of it. No QC I have spoken to is aware of it.

 

So for the theory to be correct it would have to be something that only every single judge and magistrate is aware of, but no legal practitioner. At least those whom I know.

 

Of course this is possible. But I would submit quite unlikely.

 

But my bigger problem with it is this.

 

Say I am at home quietly enjoying an adult beverage and some thug decides to break in and grab my turntable. Of course I can hold up the criminal law and point out the illegal nature of his actions.

 

But I doubt that will get me very far.

 

Criminals do not obey the law.

 

Now what if those criminals happen to be the politicians and judges. Which they do.

 

We all know that they completely disregard the law.

 

So even if this common law stuff is correct. What is to prevent it from being ignored along with all of the other laws?

Indeed. 

 

"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law"

 

Aleister Crowley.

 

We are dealing with Luciferians from top to bottom.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, alexa said:

Cinema in Wales is told to shut after owner REFUSES to ask customers for Covid passes - as council chiefs reveal they are 'considering further steps' and say they could keep the venue closed for up to 28 days

50720127-0-image-a-17_1637354230280.jpg

Cinema & Co in Swansea announced on Tuesday it would not enforce the rules which came in this week, extending the Covid pass scheme in Wales to cover cinemas, theatres and concert halls.

DM

 

 It's nice to read that the owner is still defing the NWO's rules, by continuing not to check the NHS electronic prison passes and is keeping the cinema open.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This links to a copy of Pfizer's agreement with the government of Albania. I understand that the agreements with all governments are very similar.

 

Albania-Pfizer.pdf (ti-health.org)

 

I have only skimmed parts of it.

 

The definition of product in clause 1.42 is interesting (my emphasis).

 

" ... any or all related strains, mutations, modifications or derivatives of the foregoing."

 

Strains and mutations I get. After all, these can occur naturally.

 

But modifications?

 

That doesn't seem like a very natural process to me.

 

As if we needed any more evidence that the kung flu is manufactured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doc said:

Indeed. 

 

"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law"

 

Aleister Crowley.

 

We are dealing with Luciferians from top to bottom.

Do you reckon, I reckon we are being sold slow but sure depopulation under the guise of we are saving you and the NHS. Which they also pointed out if they had a smaller population it would need to run under fascism.

Edited by Sheepy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...