Coronavirus Mega-Thread.

[blowonthepie]

3 hours ago, bamboozooka said:

take note of the likes noobies get.

find the pattern

 

Lol

[blowonthepie]

1 hour ago, Sheepy said:

I enjoy Skitso posts all that was really said was don't bother trying to psychoanalyse me. Which amused me no end, I am not sure how that makes a poster violent. Probably just getting a reaction.

 

‘Violent’?

 

The cognitive functions of some here are a bit poor

[bamboozooka]

6 minutes ago, blowonthepie said:

 

‘Violent’?

 

The cognitive functions of some here are a bit poor

thats what happens when you start championing noobies.

they end up thinking they are gods gift to forum postings 

[DarianF]

Victoria's privacy commission orders release of secret COVID lockdown briefings

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-20/victorias-covid-lockdown-briefings-release-ordered/100552548

[DarianF]

11 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

Where?

 

Something about a Paperclip. So I heard.

[Ween Dwijler]

7 hours ago, Diesel said:

I have wondered for some time about this, I mean even the spooks are people, Edward Snowden was a spook. I just wonder if things get really bad would the spooks switch sides. The intelligence services have the information and the power to blow the lid off everything and change the world

It's complex psychology and sociology what you're touching there. Whistle blowers are but a few of the 100's of thousands working in that field. I've coined the term "Disciples of Tyrants" for those who serve tyrants in any capacity. Maybe we can shorten that to DoT. They can be found in every authoritarian, or tyrannical system of "government"., on all levels of it. These DoTs are believers, and we know what that means from all religions humanity has ever come up with. I have recently posted 2 books in recommended reading that can help to understand these mechanisms better.

[zarkov]

1 hour ago, DaleP said:

 

 

Just a thought.... As per zarkov's useful post, a finding by Weston A. Price Foundation.....

ACT is not the law. As in the note above "Case of Proclamations...."

Correct me if I understood wrongly. You cannot be punished.

 

 

I appreciate the positive affirmation of common law by Weston Price Foundation!

 

I think you understand it rightly. Acts are legislation not Law. Legislation is commercial, law of the sea, law of invading pirates.

 

I think that common law, as it is based on principles of natural law is something that we may be compelled to collectively stand behind or under as the legislators become more draconian.

 

Natural Law/Common law presents the opportunity to unify the mass of humanity under life affirming moral principles.

As common law is embedded into our constitution, its only our lack of familiarity with it that prevents its more frequent use.

The coronavirus act was enabled after gov announced that covid was no longer classified as an HCID.

The gov guidance is referred to and regarded by legislators to be enforceable which it is not but is enacted commercially upon the public regardless.

If the legislators do not protect our sovereignty then they act against us!

 

These acts and many others conflict with the established rights of sovereignty under the constitution/common law.

Its is not possible to have laws that conflict with one another, one must be right and the other not.

Sovereign rights are innate, cannot be removed and are above any and all laws allowing us the freedom to own property (including self ownership), to travel and act unhindered in the pursuit of life and happiness provided we cause no harm, loss or deception to others.

 

If Natural Law is derived from principles based on objective morality which affirms life. Morality then is an act of consciousness, the divine enabler of life which we observe all around us in various forms and stages.

Natural law then can be seen as divine law and as precursor to common law bestowing each of us our inalienable rights.

 

Just musing though! - historically common law was referenced in connection with Christianity thereby linking the divine and placing it above the monarchy or any other body thus keeping them in check.

 

Overall, their commercial legislation has no place in law.  The discrepancy between Law and commerce/legislation becomes all the more apparent as there is no equitability between them.

Logically a sovereign being can choose which commercial transaction he enters into.

 

Acts and Statutes therefore cant rationally be seen as legitimate or relevant other than commercially.

 

 

- as far as I can tell  lol

[Ween Dwijler]

3 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

I'm not denying that it's a merger of corporation and state, I just don't understand why people seem to forget one of the key elements.

 

If you live in a nation that crushes, censors and punishes Fascists, is it really Fascism that you're dealing with? Is it really Fascism if you're being screwed by a rootless internationalist clique?

 

Are there some elements of Fascism in what we're seeing the gov do? Of course, but there are elements of other ideologies too.

 

How comes Fascists think the idea of us being ruled by Fascists is bonkers?

 

 

 

 

It all makes no sense to me. My nation is being destroyed by woke Capitalists and Marxists, flooding my country with people that they indoctrinate to hate the natives. They push degeneracy everywhere. Attack the family unit, and so on. Yet, the mainstream political spectrum still shouts Fascist.

I think the key element of all those isms are psychopathic tyrants. Their rule is based upon division among the population. What better way to achieve that than by politics and religion. Both have their foundation in believe, not rational thinking. They are traps very hard to escape.

[Ween Dwijler]

5 hours ago, DaleP said:

 

I posted in the other thread but will copy it here for anyone affected.

Fight back please! You gonna lose your job then you've got nothing to lose.

 

https://pjhlaw.co.uk/no-jab-no-job-employment-tribunal-claims/

 

 

Last year I "designed" the following contract to present to your vaccinating MD. In case they do not sign it, you are free to refuse the vaccine. It's a bit in the same line as your posting but aiming at the execution side of the "operation".

 

I, …..................................... (name MD, Physician, Nurse),

herewith declare the following;

 

1. Qualifications as healthcare professional

   1. I am a fully qualified Medical Doctor, Physician, Nurse and completed all requested education and exams with success according to the laws of this country.

   2. I have taken the Hippocratic Oath, or recited the Declaration of Geneva (1948) and uphold the medical principle of “Primum non nocere” which is Latin for “First, do no harm”.

   3. I fully understand and am aware of the meaning of non-maleficence, as the principal precepts of bioethics and practicing as a healthcare professional.

   4. I am not pressured, forced or else to practice medicine other than out of my own free will and declare that administering the hereunder mentioned Covid-19 Vaccine is my full responsibility and mine only.

2. Informed consent of my patient

   1. To give informed consent, my patient must have adequate reasoning faculties and be in the possession of all relevant facts concerning this Covid-19 Vaccination I intend to administer today …...../........../.........

   2. I have thoroughly examined my patient to determine that there are no impairments to reasoning and judgement that may prevent informed consent. I am aware that my patient may verbally agree or give consent out of fear, perceived social pressure, or psychological difficulty in asserting his/her true feelings. I have done everything within my capacities and abilities to ensure my patient's consent is genuine and not given because of aforementioned fears, social pressure or psychological difficulties.

   3. I have fully, completely and adequately informed my patient of all the risks involved with this Covid-19 vaccine, named …................................... manufactured by …..................... with batch number ….................... production date …...................., as publicly known on this day of administering. I have researched and investigated said risks to the best of my abilities and confirm those risks are real and existing.

   4. I persist in administering above specified Covid-19 vaccine, despite all known and unknown risks, even after having received the informed consent of my patient.

3. Liability

   1. Following article 2.d. of this declaration, I take full personal, responsibility (financial and social) for any future health complications of my patient, resulting from this vaccine treatment, including all presently known possible complications and not excluding presently unknown complications that might occur in the future and are related to this vaccine.

   2. I will fully cooperate with any possible future legal investigation, provide all requested information and willfully submit myself to the legal proceedings that might follow out of that investigation.

   3. I wave any rights to call upon laws or regulations of this country that could possibly dismiss and/or negate my legal liability and will not attempt to challenge that liability in any way.

    

I have read this declaration, fully understand it, accept it and agree with its terms and conditions.

 

Date ….../......./........

 

Signature................................................

 

Name in writing …........................................ identification number …...........................ID/PP

[Ween Dwijler]

7 hours ago, skitzorat said:

HA!

 

I can't help it. I've made my peace with the camps already - joking/not joking

 

But they gotta catch me first and I'm a sprinter... 

 

But by hook or by crook, no needle is going into my arms...

I wonder if you ever read Orwell's 1984 and made it to the end. If so, then you must know how Winston Smith ended up on a bench. In the 50's Joost Meerloo wrote a book "Rape of the mind". Worth while to read it, in my opinion.

[jack121]

19 hours ago, Gameisup said:

Its literally impossible for it to contain AIDS

 

Why?  Did you follow the link?

[jack121]

5 hours ago, Ziggy Sawdust said:

 

That's no erection....it's the top of the thigh high pirate type boots he's wearing.

 

Which is specially designed to cover up his erection.

They knew he would get an erection when so close to children, so the wardrobe department improvised. Clever these paedos, that's why he got away with it for so long. All these fore-planning.

[Morpheus]

15 hours ago, DarianF said:

"You need to get vaccinated so we can return to a normal way of life."

https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/australia-covid-news-live-new-freedoms-cases-and-vaccinations/news-story/3fce7058153a931445a771235d354024

 

 

Yeah, and I have an amazing seaside villa for sale in Mongolia. PM me for the price and full details.

How much for the Villa mate? 

[Golden Retriever]

5 hours ago, Shake said:

Does anyone have a video clip of bill gates in London recently?

 

Unfortunately, yes.  Oops sorry only photos.

 

 

 

More here

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10108181/Queen-welcomes-billionaire-business-leaders-tech-entrepreneurs-Windsor-Castle.html

Edited October 20, 2021 by Golden Retriever

[jack121]

1 hour ago, Morpheus said:

How much for the Villa mate? 

Carrot and donkey, then rubber bullets and head busting batons, then injection and death, plenty of HIV AIDS heavy metals to speed up the process. Poor suckers, wonder what it will be like to live in a sheep free world in a few years.

[jack121]

4 minutes ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Unfortunately, yes.  Oops sorry only photos.

 

 

 

More here

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10108181/Queen-welcomes-billionaire-business-leaders-tech-entrepreneurs-Windsor-Castle.html

 

Always smiling those two. Wonder what they are always smiling about.

The title is a little misleading. Gates is not a billionaire, he should be penniless, but B.J. gave him £10 billion of tax payers money to reimburse him for all the money spent and good work gates did on the pandemic.

Plus he got millions from jacinda arden about a month ago. Everyone is throwing taxpayers money at gates, like it grows on trees.

Wonder how many millions this is going to cost the taxpayer, another party for the snobs, another reason for crack / cocaine, champagne caviar. Also wonder about all the gold and paintings just in the one pictured room wonder how much that cost us.

Keep smiling bitch.

[Saved]

38 minutes ago, jack121 said:

 

Always smiling those two. Wonder what they are always smiling about.

The title is a little misleading. Gates is not a billionaire, he should be penniless, but B.J. gave him £10 billion of tax payers money to reimburse him for all the money spent and good work gates did on the pandemic.

Plus he got millions from jacinda arden about a month ago. Everyone is throwing taxpayers money at gates, like it grows on trees.

Wonder how many millions this is going to cost the taxpayer, another party for the snobs, another reason for crack / cocaine, champagne caviar. Also wonder about all the gold and paintings just in the one pictured room wonder how much that cost us.

Keep smiling bitch.

Thanks. I'd forgotten what bloody thread I was on this morning.

[Looney tune]

6 hours ago, blowonthepie said:

 

Nowhere have I stated that skitz is not an informative poster; I get a lot of info from ‘their’ posts that I otherwise would not get because I don’t  have the time to research as much as skitz obviously does.

I hope that clears that up.

 

But when a member tells another member 

“How about you just stop telling us what we should and shouldn't be doing/saying here as you first rock on up. That's a good start.”

 

That kind of thing smacks of superiority imo; ‘as you first rock on up’?

As though the member who has been here longer has the right to tell a newer one that? 

 

I got the gist of the other members post; but I know it’s hard sometimes to interpret the nuance of posts; or another poster may not have English as their first language (not saying that’s the case here) which often the meaning gets lost in translation and just stuff like that; no need to ‘speak’ to a new poster that way - imo.

 

It can be really off putting to some who are new here; as though there’s a pecking order, that there’s a group who because they contribute so much are the arbiters of what can and cannot be said.

 

Your first paragraph backs up what I said; I’m truly sorry that happened; it seems to happen quite a bit unfortunately; new (kosher) members are good, the more the merrier imo.

 

Ive already had my say about influencers, 77; innocent til proven guilty.

 

I agree re content not number of posts.

 

Nothing to say about ink; did I say it’s a bully? I can’t remember; it’s not important to me.

 

You see, when others come running to ‘stick up’ for one of the ‘popular’ crowd - even after what they said - and misinterpret what it was I said, that’s when you know there is a popular crowd lol.

Not my cup of tea; I’ll stick to being one of the ‘unpopular’ crowd, one of the misfits who don’t give a continental about the in crowd; I’ll lick no ones arse to fit in, have my say and be damned

Just checked back, the post was at skiz but followed inks take so my bad your post wasn't at ink. Mine wasn't a group but just one individual that had likes when calling me 77th. He even quoted art of war book, no thy enemy, all tho that blew up because he clearly knew nothing about me and I think he thinks I'm a person of colour cos I pulled a racist line up he used. In reality he didn't realise I'm as white as milky bar kid. It was a mere point out when he did the line from the book I thought I'd school him as he clearly didn't take the said book in properly. He never realised Id been around before he actually joined up on the site. 

Honestly tho, I don't think skiz is a bully. 

[HAARPING_On]

3 hours ago, Ween Dwijler said:

Last year I "designed" the following contract to present to your vaccinating MD. In case they do not sign it, you are free to refuse the vaccine. It's a bit in the same line as your posting but aiming at the execution side of the "operation".

 

I, …..................................... (name MD, Physician, Nurse),

herewith declare the following;

 

1. Qualifications as healthcare professional

   1. I am a fully qualified Medical Doctor, Physician, Nurse and completed all requested education and exams with success according to the laws of this country.

   2. I have taken the Hippocratic Oath, or recited the Declaration of Geneva (1948) and uphold the medical principle of “Primum non nocere” which is Latin for “First, do no harm”.

   3. I fully understand and am aware of the meaning of non-maleficence, as the principal precepts of bioethics and practicing as a healthcare professional.

   4. I am not pressured, forced or else to practice medicine other than out of my own free will and declare that administering the hereunder mentioned Covid-19 Vaccine is my full responsibility and mine only.

2. Informed consent of my patient

   1. To give informed consent, my patient must have adequate reasoning faculties and be in the possession of all relevant facts concerning this Covid-19 Vaccination I intend to administer today …...../........../.........

   2. I have thoroughly examined my patient to determine that there are no impairments to reasoning and judgement that may prevent informed consent. I am aware that my patient may verbally agree or give consent out of fear, perceived social pressure, or psychological difficulty in asserting his/her true feelings. I have done everything within my capacities and abilities to ensure my patient's consent is genuine and not given because of aforementioned fears, social pressure or psychological difficulties.

   3. I have fully, completely and adequately informed my patient of all the risks involved with this Covid-19 vaccine, named …................................... manufactured by …..................... with batch number ….................... production date …...................., as publicly known on this day of administering. I have researched and investigated said risks to the best of my abilities and confirm those risks are real and existing.

   4. I persist in administering above specified Covid-19 vaccine, despite all known and unknown risks, even after having received the informed consent of my patient.

3. Liability

   1. Following article 2.d. of this declaration, I take full personal, responsibility (financial and social) for any future health complications of my patient, resulting from this vaccine treatment, including all presently known possible complications and not excluding presently unknown complications that might occur in the future and are related to this vaccine.

   2. I will fully cooperate with any possible future legal investigation, provide all requested information and willfully submit myself to the legal proceedings that might follow out of that investigation.

   3. I wave any rights to call upon laws or regulations of this country that could possibly dismiss and/or negate my legal liability and will not attempt to challenge that liability in any way.

    

I have read this declaration, fully understand it, accept it and agree with its terms and conditions.

 

Date ….../......./........

 

Signature................................................

 

Name in writing …........................................ identification number …...........................ID/PP

 

Excellent post. Thank you.

[Anders]

1 hour ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Unfortunately, yes.  Oops sorry only photos.

 

 

 

More here

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10108181/Queen-welcomes-billionaire-business-leaders-tech-entrepreneurs-Windsor-Castle.html

 

I wouldn't trust any of them to sell me a brand NEW car, let alone a second-hand one

[Sheepy]

7 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

8 hours ago, Sheepy said:

 

 

I'm not denying that it's a merger of corporation and state,

Well, I wouldn't either as it is, right under your nose, corporate fascism corporate communism, what's the difference, both require big government and a brainwashed population ruled by fear. Anyway, I am sure the next variant won't be far behind for the unconvinced, enjoy.

[Bombadil]

6 hours ago, DarianF said:

skitz could take a shit on my front lawn and I wouldn't care.

As long as they don’t put it a black poop bag and throw it my tree.

[Bombadil]

It would be quite pleasant to get back to business of covid peaps. Lots of derailing going in at the moment. Not everyone, just some. Just my opinion and you all can tell me to shut the fuck up!

 

Anyway health bosses now pushing for plan B immediately here in U.K. won’t post a link as it’s on all the usual shite newspaper sites.

[jack121]

1 hour ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

Unfortunately, yes.  Oops sorry only photos.

 

 

 

More here

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-10108181/Queen-welcomes-billionaire-business-leaders-tech-entrepreneurs-Windsor-Castle.html

 

Is the ugly parasite scrounging whore on the left giving the paedo mass murderer on the right a satanic handshake?

the queer only grips the paedo's two fingers, and the paedo's grip is lower than the queer's,

so it appears the queer's hand is higher. Does this mean the queer is higher up the satanic cocksucking pyramid than the vaccine injecting mass murderer, or is it the other way around. 

Did one make more trips to epstein island and rape and torture more, or does being a complete and utter bastard make up for lack of dajjal worshipping and cocksucking

[alexa]

4 minutes ago, Bombadil said:

Anyway health bosses now pushing for plan B immediately here in U.K. won’t post a link as it’s on all the usual shite newspaper sites.

 

I was going to post the article, but fortunately I don't have to bother now. 

Plan B = Bastards in play again