Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Can anybody here speak Spanish, if so, what does this say? For the sake of clarity, I cannot confirm the legitimacy of this document, but I'm slightly aware of it's contents, but not in full. Thanks in advance for any assistance. 🙏

NotasDePrensaDocumentos-2.jpg

NotasDePrensaDocumentos.jpg

Use google translate for details. In short it says that the Constitutional Court has declared a bunch of decrees unconstitutional (in relation to Covid measures taken by the Spanish government).

Edited by Ween Dwijler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hitler's Euthanasia Program never stopped?

In the autumn of 1939, Adolf Hitler signed a secret authorization in order to protect participating physicians, medical staff, and administrators from prosecution.

 

In 2005 the house of representatives and the senate of the U.S. passed a bill to do exactly the same for vaccine manufacturers and all others participating in future mass vaccination efforts.

 

In 2019 and 2020 many governments in the world signed “secret” agreements with the main Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) that they, and the participating physicians, medical staff and administrators can not be held responsible for the negative effects of their vaccine programs. Effectively preventing any criminal prosecution.

 

Is it just coincidence or can we call this a pattern?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Can anybody here speak Spanish, if so, what does this say? For the sake of clarity, I cannot confirm the legitimacy of this document, but I'm slightly aware of it's contents, but not in full. Thanks in advance for any assistance. 🙏

NotasDePrensaDocumentos-2.jpg

NotasDePrensaDocumentos.jpg

 

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
President's Cabinet
Press office
INFORMATION NOTE N ° 100/2021
ADVANCE DEVICE PART
THE PLENARY OF THE TC DECLARES THE EXTENSION UNCONSTITUTIONAL
OF THE SIX MONTHS AND THE APPOINTMENT OF AUTHORITIES
COMPETENT DELEGATES SET IN THE ROYAL DECREE
926/2020 OF THE SECOND ALARM STATE
The Plenary of the Constitutional Court has resolved the following:
POSITIVE SIDE
"In view of all the above, the Constitutional Court, by the authority that
contains the Constitution of the Spanish Nation,
Has decided
1 ° To partially estimate the present appeal of unconstitutionality and, by virtue of it,
declare unconstitutional and null the following precepts or paragraphs of precepts:
A) Of Royal Decree 926/2020, of October 25, by which the Government declared the
state of alarm to contain the spread of infections caused by SARS-Cov-2:
a) Sections 2 and 3 of art. 2.
b) Section 2 of art. 5.
c) The "corresponding delegated" subsection of section 2 of art. 6.
d) Section 2 of art. 7
e) The subsection "corresponding delegate" of art. 8.
1) Sections 1 (except the initial paragraph of its second paragraph) and 2 (except its paragraph
first) of art. 9.
g) Art. 10.
h) Art. eleven.
B) From the Agreement of the Plenary of the Congress of Deputies of October 29, 2020,
authorizing the extension of the state of alama declared by Royal Decree 926/2020,
October 25:
a) The second section.

b) The fourth section, as soon as it gave new wording to arts. 9 (except as regards
to the first paragraph of its second paragraph), 10 and 14 of Royal Decree 926/2020. Regarding the two
first paragraphs of this last precept, the declaration of unconstitutionality affects
exclusively to the subsections "every two months" (first paragraph) and "monthly"
(second paragraph).
c) The fifth section.
C) Royal Decree 956/2020, of November 3, by which it was extended, by virtue of
of the previous Parliamentary Agreement, the state of alarm declared by Royal Decree 926/2020,
October 25:
a) The first paragraph of art. 2 .: "The extension established in this royal decree is
It will extend from 00:00 hours on November 9, 2020 until 00:00 on November 9,
May 2021 ".
b) The sole transitory provision.
c) Sections one and two of the first final provision, as soon as they gave new
drafting of arts. 9 and 10 of Royal Decree 926/2020. The subsection
first of the second paragraph of art. 9.
d) Section three of the first final provision, insofar as it gave new wording to the
art. 14 of Royal Decree 926/2020. Regarding the first two paragraphs of this art. 14, the
Declaration of unconstitutionality exclusively affects the subsections "every two months" (paragraph
first) and "on a monthly basis" (second paragraph).
2 ° Dismiss the appeal of unconstitutionality in everything else ".
The sentence, of which the magistrate Antonio Narváez has been rapporteur, explains
that what deserves constitutional censure is not the duration of the extension, by itself and without
more, but the unreasonable or unfounded character, considering the Agreement adopted by the Parliament
as a whole, of the decision by which such term was fixed. Therefore, the temporary determination
of that six-month extension was carried out in a way that was entirely inconsistent with the
constitutional that is proper to the act of authorization and without any coherence, even, with the
reasons that the Government asserted to urge the extension finally granted. Besides, the
The extension was authorized when the limiting measures of rights included in the request did not
were to be applied immediately by the Government, since their implementation was subject to
to whatever the presidents of the Autonomous Communities so decided, so that
Authorization was given without knowing what measures were going to be applied to combat the pandemic.
Regarding the designation of the delegated competent authorities, the
judgment considers that, among other reasons, this decision contravenes the provisions of the law
organic to which art. 116.1 CE the regulation of states of crisis and
corresponding competencies and limitations. In addition, the Government agreed with character
permanent delegation without any reservation of the effective supervision or the eventual
certification to the Government itself, of which the Delegated Authorities could act in their
respective territorial areas.
The sentence has the particular votes formulated by President Juan
José González Rivas and justices Juan Antonio Xiol, Cándido Conde-Pumpido and María
Luisa Balaguer.
In the next few days the sentence and the particular votes will be notified along with
a broader press release.
Madrid, October 27, 2021

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Can anybody here speak Spanish, if so, what does this say? For the sake of clarity, I cannot confirm the legitimacy of this document, but I'm slightly aware of it's contents, but not in full. Thanks in advance for any assistance. 🙏

NotasDePrensaDocumentos-2.jpg

NotasDePrensaDocumentos.jpg

 

I speak basic Spanish, but not legal Spanish.

 

Spain endured one of the most harsh lockdowns in 2020, not being allowed outside your home to go for a walk! Hundreds of thousands of Spaniards and foreign nationals were fined for doing so.

 

I'm not sure, but the text may be about how the Spanish Supreme Court ruled these actions were against the Spanish Constitution and in effect illegal. Everyone now has the right to have those fines refunded. The court was also against vaccine passports.

 

So, thank God, Spain where I live can never have those draconian measures imposed on them again.

Covid: Spain's top court rules lockdown unconstitutional

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57838615

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Ween Dwijler said:

Hitler's Euthanasia Program never stopped?

In the autumn of 1939, Adolf Hitler signed a secret authorization in order to protect participating physicians, medical staff, and administrators from prosecution.

 

In 2005 the house of representatives and the senate of the U.S. passed a bill to do exactly the same for vaccine manufacturers and all others participating in future mass vaccination efforts.

 

In 2019 and 2020 many governments in the world signed “secret” agreements with the main Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) that they, and the participating physicians, medical staff and administrators can not be held responsible for the negative effects of their vaccine programs. Effectively preventing any criminal prosecution.

 

Is it just coincidence or can we call this a pattern?

 

What do today's shenanigans have to do with Hitler or National Socialism? We can clearly see who is overrepresented in the vax crap, and who is profiting while the average persons livelihood is under attack, and guess what? They're not muh Nazis.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Velma said:

 

Winter is Coming!

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59262701

 

Dr Simon Clarke, from the University of Reading, said we're "probably seeing the start of winter" in Europe. "When the circumstances are wrong and infection is just more possible you can expect numbers to start climbing and more socialising and mixing indoors means there's more opportunity for transmission, even in vaccinated individuals." 

 

 

No Shit Sherlock, has Dr Clarke mislaid his calendar? I didn't know Universities provided courses in the study of the bleedin' obvious!

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just doesn't stop does it.

Covid: 'No reason' not to give boosters to under-50s

Rolling out booster jabs to younger age groups could help cut Covid infection rates to low levels across the UK, a leading scientist has said.

 

Prof Neil Ferguson said data suggests a third jab gives significant protection, even against mild illness.

He said he saw "no reason" why younger age groups should not be offered boosters after priority groups.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-59273273?xtor=AL-72-[partner]-[bbc.news.twitter]-[headline]-[news]-[bizdev]-[isapi]&at_custom1=[post+type]&at_custom2=twitter&at_campaign=64&at_medium=custom7&at_custom3=%40BBCNews&at_custom4=E660CB84-4468-11EC-BAC3-75D14744363C

 

Any decent news outlet would not want to know this man's opinions. But they all have him spouting his

crap week in, week out Just a daily reminder about this man who broke his own lockdown rules twice by visiting his mistress and liked the Chinese Communistic model of lockdowns.

 

"Professor Neil Ferguson has given an extraordinary interview to Tom Whipple at The Times, in which he confirms the degree to which he believes that imitating China’s lockdown policies at the start of 2020 changed the parameters of what Western societies consider acceptable.

 

“I think people’s sense of what is possible in terms of control changed quite dramatically between January and March,” Professor Ferguson says. When SAGE observed the “innovative intervention” out of China, of locking entire communities down and not permitting them to leave their homes, they initially presumed it would not be an available option in a liberal Western democracy:

 
It’s a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought… and then Italy did it. And we realised we could.
 
- Professor Neil Ferguson, The Times
 

https://unherd.com/thepost/neil-ferguson-interview-china-changed-what-was-possible/

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

It’s a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought… and then Italy did it. And we realised we could

Indeed and far too many are shilling for the great reset while pretending they are somehow stupid to the fact and voting each other up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Ween Dwijler said:

Hitler's Euthanasia Program never stopped?

In the autumn of 1939, Adolf Hitler signed a secret authorization in order to protect participating physicians, medical staff, and administrators from prosecution.

 

In 2005 the house of representatives and the senate of the U.S. passed a bill to do exactly the same for vaccine manufacturers and all others participating in future mass vaccination efforts.

 

In 2019 and 2020 many governments in the world signed “secret” agreements with the main Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) that they, and the participating physicians, medical staff and administrators can not be held responsible for the negative effects of their vaccine programs. Effectively preventing any criminal prosecution.

 

Is it just coincidence or can we call this a pattern?

 

 

It's another form of control called Communism today. And you must know which group of people disproportionately support communism. Not Christians nor Muslims.

 

"Professor Neil Ferguson has given an extraordinary interview to Tom Whipple at The Times, in which he confirms the degree to which he believes that imitating China’s lockdown policies at the start of 2020 changed the parameters of what Western societies consider acceptable.

 

“I think people’s sense of what is possible in terms of control changed quite dramatically between January and March,” Professor Ferguson says. When SAGE observed the “innovative intervention” out of China, of locking entire communities down and not permitting them to leave their homes, they initially presumed it would not be an available option in a liberal Western democracy:

 
It’s a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought… and then Italy did it. And we realised we could.
 
- Professor Neil Ferguson, The Times
 

https://unherd.com/thepost/neil-ferguson-interview-china-changed-what-was-possible/

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DarrynB said:

What is the reasoning for a headline like this....

Conspiracy theorist equals terrorist. There's a lot of it about. In the USA, parents who have the temerity to object to the filth their kids learn at school are labelled domestic terrorists. This from the Attorney-General himself. The non-stop demonization continues at all levels.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

I speak basic Spanish, but not legal Spanish.

 

Spain endured one of the most harsh lockdowns in 2020, not being allowed outside your home to go for a walk! Hundreds of thousands of Spaniards and foreign nationals were fined for doing so.

 

I'm not sure, but the text may be about how the Spanish Supreme Court ruled these actions were against the Spanish Constitution and in effect illegal. Everyone now has the right to have those fines refunded. The court was also against vaccine passports.

 

So, thank God, Spain where I live can never have those draconian measures imposed on them again.

Covid: Spain's top court rules lockdown unconstitutional

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57838615

 

 

Interesting, I sincerely hope that the document has some legitimacy to it. That's a fee courts on the continent that have ruled at against the PCR test not being fit for purpose, Germany and Spain both count lockdowns as unlawful. Hopefully the tide is turning. Thanks for that GR and @SimonTV 🙏

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Conspiracy theorist equals terrorist. There's a lot of it about. In the USA, parents who have the temerity to object to the filth their kids learn at school are labelled domestic terrorists. This from the Attorney-General himself. The non-stop demonization continues at all levels.

Watching Ted Cruz rip the GA a new arsehole was quite pleasurable to watch that fucker squirm. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Ween Dwijler said:

Proving the point of my previous posting. Thanks for your prompt cooperation.

 

Don't know what you're on about. All I know is that there is no NatSoc conspiracy, unless we have some anti-white Nazis running around, but that doesn't explain the degeneracy.

 

I guess it's a duality of man thing too.

 

Look at Schwab for example. The normie will focus on his thick German accent and historical ties to NatSoc Germany, which makes him look like a some kind of caricature villain.

 

Then others will look at his surname, who he rubs shoulders with, and where he was when 9/11 was going down.

 

It takes balls to talk about the latter.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EnigmaticWorld said:

Not surprised.

I am. I thought the Orthodox Church was one of the bastions of anti-globalism but I suppose they've just fallen into line behind Bergoglio and the Anglicans.

 

“A person cannot justify his refusal to vaccinate with the Orthodox faith ... But we believe that a person should independently, freely make a decision,” he said. Fancy that. So if a believer independently and freely chooses not to take the shot because aborted baby cells were used in its development, the church will not stand behind that believer?

 

As far as I know, Orthodoxy has condemned the abortion of babies since the 4th century, equating such as murder. So what's changed? Have they finally got around to debating the issue? I doubt it. This is Putin speaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

I am. I thought the Orthodox Church was one of the bastions of anti-globalism but I suppose they've just fallen into line behind Bergoglio and the Anglicans.

 

I used to think that too. I don't trust them these days though. Too many NazBols and KGB assets about.

 

The Soviet Israel connection is still massive too.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

He's had his knickers in a twist ever since he was rejected as a Supreme Court Justice. Petty little man. The decision to reject him was clearly right.

Oh yeah, indeed. Labelling your own countrymen as domestic terrorists without investigating the claim is the best way to assure you don't get any further. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...