Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Message added by Grumpy Owl,

This topic is for all general discussion regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic. There are of course numerous other related topics for discussing specific aspects of this pandemic in more detail. And there are other parts of this forum for more 'off-topic' discussions.

Recommended Posts

Also praying that all parents will send their school this IMMEDIATE CEASE AND DESIST NOTICE

 

If enough parents take action now then we can stop this as a collective, we have to take action, united we stand and fuck their NWO CHILD SACRIFICE RITUAL.

 

JAIL THESE EVIL BASTARDS NOW.

 

https://www.nomorelockdowns.uk/immediate_cease_desist

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SimonTV said:

https://t.me/resistancegbchat/28112

 

Sturgeon said that 12-15 year olds recommending vaccine not "only" for their health benefit but also to make going back to school "easier" and that they only need one dose not 3 like adults. 

 

Total utter madness and without all logic. I do feel like I am living in the soviet union under Bolshevik rule. 

 

had the same thought as I watched. Completely contradicts herself. Peoples brains must be deep fried to accept this corporate diatribe.

 

"OFFER" of vaccine!

 

 

12-15yr olds do not comprehend the distinction that is a contractual offer, nor associated implications.

 

The universal age of consent is 16yrs

 

No Contract!

Edited by zarkov
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PLEASE SEND THIS IMMEDIATELY via e-mail and or post to anyone you think with ANY involvement with the rollout of jabs to healthy 12 to 15 year olds. This can range from CMO's, The PM, The Health Secretary to headmasters/teachers/healthcare workers and any venues that will be facilitating this. Even the janitor opening the door to these venues or ANYONE facilitating this in any way no matter how small can be held CRIMINALLY responsible should anything happen to a healthy child.

 

You can send this is as an individual/parent(s)/guardian(s)/group(s)

All sections in RED please amend accordingly, we will next send out a generic one that can be handed to anyone you feel is involved and you can then take their name and details for future criminal trials.

 

 

Your Name and Address                                                                              

Name & Address of Recipient      

Date                                                                                                              

  

Re: Cease and desist demand 

Dear ______________________: 

  

I/We believe that you are involved in either the decision making or practical elements in the rolling out of experimental Pfizer Gene Therapies to children between the ages of 12-15. 

 

The JCVI has said these are not safe for healthy Children aged 12-15 and the MHRA Yellow Card scheme has already documented over 1600 deaths following 'Covid 19 vaccinations' as well as over 1 million adverse reactions in the UK alone as a result of these jabs. Details can be found here: https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/ 

 

I/We will hold you Name of individual or organisation PERSONALLY & CRIMINALLY responsible should any harm come to a child as a result of your actions. I/We have made you aware of the adverse reactions on the Yellow Card scheme and you will not be able to use ignorance as an excuse for any crimes you may commit as a result of this rollout.  Please be aware that I/Wewill be pursuing this at both a UK level and additionally as an international crime against humanity which will then proceed to international trials. 

 

This will serve as your legal notice to cease and I/We require you to desist IMMEDIATELY all further actions in relation to the jab rollout for healthy 12-15 year olds described above. Saying you were 'just obeying orders' is not an excuse! 

 

I/We may use telephone recording devices to document any telephone conversations that I/We may have in the future if you fail to comply with this cease-and-desist letter. You are hereby instructed to comply with this letter IMMEDIATELY or face legal sanctions under applicable law. I/We intend to keep a log of any contacts you make with me after you receive this letter. 

 

Please give this very important matter your utmost attention. 

  

Sincerely, 

  

Name of Sender 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

 

BUMP ... BECAUSE SOMEONE IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS WANTS TO KNOW MORE INFORMATION ABOUT VACCINE DEATHs

 

I think this MP has been hoodwinked. In July he asked the government for the number of people who had died soon after having the covid vaccine. But the government promised to give him the figures for the number of vaccinated people who have died in hospital from covid. He's complaining that they still haven't given him the information and he doesn't seem to realise that the figures they've offered to give him are useless. These deaths would be so-called breakthrough cases, not potential vaccine deaths.

 

"Data on the number of deaths reported of people who have died within 1, 2, and 3 months of having received a covid-19 vaccination since the 1st January is not available in the format requested. Public Health England monitors the number of people who have been admitted to hospital and died from covid-19 who have received 1 or 2 doses of the vaccine and will publish this data in due course. That data has not yet been published"

 

(3:06)

 

Hancock resigned in June so the minister must have been Javid. But he asked the same question in March and Handcock struggled to come up with an answer and eventually fobbed him off with this:

 

"Let's try and do that by correspondence to make sure that we're getting it, er, exactly what's being looked for".

 

(1:15)

 

They made sure they knew exactly what he was looking for, then offered him something else.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, zarkov said:

 

had the same thought as I watched. Completely contradicts herself. Peoples brains must be deep fried to accept this corporate diatribe.

 

"OFFER" of vaccine!

 

 

12-15yr olds do not comprehend the distinction that is a contractual offer, nor associated implications.

 

The universal age of consent is 16yrs

 

No Contract!

 

They play lip service to informed consent, are they going to tell children all the potential side effects? very unlikely. You don't need to be an expert in risk to see that the benefits do not outweigh the risks and to even suggest that they should risk their health, so that the paranoid teachers and authorities have an easier job of allowing them back in to school is outrageous on its own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know the reason reason they want to get the children, so they can complete their infertility roll out, boost sales even further and so that when they bring in their vaccine passports there is not a group that will not have been offered the vaccines, which will be a non starter for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bryan said:

 

I think this MP has been hoodwinked. In July he asked the government for the number of people who had died soon after having the covid vaccine. But the government promised to give him the figures for the number of vaccinated people who have died in hospital from covid. He's complaining that they still haven't given him the information and he doesn't seem to realise that the figures they've offered to give him are useless. These deaths would be so-called breakthrough cases, not potential vaccine deaths.

 

"Data on the number of deaths reported of people who have died within 1, 2, and 3 months of having received a covid-19 vaccination since the 1st January is not available in the format requested. Public Health England monitors the number of people who have been admitted to hospital and died from covid-19 who have received 1 or 2 doses of the vaccine and will publish this data in due course. That data has not yet been published"

 

(3:06)

 

Hancock resigned in June so the minister must have been Javid. But he asked the same question in March and Handcock struggled to come up with an answer and eventually fobbed him off with this:

 

"Let's try and do that by correspondence to make sure that we're getting it, er, exactly what's being looked for".

 

(1:15)

 

They made sure they knew exactly what he was looking for, then offered him something else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

If there is to be a perfect example of someone 'fobbing off' another, this just has to be it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SimonTV said:

We know the reason reason they want to get the children, so they can complete their infertility roll out, boost sales even further and so that when they bring in their vaccine passports there is not a group that will not have been offered the vaccines, which will be a non starter for it. 

I know mate and it sad to watch unfold in slow motion.

Its the children they've been after all along - render infertile!

 In years to come it will be in vitro fertilisation, incubation and birth in clinical settings then progress to "raised by the state" 

Full on indoctrination, full state ownership. Full time slavery

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone made an interesting point on Telegram about how we don't see any so called covid deaths outside of the hospital. We do see a lot of deaths from vaccines outside of hospital which are blamed on covid and also the misallocation of deaths from other causes on covid. But actual covid deaths outside of hospital have been pretty much non existent.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SimonTV said:

Someone made an interesting point on Telegram about how we don't see any so called covid deaths outside of the hospital. We do see a lot of deaths from vaccines outside of hospital which are blamed on covid and also the misallocation of deaths from other causes on covid. But actual covid deaths outside of hospital have been pretty much non existent.

Excellent point - damage limitation!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SimonTV said:

Someone made an interesting point on Telegram about how we don't see any so called covid deaths outside of the hospital. We do see a lot of deaths from vaccines outside of hospital which are blamed on covid and also the misallocation of deaths from other causes on covid. But actual covid deaths outside of hospital have been pretty much non existent.

I'd imagine it's because it only exsist in medical profession. Out in the real world it's known as convid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?

 

https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101/rr-0   - full text

We must stop ignoring natural immunity - it’s now long overdue!

Dear Editor

There is now growing body of literature supporting the conclusion that natural immunity not only confers robust, durable, and high-level protection against COVID-19, but also better than vaccine induced immunity (1-5). Yet most scientific journals, media outlets, self-proclaimed health experts and public policy messaging continue to cast doubt. That doubt has real-world consequences, particularly for resource limited countries. We would like to review available data.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, zarkov said:

Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?

 

https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101/rr-0   - full text

We must stop ignoring natural immunity - it’s now long overdue!

Dear Editor

There is now growing body of literature supporting the conclusion that natural immunity not only confers robust, durable, and high-level protection against COVID-19, but also better than vaccine induced immunity (1-5). Yet most scientific journals, media outlets, self-proclaimed health experts and public policy messaging continue to cast doubt. That doubt has real-world consequences, particularly for resource limited countries. We would like to review available data.

 

 

Excellent content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boris said he is keeping his stockpile of masks and pcr tests and vaccine passports on standby if we have case numbers rise in winter. So the vaccines don't offer protection or immunity then? What a waste of billions of £ that was then...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, zarkov said:

I know mate and it sad to watch unfold in slow motion.

Its the children they've been after all along - render infertile!

 In years to come it will be in vitro fertilisation, incubation and birth in clinical settings then progress to "raised by the state" 

Full on indoctrination, full state ownership. Full time slavery

Only the rich will be able to have children. They might keep some fertile women around for surrogate purposes but teh kids are the main target of this abomination. If we can't reproduce, the population will die out and they'll have their 500 million population.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still out of likes -  Keep using them up somehow LOL

@Nemuri Kyoshiro seems that way.

Most of us are familiar with dystopian ideation which in itself primes the psyche.

 

It would be interesting to have had a parallel society that had not been drip fed dystopian ideals so as to ascertain the degree of reactivity by comparison.

Edited by zarkov
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case you thought the PCR test detects an actual virus...wrong 

by Jon Rappoport 

(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

 

In a CDC document titled, “Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020,” under the section, “Laboratory Criteria,” we have this:

 

“Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ribonucleic acid (SARS-CoV-2 RNA) in a clinical or autopsy specimen using a molecular amplification test.”

 

The test referred to is the PCR. And as you can plainly see, it is detecting, not the virus itself, but a piece of RNA.

 

A piece of RNA ASSUMED to come from the virus, SARS-CoV-2.

 

I say ASSUMED because, where is the actual virus? Where is the virus isolated from all surrounding material?

 

If you don’t have an isolated specimen of the virus, you can’t say, with any degree of certainty at all, that you have a piece of it (the RNA).

 

As I’ve described many times, “isolated” is a term that is tortured by researchers, so that it means just the opposite of what it is supposed to mean.

 

Numerous studies that claim the virus has been isolated actually turn out to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. The soup contains various types of animal and humans cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and other genetic material. The virus is completely surrounded, but it is there. We know this, because some of the cells are dying, and this dying must be the result of infection with the virus…”

 

This argument not only turns the definition of “isolation” on its head, it reveals, upon a moment’s consideration, that the dying of the cells could come from the action of the toxic chemicals and drugs; and on top of that, the cells are being starved of nutrients, so they could be dying as a result of that deprivation.

 

Therefore, to say “the virus must be in the soup in the dish in the lab” because is killing cells…well, this is completely unproven, and therefore…

 

There is no reason under the sun to claim that the virus is there in the soup at all.

 

Hence, the claim that the PCR test is detecting a piece of RNA from the virus is unwarranted. Because, again…where is the virus? Where is the truly isolated virus?

 

Nowhere.

 

And on that basis alone, the PCR test is irrelevant, useless, and deceptive.

 

It is set up to look for and detect a piece of RNA material that has never been proved to come from this un-isolated phantom ASSUMPTION, called “SARS-CoV-2.”

 

A few more moments of clear thought, and you realize the whole string of “science” that leads to the lockdowns and the economic devastation is not science at all.

 

It is what is called, in the intelligence community, a cover story. A story launched to justify crimes.

 

In this case, capital crimes against humanity.

 

~~~

 

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)

 

(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hey guys, can anybody help me out here.

 

Im working on a quick video about vax deaths and I was wondering if anybody knew of the clip I will describe.

 

Somewhere in america around 6 months or so ago a black woman was talking on a stage surrounded by vax pushers and she went on to say "I dont care whats in it, im not looking at the ingredients, Im rolling up my sleeve, and im taking it"

 

Anyone help?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, zarkov said:

 

Out of reactions - feel the same way!

Seems to be the crack with most purchase to pry open the grand deception of the parasitical corporate agenda.

________________________________________________________________

 

Lone MP puts his head above the parapet for vaccine victims

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/lone-mp-puts-his-head-above-the-parapet-for-vaccine-victims/  - Full article

 

 

MHRA Yellow Card reporting published September 9 2021, figures to September 1

Pfizer – 21.9million people – 40million doses – Yellow Card reporting rate: 1 in 197 people impacted

AstraZeneca – 24.8m people – 48.9m doses – Yellow Card reporting rate: 1 in 107 impacted

Moderna – 1.4m people – 2.3m doses – Yellow Card reporting rate: 1 in 93 impacted

Overall, 1 in 134 people injected experienced a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10 per cent of actual figures, according to MHRA.

Reactions – 314,700 (Pfizer) + 820,923 (AZ) + 47,977 (Moderna) + 3244 (Unknown) = 1,186,844

Reports – 111,317 (Pfizer) + 230,499 (AZ) + 15,079 (Moderna) + 1,061 (Unknown) = 357,956

Fatal – 524 (Pfizer) + 1,064 (AZ) + 16 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1,632

Acute cardiac – 5,129 (Pfizer) + 9,214 (AZ) + 544 (Moderna) + 40 (Unknown) = 14,927

Pericarditis/myocarditis (Heart inflammation) – 427 (Pfizer) + 259 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 770

Anaphylaxis – 476 (Pfizer) + 816 (AZ) + 37 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1,330

Blood disorders – 10,736 (Pfizer) + 7407 (AZ) + 895 (Moderna) + 44 (Unknown) = 19,082

Infections – 7,421 (Pfizer) + 18,237 (AZ) + 802 (Moderna) + 90 (Unknown) = 26,550

Herpes – 1,602 (Pfizer) + 2,492 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 4,188

Headaches – 22,354 (Pfizer) + 83,728 (AZ) + 2,883 (Moderna) + 232 (Unknown) = 109,197

Migraine – 2,599 (Pfizer) + 8,064 (AZ) + 319 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 11,011

Eye disorders – 5,236 (Pfizer) + 13,818 (AZ) + 542 (Moderna) + 57 (Unknown) = 19,653

Blindness – 101 (Pfizer) + 283 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 402

Deafness – 195 (Pfizer) + 367 (AZ) + 16 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 580

Psychiatric disorders – 6,444 (Pfizer) + 17,172 (AZ) + 977 (Moderna) + 76 (Unknown) = 24,669

Skin disorders – 22,076 (Pfizer) + 50,525 (AZ) + 7,024 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) = 79,839

Muscle & tissue disorders – 37,907 (Pfizer) + 98,975 (AZ) + 5,235 (Moderna) + 371 (Unknown) = 142,488

Spontaneous abortions – 301 + 7 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 203 + 2 stillbirth (AZ) + 29 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 535 + 10 (figures now imply 24 related maternal deaths)

Vomiting – 3,390 (Pfizer) + 11,377 (AZ) + 574 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 15,383

Facial paralysis including Bell’s Palsy – 727 (Pfizer) + 879 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1,667

Nervous system disorders – 55,002 (Pfizer) + 174,814 (AZ) + 7473 (Moderna) + 615 (Unknown) = 237,904

Strokes and CNS haemorrhages – 515 (Pfizer) + 2033 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2,574

Guillain-Barré syndrome – 46 (Pfizer) + 397 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 451

Tremor – 1,349 (Pfizer) + 9,692 (AZ) + 173 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 11,252

Pulmonary embolism & deep vein thrombosis – 623 (Pfizer) + 2,737 (AZ) + 32 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3,410

Respiratory disorders – 13,500 (Pfizer) + 27,616 (AZ) + 1,253 (Moderna) + 113 (Unknown) = 42,482

Seizures – 757 (Pfizer) + 1891 (AZ) + 127 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 2,786

Paralysis – 308 (Pfizer) + 748 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1,101

Haemorrhage (all types) – 2,755 (Pfizer) + 4,877 (AZ) + 342 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 8,003

Vertigo/tinnitus – 2,801 (Pfizer) + 6,389 (AZ) + 293 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 9,508

Renal/urinary – 852 (Pfizer) + 2,534 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3,512

Reproductive/breast – 18,171 (Pfizer) + 17,023 (AZ) + 2,388 (Moderna) + 131 (Unknown) = 37,713

See Annex One for full reports.

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Not forgetting the ~5000 Scottish vaccine related deaths!

 

 

I have just emailed my child's school with this information and a reminder that the Cease and Desist Notice warns of CRIMINAL CHARGES OF ATTEMPTED MURDER if they participate IN ANY WAY in this genocide attempt against our children....

 

I am fucking on fire with this shit,

 

THEY SHALL NOT PASS WE WILL STAND AGAINST THEM TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN

 

NUREMBURG

NUREMBURG

NUREMBURG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an example of pure nonsense.

 

A work colleague has just had flu which (predictably) made her feel very poorly. Her doctor apparently told her that she had Covid (she tells me she has not been jabbed and refuses to be as she doesn't believe in it). And according to said doctor, it's because she had Covid that that made her catch flu. All the ill-feeling she suffered was, according to him, was flu, which she caught because she had Covid. If that is't blatant rubbish, I don't know what is. 

 

My daughter also supposedly had Covid the other week. Her symptoms, in my opinion, showed her to have a cold. And not even a bad one. They were not severe enough to deter her from chatting to me on the phone for an hour, and playing video games all week with her mate - so not really much of a reason to close the world down and race around the media shouting, "Don't panic", hysterically for 21 months, whilst convincing everyone we are killing our grannies (whilst the government actively orchestrated the isolating and killing grannies and grandads galore).

 

I can't even log in very often now because I am so incensed by the whole debacle when focusing on it that it was literally having a bad effect on my hypertension.

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...