Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Interesting story. Lockdown for unvaxxed in Austria. Makes one wonder why they didn't do this for the elderly in the first instance.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/12/austria-province-to-place-millions-of-unvaccinated-people-in-covid-lockdown

 

You would think so, just like we always told the old to be careful during a flu season. 

 

But this isn't about health, it's about getting that jab into people.

Edited by Firebird
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr H said:

Interesting story. Lockdown for unvaxxed in Austria. Makes one wonder why they didn't do this for the elderly in the first instance.

 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/12/austria-province-to-place-millions-of-unvaccinated-people-in-covid-lockdown

But then where would all of the deaths have come from so that they could justify a lockdown for all. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough is enough.  Stand firm everyone.

 

Police blast protestors with WATER CANNON as Netherlands plunges back into Covid lockdown as shops and restaurants are ordered to close early and crowds are banned from sports events

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10197763/Dutch-police-use-WATER-CANNON-people-demonstrators-protest-return-lockdown.html

 

Isn't karma great.

 

From memory this was a protest in Holland, when the dog turned on its police handler🙂

 

 

 

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

Enough is enough.  Stand firm everyone.

 

Police blast protestors with WATER CANNON as Netherlands plunges back into Covid lockdown as shops and restaurants are ordered to close early and crowds are banned from sports events

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10197763/Dutch-police-use-WATER-CANNON-people-demonstrators-protest-return-lockdown.html

The vaccinated must feel like a bunch of wankers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Velma said:

 

Winter is Coming!

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59262701

 

Dr Simon Clarke, from the University of Reading, said we're "probably seeing the start of winter" in Europe. "When the circumstances are wrong and infection is just more possible you can expect numbers to start climbing and more socialising and mixing indoors means there's more opportunity for transmission, even in vaccinated individuals." 

 

Boosters are being closely monitored, but it is too soon to tell if the declines in cases among the over 80s are due to extra protection from boosting or less Covid circulating due to half term school holidays.

 

"In the UK, the proportion of the population who have antibodies due to vaccination or infection or both is very high, so essentially more people are protected," said Prof Ballux.

 

So, they don't even pretend to know if there is any benefit from booster shots, or whether some other factor is at play, but dish them out anyway, no expenses spared.

 

20aivo.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All this bollocks for the common cold and flu.....99.9% survival rate.

Dear oh dear.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't surprise me at all that Rantzen wants the unvaccinated elderly people to die (probably alone) at home. She and Savile were close. Initially, she tried to protect his reputation when the truth was finally revealed. And it has never sat well with me that she was involved with Childline, asking children to report sexual abuse, possibly those in care homes abused by powerful politicians. She's part of the evil gang imo.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esther_Rantzen

 

Early life .. Almost Every. Single. Time

 

Her family is Jewish.

 

 

Esther Rantzen: Rumours Followed Jimmy Savile | UK News | Sky News

Edited by Golden Retriever
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Can anybody here speak Spanish, if so, what does this say? For the sake of clarity, I cannot confirm the legitimacy of this document, but I'm slightly aware of it's contents, but not in full. Thanks in advance for any assistance. 🙏

NotasDePrensaDocumentos-2.jpg

NotasDePrensaDocumentos.jpg

Use google translate for details. In short it says that the Constitutional Court has declared a bunch of decrees unconstitutional (in relation to Covid measures taken by the Spanish government).

Edited by Ween Dwijler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hitler's Euthanasia Program never stopped?

In the autumn of 1939, Adolf Hitler signed a secret authorization in order to protect participating physicians, medical staff, and administrators from prosecution.

 

In 2005 the house of representatives and the senate of the U.S. passed a bill to do exactly the same for vaccine manufacturers and all others participating in future mass vaccination efforts.

 

In 2019 and 2020 many governments in the world signed “secret” agreements with the main Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, etc.) that they, and the participating physicians, medical staff and administrators can not be held responsible for the negative effects of their vaccine programs. Effectively preventing any criminal prosecution.

 

Is it just coincidence or can we call this a pattern?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Morpheus said:

Can anybody here speak Spanish, if so, what does this say? For the sake of clarity, I cannot confirm the legitimacy of this document, but I'm slightly aware of it's contents, but not in full. Thanks in advance for any assistance. 🙏

NotasDePrensaDocumentos-2.jpg

NotasDePrensaDocumentos.jpg

 

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT
President's Cabinet
Press office
INFORMATION NOTE N ° 100/2021
ADVANCE DEVICE PART
THE PLENARY OF THE TC DECLARES THE EXTENSION UNCONSTITUTIONAL
OF THE SIX MONTHS AND THE APPOINTMENT OF AUTHORITIES
COMPETENT DELEGATES SET IN THE ROYAL DECREE
926/2020 OF THE SECOND ALARM STATE
The Plenary of the Constitutional Court has resolved the following:
POSITIVE SIDE
"In view of all the above, the Constitutional Court, by the authority that
contains the Constitution of the Spanish Nation,
Has decided
1 ° To partially estimate the present appeal of unconstitutionality and, by virtue of it,
declare unconstitutional and null the following precepts or paragraphs of precepts:
A) Of Royal Decree 926/2020, of October 25, by which the Government declared the
state of alarm to contain the spread of infections caused by SARS-Cov-2:
a) Sections 2 and 3 of art. 2.
b) Section 2 of art. 5.
c) The "corresponding delegated" subsection of section 2 of art. 6.
d) Section 2 of art. 7
e) The subsection "corresponding delegate" of art. 8.
1) Sections 1 (except the initial paragraph of its second paragraph) and 2 (except its paragraph
first) of art. 9.
g) Art. 10.
h) Art. eleven.
B) From the Agreement of the Plenary of the Congress of Deputies of October 29, 2020,
authorizing the extension of the state of alama declared by Royal Decree 926/2020,
October 25:
a) The second section.

b) The fourth section, as soon as it gave new wording to arts. 9 (except as regards
to the first paragraph of its second paragraph), 10 and 14 of Royal Decree 926/2020. Regarding the two
first paragraphs of this last precept, the declaration of unconstitutionality affects
exclusively to the subsections "every two months" (first paragraph) and "monthly"
(second paragraph).
c) The fifth section.
C) Royal Decree 956/2020, of November 3, by which it was extended, by virtue of
of the previous Parliamentary Agreement, the state of alarm declared by Royal Decree 926/2020,
October 25:
a) The first paragraph of art. 2 .: "The extension established in this royal decree is
It will extend from 00:00 hours on November 9, 2020 until 00:00 on November 9,
May 2021 ".
b) The sole transitory provision.
c) Sections one and two of the first final provision, as soon as they gave new
drafting of arts. 9 and 10 of Royal Decree 926/2020. The subsection
first of the second paragraph of art. 9.
d) Section three of the first final provision, insofar as it gave new wording to the
art. 14 of Royal Decree 926/2020. Regarding the first two paragraphs of this art. 14, the
Declaration of unconstitutionality exclusively affects the subsections "every two months" (paragraph
first) and "on a monthly basis" (second paragraph).
2 ° Dismiss the appeal of unconstitutionality in everything else ".
The sentence, of which the magistrate Antonio Narváez has been rapporteur, explains
that what deserves constitutional censure is not the duration of the extension, by itself and without
more, but the unreasonable or unfounded character, considering the Agreement adopted by the Parliament
as a whole, of the decision by which such term was fixed. Therefore, the temporary determination
of that six-month extension was carried out in a way that was entirely inconsistent with the
constitutional that is proper to the act of authorization and without any coherence, even, with the
reasons that the Government asserted to urge the extension finally granted. Besides, the
The extension was authorized when the limiting measures of rights included in the request did not
were to be applied immediately by the Government, since their implementation was subject to
to whatever the presidents of the Autonomous Communities so decided, so that
Authorization was given without knowing what measures were going to be applied to combat the pandemic.
Regarding the designation of the delegated competent authorities, the
judgment considers that, among other reasons, this decision contravenes the provisions of the law
organic to which art. 116.1 CE the regulation of states of crisis and
corresponding competencies and limitations. In addition, the Government agreed with character
permanent delegation without any reservation of the effective supervision or the eventual
certification to the Government itself, of which the Delegated Authorities could act in their
respective territorial areas.
The sentence has the particular votes formulated by President Juan
José González Rivas and justices Juan Antonio Xiol, Cándido Conde-Pumpido and María
Luisa Balaguer.
In the next few days the sentence and the particular votes will be notified along with
a broader press release.
Madrid, October 27, 2021

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...