Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[Ween Dwijler]

13 minutes ago, wideawake said:

 

Yeap, their own documents and statements to the public.

You've got references to those documents and public statements that are decisive in nature? I would like to see them.

[DaleP]

23 hours ago, Ween Dwijler said:

It's not my problem, mate. It's at best slightly amusing, at worst the discovery of a potential tyrant among this group. Whether his/her information is truly useful is always debatable.

 

amusing....amusingly violent.

 

On 10/20/2021 at 1:22 AM, Sheepy said:

I enjoy Skitso posts all that was really said was don't bother trying to psychoanalyse me. Which amused me no end, I am not sure how that makes a poster violent. Probably just getting a reaction.

[DaleP]

26 minutes ago, Ween Dwijler said:

Oh man, you crack me up. I bet you look in your closets and under your bed, before you go to sleep.

 

No man, I pray to Jesus before going to bed. lol

[Ween Dwijler]

8 hours ago, bamboozooka said:

get a room 

Do I notice some jealousy here?

[Ween Dwijler]

8 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

As it was meant to be.

Culprits are recent joiners.

Where are the mods?

It's so, so obvious.

Hey, I thought you had me on ignore? You're not really a man of your word, are you?

[zArk]

8 minutes ago, Merlin said:

There was a post posted here a few days ago, a very unknown British movie that predicted a "pandemic" and talked of "depopulation" they were sitting at a table discussing it in this scene, it was a youtube video.  I have looked back going back days and have had no luck finding it, can anyone remember?

there was the UK tv series Utopia ? janus?

[Merlin]

Just now, zArk said:

there was the UK tv series Utopia ? janus?

Nope wasn't anything like that, It had like 300 IMDB reviews, someone posted it here a week or so ago, if that.

I just can't understand why I cannot find it, ironically I added it to my bookmarks and it "disappeared" too.  The scene involved three people sitting at a table talking about "pandemics" the potential for "vaccines" and depopulation, it was absolutely spot on I just cant understand why its unfindable.

[Merlin]

Just now, Merlin said:

Nope wasn't anything like that, It had like 300 IMDB reviews, someone posted it here a week or so ago, if that.

I just can't understand why I cannot find it, ironically I added it to my bookmarks and it "disappeared" too.  The scene involved three people sitting at a table talking about "pandemics" the potential for "vaccines" and depopulation, it was absolutely spot on I just cant understand why its unfindable.

Was a budget British movie if that helps, was 100% posted here recently - If you can find it again, its worth watching!

[Ween Dwijler]

11 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

amusing....amusingly violent.

 

What has someone else's posting to do with me?

[Athenry04]

4 minutes ago, Merlin said:

Nope wasn't anything like that, It had like 300 IMDB reviews, someone posted it here a week or so ago, if that.

I just can't understand why I cannot find it, ironically I added it to my bookmarks and it "disappeared" too.  The scene involved three people sitting at a table talking about "pandemics" the potential for "vaccines" and depopulation, it was absolutely spot on I just cant understand why its unfindable.

 

Rick Mayall in it?

[Saved]

5 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Strange contradiction.

 

 

Pope Demands Silicon Valley "In The Name Of God" Censor "Hate Speech", "Conspiracy Theories"

https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/pope-demands-silicon-valley-name-god-censor-hate-speech-conspiracy-theories

The Pope will demand that the Gospel (Christ died for all) be completely censored (removed). This will happen across the entire world under penalty of death for those that disobey.

 

This is what they are all ultimately after and it will happen because the Gospel - to the ones who serve Satan - is the worst news imaginable.

 

They first need to attain complete regulation of the quickest and widest reaching medium for sharing information. Some nations have already achieved a shadow of that picture. 

[Merlin]

Just now, Athenry04 said:

 

Rick Mayall in it?

Yes! It had him at the end of the video!  The movie was "one by one"  Thank you mate!

[Ween Dwijler]

8 hours ago, Sheepy said:

I don't much care about being a noobie, I have been pointing out exactly what retriever and thousands of other populists are pointing out all over the internet, what you should be doing is listening up.Ween is a member of different forums and I could point diesel to exactly what ween was trying to tell him. I have seen it all before ween will calm down.

You're a nice person. But, a little wrong in one thing. I will NOT calm down. Because I am already. The virtual world can not upset me. Most of it is not real.

[alexa]

It's plan 'C' now, I can't repeat what I think this stands for 

 

Coronavirus 'Plan C'

DM headlines today

Edited October 21, 2021 by alexa

[Ween Dwijler]

8 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Good points from Off Guardian here.

So, Should we endorse the ivermectin treatment?

Well, first of all, OffGuardian is not here to recommend any medical treatment. We are not in the business of giving out medical advice, that is not the purpose of the site. We simply report facts that get neglected by the mainstream.

 

It’s certainly true that ivermectin has been around for a long time, and has always been considered safe and effective for a wide variety of conditions and is approved for off-label use, and even some indications it could an effective anti-viral treatment – the anti-ivermectin fear-porn in the media is highly misleading in that regard.Therefore doctors should be free to prescribe the treatment if they see fit, and patients should be free to take it.

 

However, there is a distinct danger in spreading the “ivermectin cures covid” story, because it concedes ground to the official narrative that we shouldn’t be conceding. Just as with the “vaccines make variants more dangerous” story, the “ivermectin treats covid” angle reinforces the idea that there is a scary new virus out there that requires some kind of special treatment.

 

If you take that position, you put yourself in a situation where all the mainstream has to do is proclaim the existence of a new “ivermectin resistant variant”, and suddenly you have been swallowed up completely by the official story."

 

https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/29/coronavirus-fact-check-12-ivermectin/#update

Makes sense.

[Ween Dwijler]

8 hours ago, SimonTV said:

Anyone after a vaccine passport?

 

Get the newer one. Much more benefit. Here it is.

 

 

[Merlin]

Thanks to Athenry04 I can share this with any of you guys that missed this video, its a good one - 

 

 

Thanks again

[alexa]

Anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorists storm into hospital to serve 'legal documents' citing the 'Nuremberg Code' and accusing medics of complicity in 'crimes against humanity'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10114013/Disgraceful-moment-anti-vaxxers-turn-Colchester-Hospital-accusing-medics-plandemic-crimes.html

 

[zArk]

7 hours ago, epsom said:

HOW TO REFUSE VACCINE MANDATES

 

 

 

THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE WHAT YOU ASK FOR----THEREFORE--DO THE FOLLOWING:

 

Please be advised that your silence on this very serious matter has given rise, by TACIT PROCURATION, to your agreement that:...... . 

 

 

now, this template is very very very similar to what GETOUTOFDEBTFREE were encouraging people to use to try and discharge debt.

the templates were written to require the original note .. which the company did not have .... and without ownership of the note they have no claim thus tacit procuration. <<< this caused many many people lots and lots of money , CCJ's , debt collectors /bailiff fees / liens on their homes

 

i would suggest that in this situation of job security, prepare a court case for breach of contract. Any paper work you send to the employer is building your case centered around your contract of employment.

 

a further point would be to avoid 'refusing' a vaccine mandate in employment instead it is required that the employer prove he can amend your contract, without your agreement, to lawfully mandate battery.

 

 i am not saying those statements in the notice are wrong but i am saying do not rely upon 'silence' by the employer to create tacit procuration

 

dont try and argue legalities, make a lawful point. Base it on common law. Hurt. (with a case everything is Trespass)  Object inserted into body without your consent.

 

these templates are straight from the 'sovereign citizen' crowd. Mixing legalese with law. Mixing citizen with people. It doesnt work and will only result in the legal system claiming ownership and positioning you as subject to it.

Edited October 21, 2021 by zArk

[Ween Dwijler]

6 hours ago, Captainlove said:

If the elites wanted to fully depopulate they could use any number of germ warfare weapons. Sarin,smallpox,anthrax etc.

No, they wouldn't. Any of those can not be covered up with a large scale disinformation campaign. The people would notice the truth around them and revolt instantly. This is a long term project of which the end game is going to be played between 2050 and 2060. The aim is to create a paradise (for them) on Earth. Unfortunately, as it goes with plans made by psychopaths, some essential details were overlooked, and come to bite them soon after completion. The next century will probably no longer see the human species roaming around.

 

And you know, that thought makes me so happy! Finally a true paradise again, for all other species.

[Ween Dwijler]

2 minutes ago, zArk said:

 

now, this template is very very very similar to what GETOUTOFDEBTFREE were encouraging people to use to try and discharge debt.

the templates were written to require the original note .. which the company did not have .... and without ownership of the note they have no claim thus tacit procuration. <<< this caused many many people lots and lots of money , CCJ's , debt collectors /bailiff fees / liens on their homes

 

i would suggest that in this situation of job security, prepare a court case for breach of contract. Any paper work you send to the employer is building your case centered around your contract of employment.

 

a further point would be to avoid 'refusing' a vaccine mandate in employment instead it is required that the employer prove he can amend your contract, without your agreement, to lawfully mandate battery.

 

 i am not saying those statements in the notice are wrong but i am saying do not rely upon 'silence' by the employer to create tacit procuration

 

dont try and argue legalities, make a lawful point. Base it on common law. Hurt. Object inserted into body without your consent.

 

these templates are straight from the 'sovereign citizen' crowd. Mixing legalese with law. Mixing citizen with people. It doesnt work and will only result in the legal system claiming ownership and positioning you as subject to it.

It's a bit hilarious to see that people want to start a legal battle to maintain their enslavement with their employer. If you're skilled, be your own man.

[alexa]

The Blair Lizard Project Strikes Again

 

Tony Blair urges ministers to set target of 500,000 booster jabs every day over fears a fresh Covid wave could cripple the NHS 

With cases rising, the former prime minister says the Government needs to act 'rapidly and decisively' to avoid the need for another lockdown as winter approaches.

DM

[Ween Dwijler]

6 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

Wouldn't that kill them and their families too?

Logical question that negates the validity of the idea of mass depopulation through mass murder. Good one!

[zArk]

4 minutes ago, Ween Dwijler said:

It's a bit hilarious to see that people want to start a legal battle to maintain their enslavement with their employer. If you're skilled, be your own man.

payoff is required

imo, if the employer is going down the jab mandate route, as the booted employee you are looking for compensation as the minimum

 

[alexa]

8 minutes ago, zArk said:

 

now, this template is very very very similar to what GETOUTOFDEBTFREE were encouraging people to use to try and discharge debt.

the templates were written to require the original note .. which the company did not have .... and without ownership of the note they have no claim thus tacit procuration. <<< this caused many many people lots and lots of money , CCJ's , debt collectors /bailiff fees / liens on their homes

 

i would suggest that in this situation of job security, prepare a court case for breach of contract. Any paper work you send to the employer is building your case centered around your contract of employment.

 

a further point would be to avoid 'refusing' a vaccine mandate in employment instead it is required that the employer prove he can amend your contract, without your agreement, to lawfully mandate battery.

 

 i am not saying those statements in the notice are wrong but i am saying do not rely upon 'silence' by the employer to create tacit procuration

 

dont try and argue legalities, make a lawful point. Base it on common law. Hurt. (with a case everything is Trespass)  Object inserted into body without your consent.

 

these templates are straight from the 'sovereign citizen' crowd. Mixing legalese with law. Mixing citizen with people. It doesnt work and will only result in the legal system claiming ownership and positioning you as subject to it.

 

Employees should also have a contract drawn up, holding the Employer responsible & can sue if anything happens to the Employee after he has been vaccinated, this may deter their actions.