Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I started a new job not so long ago and quit after three weeks, I refused to wear a stupid mask all day at all, laughed at the managers and their covid terror.. I could see it wasn't going to end well

I've already posted about this in the 'Come Together by Region?' thread in the Solutions forum.   But now here is the advert for the big event on the 29th August. It would be great if as ma

I'm in no way condoning violence in this post but i am speculating about how some people might react under certain conditions.   I think the reason they are goi

Posted Images

Let's just recap.

 

If only the downright rotten and complicit MSM reported the following. The medical establishment too.

 

The Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the Foreign Secretary Demonic Raab both publicly said last month,

the PCR tests are only 7% accurate. The tests are meaningless and therefore the number of cases.

 

IF THIS INFORMATION WAS ON THE FRONT PAGES OF THE PRESS AND THE LEAD STORY ON

BBC, SKY, ITV, CHANNEL FOUR, FOX, CNN ETC THINK WHAT A DIFFERENCE IT WOULD MAKE

TO INFORM THE GENERAL PUBLIC WHO HAVE BEEN DENIED ANY INFORMATION WHICH GOES

AGAINST THE OFFICAL NARRATIVE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Saved said:

I've already been warned by a teacher friend that this is what the government are planning, given the 

concentration on electronic homework scheduling. They are in a huge rush to provide data to the government regarding which parents can or can't access online assignments. And that's for eight year olds, as well as twelve year olds at the same school.

 

The spreadsheet data had to be in last week. Half term for my kids begins in one week. If they do go back to school, I don't believe it will be for very long before they are back in the house for months on end.

 

I said it a few pages back, the media have 'leaked' the October half term circus  circuit breaker way back in September and it's all been a series of dramatic interludes between now and then.  I will be literally amazed if England doesn't lock down at half term like the mighty media already told us we would a month ago.  It's so badly managed and yet so horribly inevitable.  All the rest is just cinema.

 

56 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

EkeEKatWkAA5Ypp?format=jpg&name=medium

 

Normal as in bend over for any tyrant sad excuse for a human.

 

 

 

What the actual fuck.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This from a nurse on twitter, locks her account so cant embed her post. Q1 is for April to June 2020.

 

KH03 submissions. Compare previous years. Bed occupancy usually always at approx 90% By Q1 20/21 during a pandemic the NHS was declaring less available beds and only reaching 62.8% occupancy for G&A beds yet they claimed the NHS was overwhelmed?

 

EkeBF6BWkAUUy3e?format=jpg&name=medium

 

https://twitter.com/Charlotte3003G/status/1317163359905734658

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, oddsnsods said:

EkeEKatWkAA5Ypp?format=jpg&name=medium

 

Normal as in bend over for any tyrant sad excuse for a human.

 

 

I'm the one who doesn't care about others. Fuckem, and fuck you too XD

Jokes aside I haven't ever been questioned in Wales yet. I was once in Bristol, it seemed good enough to hear I was exempt. It feels great walking around flaunting the (disregard of the) rules.

 

But I will defo pull that one out for anyone trying it on about masks. A year ago nobody thought twice about going to work with the flu and killing a couple of grannies in the process.  The programming works unfortunately

Edited by - TZC -
I messed up
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if this is here already, hard to keep up...
 

The Smoking Gun: Where is the coronavirus? The CDC says it isn’t available.

 

by Jon Rappoport

October 8, 2020

 

The CDC document is titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is dated July 13, 2020.

Buried deep in the document, on page 39, in a section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” we have this: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

The key phrase there is: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available…”

Every object that exists can be quantified, which is to say, measured. The use of the term “quantified” in that phrase means: the CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because it is unavailable. THE CDC HAS NO VIRUS.

A further tip-off is the use of the word ‘isolates.” This means NO ISOLATED VIRUS IS AVAILABLE.

Another way to put it: NO ONE HAS AN ISOLATED SPECIMEN OF THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

NO ONE HAS ISOLATED THE COVID-19 VIRUS.

THEREFORE, NO ONE HAS PROVED THAT IT EXISTS.

As if this were not enough of a revelation to shock the world, the CDC goes on to say they are presenting a diagnostic PCR test to detect the virus-that-hasn’t-been-isolated…and the test is looking for RNA which is PRESUMED to come from the virus that hasn’t been proved to exist.

And using this test, the CDC and every other public health agency in the world are counting COVID cases and deaths…and governments have instituted lockdowns and economic devastation using those case and death numbers as justification.

If people believe “you have the virus but it is not available,” and you have the virus except it is buried within other material and hasn’t been extracted and purified and isolated, these people believe the moon is made of green cheese.

This is like saying. “We have the 20 trillion dollars, they are contained somewhere in our myriad accounts, we just don’t know where.” If you don’t know where, you don’t know you have the money.

“The car keys are somewhere in the house. We just don’t where.” Really? If you don’t know where, you don’t know the keys are in the house.

“The missing cruise missile is somewhere in the arsenal, we just don’t where.” No. If you don’t know where, you don’t know the missile is in the arsenal.

“The COVID-19 virus is somewhere in the material we have—we just haven’t removed it from that material. But we know what it is and we’ve identified it and we know its structure.” NO YOU DON’T. YOU ASSUME THAT.

Science is not assumptions.

“But…but…there is a study which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…”

They say they did. But in July, the CDC is saying no virus is available. I guess that means trucks were not available to bring the virus from that lab to the CDC. The trucks were out of gas. It was raining. The bridge was washed out. The trucks were in the shop. Joe, the driver, couldn’t find his mask, and he didn’t want to leave home without it…

Science is not assumptions.

The pandemic is a fraud, down to the root of the poisonous tree. 
 

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10/08/the-smoking-gun-where-is-the-coronavirus-the-cdc-says-it-isnt-available/?fbclid=IwAR0RjJw1L-pGFAXbVN40JgFcqOh206yPm3CL6OJ0rbbaIFrlACLmV3ncYoQ 

CDC Document; https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download 
 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

EkeEKatWkAA5Ypp?format=jpg&name=medium

 

Normal as in bend over for any tyrant sad excuse for a human.

 

 

That is scandalous propaganda. Psychological abuse. Only the dim-witted, the servile, the slave-thinkers could ever being meaningfully influenced by such crude manipulation. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

Let's just recap.

 

If only the downright rotten and complicit MSM reported the following. The medical establishment too.

 

The Prime Minister Boris Johnson and the Foreign Secretary Demonic Raab both publicly said last month,

the PCR tests are only 7% accurate. The tests are meaningless and therefore the number of cases.

 

 

do you hear the spin though, damage control

 

both infer that 93% of infected are not identified with the test

 

this is the mentality of the Vaccine Scientologists

 

so 1,000 cases equates in the Cabinet office to 14,000 infected . get it? they are considering 13,000 infected walking around not identified

 

50,000 cases a day equates 714,000 cases AT LARGE free walking about

 

lunatics

 

i would suggest though in fairness that last February i reckon ishly there were at least 20,000,0000 cases of coronavirus in the UK... and i reckon 1/3 of the population have a cold or similar on a yearly basis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

There are several different estimates on mortality rates.

 

 

And you chose the inaccurate Facebook one. From your link, which is from the "evil" WHO...

"The WHO believe Covid-19 kills 0.6 per cent of all patients or one in every 167. Although it sounds minimal, it means Covid-19 is six times deadlier than the flu and almost as twice as fatal as polio."

 

If the methodology by which you dismiss counter evidence is "because it's from the mainstream" - then your method is just a little bit flawed.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Why does Google show fact checker sites when doing any search that may contradict the offical narrative?

Why does Google have the authority to decide what is & what isnt truth? When most of these fact checker sites are financed by the very people who the claims are aimed against.

 

 

Take it up with Google. I imagine they don't hold the same sites as you do in high esteem. I don't agree with their policy.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Its a wizard of Oz senario.. how else can you expose the psyop or break the spell, that everyone is under?

 

 

Then don't label me as "infected" when I do the same. If you think I watch it and lap it up then you are mistaken.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Its trauma based mindcontrol to keep you in a state of fight or flight.

 

 

I suppose there is an element of truth to that in general terms, but since the matter is deemed as "nothing to worry about" that is not valid here.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Thats all the news is 24/7 so you will easily summit to any demands.

 

Yes, I can agree in theory with that. The news generally will dictate the reaction from the public at large.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Read between the lines, coz everything is censored yes thats a fact.

 

I don't have a problem with reading between the lines or that some things are censored or shutdown. You weren't reading at all simply because it comes from the MSM. So effectively you only cherry pick things FROM the MSM that support your case and ignore things that don't.

 

Please don't insult "anyone's" intelligence by saying that is not the case.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Im not going to take anything CNN puts out as legit as they put out countless amounts of proven bullshit. I gave you examples. Ive seen cases of nurses that have been debunked on this thread or the previous pre hack thread as actors or links to government. So excuse me if I cant be bothered to drag it all up again

 

 

I've just spent a couple of hours searching this thread and there are examples of empty wards etc. But again you are cherry picking things that agree with you and labelling fake those that do not.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Snopes wanky fact check doesnt debunk nothing neither does your BBC fake news paedo apologist news corp.

She could be real but doesnt mean shes not acting or shedding crocodile tears you simpleton.

 

 

Righto, so Snopes is all wrong and so is the BBC because of "reasons".  She could be real huh and I am a "simpleton" for not realising she could be acting. But you aren't one for not realising that all your examples could be from people selling books and lying to get attention?

 

https://www.simonandschuster.co.uk/books/Undercover-Epicenter-Nurse/Erin-Marie-Olszewski/9781510763678

 

Cherry picking again.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

You automatically take their words as truth because the fear mongering lying horror show media tells you its true.

 

And YOU automatically take all the opposite as truth because you are a conspiracy theorist. I don't automatically take anything as truth, I assimilate data and form a logical opinion that fits what the data tells me. I modify that opinion as the data may or may not change.

 

You should try that.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Your bullshit is tiring & cluttering up the thread.

 

 

My "bullshit" is observational contradictions to what is being presented. None of you people are questioning a single thing being shown. What you are doing is lapping it all up into a "coronavirus" memory store then when quizzed about it, it becomes a huge thing because of "all" that evidence presented.

 

I actually don't want to limit this thread at all, or disrupt it, but really!! WHY aren't any of you truth seekers questioning things being presented by your own side?

 

Example... Empty hospital beds/ full beds and sobbing nurses. Former stored, latter is fake

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Go read about Brigade77

 

 

Which bit, the official one or the conspiracy "read between the lines" one? I asked where they are on this thread!

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

No dodge, Barack Obama doesnt control world Health.

Again you haven't listened to any interview with BG or know anything  about the topic.

 

 

It is a complete dodge. You quote an advisory script from the government employed buffoons but failed to answer this....

 

 I dare you to imagine just for a second that there IS a nasty disease out there and the public aren't taking it seriously. What would YOU do?

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

No dodge gimpy.

This isnt meant to be North Korea.

 

Yes it was, insult noted yet again. Regardless of the agreed draconian result. He didn't photograph what you said he did!!

 

He actually photographed the sealed off section of A&E that was closed.

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

They did & they are still doing it.

Theres tons of evidence also, thats been provided non stop for months now. You are insulting everyones intelligence.

 

I cannot actually believe how you can so badly miss the point I am making!

 

You claim the figures show x,y,z (cherry picking again of course). I said why don't they fake them, you know the ones that YOU think are incriminating. It would be a piece of cake for them to do so. You aren't the spokesperson for "everyones intelligence" sic.

 

 

16 hours ago, oddsnsods said:

Start a thread for any questions you have with me on this topic coz you clutter the thread with discussion, most are well past.

 

No, I am highlighting inconsistencies with your approach, relevant to the topic. Don't flatter yourself concerning me "asking you questions", many are asked to show how your method is biased.

 

 

Edited by Comedy Time
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, wingwang said:

 

Not really. You have pseudo isolation and then there's real isolation. Take your pick.

 

False dichotomy. Koch's postulates are not gospel.

 

Despite the importance of Koch’s postulates in the development of microbiology, they have severe limitations, which even Koch realized. For example, he believed that cholera and leprosy were caused by microbes, but could not fulfill all four postulates. Furthermore, Koch knew that the putative agent of cholera, Vibrio cholerae, could be isolated from both sick and healthy people, invalidating postulate #2.

 

Many viruses do not cause illness in all infected individuals, a requirement of postulate #1. An example is poliovirus, which causes paralytic disease in about 1% of those infected. Further compromising postulate #1 is the fact that infection with the same virus may lead to markedly different diseases, while different viruses may cause the same disease. Postulates #2 and #3 cannot be fulfilled for viruses that do not replicate in cell culture, or for which a suitable animal model has not been identified.

Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Comedy Time said:

 

And you chose the inaccurate Facebook one. From your link, which is from the "evil" WHO...

"The WHO believe Covid-19 kills 0.6 per cent of all patients or one in every 167. Although it sounds minimal, it means Covid-19 is six times deadlier than the flu and almost as twice as fatal as polio."

 

If the methodology by which you dismiss counter evidence is "because it's from the mainstream" - then your method is just a little bit flawed.

 

 

Take it up with Google. I imagine they don't hold the same sites as you do in high esteem. I don't agree with their policy.

 

 

Then don't label me as "infected" when I do the same. If you think I watch it and lap it up then you are mistaken.

 

 

I suppose there is an element of truth to that in general terms, but since the matter is deemed as "nothing to worry about" that is not valid here.

 

 

Yes, I can agree in theory with that. The news generally will dictate the reaction from the public at large.

 

 

I don't have a problem with reading between the lines or that some things are censored or shutdown. You weren't reading at all simply because it comes from the MSM. So effectively you only cherry pick things FROM the MSM that support your case and ignore things that don't.

 

Please don't insult "anyone's" intelligence by saying that is not the case.

 

 

I've just spent a couple of hours searching this thread and there are examples of empty wards etc. But again you are cherry picking things that agree with you and labelling fake those that do not.

 

 

Righto, so Snopes is all wrong and so is the BBC because of "reasons".  She could be real huh and I am a "simpleton" for not realising she could be acting. But you aren't one for not realising that all your examples could be from people selling books and lying to get attention?

 

https://www.simonandschuster.co.uk/books/Undercover-Epicenter-Nurse/Erin-Marie-Olszewski/9781510763678

 

Cherry picking again.

 

 

And YOU automatically take all the opposite as truth because you are a conspiracy theorist. I don't automatically take anything as truth, I assimilate data and form a logical opinion that fits what the data tells me. I modify that opinion as the data may or may not change.

 

You should try that.

 

 

My "bullshit" is observational contradictions to what is being presented. None of you people are questioning a single thing being shown. What you are doing is lapping it all up into a "coronavirus" memory store then when quizzed about it, it becomes a huge thing because of "all" that evidence presented.

 

I actually don't want to limit this thread at all, or disrupt it, but really!! WHY aren't any of you truth seekers questioning things being presented by your own side?

 

Example... Empty hospital beds/ full beds and sobbing nurses. Former stored, latter is fake

 

 

Which bit, the official one or the conspiracy "read between the lines" one? I asked where they are on this thread!

 

 

It is a complete dodge. You quote an advisory script from the government employed buffoons but failed to answer this....

 

 I dare you to imagine just for a second that there IS a nasty disease out there and the public aren't taking it seriously. What would YOU do?

 

 

Yes it was, insult noted yet again. Regardless of the agreed draconian result. He didn't photograph what you said he did!!

 

He actually photographed the sealed off section of A&E that was closed.

 

 

I cannot actually believe how you can so badly miss the point I am making!

 

You claim the figures show x,y,z (cherry picking again of course). I said why don't they fake them, you know the ones that YOU think are incriminating. It would be a piece of cake for them to do so. You aren't the spokesperson for "everyones intelligence" sic.

 

 

 

No, I am highlighting inconsistencies with your approach, relevant to the topic. Don't flatter yourself concerning me "asking you questions", many are asked to show how your method is biased.

 

 

🥱🥱🥱 Keep defending the government. 

I'm sure defending the government is going to give a leg up on the tower of social credits once that's here in the UK. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Newbiebrbr said:

🥱🥱🥱 Keep defending the government. 

I'm sure defending the government is going to give a leg up on the tower of social credits once that's here in the UK. 

 

Wrong!! I am not defending the shitty government and your argument is like someone going nah nah na nah naaaah.

 

I am pointing out discrepancies and poor methodology in these alternate claims. They aren't all wrong, far from it....try reading the flow of that exchange instead of knee jerk comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...