Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, wingwang said:

 

Your post was perfectly timed. I was having a conversation with my neighbour [Magneto] and was really making headway covering topics such as social credit score, intentional collapse of the economy, how covid was just a pretext to things to come, WEF, UN, digital currency, and how it all links together. I showed Magneto your post and asked him whether it was strange all the papers were pimping the app after the conversation we'd just had. The penny dropped. It's only taken the best part of a year! He's been on auto-dismiss reality and msm regurgitation all that time... Thanks!

Excellent. Glad the photo helped. Even I was a bit surprised at that image and how obvious they're making it now. I guess the cabal know most people still won't question it, or they don't care if people do. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

* * VERY INTERESTING ARTICLE **  from TCW Defending Freedom site

 

Could this Jewish ban on Covid vaccines turn the tide?

 
By Karen Harradine - November 12, 2021
 

IN a major development which could have far-reaching consequences, a Hasidic rabbinical court in New York ruled on November 1 that it is ‘absolutely forbidden to administer the mRNA Covid-19 vaccine to children, adolescents, young men and women.

 

The court heard eight hours of testimony from experts shunned and demonised by Western governments including Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines, and Thomas Renz, lead attorney for America’s Frontline Doctors suing the US Centers of Disease Control, President Joe Biden and Anthony Fauci. Jews injured by the vaccine also gave evidence. 

 

A rabbinical court usually consists of three people, and some in the US are often lawyers too. They are often formed to resolve issues through the interpretation of Jewish law. The rulings of a rabbinical court outside Israel are often used by Jews to settle disputes within their communities.  Some rabbinical courts are conducted in ways which respect secular law, so that rulings can be legally binding and enforceable in a secular court system. In Orthodox Judaism, the rabbinical court will be made up of at least one rabbi and two other observant men, experts in Torah (Jewish law) and the matter which is being addressed

 

This particular court is a Hasidic one. Hasidism is a religious movement founded in the Ukraine in the 18th century, deeply rooted in Kabbalah, and its followers are devout. There are several different groups within this movement, each with their own unique interpretations of Hasidic Judaism. 

 

In this case, the three court judges are religious leaders in their respective communities in New York State.  In their ruling they declared: ‘It is best to err on the side of caution and abstain from taking the injection, rather than endangering one’s life by performing an action that can engender immediate and direct harm. Especially since there are other medical treatments that work . . . and that are not harmful.’

 

The ruling also states: ‘It is an explicit obligation to protest against this mandate, and anyone who can prevent the injection from being forced upon our youth must do so, forthrightly and emphatically.’

 

And: ‘Much harm appears to be caused to pregnant women as a result of the injection, possibly due to the antibodies that the body develops against the protein called Syncytin‐1, or from the SM102, or from the micro blood clots caused by the injection.’

 

And: ‘For older adults and the elderly, further clarification is needed (but as mentioned above, there are efforts to obscure the data, and it is presently difficult to attain accurate clarification). However, practically we have seen breakthrough cases, indicating that there is no substantial difference between those who received the mRNA and those who did not. The number of Covid patients are about the same, comparatively, in both demographics.’

 

The judges explained: ‘We also heard from doctors who invented and manufactured the mRNA, who testified as to its function (most doctors in medical practice are not experts in these matters at all, and from our experience and as is well‐known, they merely relate the information provided to them by the NIH, CDC, etc). They illustrated to us the profound danger and harm inherent in this new technology. They showed us how the governmental agencies and the pharmaceutical companies deny this fact, and how they conceal the data, making it so difficult for the public to realize the severe adverse reactions and mortalities that have befallen so many people who received the injection. We were also made privy to how they withhold the said information through various means, preventing the injuries and deaths from being publicized by the media or on the internet, as known.’ 

 

There is a principle in Judaism called ‘pikuach nefesh’, in which every single Jewish law can be broken to save a life. There are few exceptions to this law, one being that a person is forbidden from killing another to save a life. Given the rationale used by the judges to explain their decree, it seems that this very important Judaic principle may have guided them. 

 

They have certainly made it obvious that their decree is based on ‘halachah’ (Jewish Law): ‘Therefore, we hereby express our rabbinic decision, as per the teachings of our holy Torah.’

“Halachah’ guides the everyday life for Jews and experts in it are tasked with interpreting it for contemporary situations and issues. 

 

Little information is available as to why the court was formed to judge solely on this matter, or on the workings of Hasidic rabbinical courts. So it’s useful to look at the rules and regulations of the biggest Orthodox rabbinical court in the US, the Beth Din, for insight. Rabbinical courts are known as ‘Beit Din’. The rulings of a rabbinical court outside Israel are usually used by Jews to settle disputes within their communities; secular law is applicable as long as this doesn’t transgress a particular ‘Jewish law prohibition’.

 

Some rulings are binding in secular law, such as arbitrations which are fully enforced by secular courts in business disputes. The practices and rules of the Beth Din may differ slightly to that of a Hasidic rabbinical court, but the principles will be similar in the deference to ‘halachah’ and the use of experts for testimonies, evidence and rulings. 

 

This decree on the Covid-19 vaccine should be binding to the Hasidic communities which the Rabbinical court serves but its implications expand far beyond these communities. The judges ruled that mandatory Covid-19 vaccines transgress Jewish law, which means it could be anti-Semitic to enforce it on religious Jews who have no wish to take it. Other rabbinical courts might disagree with the interpretation but given that it is based on expert testimonies and evidence, and centred on ‘halachah’, it will be hard to dismiss. It is a vital document to any Jew needing a new halachic interpretation of the obligation to take the Covid-19 vaccine.

 

It will be interesting to see if Hasidic rabbinical courts in Israel now follow suit. Given that the rabbinical courts in Israel are part of the formal legal system, further decrees forbidding mandatory Covid-19 vaccines might have the power to dissolve the infamous green pass system.

This Hasidic rabbinical court in New York has broken rank and set a precedent. They may be the ones to save us all.

 

Link: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/could-this-jewish-ban-on-covid-vaccines-turn-the-tide/

 

 

 

Edited by webtrekker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

Day 608 of me not knowing someone that has died of Covid-19.

 

I am living next door to someone who swears blind that someone he knew died of Covid. He like the good obedient drone has had both jabs even though he works from home, has his shopping delivered and the only other people he spends time with, have also been double jabbed and they all sit/stand about 10 feet apart wearing masks.

 

He knocked on my door last week and stood quite a way away. I stepped forward and he stepped back immediately. He also believes in long Covid.

 

Since this horror show began, I have only met 1 other person who hasn't been jabbed and I have spoken with over 700 different people. Where are all the other people who haven't been jabbed? Aside from places such as this, I don't come into contact with anyone who hasn't been brainwashed to the nth degree. It's frightening.

Edited by JJ73
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JJ73 said:

Maybe that's the plan. Get rid of those who could keep alive all the 'useless eaters' who no longer add anything to the pot, except the one under the bed that is.

 

You've a good point here, I never looked at it like this.👍

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop being bad goys. Take your vax so you can enjoy your anti-Fascist pizza, made by Mr soy face.

 

1636697977405.jpg

 

ave.jpg

 

1636698009210.jpg

 

lts.jpg

 

gfddd.jpg

 

Why do they assume that people would even buy their products anyway? I go out of my way to avoid consuming products from people that hate me.

 

I would rather just focus on gains than giving folks like that my dough.

 

And no, I don't care if they call me fash for caring about fitness. Go control a cuck with words, I'm not bothered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Made in Wales said:

So all these nursing homes sacking staff who refuse to be jabbed don't seem to have been challenged by any of the sacked unjabbed staff as to the fact that it is surely illegal under common law and if they held their nerve and took these fackers to court even the most biased judge who is under the thumb of the elite can't ignore common law and their sacking would indeed be deemed illegal and thrown out in a heartbeat. 

 

This is my understanding anyway unless they are just not telling the public that in fact these sackings are being challenged because they don't want to highlight that fact so that some sacked unjabbed people won't be aware of their rights and accept their fate and walk away without a fight and also making sure the threat of dismissal is mopping up those who are on the fence and also unaware of their rights decide to get jabbed to keep their job. 

 

I know there is The Vaccine Control Group (look them up on Duck duck go) who I believe offer free legal representation to anyone who challenges these ridiculous covid mandates and as far as I know they have won all their cases because all the fines and restrictions are illegal under common law. 

 

If this isn't the case then I'll be amazed these reptiles can get away with this so I want to believe that there will be a comeuppance for these scumbags and that behind the scenes justice eventually will out. 

 

 

 

 

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/stop-coerced-vaccination/

 

Its been tried and thrown out. I'm still trying, I have ACAS involved now but with little knowledge and minimum support from union I don't have much hope but I won't give in until the end. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deadliest Batches of CV19 ‘Vaccines’ Being Sent to Kill White Americans in Red States
http://www.renegadetribune.com/deadliest-batches-of-cv19-vaccines-being-sent-to-kill-white-americans-in-red-states/

 

Any stats from the UK? I mean we have witnessed the loony Left say that they wish old Brexit voters would just die, so can you blame me for thinking demographically?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, JJ73 said:

Maybe that's the plan. Get rid of those who could keep alive all the 'useless eaters' who no longer add anything to the pot, except the one under the bed that is.

And then really go to town on the granny killers otherwise known as the unvaccinated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

Stop being bad goys. Take your vax so you can enjoy your anti-Fascist pizza, made by Mr soy face.

 

1636697977405.jpg

 

ave.jpg

 

1636698009210.jpg

 

lts.jpg

 

gfddd.jpg

 

Why do they assume that people would even buy their products anyway? I go out of my way to avoid consuming products from people that hate me.

 

I would rather just focus on gains than giving folks like that my dough.

 

And no, I don't care if they call me fash for caring about fitness. Go control a cuck with words, I'm not bothered.

They DO all look the same. It matters not if all the other features are different (size of face, hair etc); it is the eyes that are identical.

 

There's a glassy, weak, weasely, embarrassed, scared look that is common amongst them all.

 

Windows to the soul, indeed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Saved said:

They DO all look the same. It matters not if all the other features are different (size of face, hair etc); it is the eyes that are identical.

 

There's a glassy, weak, weasely, embarrassed, scared look that is common amongst them all.

 

Windows to the soul, indeed.

 

All that is missing is the wide open mouth, which in body language terms means that they're often weak and are trying to look non-threatening.  It's essentially saying "I'm a beta" with your face.

 

hgddd.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Sit down, Waldo said:

The chancellor says this means that people who have not been vaccinated won't be able to leave home, unless it is for essential reasons like going to work, buying food or exercise.

 

In other words, they can't stop you from living, only from paticipating in the Metaverse,which is somewhere I don't want go. My avatar has retired.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Karma's a mother fucker. 

 

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cardiologist-medical-doctor-who-wanted-to-punch-anti-vaxxers-in-the-face-dead-after-covid-booster-shot/?fbclid=IwAR07zSMquZ5sTkPonYFFmQdWWWpkSgrGx3D17Kgl7Iq15BpcEvIAnbfno-g

 

Cardiologist Medical Doctor who Wanted to Punch Anti-Vaxxers in the Face DEAD After COVID Booster Shot

 

From Icke main page. What goes around comes around bitch. 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Made in Wales said:

So all these nursing homes sacking staff who refuse to be jabbed don't seem to have been challenged by any of the sacked unjabbed staff as to the fact that it is surely illegal under common law and if they held their nerve and took these fackers to court even the most biased judge who is under the thumb of the elite can't ignore common law and their sacking would indeed be deemed illegal and thrown out in a heartbeat. 

 

This is my understanding anyway unless they are just not telling the public that in fact these sackings are being challenged because they don't want to highlight that fact so that some sacked unjabbed people won't be aware of their rights and accept their fate and walk away without a fight and also making sure the threat of dismissal is mopping up those who are on the fence and also unaware of their rights decide to get jabbed to keep their job. 

 

I know there is The Vaccine Control Group (look them up on Duck duck go) who I believe offer free legal representation to anyone who challenges these ridiculous covid mandates and as far as I know they have won all their cases because all the fines and restrictions are illegal under common law. 

 

If this isn't the case then I'll be amazed these reptiles can get away with this so I want to believe that there will be a comeuppance for these scumbags and that behind the scenes justice eventually will out. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unfair Dissmisal Act

 

https://www.gov.uk/dismissal/unfair-and-constructive-dismissal

 

Constructive dismissal is when you’re forced to leave your job against your will because of your employer’s conduct.

 

The reasons you leave your job must be serious, for example, they:

 

do not pay you or suddenly demote you for no reason

force you to accept unreasonable changes to how you work - for example, tell you to work night shifts when your contract is only for day work

let other employees harass or bully you

 

Your employer’s breach of contract may be one serious incident or a series of incidents that are serious when taken together.

 

You should try and sort any issues out by speaking to your employer to solve the dispute.

 

If you do have a case for constructive dismissal, you should leave your job immediately - your employer may argue that, by staying, you accepted the conduct or treatment.

 

Employment Rights Act 1996

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/contents

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Velma said:

 

 

Unfair Dissmisal Act

 

https://www.gov.uk/dismissal/unfair-and-constructive-dismissal

 

Constructive dismissal is when you’re forced to leave your job against your will because of your employer’s conduct.

 

The reasons you leave your job must be serious, for example, they:

 

do not pay you or suddenly demote you for no reason

force you to accept unreasonable changes to how you work - for example, tell you to work night shifts when your contract is only for day work

let other employees harass or bully you

 

Your employer’s breach of contract may be one serious incident or a series of incidents that are serious when taken together.

 

You should try and sort any issues out by speaking to your employer to solve the dispute.

 

If you do have a case for constructive dismissal, you should leave your job immediately - your employer may argue that, by staying, you accepted the conduct or treatment.

 

Employment Rights Act 1996

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/contents

 

Union told me this is much harder to prove at tribunal than unfair dismissal. If anyone is under threat at work you have to gain as much evidence as possible. Have everything written down and dated, even verbal conversations. Anything to do with harassment and or intimidation too. At a tribunal they want a folder of evidence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Velma said:

The chancellor says this means that people who have not been vaccinated won't be able to leave home, unless it is for essential reasons like going to work, buying food or exercise.

 

In other words, they can't stop you from living, only from paticipating in the Metaverse,which is somewhere I don't want go. My avatar has retired.

 

Not bothered about nightclubs or concerts, neither are my edgy friends.

 

Pro football is dead to me.

 

Only time I go to the cinema is when I take my niece, but even she is getting tired of mainstream entertainment.

 

Restaurants are okay, but I don't feel a great loss without them. Some pubs are cool, but many are inhabited by normies and annoying sportsball zombies.

 

The only thing that would piss me off is the time element. I mean in the sense that they say you can go out for exercise, but how long can you be outside for? If I want to go on a hike where I won't be near anyone, why should my time outside be limited?

 

Not really sure where I'm going with this. I guess what I'm getting at is that they're mostly just restricting bread and circus shit, but the exercise bit is the bit that concerns me.

Edited by EnigmaticWorld
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, webtrekker said:

* * VERY INTERESTING ARTICLE **  from TCW Defending Freedom site

 

Could this Jewish ban on Covid vaccines turn the tide?

 
By Karen Harradine - November 12, 2021
 

IN a major development which could have far-reaching consequences, a Hasidic rabbinical court in New York ruled on November 1 that it is ‘absolutely forbidden to administer the mRNA Covid-19 vaccine to children, adolescents, young men and women.

 

The court heard eight hours of testimony from experts shunned and demonised by Western governments including Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA vaccines, and Thomas Renz, lead attorney for America’s Frontline Doctors suing the US Centers of Disease Control, President Joe Biden and Anthony Fauci. Jews injured by the vaccine also gave evidence. 

 

A rabbinical court usually consists of three people, and some in the US are often lawyers too. They are often formed to resolve issues through the interpretation of Jewish law. The rulings of a rabbinical court outside Israel are often used by Jews to settle disputes within their communities.  Some rabbinical courts are conducted in ways which respect secular law, so that rulings can be legally binding and enforceable in a secular court system. In Orthodox Judaism, the rabbinical court will be made up of at least one rabbi and two other observant men, experts in Torah (Jewish law) and the matter which is being addressed

 

This particular court is a Hasidic one. Hasidism is a religious movement founded in the Ukraine in the 18th century, deeply rooted in Kabbalah, and its followers are devout. There are several different groups within this movement, each with their own unique interpretations of Hasidic Judaism. 

 

In this case, the three court judges are religious leaders in their respective communities in New York State.  In their ruling they declared: ‘It is best to err on the side of caution and abstain from taking the injection, rather than endangering one’s life by performing an action that can engender immediate and direct harm. Especially since there are other medical treatments that work . . . and that are not harmful.’

 

The ruling also states: ‘It is an explicit obligation to protest against this mandate, and anyone who can prevent the injection from being forced upon our youth must do so, forthrightly and emphatically.’

 

And: ‘Much harm appears to be caused to pregnant women as a result of the injection, possibly due to the antibodies that the body develops against the protein called Syncytin‐1, or from the SM102, or from the micro blood clots caused by the injection.’

 

And: ‘For older adults and the elderly, further clarification is needed (but as mentioned above, there are efforts to obscure the data, and it is presently difficult to attain accurate clarification). However, practically we have seen breakthrough cases, indicating that there is no substantial difference between those who received the mRNA and those who did not. The number of Covid patients are about the same, comparatively, in both demographics.’

 

The judges explained: ‘We also heard from doctors who invented and manufactured the mRNA, who testified as to its function (most doctors in medical practice are not experts in these matters at all, and from our experience and as is well‐known, they merely relate the information provided to them by the NIH, CDC, etc). They illustrated to us the profound danger and harm inherent in this new technology. They showed us how the governmental agencies and the pharmaceutical companies deny this fact, and how they conceal the data, making it so difficult for the public to realize the severe adverse reactions and mortalities that have befallen so many people who received the injection. We were also made privy to how they withhold the said information through various means, preventing the injuries and deaths from being publicized by the media or on the internet, as known.’ 

 

There is a principle in Judaism called ‘pikuach nefesh’, in which every single Jewish law can be broken to save a life. There are few exceptions to this law, one being that a person is forbidden from killing another to save a life. Given the rationale used by the judges to explain their decree, it seems that this very important Judaic principle may have guided them. 

 

They have certainly made it obvious that their decree is based on ‘halachah’ (Jewish Law): ‘Therefore, we hereby express our rabbinic decision, as per the teachings of our holy Torah.’

“Halachah’ guides the everyday life for Jews and experts in it are tasked with interpreting it for contemporary situations and issues. 

 

Little information is available as to why the court was formed to judge solely on this matter, or on the workings of Hasidic rabbinical courts. So it’s useful to look at the rules and regulations of the biggest Orthodox rabbinical court in the US, the Beth Din, for insight. Rabbinical courts are known as ‘Beit Din’. The rulings of a rabbinical court outside Israel are usually used by Jews to settle disputes within their communities; secular law is applicable as long as this doesn’t transgress a particular ‘Jewish law prohibition’.

 

Some rulings are binding in secular law, such as arbitrations which are fully enforced by secular courts in business disputes. The practices and rules of the Beth Din may differ slightly to that of a Hasidic rabbinical court, but the principles will be similar in the deference to ‘halachah’ and the use of experts for testimonies, evidence and rulings. 

 

This decree on the Covid-19 vaccine should be binding to the Hasidic communities which the Rabbinical court serves but its implications expand far beyond these communities. The judges ruled that mandatory Covid-19 vaccines transgress Jewish law, which means it could be anti-Semitic to enforce it on religious Jews who have no wish to take it. Other rabbinical courts might disagree with the interpretation but given that it is based on expert testimonies and evidence, and centred on ‘halachah’, it will be hard to dismiss. It is a vital document to any Jew needing a new halachic interpretation of the obligation to take the Covid-19 vaccine.

 

It will be interesting to see if Hasidic rabbinical courts in Israel now follow suit. Given that the rabbinical courts in Israel are part of the formal legal system, further decrees forbidding mandatory Covid-19 vaccines might have the power to dissolve the infamous green pass system.

This Hasidic rabbinical court in New York has broken rank and set a precedent. They may be the ones to save us all.

 

Link: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/could-this-jewish-ban-on-covid-vaccines-turn-the-tide/

 

 

 

 

Oh vey 

 

All these jews at pfizer and cdc and health departments around the world are going to be very unpleased. 

 

photo-2021-06-01-21-46-45.jpg

 

photo-2021-09-03-02-40-10.jpg

Edited by SimonTV
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SimonTV said:

image.png

 

Some Nike or Adidas trainers would suffice, they both support clown shit anyway.

 

I did stop buying Nike years ago, and decided to just buy Adidas instead if I was buying trainers. Then Adidas went all woke too, and I'm not even sure if I was actually buying European or German product anyway. Most of these companies seem to read from the same globohomo script, like they have no roots or identity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...