Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

 

I don't care if I am better than them or not. What matter is if I am effective in producing a result at this point and I don't need to seek a permission or approval from anybody though I'd appreciate extra ideas from others. We've been through these kind of moral issues in the past and look where it got to us. You are the kind of person who would say in a war, oh it's the enemy's stash, we shouldn't steal from them. lol All war is based on deception if you read Sun Tzu.

 

 

Dude you asked me for a alternative (even tho I said I get where your coming from) i gave a quick response which I never I must add advocated anyone to do just gave an opinion. I said to you I DON'T THINK thats the way to go about it (again my own opinion), I never told you you couldn't do it.  Your a tripe condescending if your presuming you know how I would act in a war, it's difficult to call it stealing when there dead. War is war and you fight till either they are all dead or god forbid I end up losing and am dead. What the foxs idea of de culting sounded a better way to go. Are you the type to fight for free will by removing someones free will along the way? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mikhail Liebestein said:

 

yes of course as they intend to get the nanotech into everyone. They said this clearly from the start. Bill Gates told us they wanted to jab all 7 billion people on the planet.

 

It is now becoming harder for them to spin this though......we have seen more caution as they approached the issue of jabbing 12+

 

For this age bracket they have said that parental consent will be sought but can be over ruled which is a kind of compromise that doesn't sound too tyrannical whilst in fact being completely morally reprehensible

 

So how will they spin the next age bracket of say 5-12 year olds (ie primary school kids)?

 

Once again they will of course have to stave off a fullblown meltdown from parents by saying 'parental consent will be sought' but can they really play the gillick competancy card for children so young?

 

I guess what they could do is use a disaster as cover for being more aggressive. For example as people die of the jabs they can blame the deaths on a variant of the covid and declare an emergency under which they declare mandated jabs or they could simply say that all kids who want to go to schools must be jabbed....

 

its going to be interesting to see how they push jabs on the 5-12 years olds whilst still trying to keep up the pretense that this is a democracy where people have rights...

Edited by Macnamara
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Macnamara said:

 

 

 

its going to be interesting to see how they push jabs on the 5-12 years olds whilst still trying to keep up the pretense that this is a democracy where people have rights...

 

Whilst trying to keep up the pretense that this is about a deady contagion, which kids don't get.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Velma said:

Whilst trying to keep up the pretense that this is about a deady contagion, which kids don't get.

 

YES!

 

with that age bracket we have a few converging logical fallacies that will surely cause some grinding of the mental gears for even the most retarded of normies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

25 minutes ago, DaleP said:

 

 

I don't care if I am better than them or not. What matter is if I am effective in producing a result at this point and I don't need to seek a permission or approval from anybody though I'd appreciate extra ideas from others. We've been through these kind of moral issues in the past and look where it got to us. You are the kind of person who would say in a war, oh it's the enemy's stash, we shouldn't steal from them. lol All war is based on deception if you read Sun Tzu.

 

 

So far you've called me the 77th, now it's I bet your this sort of person, what next as you seem to have a hard on for me at the moment. I only gave you a opinion and then have just responded to your mini onslaught! You need a hug or something?

Edited by Looney tune
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Macnamara said:

so after countless blood clots have been reported they are still considered 'rare' events are they? total clown world

Champion show jumper, 22, who suffered 'extremely rare' reaction to Moderna vaccine may never ride again as doctors say blood clots that formed on her lungs after she had Covid jab could have been triggered by taking the combined contraceptive pill

  • Imogen Allen, 22, had two blood clots form on her lungs after Moderna vaccine
  • Doctors said the clots may have been triggered by jab and contraceptive pill
  • She will be on blood-thinning medication for all her life due to the rare reaction 
  • Ms Allen, from Woodcote, may never ride a horse again or become a detective

By Kate Dennett For Mailonline

Published: 09:38 EDT, 15 September 2021 | Updated: 09:54 EDT, 15 September 2021

A champion show jumper may never ride a horse again after two massive clots formed on her lungs in an incredibly rare reaction to the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine.

Imogen Allen, 22, was told by doctors that the clots, which formed two weeks after she was jabbed, could have been triggered by the vaccine alongside five years on the combined contraceptive pill.

Ms Allen, from Woodcote, Berkshire, may never be able to ride a horse again and has had her dreams of becoming a police detective dashed after she was left bedbound.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9993515/Show-jumper-22-suffered-extremely-rare-reaction-Moderna-vaccine-never-ride-again.html

 

Are the contraindications even being taken in account?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Velma said:

 

Whilst trying to keep up the pretense that this is about a deady contagion, which kids don't get.

They could spin the inevitable adverse reactions that the 12-15 year olds suffer as a new variant of covid.....to scare and panic the parents of the younger age group children into getting them vaxxed. High likelihood is that the media will go full steam ahead with children getting covid stories over these next few weeks to ramp up the fear. They could also turn up/ turn on 5G in school settings to embolden the lie.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Golden Retriever said:

Because the Goyim are cattle.

 

Read the Babylonian Talmud to understand their supremacism

 

 

 

So, I'm guessing hospital admissions are going to soar and a jab-resistant variant will take over!

 

Then they wil limplement Plan C which will be a lockdown with a new name, like a "heartbreak."

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nemuri Kyoshiro said:

Whoa! What have I missed?

While I can see what @Ergo Storm perhaps means by the way the media and elites were happy to let Savile (or the legacy of Savile) come out posthumously; it was simply a limited hangout, intended to distract from the full extent of dodgy goings-on, rituals, murder etc being perpertrated over several decades.

 

One Bad Apple, basically.

 

But there is so much overwhelming evidence of Savile's crimes, and behaviour, there is no way he was innocent of anything.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

https://reclaimthenet.org/bbc-chairman-calls-for-crackdown-on-speech-online/

 

Richard Sharp, BBC Chairman, is likely to back proposals to increase regulation of the world’s largest social networks and platforms to combat “fake news” and “disinformation.”

 

It is pertinent to ask “urgent questions” about these platforms, since platforms have allowed lies, conspiracy theories, and falsehoods to spread rapidly, the chairman claimed in a speech to the Royal Television Society convention.

 

Since assuming office in February, Sharp will make his first significant public statement, calling for an update to outdated Communications Act of 2003, calling for a crackdown on speech online.

 

He continued stating that he wants the BBC “to define itself globally as a pre-eminent purveyor of facts in the disinformation age.”

 

Sharp also claimed that “The pandemic and ‘infodemic’ that has spread alongside have left us in no doubt of how vulnerable we all are. But it has also suggested that some are more vulnerable than others….The magnetic draw of conspiracy theories in our societies is getting stronger. And we can no longer pretend it doesn’t have real-life consequences – whether it’s pulling down 5G masts, driving down vaccine take up, or leaving the results of democratic elections in doubt, ” Televisual reported.

 

Even though the provision of fact-checking services and coordinating efforts between platforms and credible news organizations to detect misinformation is important, Sharp alleged more needed to be done.

 

“There are urgent questions to be answered about the future media world we want to live in. We need to rethink the regulatory environment in this country – and replace a Communications Act that predates Facebook with one that can deliver on a clear vision,” the chairman said.

 

“But we also need to look at where the digital world comes up against the fundamental rights, freedoms and privacies we sign up to as societies and individuals. Does the principle of media freedom need to be redefined and re-enshrined for the digital age? Do we need to claim our personal data as a human right, rather than an asset to be bought and sold?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...