Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, spideysensei said:

Anyone remember a specific day, about 4 or 5 before the first lockdown, when the msm went from scattered commentary about a foreign curiosity, to 24/7 news coverage? I'm convinced this was a specific point where many were literally hypnotized from that point on.

 

tbh, people have been hypnotized since Bojo said..."Go to work, don't go to work".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Looney tune said:

I don't know where your coming from thinking I'm from Satan's army, you know nothing about me all tho you pretend to do so. You really need to have a reality check. All I've done is to to give you my opinion on your idea of subliminal messaging the masses. You say you don't care about being better than them but you first aim is to use there very much hated means. I'm all for fighting them but you think playing with someone else mind and free will is a good ideal. 

Your name in Dale p rearrange it you get plaed which is how a dyslexic spells played. Maybe thats what your up to here promoting subliminal messaging or maybe your name is Dale. I don't like your idea of implanting messaging in peoples mind but what you do is up to you. Unless you have something of interest to ask me you can frankly bugger off and carry on with your life as all you seem to do is want to aim posts at me. 

So as it stands

77th brigade

I'm sort of person that would

Now Satan's army

 

Do you think you can actually aim a post with some sort of intelligence constructed about it? Or you just about wasting space on this thread because you seem to have it in for me.

Get over it I just don't like the way you going for subliminal messaging and your having a mini tantrum cos I disagree. You say I'm all that 77th, Satan's army yet it is you that doesn't care and uses there tactics, says a lot.

P.s you never answered when you would stop subliminal messaging the masses. 

 

 

Well I am so sorry if you are bothered with my idea. It's not my problem though. LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DaleP said:

It's ok bro. You know nothing.

Hang on a minute as a black man I'm curious! 

You say especially the whites, why not everyone? You think I know nothing?. On what basis do you judge that? 

Let's get a reality check you like subliminal messaging (break a humans free will)

You want to especially save the white race9(not humanity)

Someone disagrees with your actions you start attaching labels to them

You really don't have far to go on being a nwo member (if your not already)

You still haven't answered when you would stop sub messaging people

But I'm the satanic 77th brigade type of person who would act like...

I haven't labeled you as anything just disagreed with that one aspect and that's how you respond.

Also over the last 3 days all you've done is personally single me out, not posted anything of note on covid except something about 5G on a covideo thread.

What's that saying about people who cast the first stone...

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

Well I am so sorry if you are bothered with my idea. It's not my problem though. LOL

I'm not bothered one bit by your childNess, you keep coming to me so I respond back to you. Let's start over

Dale. I want to influence peoples mind

Me. Great idea who cares about free will

Dale not me I like to trample on that sanctuary

Me when will you stop

Dale when I have the race I want

Me great idea

 

Edited by Looney tune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SimonTV said:

image.png

 

6 hours ago, Nats and dogs said:

This is just a guess - maybe the black one on the right has graphene in it?

 

I reckon it's because vaxxed is unable to carry enough oxygen due to red blood cells being destroyed that the colour is so darkened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, whatthefoxhat said:

If you fancy an hour of reading of pilots and their slow on the uptake reality of the covid situation have a look at this thread in PPrune

 

Intellectual self strangulation with cherries and sprinkles on top

Apparently, there are a lot of trolls/disinfo merchants on that site. One of my neighbours is a professional pilot and he reckons that, based on the actual knowledge of aviation expressed by some on their, the closest they've got to flying is a RC model. They call themselves pilots too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

Well I am so sorry if you are bothered with my idea. It's not my problem though. LOL

What I'm bothered about is because I disagreed you started attaching labels to me. And I may have missed something in your earlier post (my sub level mind) but why especially the whites? Are our minds stronger and aura, or is it because you are just worried about white people? Why not everyone?if that sentance makes you lol you need to get out more

Edited by Looney tune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

 

I reckon it's because vaxxed is unable to carry enough oxygen due to red blood cells being destroyed that the colour is so darkened.

 

 

What is the source of that picture?

 

It could be due to this and nothing to do with the vaccine.

 

Photograph illustrating the color difference between the patient's venesected blood (left) and a normal donor unit (right).

 

Photograph illustrating the color difference between the patient's venesected blood (left) and a normal donor unit (right).

 

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Photograph-illustrating-the-color-difference-between-the-patients-venesected-blood_fig1_339192204

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Periods disrupted by COVID vaccines usually resort to normal after just one irregular cycle, experts say as 35,000 British women report side effect

  • More than 6,000 women in the U.S. and 35,000 women in the UK have reported heavier than normal or abnormal menstrual cycles 
  • The most common complaint is heavy menstrual bleeding but other reports include intermenstrual bleeding and irregular ovulation 
  • A doctor has called for more studies into the link between irregular periods and COVID-19 vaccines
  • Dr Victoria Male wrote on Wednesday investigating such a link could calm fears that the vaccines are linked to infertility and increase confidence in the shots
  • Gynecologists have said the vaccine could be inducing stress from the immune response or it could be self-induced from worry about getting the jab 
  • There is currently no link between menstrual cycle changes post-Covid vaccination and fertility issues 

By Mary Kekatos Acting U.S. Health Editor For Dailymail.Com

Published: 17:05 BST, 16 September 2021 | Updated: 18:20 BST, 16 September 2021

A doctor has called for more studies into whether or not COVID-19 vaccines cause period changes after thousands of women have reported irregular menstrual cycles following the shots.

Dr Victoria Male, a lecturer in reproductive immunology at Imperial College London, said last year's clinical trials should have looked for abnormal menstruation.  

At least 6,000 women in the U.S. report that their periods have come earlier than usual, felt heavier or just appeared irregular post-vaccination. 

Additionally, more than 35,000 women in Britain have complained of suffering irregular periods after being jabbed. 

Officials have yet to confirm there is a link between the shots and an irregular cycle, but Male said that the uterus has a lining with a high number of immune cells, which are likely activated by the vaccine and lead to irregular bleeding.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9998119/Doctor-calls-studies-COVID-19-vaccines-cause-period-changes.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BREAKING – 30,305 people died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 Vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021 according to ONS data

Official Office for National Statistics data has inadvertently revealed that 30,305 people have died within twenty-one days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.

Dozens of freedom of information requests have been made to Public Health England (PHE) over the past few months requesting to know how many people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, but each and every time PHE have claimed they do “not hold the information requested”.

t is extremely strange to find that PHE do not hold the information considering their counterpart in Scotland has been able to publish the data on deaths within 28 days of a Covid-19 vaccination.

Public Health Scotland last published the figures on the 23rd June 2021 in their ‘Covid-19 Statistical Report’ in which they revealed 5,522 people had died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine between December 8th 2020 and June 11th 2021 in Scotland.

PHS were also able to reveal the numbers by brand of vaccine and date of occurrence in a published spreadsheet found here. The spreadsheet shows that 1,877 people died with 28 days of having the Pfizer mRNA jab, 3,643 people died within 28 days of having the AstraZeneca viral vector jab, and 2 people died within 28 days of having the Moderna mRNA jab.

The reason people have been requesting to know the number of people to have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine is because these are the exact same parameters that have been used to count alleged Covid-19 deaths for the majority of the alleged pandemic.

Deaths are counted as Covid-19 if they occur within 28 days of a positive test, however, in the beginning they were actually counting deaths as Covid-19 if they occurred within 60 days of a positive test.

But it would seem PHE have been able to elude the requests made for the number of people who have died after having the Covid-19 jab thanks to a technicality. That technicality being the number of days used in their request, because we have discovered that they do hold the data on the number of people to have died after having a Covid-19 injection.

But it isn’t the number of people who have died within 28 days, it is instead the number of people who have died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, and the figures have just been published inadvertently by the Office for National Statistics.

A report published by the ONS on September 13th 2021 was a clear attempt to dupe the public into believing the majority of Covid-19 deaths are occurring among the unvaccinated popuation. But the date parameters used in their report include a huge swathe of deaths that occurred during the second alleged wave of Covid-19 in January 2021, when barely anybody was vaccinated.

The cut off point was also the 2nd July 2021, meaning deaths that have occurred during the summer third wave that we are currently experiencing have not been included.

https://theexpose.uk/2021/09/15/30k-people-died-within-21-days-of-having-a-covid-19-vaccine-in-england/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can’t help but chuckle at all the jabbed parents threatening legal action, should their kid be jabbed.

 

Did their uncle Boris not explain clearly enough that they now have no say on what happens to their children?

 

Maybe they didn’t hear him over all the laughter at the ‘tinfoil heads’ who predicted all this…

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

 

Are you questioning the colour of the blood?  The more oxygen in the blood the redder it is. Deoxygenated is darker. Sorry if I missed the point. Venous blood is more blue/reddy/black. Arterial blood being the reddest I believe.

 

Edited by Beaujangles
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, EnigmaticWorld said:

 

 

 he's there wearing a suit which i assume is to bring dignity to the work place and yet he's a grown ass man punting about indoors on what looks like a childrens toy

 

i can't imagine my grandfathers or even my fathers generation behaving like that. No decorum

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

they say they can't cure cancer despite billions having been suck into 'research' and yet they claim they cured a novel cold virus in just 8 months

 

they've been jabbing people with flu vaccines for years but its still here

I was watching a program on online where some bloke was diagnosed with terminal cancer and see that a Scandinavian prof was using brest milk to try and cure it. When he was drinking daily amounts the tumor shrunk, when he stopped it re grew, started drinking again it shrunk. I've seen some program where they claim the venom from a bee sting can destroy cancer cells. Big pharma won't touch it because it's not profitable unfortunatley. No point in curing it if you can spend eternity charging for radiation poison. Nature always produces a antidote somehow but in today's age it's not profitable enough.

I also think positive thinking can play a big part, as people are non stop bombarded with cancer images along with others, the brain thinks it the brain makes it scenario.

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SimonTV said:

 

I am not sure how to calculate the chance vs dying of other causes. 

 

image.png

 

I do think though that some of the stats are skewed to make the vaccine look more effective than it is at stopping covid deaths and some unvaccinated deaths are likely misattributed as covid deaths to boost those numbers. 

 

I think this is correct which kind of tallys with your previous post on this - I removed the context of covid existing to see if it clarifies at all.

 

Deaths Totals 265982

 

104134 unvaxed

 

161848 vaxed

 

61% of all deaths were vaccinated!

39% of all deaths were not vaccinated

 

Overall ~20% increase in mortality if you vaccinate!

according to the presented data.

 

 

Edited by zarkov
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Looney tune said:

Big pharma won't touch it because it's not profitable

 

i think it goes beyond that

 

before wokeness took over it was a common argument on the left that the bad things that were done in the world by the corporations were done due to greed plain and simple

 

i don't subscribe to that view. I subscribe to a conspiratorial conception of history

 

I believe that they ignore treatments that work and create synthetic drugs that cause harm deliberately as a way to weaponise healthcare against humanity

 

By firing pills instead of bullets it allows them to have 'plausible deniability' when something goes wrong as they can hide behind their pretense that they are in the 'healthcare' business. They can say it was a 'rare' occurance or an 'accident' or that 'more research needs to be done' but that 'correlation does not prove causation'

 

They can get away with this for as long as the bulk of people continue to believe that big pharma is working for their best interests. I don't believe that.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...