Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

I received a wonderful message from one of my teachers today, part of which I will share here hopefully to inspire.

 

"It is of utmost importance to never let fear dictate or even affect your action. The success of their strategy depends on fear. Thus, never-ceasing fear mongering.

 

Ultimately we all need to be ready and willing to stand alone against tyranny.

 

We are with you, standing alone, but together."

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SimonTV said:

 

What else would it be? Maybe it has not been labelled yet?

 

 

On closer inspection there is something attached to them with labels but it would have been better if those labels were in view. Anything of a personal note on it like who's it was could be blacked out but it would have been nice to have read what was on the labels rather than left guessing what was in the bags eg weather one is graphene or weather something else is in there making it look that colour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Looney tune said:

On closer inspection there is something attached to them with labels but it would have been better if those labels were in view. Anything of a personal note on it like who's it was could be blacked out but it would have been nice to have read what was on the labels rather than left guessing what was in the bags eg weather one is graphene or weather something else is in there making it look that colour.

 

I assume it is two different blood samples taken from two different people, one vaccinated and the other not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

I assume it is two different blood samples taken from two different people, one vaccinated and the other not. 

It most likely is, but most likely doesn't guarantee it is. Theres alot of misinformation flying about I would rather be 100 percent rather than wrong or as close to. I just think if it was one vax and one not you would have put the labels in view so as to leave no confusion. It leaves it to guess work rather than clearing it up which wouldn't have taken much time to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Looney tune said:

It most likely is, but most likely doesn't guarantee it is. Theres alot of misinformation flying about I would rather be 100 percent rather than wrong or as close to. I just think if it was one vax and one not you would have put the labels in view so as to leave no confusion. It leaves it to guess work rather than clearing it up which wouldn't have taken much time to do.

 

I guess the one on the right could be chocolate milk in a blood bag. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

I guess the one on the right could be chocolate milk in a blood bag. 

Lol. But it might not even be human blood. Or it could be contaminated blood via something else. Or it could be graphene from vax. But if it was the smoking gun to end this charade then moving the bags attached into view so they could have been read and maybe ended this vax demic that's going on once and for all. Just because there's two bags of blood isn't enough to say what's in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Anti Facts Sir said:

Pity the old forum from 2012-14 isn't still part of this one, as the incredibly detailed and thorough Savile thread(s) on there had plenty of non-mainstream info and contemporary evidence. Anders (RIP) and other diligent people put hundreds of hours into uncovering all kinds of links and examples of what went on. But this is for the Child Abuse sub-forum, really.

Yes please someone reopen the old savile threads, i come here for covid news. I read all books and watched plenty of indie documentaries about that necrphile paedo, don't need this thread cluttered with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could some of you smarter folks help me out please?  I visit my local market café two to three times per week.  As such, I have got to know other regulars.  Here's my issue.  There is one individual who is aware that I have a passion for travel.  Indeed, on a number of occasions, he has taken great delight in reminding me that I can no longer go on holiday due to me not having the vaccine, which is of course isn't strictly true, not yet anyway.  This individual I can only describe as a 40 watter (although the light is most definitely on, its just that it isn't very bright)and again, today, with a smug smile, reminded me that I wouldn't be going on holiday, unless I accepted the jab.  My reply has always been the same in that I have replied by saying at least I have my health.

 

Anyway, next time this idiot feels the need to remind me that I will need to have the jab, I would like to reply in a simple way what the vaccine is doing to his body.  How can I put the fear of god into him by explaining in a simple way what the poison is doing, or will do to his body.  Immature I know, but I'm pissed off with his smugness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.png

 

Based on this after vaccination you are more likely to die of non covid-19 related death than an unvaccinated person and with the non covid related deaths 4 times more common, you have a greater chance of dying as a result of the vaccine. 

 

21% more chance dying non covid after vaccination vs 18% greater chance of dying of covid with no vaccine. 

 

Not sure if math is correct. That is if we accept the statistics as they are. 

Edited by SimonTV
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

image.png

 

Based on this after vaccination you are more likely to die of non covid-19 related death than an unvaccinated person and with the non covid related deaths 4 times more common, you have a greater chance of dying as a result of the vaccine. 

Its like the fact a child is more likely to die from adverse reactions in the jab than they would of ever getting hit by lightning. But they are still pushing ahead with it regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Looney tune said:

Its like the fact a child is more likely to die from adverse reactions in the jab than they would of ever getting hit by lightning. But they are still pushing ahead with it regardless.

 

I am not sure how to calculate the chance vs dying of other causes. 

 

image.png

 

I do think though that some of the stats are skewed to make the vaccine look more effective than it is at stopping covid deaths and some unvaccinated deaths are likely misattributed as covid deaths to boost those numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mikey13 said:

Could some of you smarter folks help me out please?  I visit my local market café two to three times per week.  As such, I have got to know other regulars.  Here's my issue.  There is one individual who is aware that I have a passion for travel.  Indeed, on a number of occasions, he has taken great delight in reminding me that I can no longer go on holiday due to me not having the vaccine, which is of course isn't strictly true, not yet anyway.  This individual I can only describe as a 40 watter (although the light is most definitely on, its just that it isn't very bright)and again, today, with a smug smile, reminded me that I wouldn't be going on holiday, unless I accepted the jab.  My reply has always been the same in that I have replied by saying at least I have my health.

 

Anyway, next time this idiot feels the need to remind me that I will need to have the jab, I would like to reply in a simple way what the vaccine is doing to his body.  How can I put the fear of god into him by explaining in a simple way what the poison is doing, or will do to his body.  Immature I know, but I'm pissed off with his smugness.

When he asks how are you ? Just smile and say „I‘ m feeling great  and I feel sooo free life couldn‘t be better !  „  

 

and say it like you mean it because that is what you are!

 

then say to him „are you happy ? „

 

don‘t get on subject of covid pass , vaccines, or restrictions !

 

just be you youself  ! You are free and you are master of your life!

 

like david icke says the moment you are botherd abou what others think of you you are NOT living Your life  ! So enjoy every little thing in your life ( how good is the coffee your drinking for example ! Live life as if iyou‘ve been reborn)

 

you friend is NOT living HiS life ! Thats why he needs to compare himself with you !

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mikey13 said:

Could some of you smarter folks help me out please?  I visit my local market café two to three times per week.  As such, I have got to know other regulars.  Here's my issue.  There is one individual who is aware that I have a passion for travel.  Indeed, on a number of occasions, he has taken great delight in reminding me that I can no longer go on holiday due to me not having the vaccine, which is of course isn't strictly true, not yet anyway.  This individual I can only describe as a 40 watter (although the light is most definitely on, its just that it isn't very bright)and again, today, with a smug smile, reminded me that I wouldn't be going on holiday, unless I accepted the jab.  My reply has always been the same in that I have replied by saying at least I have my health.

 

Anyway, next time this idiot feels the need to remind me that I will need to have the jab, I would like to reply in a simple way what the vaccine is doing to his body.  How can I put the fear of god into him by explaining in a simple way what the poison is doing, or will do to his body.  Immature I know, but I'm pissed off with his smugness.

 

Words are wasted on dimwits.

Scissor kick to the windpipe will suffice.

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, SimonTV said:

 

I am not sure how to calculate the chance vs dying of other causes. 

 

image.png

 

I do think though that some of the stats are skewed to make the vaccine look more effective than it is at stopping covid deaths and some unvaccinated deaths are likely misattributed as covid deaths to boost those numbers. 

It's like when they were  counting gun shot victims and road accidents as died of covid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ergo Storm said:

 

I am not the only person who is sceptical about it.  Others have questioned it.  I am aware of at least two popular blogs that go into the matter in some detail, though to be honest, my scepticism pre-dates those.  I was sceptical from the moment the story broke.  And yes, one basis for scepticism is that it comes from the mainstream media, but there are other reasons.  I tend to find that people who have been taken in by the Savile-Harris-Gad stories are approaching the topic emotionally or from an agenda-driven perspective (anti-Establishment or whatever) and not considering the facts and whether the allegations add up, which mostly they do not.

 

I do NOT want to get distracted from this thread.  The relevance of it to this thread is the propaganda angle and the credulity of people-at-large in believing fantastical stories without applying critical thinking.

In fairness Gad was found to have abused a little boy in a village where I used to live. Was reported but then got hushed up. As for the others I don’t have any personal knowledge or evidence. You may be right or wrong.😁

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ergo Storm said:

 

That would mean everybody who works at the BBC is a sex offender.  Clearly that cannot be true, but that would be the logic of what you say, so your logic is specious.  I agree that the evidence against him seems thin and there are lots of obvious flaws in the narrative that hardly anybody discusses.

Jill Dando who worked for the beeb was allegedly investigating pedo angle when she was murdered. Don’t know if she really was investigating but if she was a genuine diamond in the rough, they definitely needed to off her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...