Jump to content

Coronavirus Mega-Thread.


numnuts
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, whatthefoxhat said:

Question

Can anyone here say with any conviction that they can go for a period of 14 days without using a phone/computer/internet connection ?

 

At this moment in time i can't unless i go on the streets and even then i would find it very difficult to survive and i recently had occasion to spend a short period of time overnight on the streets with the homeless in Birmingham and every single person i spoke to in that community had a phone,admittedly some were dumb phones or 'old tech' smartphones but every one had one and viewed not having one as a distinct liability

 

Yes, I could live without an internet connection for 14 days and more.  If we are not going to take the jab, we have to be prepared to forget about the internet at some point soon, if the Agenda is not stopped.   I have never had a smartphone as it is a piece of tech I have never been interested in. A smartphone can easily get one sucked deeply into around the clock internet tech dependence, so I just say no.    My dumb phone I can leave at home without a worry.   I have gone from using 50/50 cash vs card payments to about 95% cash.  I have kept and increased my collection of books and films, so I can always entertain myself without the internet.

 

Edited by Orange Alert
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, oddsnsods said:

 

This topic is about covid, not XR or Bitcoin or any other shit you feel the urge to talk about.

Then you have the nerve to talk about them jabbing kids.

You disrespect the forum blatantly.

 

Ok thats it odds n sods has spoken no more talk of anything other than covid,nothing even remotely related covid only.And to talk of disrepsect is laughable in the extreme ,who exactly appointed you thread arbiter ? are there not mods for that ? perhaps you could become a mod and arrange the thread more to your liking ? would it generate the page views  if it was confined to discussion of the latest set of figures or the latest on the pcr test fiasco ?

It takes all sorts to make a world and sometimes it wont go the way you want it but intolerance of things because they don't fit into your pet theme or because you feel some kind of injustice because no one picked up on your latest set of ons figures is actually laughable,perhaps review how you present the information if you want more uptake or discussion but don't start having a go at other people because you don't want to see what they have to say as your information is FAR more important,that is not only disrspectful but arrogant in the extreme.Post it,if it doesnt get any reaction move on or alter the delivery but please don't start complaining that its other peoples fault when in reality perhaps it may have been the way you delivered the information in the first place that led to people ignoring it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Orange Alert said:

 

Yes, I could live without an internet connection for 14 days and more.  If we are not going to take the jab, we have to be prepared to forget about the internet at some point soon, if the Agenda is not stopped.   I have never had a smartphone as it is a piece of tech I have never been interested in. A smartphone I can see it getting one sucked deeply into around the clock internet tech dependence, so I just say no.    My dumb phone I can leave at home without a worry.   I have gone from using 50/50 cash vs card payments to about 95% cash.  I have kept and increased my collection of books and films, so I can always entertain myself without the internet.

 

Ditto or thereabouts

and outa likes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the Independent.

 

I don't understand how reducing capacity helps things. Surely just ensures us that we head into the Plan B scenario. 

 

Tory MP raises issue of hospital capacity with Sajid Javid

Conservative Esther McVey raised the issue of hospital capacity in the Commons today and asked the health secretary if additional capability was being built.

She said: “Given that the number of hospital beds has fallen by over 6,000 since the pandemic, figures sent to me by his department, will the minister assure me that proper additional capacity will be built back into the NHS as part of his plan, rather than resorting to hugely damaging lockdowns and restrictions.”

Sajid Javid replied: “The reason for the falling capacity in the first place is (to) control the spread of the virus to make sure that those in hospital that are naturally vulnerable in any case are protected from the virus.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Orange Alert said:

 

Yes, I could live without an internet connection for 14 days and more.  If we are not going to take the jab, we have to be prepared to forget about the internet at some point soon, if the Agenda is not stopped.   I have never had a smartphone as it is a piece of tech I have never been interested in. A smartphone can easily get one sucked deeply into around the clock internet tech dependence, so I just say no.    My dumb phone I can leave at home without a worry.   I have gone from using 50/50 cash vs card payments to about 95% cash.  I have kept and increased my collection of books and films, so I can always entertain myself without the internet.

 

I think the point of jab merging with the web is closer than most realise,maybe not so much in places like here where the vast majority are awake to the progress of the technocratic future but amongst folk who don't and never will seek an alternative viewpoint it's going to be a huge shock,I remember reading many years ago about internet addiction (prior to widespread smartphones time) and various 'experts' predicting psychological withdrawl symptoms manifesting in people suddenly finding themselves cut off which when it manifests,as it surely will, combined with the stress levels from lockdowns ,jab pressure etc doesn't bode well for the health prospects of those people welded to their 'tech' ,is this intentional ? time will tell but its something to be aware of as one of the first symptoms will be anger and it doesnt take a genius to work out where that will be funneled

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr H said:

From the Independent.

 

I don't understand how reducing capacity helps things. Surely just ensures us that we head into the Plan B scenario. 

 

Tory MP raises issue of hospital capacity with Sajid Javid

Conservative Esther McVey raised the issue of hospital capacity in the Commons today and asked the health secretary if additional capability was being built.

She said: “Given that the number of hospital beds has fallen by over 6,000 since the pandemic, figures sent to me by his department, will the minister assure me that proper additional capacity will be built back into the NHS as part of his plan, rather than resorting to hugely damaging lockdowns and restrictions.”

Sajid Javid replied: “The reason for the falling capacity in the first place is (to) control the spread of the virus to make sure that those in hospital that are naturally vulnerable in any case are protected from the virus.”

Maybe they can rebuild the nightingales ? wasn't what they were for originally ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, whatthefoxhat said:

Maybe they can rebuild the nightingales ? wasn't what they were for originally ?

I think so, but they were never used - strange considering we were meant to be in a pandemic. Staff shortages allegedly - would have thought they'd had plenty of time to train some more up.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, zArk said:

still not gonna read the telegraph or subscribe to it

it could paywall an article on the definitive meaning of life.. still wont be tempted

 

Although still employed by the Telegraph, who knows for how much longer?

 

Maybe he is controlled opposition, but if you read my Bob Moran thread, he blames

the NHS for damage to his baby daughter and his tweets are spot on.

 

Give him some credit.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, zarkov said:

 

Out of reactions - feel the same way!

Seems to be the crack with most purchase to pry open the grand deception of the parasitical corporate agenda.

________________________________________________________________

 

Lone MP puts his head above the parapet for vaccine victims

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/lone-mp-puts-his-head-above-the-parapet-for-vaccine-victims/  - Full article

 

 

MHRA Yellow Card reporting published September 9 2021, figures to September 1

Pfizer – 21.9million people – 40million doses – Yellow Card reporting rate: 1 in 197 people impacted

AstraZeneca – 24.8m people – 48.9m doses – Yellow Card reporting rate: 1 in 107 impacted

Moderna – 1.4m people – 2.3m doses – Yellow Card reporting rate: 1 in 93 impacted

Overall, 1 in 134 people injected experienced a Yellow Card Adverse Event, which may be less than 10 per cent of actual figures, according to MHRA.

Reactions – 314,700 (Pfizer) + 820,923 (AZ) + 47,977 (Moderna) + 3244 (Unknown) = 1,186,844

Reports – 111,317 (Pfizer) + 230,499 (AZ) + 15,079 (Moderna) + 1,061 (Unknown) = 357,956

Fatal – 524 (Pfizer) + 1,064 (AZ) + 16 (Moderna) + 28 (Unknown) = 1,632

Acute cardiac – 5,129 (Pfizer) + 9,214 (AZ) + 544 (Moderna) + 40 (Unknown) = 14,927

Pericarditis/myocarditis (Heart inflammation) – 427 (Pfizer) + 259 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) + 3 (Unknown) = 770

Anaphylaxis – 476 (Pfizer) + 816 (AZ) + 37 (Moderna) + 1 (Unknown) = 1,330

Blood disorders – 10,736 (Pfizer) + 7407 (AZ) + 895 (Moderna) + 44 (Unknown) = 19,082

Infections – 7,421 (Pfizer) + 18,237 (AZ) + 802 (Moderna) + 90 (Unknown) = 26,550

Herpes – 1,602 (Pfizer) + 2,492 (AZ) + 81 (Moderna) + 13 (Unknown) = 4,188

Headaches – 22,354 (Pfizer) + 83,728 (AZ) + 2,883 (Moderna) + 232 (Unknown) = 109,197

Migraine – 2,599 (Pfizer) + 8,064 (AZ) + 319 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 11,011

Eye disorders – 5,236 (Pfizer) + 13,818 (AZ) + 542 (Moderna) + 57 (Unknown) = 19,653

Blindness – 101 (Pfizer) + 283 (AZ) + 14 (Moderna) + 4 (Unknown) = 402

Deafness – 195 (Pfizer) + 367 (AZ) + 16 (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 580

Psychiatric disorders – 6,444 (Pfizer) + 17,172 (AZ) + 977 (Moderna) + 76 (Unknown) = 24,669

Skin disorders – 22,076 (Pfizer) + 50,525 (AZ) + 7,024 (Moderna) + 214 (Unknown) = 79,839

Muscle & tissue disorders – 37,907 (Pfizer) + 98,975 (AZ) + 5,235 (Moderna) + 371 (Unknown) = 142,488

Spontaneous abortions – 301 + 7 stillbirth/foetal death (Pfizer) + 203 + 2 stillbirth (AZ) + 29 + 1 foetal death (Moderna) + 2 (Unknown) = 535 + 10 (figures now imply 24 related maternal deaths)

Vomiting – 3,390 (Pfizer) + 11,377 (AZ) + 574 (Moderna) + 42 (Unknown) = 15,383

Facial paralysis including Bell’s Palsy – 727 (Pfizer) + 879 (AZ) + 54 (Moderna) + 7 (Unknown) = 1,667

Nervous system disorders – 55,002 (Pfizer) + 174,814 (AZ) + 7473 (Moderna) + 615 (Unknown) = 237,904

Strokes and CNS haemorrhages – 515 (Pfizer) + 2033 (AZ) + 17 (Moderna) + 9 (Unknown) = 2,574

Guillain-Barré syndrome – 46 (Pfizer) + 397 (AZ) + 3 (Moderna) + 5 (Unknown) = 451

Tremor – 1,349 (Pfizer) + 9,692 (AZ) + 173 (Moderna) + 38 (Unknown) = 11,252

Pulmonary embolism & deep vein thrombosis – 623 (Pfizer) + 2,737 (AZ) + 32 (Moderna) + 18 (Unknown) = 3,410

Respiratory disorders – 13,500 (Pfizer) + 27,616 (AZ) + 1,253 (Moderna) + 113 (Unknown) = 42,482

Seizures – 757 (Pfizer) + 1891 (AZ) + 127 (Moderna) + 11 (Unknown) = 2,786

Paralysis – 308 (Pfizer) + 748 (AZ) + 39 (Moderna) + 6 (Unknown) = 1,101

Haemorrhage (all types) – 2,755 (Pfizer) + 4,877 (AZ) + 342 (Moderna) + 29 (Unknown) = 8,003

Vertigo/tinnitus – 2,801 (Pfizer) + 6,389 (AZ) + 293 (Moderna) + 25 (Unknown) = 9,508

Renal/urinary – 852 (Pfizer) + 2,534 (AZ) + 103 (Moderna) + 23 (Unknown) = 3,512

Reproductive/breast – 18,171 (Pfizer) + 17,023 (AZ) + 2,388 (Moderna) + 131 (Unknown) = 37,713

See Annex One for full reports.

 

______________________________________________________________________________

 

Not forgetting the ~5000 Scottish vaccine related deaths!

 

 

 

Out of reactions

 

BUMP

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://t.me/resistancegbchat/28112

 

Sturgeon said that 12-15 year olds recommending vaccine not "only" for their health benefit but also to make going back to school "easier" and that they only need one dose not 3 like adults. 

 

Total utter madness and without all logic. I do feel like I am living in the soviet union under Bolshevik rule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if anyone has posted this so apologies if it has already been shared..

 

Read it and try not to throw up and/ or smash your computer lol

 

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1017404/COVID-19-response-autumn-and-winter-plan-2021.pdf

 

We are watching a movie.

 

A really really shit movie.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also praying that all parents will send their school this IMMEDIATE CEASE AND DESIST NOTICE

 

If enough parents take action now then we can stop this as a collective, we have to take action, united we stand and fuck their NWO CHILD SACRIFICE RITUAL.

 

JAIL THESE EVIL BASTARDS NOW.

 

https://www.nomorelockdowns.uk/immediate_cease_desist

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SimonTV said:

https://t.me/resistancegbchat/28112

 

Sturgeon said that 12-15 year olds recommending vaccine not "only" for their health benefit but also to make going back to school "easier" and that they only need one dose not 3 like adults. 

 

Total utter madness and without all logic. I do feel like I am living in the soviet union under Bolshevik rule. 

 

had the same thought as I watched. Completely contradicts herself. Peoples brains must be deep fried to accept this corporate diatribe.

 

"OFFER" of vaccine!

 

 

12-15yr olds do not comprehend the distinction that is a contractual offer, nor associated implications.

 

The universal age of consent is 16yrs

 

No Contract!

Edited by zarkov
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PLEASE SEND THIS IMMEDIATELY via e-mail and or post to anyone you think with ANY involvement with the rollout of jabs to healthy 12 to 15 year olds. This can range from CMO's, The PM, The Health Secretary to headmasters/teachers/healthcare workers and any venues that will be facilitating this. Even the janitor opening the door to these venues or ANYONE facilitating this in any way no matter how small can be held CRIMINALLY responsible should anything happen to a healthy child.

 

You can send this is as an individual/parent(s)/guardian(s)/group(s)

All sections in RED please amend accordingly, we will next send out a generic one that can be handed to anyone you feel is involved and you can then take their name and details for future criminal trials.

 

 

Your Name and Address                                                                              

Name & Address of Recipient      

Date                                                                                                              

  

Re: Cease and desist demand 

Dear ______________________: 

  

I/We believe that you are involved in either the decision making or practical elements in the rolling out of experimental Pfizer Gene Therapies to children between the ages of 12-15. 

 

The JCVI has said these are not safe for healthy Children aged 12-15 and the MHRA Yellow Card scheme has already documented over 1600 deaths following 'Covid 19 vaccinations' as well as over 1 million adverse reactions in the UK alone as a result of these jabs. Details can be found here: https://coronavirus-yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/ 

 

I/We will hold you Name of individual or organisation PERSONALLY & CRIMINALLY responsible should any harm come to a child as a result of your actions. I/We have made you aware of the adverse reactions on the Yellow Card scheme and you will not be able to use ignorance as an excuse for any crimes you may commit as a result of this rollout.  Please be aware that I/Wewill be pursuing this at both a UK level and additionally as an international crime against humanity which will then proceed to international trials. 

 

This will serve as your legal notice to cease and I/We require you to desist IMMEDIATELY all further actions in relation to the jab rollout for healthy 12-15 year olds described above. Saying you were 'just obeying orders' is not an excuse! 

 

I/We may use telephone recording devices to document any telephone conversations that I/We may have in the future if you fail to comply with this cease-and-desist letter. You are hereby instructed to comply with this letter IMMEDIATELY or face legal sanctions under applicable law. I/We intend to keep a log of any contacts you make with me after you receive this letter. 

 

Please give this very important matter your utmost attention. 

  

Sincerely, 

  

Name of Sender 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Golden Retriever said:

 

 

BUMP ... BECAUSE SOMEONE IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS WANTS TO KNOW MORE INFORMATION ABOUT VACCINE DEATHs

 

I think this MP has been hoodwinked. In July he asked the government for the number of people who had died soon after having the covid vaccine. But the government promised to give him the figures for the number of vaccinated people who have died in hospital from covid. He's complaining that they still haven't given him the information and he doesn't seem to realise that the figures they've offered to give him are useless. These deaths would be so-called breakthrough cases, not potential vaccine deaths.

 

"Data on the number of deaths reported of people who have died within 1, 2, and 3 months of having received a covid-19 vaccination since the 1st January is not available in the format requested. Public Health England monitors the number of people who have been admitted to hospital and died from covid-19 who have received 1 or 2 doses of the vaccine and will publish this data in due course. That data has not yet been published"

 

(3:06)

 

Hancock resigned in June so the minister must have been Javid. But he asked the same question in March and Handcock struggled to come up with an answer and eventually fobbed him off with this:

 

"Let's try and do that by correspondence to make sure that we're getting it, er, exactly what's being looked for".

 

(1:15)

 

They made sure they knew exactly what he was looking for, then offered him something else.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, zarkov said:

 

had the same thought as I watched. Completely contradicts herself. Peoples brains must be deep fried to accept this corporate diatribe.

 

"OFFER" of vaccine!

 

 

12-15yr olds do not comprehend the distinction that is a contractual offer, nor associated implications.

 

The universal age of consent is 16yrs

 

No Contract!

 

They play lip service to informed consent, are they going to tell children all the potential side effects? very unlikely. You don't need to be an expert in risk to see that the benefits do not outweigh the risks and to even suggest that they should risk their health, so that the paranoid teachers and authorities have an easier job of allowing them back in to school is outrageous on its own. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We know the reason reason they want to get the children, so they can complete their infertility roll out, boost sales even further and so that when they bring in their vaccine passports there is not a group that will not have been offered the vaccines, which will be a non starter for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bryan said:

 

I think this MP has been hoodwinked. In July he asked the government for the number of people who had died soon after having the covid vaccine. But the government promised to give him the figures for the number of vaccinated people who have died in hospital from covid. He's complaining that they still haven't given him the information and he doesn't seem to realise that the figures they've offered to give him are useless. These deaths would be so-called breakthrough cases, not potential vaccine deaths.

 

"Data on the number of deaths reported of people who have died within 1, 2, and 3 months of having received a covid-19 vaccination since the 1st January is not available in the format requested. Public Health England monitors the number of people who have been admitted to hospital and died from covid-19 who have received 1 or 2 doses of the vaccine and will publish this data in due course. That data has not yet been published"

 

(3:06)

 

Hancock resigned in June so the minister must have been Javid. But he asked the same question in March and Handcock struggled to come up with an answer and eventually fobbed him off with this:

 

"Let's try and do that by correspondence to make sure that we're getting it, er, exactly what's being looked for".

 

(1:15)

 

They made sure they knew exactly what he was looking for, then offered him something else.

 

 

 

 

 

 

If there is to be a perfect example of someone 'fobbing off' another, this just has to be it

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SimonTV said:

We know the reason reason they want to get the children, so they can complete their infertility roll out, boost sales even further and so that when they bring in their vaccine passports there is not a group that will not have been offered the vaccines, which will be a non starter for it. 

I know mate and it sad to watch unfold in slow motion.

Its the children they've been after all along - render infertile!

 In years to come it will be in vitro fertilisation, incubation and birth in clinical settings then progress to "raised by the state" 

Full on indoctrination, full state ownership. Full time slavery

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • lake locked this topic
  • lake unlocked this topic
  • Beaujangles featured this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...