Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

I use the ignore function a lot.

It's a great tool.

 

All information from this thread has been ignored by this particular commenter, much of which answers their questions or counters their statements.

So this user intentionally ignores said information and continues regardless.

Therefore the only reason for their being here is to cause disruption and to goad other commenters.

 

Why is it not removed ? - I believe that is the correct gender description ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, zarkov said:

 

All information from this thread has been ignored by this particular commenter, much of which answers their questions or counters their statements.

So this user intentionally ignores said information and continues regardless.

Therefore the only reason for their being here is to cause disruption and to goad other commenters.

 

Why is it not removed ? - I believe that is the correct gender description ;)

 

I could have sworn I had replied something exactly similar to him a while back. So not only does he ignore everything in the thread, he also seems to ignore replies to his own posts as well and forget's that he has already made arguments that have already been refuted. So basically a time waster. 

 

Could be Prions.... Ally have you had your booster yet? 

Edited by SimonTV
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, zarkov said:

Hilarious witch!

PSYCHOPATH AYLSSA MILANO TELLS YOU TO TAKE THE MILKSHAKE, TRUST HER SHE'S UNICEF AMBASSADOR FOR USA

 

What a sweet and compassionate sounding young lady.  However, thanks but no thanks. You're welcome.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ant-vax pass protesters team up with BLM to protest Kyrie Irving not being allowed to play for refusing to get beast’d.

 

comments are full of dummies who aren’t aware the fake vaccine doesn’t do anything.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Gremmels said:


Ant-vax pass protesters team up with BLM to protest Kyrie Irving not being allowed to play for refusing to get beast’d.

 

comments are full of dummies who aren’t aware the fake vaccine doesn’t do anything.

 

 

 

I don't think there are any anti-vax protesters groups "teaming up" there. Who is Kyrie Irving? 

 

I suspect these people are protesting on their own accord. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, zarkov said:

Lost for words at the behaviour of "adults

short clip:

FACE MASK TIED AROUND DOWN SYNDROME CHILD WITH NYLON ROPE BY TEACHERS (25TH OCT)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lSXYEh5Gq5c7/

 

wow that is wrong. I heard another story that teachers used duct tape on children's faces to keep them from pulling their masks down. 

Edited by SimonTV
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

I don't think there are any anti-vax protesters groups "teaming up" there. Who is Kyrie Irving? 

 

I suspect these people are protesting on their own accord. 


Here’s some better videos of the protesters. 
 

kyrie Irving is a basketball player who’s not allowed to play because he refuses to take the fake

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ally_uk said:

He does have a valid point why the hostility when somebody challenges the view point you have..... 

 

What is the basis for the theories? 

 

A couple of videos on brand new tube,  Some idiotic pretend doctor monopolising the audience with silly nonsensical theories...... 

 

I have noticed it with all you conspiracy dudes you immediately become butthurt when challenged....

 

Millions have had the jab..... are they keeling over? 

 

If you were that worried about it you would get organised and assemble not sitting on a Internet forum......

 

🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

I'll ask you again, since you ignored it before. What is your opinion of Bill Gates?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BornFreeNowAgain said:

Although I only joined recently ( I was a member of the old forum but not very active) I have been mostly reading the Icke forum for many years. They come across as a 'journo' to me. I can just see it now "i spent 18 looking into the 'other side' of things and found nothing but crazy people who call the vaccines satan juice. I decided looking at all the evidence to take the jabs as I could clearly see the science was right'. Certainly they do not appear to be a free thinker. 

You might well have hit the target. 

 

Also, some of the crazier stuff (whatever that might be) and ALL the derailments over silliness and every heated disagreement over minor doctrines that really aren't important will form the basis of what would be a hit piece.

 

They destroy context. I've been a part of protest groups and saw a two hour interview (filmed by BBC journos) that would have left the viewer without doubt that a particular group I was filming for a documentary had legitimacy and righteousness on their side. Because the BBC would not be allowed access unless I filmed them filming the group, they did not show one second of that interview - because they couldn't cut it or show any words out of context. I had the entire interview in my can and they knew it.

 

What they did show was a scuffle in the car park of a meeting place - started by one of the BBC dick heads deliberately filming somebody who said they wanted privacy. That was framed as:

 

"Some of the group tried to fight us"

 

Likewise, hundreds of posts here could be partly quoted in a way that would get the forum banned from the internet. Banter would be framed as violent intent:

 

"One particularly angry member, known as Ziggy, remarked regularly how he longed to scissor kick Matt Hancock in the throat"

 

"Another member, Jack, left us feeling queasy with his use of words. The picture he painted of Jacinda Adern performing fellatio on a spiritual entity's dark coloured member had us taking the day off"

 

Personally, I thought many members were gentle and helpful towards Ally in the beginning. One or two were hostile but that wasn't allowed to stand for long.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ally_uk said:

He does have a valid point why the hostility when somebody challenges the view point you have..... 

 

What is the basis for the theories? 

 

A couple of videos on brand new tube,  Some idiotic pretend doctor monopolising the audience with silly nonsensical theories...... 

 

I have noticed it with all you conspiracy dudes you immediately become butthurt when challenged....

 

Millions have had the jab..... are they keeling over? 

 

If you were that worried about it you would get organised and assemble not sitting on a Internet forum......

 

🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

No hostility here, id like to here your point of veiw along with some of your sources to back up your what your saying.

 

This forum has alot of opinions which hold no water. Perhaps like this shpeel.

But its also a fantastic archive of links science papers, data , Crossrefrence,  msm articles , wacky articles, a spectrum of podcast links. Its a good timeline of events. Its not one sided. There is alot of mainstream media links posted here. Both sides of the argument is presented via links. Not necessarily by the opinions of the posters.

 

So i welcome your input on this page, Provided you back up what your saying and stop the unproductive taunting. Some Sincerity.

 

This is a confusing and hard time psycologicaly for either  "side" . Im personally finding it challeneging. 

My pre covid vison of my future is shatterd.

Ive always found it hard to trust the goverment. Always and still scandal after scandal. Why should in turn trust the scientists they instate. Where do we start with the medias bias, the onesided censorship, the closure of polarized conversation.

 

We are one no matter what. End of. We need to start speaking to one another with respect. Otherwise is just going to be unending misery, and we will just get good and better at hating each other until, god knows.

When did vaccination status ever divide us? 

Sucessful and failed Vaccines have been around for along time. Never divided us. Never been an issue for people to not have flu vaccine. People who didnt have to flu vaccine werent seen as selfish and a danger to others and portrayed as selfish heathens who dont care about others.

 

Its a shame we didnt all just not comply and flex public power and somehow topple the hierarchy.

But we didnt. Lets get over it.

we need to start understanding one another what ever choice they made.

Calling people cunts and this and that. Its not good communication. Its futile. And no one will listens to a hot head, never mind takes on board what they saying. I know this all too well...

 

 

Edited by Soandso
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nathan Oakley said:

 

The guy who invented mRNA tech says it shouldnt be used as a Covid vaccine! Isnt that damning enough for you!

 

Robert Malone—a medical doctor and an infectious-disease researcher—recently suggested that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines might actually make COVID-19 infections worse. He chuckled as he imagined Anthony Fauci announcing that the vaccination campaign was all a big mistake (“Oh darn, I was wrong!”) and would need to be abandoned. When he floated that nightmare scenario during a recent podcast interview with Steve Bannon, both men seemed almost delighted at the prospect of public-health officials and pharmaceutical companies getting their comeuppance. “This is a catastrophe,” Bannon declared, beaming at his guest. “You’re hearing it from an individual who invented the mRNA [vaccine] and has dedicated his life to vaccines. He’s the opposite of an anti-vaxxer.”

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/

That's exactly what happened in the animal trials. They all succumbed to the wild virus that they were vaccinated for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ally_uk I thought this might help you make an informed choice. If you believe in the virus of course.

 

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-covid-vaccines-will-keep-you/comments

 

Don’t take it from me, I don’t even get to tweet anymore.

Take it from a little place I call the British government. Which admitted today, in its newest vaccine surveillance report, that:

“N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” (Page 23)

 

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-43

What’s this mean? Several things, all bad. We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).

What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.

This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably).

It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.

Aside from that, everything is fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Diesel said:

@ally_uk I thought this might help you make an informed choice. If you believe in the virus of course.

 

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-covid-vaccines-will-keep-you/comments

 

Don’t take it from me, I don’t even get to tweet anymore.

Take it from a little place I call the British government. Which admitted today, in its newest vaccine surveillance report, that:

“N antibody levels appear to be lower in people who acquire infection following two doses of vaccination.” (Page 23)

 

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-43

What’s this mean? Several things, all bad. We know the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission of the virus (in fact, the report shows elsewhere that vaccinated adults are now being infected at much HIGHER rates than the unvaccinated).

What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people.

This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably).

It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction, because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.

Aside from that, everything is fine.

If this is a real goverment report then its what i thought all along. Natural protection is always the best.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...